Inorganic Chemistry Textbook Miessler

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Domenec Reynolds

unread,

Aug 3, 2024, 4:49:21 PM8/3/24

to goggprofirproph

Some popular inorganic chemistry problem books include "Inorganic Chemistry by Catherine Housecroft and Alan Sharpe", "Problems and Solutions: Inorganic Chemistry by R.D. Madan", and "Inorganic Chemistry: A Problem Oriented Approach by David S. Hage and James E. House". It ultimately depends on your personal preference and learning style.

Yes, there are several problem books designed for beginners in inorganic chemistry. Some examples include "Inorganic Chemistry for Dummies" by Michael Matson and Alvin W. Orbaek, and "Inorganic Chemistry: Practice Problems for Beginners" by Anna Watson.

Many inorganic chemistry problem books do come with solutions or answer keys, but it may vary from book to book. It is always a good idea to check the book description or reviews before purchasing to ensure that solutions are included.

In general, inorganic chemistry problem books can be used for both self-study and classroom use. However, some may be better suited for self-study as they may not follow a traditional textbook structure. Again, it is important to read the book description or reviews to determine its purpose and suitability for your needs.

Yes, there are several problem books that cover advanced topics in inorganic chemistry. Some examples include "Advanced Inorganic Chemistry: A Comprehensive Text" by Cotton, Wilkinson, Gaus, and Murillo, and "Advanced Problems in Inorganic Chemistry" by V.K. Jangid and N.C. Chaudhary.

1. What are the top recommended textbooks for inorganic chemistry?
Some of the top recommended textbooks for inorganic chemistry include "Inorganic Chemistry" by Catherine Housecroft and Alan Sharpe, "Chemistry: A Molecular Approach" by Nivaldo J. Tro, and "Inorganic Chemistry: Principles of Structure and Reactivity" by James E. Huheey, Ellen A. Keiter, and Richard L. Keiter.

2. Are there any good reference books for inorganic chemistry?
Yes, there are many good reference books for inorganic chemistry such as "The Handbook of Inorganic Chemistry" by Alan G. Sharpe, "Inorganic Chemistry: A Comprehensive Text" by J. E. Huheey, "Inorganic Chemistry" by D. F. Shriver, P. W. Atkins, and C. H. Langford, and "Advanced Inorganic Chemistry" by F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson.

3. What are some good books for beginners in inorganic chemistry?
For beginners, some recommended books are "Inorganic Chemistry for Dummies" by Michael Matson, "Chemistry in Context: Applying Chemistry to Society" by American Chemical Society, and "Inorganic Chemistry" by Gary L. Miessler, Paul J. Fischer, and Donald A. Tarr.

4. Are there any online resources for inorganic chemistry books?
Yes, there are several online resources for inorganic chemistry books such as Google Books, Amazon, and Barnes and Noble. Many universities also have online libraries where students can access e-books on inorganic chemistry.

5. Can you suggest books for advanced studies in inorganic chemistry?
Some books for advanced studies in inorganic chemistry are "Advanced Inorganic Chemistry" by F. Albert Cotton, "Inorganic Chemistry" by James E. House, and "Inorganic Chemistry" by Catherine E. Housecroft and Alan G. Sharpe. Additionally, research journals and publications can also be helpful for advanced studies in this field.

I know there's an old thread on this topic somewhere, but I can't find it. We've been using Shriver and Atkins' Inorganic Chem for a while now. Our other inorganic chemist tried Miessler and Tarr once and it was a bust. It was just too much for our students. I agree that Shriver and Atkins is a decent text, but it skimps so much on symmetry and group theory. I was comtemplaing a change to Housecroft and Sharpe (4th edition). Any thoughts? The order of the material is quite different than Shriver, but I constantly find myself going back to Housecroft (which I used as an undergraduate). Any thougths?

Do your classes include much descriptive chemistry? When I look at Housecroft & Sharpe or Shriver & Atkins, I just see chapters in the middle that I wouldn't use. How do you organize your course? I use Miessler, Fisher, and Tarr because I don't do much descriptive chemistry, and I prefer MFT's more theoretical approach: bonding first, then coordination chemistry, then applications, including organometallics and bioinorganic. That said, it is not perfect. I do skip around a little and I sympathize with the "too much for my students" feeling. However, I find that it is easier to give them too much information and back off on the theory than to be trying to supplement the theory when they don't have a reference.

I've been using M&T 4th edition for a number of years, and I do spend a lot of time on theory and bonding/structure. In fact, my course is fairly short on actual reactions, and I'd like to beef those up in the future. I do like Shriver & Atkins' treatment of electrochem topics, particularly Frost and Pourbaix diagrams. And I like Wulfsberg's depth on Pourbaix diagrams, too. But for me, M&T #4 is the best fit for how I structure the course. I haven't given the 5th edition a look yet - that may be another thread here on the forums...

We teach two semesters of Inorganic Chemistry and I use Shriver and Atkins for the second semester course (Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, I teach chapters 2 (MO theory), 6-8, and 19-22 along with the advanced topics catalysis and bioinorganic chapters). I agree that the Group Theory is skimpy in S&A, but I have the library put the Symmertry and Group Theory chapter form M&T online as an electronic reserve (we can put one chapter of a book online as an e-reserve through the library). I tried Housecroft and Sharp one semester, and the students did not like it as well and, as mentioned above, it is significantly more expensive. I personally do no care for M&T. Additionally, the only difference between the 5th and 6th editions of S&A are the "Frontiers" chapters with some small differences in the catalysis and bioinorganic chapters.

I am new to VIPEr, but I too have experienced this age-old problem of finding just the right inorganic textbook. I "grew up" with Huheey back in the late 1980s, which was rigorous enough for my tastes but a bit disjointed. When I began teaching, I used Miessler and Tarr for about 15 yrs, but I was really not very satisfied with the level of group theory or solid state in that text. Shriver and Atkins was way too descriptive for my tastes and has deteriorated as it gets more authors in the mix. So probably like many of you, I began writing my own material for my students and used it as supplemental readings. Over the years, I fine-tuned my collection of materials, stated writing a textbook initially just for my own students, and then beta-tested and revised it until somebody told me I should try publishing it. And so I did. Ater seven plus years in the making, my new inorganic textbook "Principles of Inorganic Chemistry" comes out this week. You can order an examination copy from Wiley's website here: -us/Principles+of+Inorganic+Chemistry%2C+2nd+Edition-p-9781119650331. Although the book is intended for students who have already had pchem, it could be easily adapted for any theoretical-based inorganic class. Using thoroughly worked in-chapter examples and generous use of color illustrations, the textbook examines the underlying principles of atomic and molecular structure and bonding. Using group theory as its underlying theme, it explores the three traditional types of chemical bonding: covalent, ionic, and metallic in separate chapters and then examines the gray areas in between these bonding extremes and compares and contrasts the different ways of thinking about atoms in molecules and solids. The chapters on MO theory and transition metal complexes are especially thorough. I am looking foward to the launch and to how the book will be received by other faculty. Maybe some of you will consider adopting it for your courses.

Thanks for all the feedback. I'm thinking of going to M&T with the "dumb down" approach, but I'm also ordering and exam copy of Brian's book! I'm really excited to read it. I used to use Shriver b/c it was cheaper. The 6th edition is nt too bad, but like most, I skip the descriptive sections.

I'm curious if people have much experience using Shriver, Housecroft or M&T at the freshman/sophomore (pre-p-chem / concurrent with organic) level. I've been using a descriptive book but it doesn't have enough explanation. I want to move to a more comprehensive book, but I'm worried that the level will put off many students. (I tried M&T in my first year and the first year students - and some of the sophmores too - were overly intimidated.)

Thanks everyone for the positive vibes about my text. I think once you all have had the time to really delve into it and read it in detail, you will appreciate the flow and the way that I develop topics. I think it is very readable text--one that students will actually use. It just needs some exposure now--spread the word!

Having just spent a few days in a seemingly endless email loop with Pearson Higher Ed, I can confirm (unofficially) that there do not appear to be any revision plans for Housecroft and Sharpe beyond the 4th ed. I used the first and third editions of that text over the years and generally liked it. I will probably pick up the 4th ed. before it disappears.

I used Miessler, Fisher and Tarr this year. I have used various versions of that text over the years. I like its focus on MO and bonding theories, but the coverage is pitched a little low for my students (most of whom have had p-chem, group theory, and quantum before they step in my class). As a result, I found myself more and more dissatisfied with the book as the semester rolled on. Also, with the removal of the bioninorganic chapter (I know it isn't your fault Paul!) and the "too low" treatment of solids, I found myself using other texts for lecture prep, but my students needed more book to support them.

Sheila Smith reminded me of Pfennig's book (which apparently I had already requested and received!) and I can see that the book is more to the level of my relatively advanced students. The lack of bioinorganic in the text is a concern (I alternate between solids/materials, bioinorganic at the end of my course depending on student interest) but I have plenty of books I can build out a unit on bioinorganic if I choose to do so.