transcript of Letter To Jane

434 views
Skip to first unread message

shihlu...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 30, 2013, 11:16:43 AM10/30/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com
Hi all:

Does anyone know where can I find the full transcript of Letter To Jane by Jean-Luc Godard and Jean-Pierre Gorin?

Had it ever been published in any book or journal before?

Criterion Collection dvd does not carry the English subtitle of this one.


Best,

Shih-lun


Sergio Basbaum

unread,
Oct 30, 2013, 11:36:53 AM10/30/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com
It's spoken in English.

You can find it in Vimeo, I think.


best
s



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Godard-list" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to godard-list...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to godar...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/godard-list/ef053775-f41e-4631-9074-de934d870e85%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
-- Prof. Dr. Sérgio Roclaw Basbaum
-- Pós-Graduação Tec.da Inteligência e Design Digital - TIDD (PUC-SP)



shihlu...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 31, 2013, 3:32:31 PM10/31/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com
Yes, I know it is in English perfectly well, but just want to know whether or not there's a definitive transcript of it.



Shih-lun

sbasbaum於 2013年10月30日星期三UTC+8下午11時36分53秒寫道:

Sergio Basbaum

unread,
Oct 31, 2013, 3:45:19 PM10/31/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com
oh, good idea: a version of the original text of the letter. 

Have you googled radically after it? Someone in the Godardian army may have already done it, you're right.

And sorry, I didn't want to be unpolite, it's just too much work here.

best
s



For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

YoDa...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 1, 2013, 7:06:42 AM11/1/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com

1
00:00:26,090 -> 00:00:27,300
Dear Jane,
 
2
00:00:27,490 -> 00:00:30,543
In the advertising brochure
accompanying Tout va Bien
 
3
00:00:30,704 -> 00:00:34,185
festivals in Venice, Carthage,
New York and San Francisco
 
4
00:00:34,493 -> 00:00:36,954
we prefer to put
your picture in Vietnam
 
5
00:00:37,205 -> 00:00:39,399
in place of film stills.
 
6
00:00:40,289 -> 00:00:45,051
We found this photo in a number of
L'Express in early August 72
 
7
00:00:45,453 -> 00:00:48,809
and we think it will allow us to
speak very concretely
 
8
00:00:49,260 -> 00:00:50,677
the problems
presented by Tout va Bien.
 
9
00:00:51,338 -> 00:00:53,327
It is not absolutely
divert the conversation
 
10
00:00:53,660 -> 00:00:56,090
and not talking about Tout va Bien,
 
11
00:00:56,302 -> 00:00:58,822
as if we were afraid
speaking of this film.
 
12
00:00:58,939 -> 00:01:00,237
Absolutely.
 
13
00:01:00,514 -> 00:01:02,710
This is a way of not
marking time,
 
14
00:01:02,943 -> 00:01:05,334
(As troops
puppet Thieu Quang-Tri)
 
15
00:01:05,577 -> 00:01:08,572
which eventually leads to
go over the other.
 
16
00:01:09,241 -> 00:01:11,693
(As of 7th howitzers
fleet of Quang-Tri).
 
17
00:01:12,082 -> 00:01:15,181
It is, therefore, a spin
 
18
00:01:15,294 -> 00:01:17,031
but it is worth a expression,
 
19
00:01:17,423 -> 00:01:18,280
Direct a rodeo.
 
20
00:01:18,734 -> 00:01:19,694
That is,
 
21
00:01:20,076 -> 00:01:25,430
a revolution that will enable us to tackle,
directly, the terrible problems that small,
 
22
00:01:25,357 -> 00:01:29,231
one way or another, the film we shot
together earlier this year shows.
 
23
00:01:29,486 -> 00:01:31,329
And before speaking, then
and in every way,
 
24
00:01:31,380 -> 00:01:33,585
and the qualities
defects in our movie
 
25
00:01:33,862 -> 00:01:39,693
prefer to ask critical
reporters, to viewers,
 
26
00:01:40,030 -> 00:01:43,909
that may have to do with us and the effort
analyzing this your picture in Vietnam
 
27
00:01:44,233 -> 00:01:47,438
Taken a few months later
the film we made in Paris.
 
28
00:01:47,882 -> 00:01:52,616
Really, this picture, and the
short text that accompanies it,
 
29
00:01:52,448 -> 00:01:55,722
seem able to summarize Tout va
Bien we would know better than to do it.
 
30
00:01:56,008 -> 00:01:58,120
And this for a very simple reason.
 
31
00:01:58,192 -> 00:02:02,637
This photo answers the same
question that the film features:
 
32
00:02:03,052 -> 00:02:06,329
what role should play
intellectuals in the revolution?
 
33
00:02:06,809 -> 00:02:08,214
To this question,
 
34
00:02:08,653 -> 00:02:10,545
the picture gives a practical answer
 
35
00:02:11,248 -> 00:02:13,537
(The answer is practice).
 
36
00:02:14,514 -> 00:02:16,008
This photo shows you,
 
37
00:02:16,248 -> 00:02:17,007
really you, Jane,
 
38
00:02:17,315 -> 00:02:20,308
in the service of freedom
Vietnamese people.
 
39
00:02:21,004 -> 00:02:24,612
Tout va Bien also
answer this question,
 
40
00:02:24,614 -> 00:02:26,067
but not the same.
 
41
00:02:26,236 -> 00:02:30,210
Because less certain that the
Photo of responses to,
 
42
00:02:30,439 -> 00:02:32,790
the film exposes other questions first.
 
43
00:02:32,747 -> 00:02:35,077
And they arrive, after all,
 
44
00:02:35,607 -> 00:02:38,869
not present as such, the question
intellectuals and the revolution.
 
45
00:02:40,336 -> 00:02:42,431
As proposed, then this question?
 
46
00:02:43,166 -> 00:02:45,726
The film still does not answer accurately.
 
47
00:02:46,310 -> 00:02:49,093
But the way because even
answer is not, in fact,
 
48
00:02:49,735 -> 00:02:51,846
an indirect way of
propose new questions.
 
49
00:02:52,493 -> 00:02:56,201
Because there is no point to old
answers to new questions
 
50
00:02:56,672 -> 00:03:00,307
presented by the current development
of revolutionary struggles.
 
51
00:03:01,019 -> 00:03:03,634
You need to learn, even so,
to formulate these new issues.
 
52
00:03:04,390 -> 00:03:05,647
And learn from those who,
 
53
00:03:05,784 -> 00:03:09,442
although they have not had time to
write clearly these new issues,
 
54
00:03:10,564 -> 00:03:15,307
already conquered the land where
can flourish and expand,
 
55
00:03:16,724 -> 00:03:20,586
and won with a new practice.
 
56
00:03:21,228 -> 00:03:24,445
We we told you that the way in which,
 
57
00:03:24,953 -> 00:03:27,088
does not truly answer
as the Vietnamese and you in this photo,
 
58
00:03:27,452 -> 00:03:30,892
was an indirect way of
first present new issues.
 
59
00:03:31,373 -> 00:03:32,488
An indirect way.
 
60
00:03:32,846 -> 00:03:34,115
A awry.
 
61
00:03:34,284 -> 00:03:35,968
Now you can understand why
 
62
00:03:36,364 -> 00:03:39,207
the need for a rodeo
before speaking of the film.
 
63
00:03:39,756 -> 00:03:42,406
And why a spin by Vietnam?
 
64
00:03:42,567 -> 00:03:43,454
First,
 
65
00:03:43,904 -> 00:03:48,984
because everyone agrees that there
present new issues really.
 
66
00:03:49,794 -> 00:03:51,837
And then, because you were with them
 
67
00:03:52,063 -> 00:03:53,865
after you have been with us.
 
68
00:03:54,082 -> 00:03:58,727
Hence, when looking at this photo of a
actress in the theater of military operations,
 
69
00:03:59,594 -> 00:04:02,083
our desire to interrogate her.
 
70
00:04:02,334 -> 00:04:04,538
Not to question
actress, and yes, the photo.
 
71
00:04:05,034 -> 00:04:08,794
And for us, this equates to submit
a number of new issues
 
72
00:04:09,161 -> 00:04:12,211
the classical response
the Vietnamese and you
 
73
00:04:12,632 -> 00:04:17,055
gave this famous question of
intellectuals, taking and disseminating this photo.
 
74
00:04:17,547 -> 00:04:21,222
Also something intervenes
More in our decision
 
75
00:04:21,419 -> 00:04:25,538
to take this photo to
strolling by Vietnam.
 
76
00:04:26,305 -> 00:04:32,149
That something is our desire to make a
 discussion of the film with the audience,
 
77
00:04:32,952 -> 00:04:34,211
whether or not journalists.
 
78
00:04:34,627 -> 00:04:37,123
Everyone is their own
journalist and his own publisher
 
79
00:04:37,898 -> 00:04:43,148
depending on how it develops
 daily activity of each in a movie
 
80
00:04:43,977 -> 00:04:46,133
posing as star
this film.
 
81
00:04:47,068 -> 00:04:50,380
And it is precisely this type of
system of self-leadership.
 
82
00:04:51,161 -> 00:04:52,437
we want to talk.
 
83
00:04:53,619 -> 00:04:55,231
To talk with the viewer.
 
84
00:04:56,171 -> 00:04:58,968
But to do so, we must give it a whirl.
 
85
00:04:59,790 -> 00:05:02,167
Because, in the same way as a
film is a kind of turning
 
86
00:05:02,669 -> 00:05:04,043
which brings us back to ourselves
 
87
00:05:04,970 -> 00:05:06,545
anyway, back to the movie,
 
88
00:05:07,135 -> 00:05:10,002
must perform this
rodeo in ourselves.
 
89
00:05:11,046 -> 00:05:15,948
And here in America, "ourselves" I mean,
first still and always, Vietnam.
 
90
00:05:16,769 -> 00:05:18,662
Let us explain this with
a little more spaciousness.
 
91
00:05:19,250 -> 00:05:21,482
We think it's important
and urgent talk
 
92
00:05:21,789 -> 00:05:24,820
a little to those who gave
work to see our movie.
 
93
00:05:26,018 -> 00:05:27,891
This is where they are,
 
94
00:05:28,280 -> 00:05:30,175
and also where we are.
 
95
00:05:30,824 -> 00:05:34,276
Therefore, we must act in a
which may present issues,
 
96
00:05:34,465 -> 00:05:35,646
if they wish,
 
97
00:05:35,672 -> 00:05:38,376
or to respond to
questions exposed by us.
 
98
00:05:39,105 -> 00:05:41,427
Viewers have to be able to reflect.
 
99
00:05:42,191 -> 00:05:46,108
And reflect, first of all, this
problem of questions and answers.
 
100
00:05:46,769 -> 00:05:50,461
It is also necessary that we can be,
affected by questions from viewers
 
101
00:05:50,875 -> 00:05:51,817
(Or answers)
 
102
00:05:52,259 -> 00:05:54,186
and we can respond
(Or question)
 
103
00:05:54,709 -> 00:05:59,996
with something different answers (or questions)
also prefabricated (and answers?)
 
104
00:06:00,400 -> 00:06:04,012
But, prefabricated by
Who? For who? Against who?
 
105
00:06:04,399 -> 00:06:08,911
That is, the possibility to introduce a
real discussion of Tout va Bien,
 
106
00:06:09,413 -> 00:06:12,378
we situate outside Tout va Bien.
 
107
00:06:12,926 -> 00:06:16,416
To speak of this machine, we
leaving the factory that uses.
 
108
00:06:16,923 -> 00:06:21,484
Meet our base
discussion outside the cinema,
 
109
00:06:21,573 -> 00:06:24,907
away to come back.
 
110
00:06:25,629 -> 00:06:27,643
And when we return, we will leave
again with best step
 
111
00:06:28,191 -> 00:06:31,062
toward the real problems
true of our material life,
 
112
00:06:31,097 -> 00:06:34,382
which the film will not have
been only one element.
 
113
00:06:34,907 -> 00:06:37,521
We will not leave, nor
abandon Tout va Bien.
 
114
00:06:38,136 -> 00:06:41,734
Instead, we from him,
starting to go somewhere else,
 
115
00:06:42,547 -> 00:06:45,517
for example, Vietnam,
as you back away.
 
116
00:06:45,850 -> 00:06:50,535
But, and this is important,
we will with our own means.
 
117
00:06:51,202 -> 00:06:52,844
That means it comes?
 
118
00:06:53,313 -> 00:06:57,158
Our technical work
and the use social which makes them
 
119
00:06:57,107 -> 00:07:00,683
(You in this picture, in Vietnam,
us with the film in Paris)
 
120
00:07:01,241 -> 00:07:04,708
and from this use exactly
can better judge.
 
121
00:07:05,143 -> 00:07:07,339
And for once, we are not alone,
 
122
00:07:07,809 -> 00:07:09,427
the viewer will be there too,
 
123
00:07:10,267 -> 00:07:13,652
will produce the same
time they consume,
 
124
00:07:14,389 -> 00:07:17,910
and we will consume the same
the time that will produce.
 
125
00:07:18,697 -> 00:07:21,314
Perhaps all this will seem complicated.
 
126
00:07:21,484 -> 00:07:23,051
As Lenin said Vertov:
 
127
00:07:23,823 -> 00:07:28,616
is that the truth is simple, but
is not simple to tell the truth.
 
128
00:07:29,046 -> 00:07:33,213
And Uncle Vertov had discovered five
difficulties to tell the truth.
 
129
00:07:34,446 -> 00:07:36,515
Well Let's put it another way.
 
130
00:07:37,198 -> 00:07:40,404
At present, it is often said
that cinema must "serve the people".
 
131
00:07:41,100 -> 00:07:41,863
Very well.
 
132
00:07:42,383 -> 00:07:45,873
Instead of theorizing about
defects and quality Tout va Bien,
 
133
00:07:46,092 -> 00:07:47,593
let us go to Vietnam.
 
134
00:07:47,716 -> 00:07:50,803
But we by and with the
means of Tout va Bien.
 
135
00:07:51,232 -> 00:07:53,761
Let's look if one can say so,
 
136
00:07:54,779 -> 00:07:56,850
as Tout va Bien "works" in Vietnam.
 
137
00:07:57,011 -> 00:08:02,965
We may take, possibly, some
conclusions of this practical example,
 
138
00:08:03,186 -> 00:08:04,782
on things to do and avoid,
 
139
00:08:05,596 -> 00:08:07,235
each of us where there is,
 
140
00:08:08,063 -> 00:08:12,331
with his wife, his boss, his
children, your money, your desires, etc..
 
141
00:08:13,061 -> 00:08:19,119
Let's use this picture to go
Vietnam to investigate this issue:
 
142
00:08:19,792 -> 00:08:23,888
how cinema can help people
Vietnamese to win its independence
 
143
00:08:24,221 -> 00:08:26,720
And as we have said several times,
 
144
00:08:27,280 -> 00:08:31,279
we are not the only ones to use
this photo to go to Vietnam.
 
145
00:08:31,849 -> 00:08:33,906
Thousands of people did,
 
146
00:08:34,364 -> 00:08:38,438
probably almost here
everyone has seen this photo
 
147
00:08:38,706 -> 00:08:43,979
and during a few seconds, its
way it is served to go to Vietnam.
 
148
00:08:44,853 -> 00:08:47,960
Exactly, that's what we
think are important to know:
 
149
00:08:48,239 -> 00:08:51,392
how each used this
photo to go to Vietnam;
 
150
00:08:51,865 -> 00:08:54,688
truth: and as they went to Vietnam.
 
151
00:08:55,288 -> 00:08:58,451
Because Dr. Kissinger also
Vietnam goes to several times per year.
 
152
00:08:59,248 -> 00:09:04,347
It is just a guy like dr. Kissinger
we ask why this photo
 
153
00:09:04,871 -> 00:09:07,598
and that relationship can be
between this picture and Tout va Bien.
 
154
00:09:07,969 -> 00:09:12,643
And he and his friends say
this is not serious,
 
155
00:09:13,203 -> 00:09:18,122
we would do better talking
film, art, etc..
 
156
00:09:18,848 -> 00:09:22,020
But one should realize the effort
see these types of reflections
 
157
00:09:22,522 -> 00:09:24,737
contradict themselves when
Proposals thus
 
158
00:09:25,453 -> 00:09:30,678
complicate and obstruct all the way
other simpler questions
 
159
00:09:31,272 -> 00:09:33,961
(As can be said for
ordinary people).
 
160
00:09:34,998 -> 00:09:36,496
For example, before
say, "that relationship"
 
161
00:09:37,399 -> 00:09:39,762
we must first ask:
"There is even a relationship"?
 
162
00:09:40,938 -> 00:09:43,280
And then, it can be asked
what is the relationship.
 
163
00:09:43,163 -> 00:09:47,717
Having discovered the relationship,
we will find out a little further,
 
164
00:09:48,069 -> 00:09:50,598
that the relationship between our film
and this picture
 
165
00:09:51,061 -> 00:09:53,059
in this issue of the expression
 
166
00:09:53,469 -> 00:09:56,750
And eventually we can judge
its importance,
 
167
00:09:57,239 -> 00:09:59,381
ie establish other relationships
 
168
00:09:59,857 -> 00:10:02,733
with other important questions
and other important responses.
 
169
00:10:03,278 -> 00:10:06,041
Say that this is
folly, bla-bla-bla,
 
170
00:10:06,509 -> 00:10:10,161
but at the opposite end of this
new small chain of questions,
 
171
00:10:10,693 -> 00:10:12,208
the question of the importance,
 
172
00:10:12,915 -> 00:10:15,260
what others call the question
practical result,
 
173
00:10:15,688 -> 00:10:18,427
appears as a
very important issue.
 
174
00:10:19,658 -> 00:10:22,254
And that's because the North Vietnamese / Vietcong
 
175
00:10:22,852 -> 00:10:26,791
already answered the question about
the importance of this photo,
 
176
00:10:27,493 -> 00:10:32,665
able to do it in post
all parts of the "free" world
 
177
00:10:33,063 -> 00:10:35,709
(This same world
that holds free)
 
178
00:10:36,366 -> 00:10:39,009
demonstrating that the
importance he attached to this picture,
 
179
00:10:39,471 -> 00:10:42,670
the importance he attached to
question of the practical results,
 
180
00:10:43,404 -> 00:10:46,955
the importance he attached to
question of what is important.
 
181
00:10:47,946 -> 00:10:51,768
This photo is therefore a response
practice that the North Vietnamese,
 
182
00:10:52,381 -> 00:10:53,447
with your help, Jane
 
183
00:10:54,226 -> 00:10:56,830
decided to give the famous question
we did at the time:
 
184
00:10:57,234 -> 00:11:00,890
what role should play
revolutionary struggles in the film?
 
185
00:11:01,433 -> 00:11:06,152
In other words: what is the role
intellectuals in the revolution?
 
186
00:11:07,065 -> 00:11:09,672
To this question, to which the
photo gives a practical answer
 
187
00:11:10,323 -> 00:11:11,925
(The response of an entire people;
 
188
00:11:12,596 -> 00:11:14,624
takes up the photo and publishes
 
189
00:11:15,320 -> 00:11:19,603
and is thereby made to have the
security and certainty that it will be published,
 
190
00:11:20,130 -> 00:11:21,364
both here and there,
 
191
00:11:21,956 -> 00:11:26,774
what is a fact, because the
Otherwise, we would not have it).
 
192
00:11:27,164 -> 00:11:28,927
Tout va Bien answers
be a question too.
 
193
00:11:29,420 -> 00:11:31,373
But, from another location and
differently.
 
194
00:11:35,124 -> 00:11:37,774
One way is to say:
 
195
00:11:38,424 -> 00:11:41,243
where we are in France, in 1972,
 
196
00:11:41,779 -> 00:11:44,545
governed by friends
Americans and Russians,
 
197
00:11:45,190 -> 00:11:47,999
nothing is so clear,
nothing is so obvious
 
198
00:11:49,068 -> 00:11:50,774
(Remember, particularly, of
Fidel Castro, saying that the UN,
 
199
00:11:51,617 -> 00:11:54,760
for revolutionaries,
never evident truths,
 
200
00:11:55,394 -> 00:11:57,336
that imperialism was
whom had invented,
 
201
00:11:58,028 -> 00:12:03,811
and that major expertly served the
evident truths to oppress small).
 
202
00:12:04,649 -> 00:12:09,241
And since nothing is obvious, Jane,
continue asking questions,
 
203
00:12:09,961 -> 00:12:12,925
but we strive to
do them differently;
 
204
00:12:13,421 -> 00:12:17,927
in a nutshell: do questions
new power to give new answers.
 
205
00:12:18,619 -> 00:12:25,923
For example, let's look at how the Vietnamese
translate their combat and do questions
 
206
00:12:25,996 -> 00:12:28,233
since we also want
translate our struggle.
 
207
00:12:28,848 -> 00:12:31,443
And, firstly,
honestly ask ourselves
 
208
00:12:31,872 -> 00:12:35,715
what allows us to say
what really fight.
 
209
00:12:36,727 -> 00:12:39,095
But perhaps at this point,
you, Jane, we ask:
 
210
00:12:39,724 -> 00:12:42,991
why this picture of me and not
Clarke one of Ramsey, for example?
 
211
00:12:43,439 -> 00:12:47,685
He was also in Vietnam, also
witnessed the bombing of the dikes.
 
212
00:12:47,897 -> 00:12:50,136
Simply You, Jane,
because of Tout va Bien
 
213
00:12:50,580 -> 00:12:54,383
and because no solution in the film
was the same as in this picture.
 
214
00:12:55,066 -> 00:12:56,265
You're an actress.
 
215
00:12:56,265 -> 00:12:59,539
Naturally, we are all
actors in theater history,
 
216
00:13:00,237 -> 00:13:04,312
but in addition, you
film and makes us too.
 
217
00:13:05,222 -> 00:13:07,952
So say why you
not Yves Montand in Chile?
 
218
00:13:07,985 -> 00:13:09,600
He was also in the movie.
It is true.
 
219
00:13:10,367 -> 00:13:13,668
But it appears that the
Chilean revolutionaries
 
220
00:13:14,528 -> 00:13:18,267
not consider it appropriate
release photos of Yves,
 
221
00:13:19,247 -> 00:13:23,280
while the revolutionaries
Vietnamese mutual agreement with you,
 
222
00:13:23,780 -> 00:13:26,515
considered appropriate
disclose your photos
 
223
00:13:27,100 -> 00:13:31,471
(In fact, release photos of
its agreement with the Vietnamese cause).
 
224
00:13:32,677 -> 00:13:36,127
Also there is another
problem, inevitable.
 
225
00:13:36,614 -> 00:13:39,387
We are two men who ran
Tout va Bien and you're a girl.
 
226
00:13:40,016 -> 00:13:43,436
In Vietnam the question does not
presents this way, but rather here.
 
227
00:13:43,795 -> 00:13:47,273
And surely, as a woman, you
feel somewhat or very hurt
 
228
00:13:47,912 -> 00:13:51,268
because we criticize,
a little or a lot,
 
229
00:13:51,693 -> 00:13:53,800
their way to intervene in this photo.
 
230
00:13:54,266 -> 00:13:57,904
Hurt, because they are always, eternally,
arranged buzzwords to attack the girls.
 
231
00:13:59,021 -> 00:14:00,144
And for no other reason,
 
232
00:14:00,728 -> 00:14:04,749
hope you will answer
speakerphone our letter,
 
233
00:14:05,334 -> 00:14:08,984
As we read in two
or three sites in the United States.
 
234
00:14:08,929 -> 00:14:12,048
But it is also true that in
United States and Europe,
 
235
00:14:12,746 -> 00:14:15,094
things are still,
or has become in this way.
 
236
00:14:15,865 -> 00:14:18,614
And you and we are in
even resort
 
237
00:14:19,267 -> 00:14:22,106
that this picture can
serve as revealing.
 
238
00:14:23,183 -> 00:14:24,823
We left there.
 
239
00:14:24,929 -> 00:14:27,127
You in the USA. Of us in Paris.
 
240
00:14:27,591 -> 00:14:30,164
You in us
Paris. You in Vietnam.
 
241
00:14:30,650 -> 00:14:35,239
Us in Paris looking at you
Vietnam. Of us, we the USA.
 
242
00:14:35,350 -> 00:14:40,006
And everybody in this room
movies, listening to us and watching you.
 
243
00:14:40,718 -> 00:14:42,204
We left it all.
 
244
00:14:42,708 -> 00:14:47,458
All this is organized from a
somehow works in a certain way.
 
245
00:14:48,156 -> 00:14:50,755
We want to discuss it, from there.
 
246
00:14:51,507 -> 00:14:55,150
From Tout va Bien, go to
Vietnam, back to Tout va Bien,
 
247
00:14:55,655 -> 00:14:59,994
ie returning from Vietnam to this
room where juts Tout va Bien
 
248
00:15:00,425 -> 00:15:04,456
and immediately return to
home, and tomorrow back to the factory.
 
249
00:15:05,087 -> 00:15:06,895
To speak of all this,
 
250
00:15:07,191 -> 00:15:09,649
slip on this photo
the eyes of people.
 
251
00:15:10,241 -> 00:15:11,932
Or rather, we make it slide
 
252
00:15:11,967 -> 00:15:14,773
because the North Vietnamese
and you already had slipped.
 
253
00:15:15,317 -> 00:15:18,675
Put another way:
Ask, and ask ourselves:
 
254
00:15:19,116 -> 00:15:22,513
we looked at this photo?
What we had seen it?
 
255
00:15:22,990 -> 00:15:25,593
And for every question
discovers another.
 
256
00:15:26,034 -> 00:15:31,518
For example: we look at this photo? As
worked our gaze to look at this photo?
 
257
00:15:32,299 -> 00:15:35,932
And what makes it work
thus and not otherwise?
 
258
00:15:36,346 -> 00:15:37,658
And another question:
 
259
00:15:38,144 -> 00:15:42,368
what makes our voice interpreting
this look this way and not another?
 
260
00:15:43,043 -> 00:15:45,075
Tout va Bien presents
all these questions,
 
261
00:15:45,882 -> 00:15:49,457
that can be summed up in the great question
 
262
00:15:50,185 -> 00:15:53,791
the role of intellectuals
in revolutionary struggles.
 
263
00:15:54,151 -> 00:15:59,224
Or better said, we started
to see that this great and famous
 
264
00:15:59,259 -> 00:16:03,961
question of intellectual
locks itself when proposing.
 
265
00:16:04,305 -> 00:16:06,298
And the other blocks.
 
266
00:16:06,660 -> 00:16:08,291
And finally,
 
267
00:16:08,488 -> 00:16:11,624
is no longer a question
belongs to the field of revolution.
 
268
00:16:11,523 -> 00:16:13,820
The current question of the revolution
 
269
00:16:14,433 -> 00:16:19,645
(Discover the purpose of this
Photo therefore the purpose of the film)
 
270
00:16:20,210 -> 00:16:23,502
would, moreover:
how to change the old world?
 
271
00:16:24,181 -> 00:16:27,483
Immediately we see that
the old world of the Vietcong
 
272
00:16:27,977 -> 00:16:30,990
is not the same as the
an intellectual western
 
273
00:16:31,590 -> 00:16:36,630
the old world is not a Palestinian
the same as that of a black boy in the ghetto,
 
274
00:16:37,143 -> 00:16:42,406
the old world of a worker
Renault is not even his girlfriend.
 
275
00:16:43,639 -> 00:16:46,997
We see that this photo gives
therefore, a practical response
 
276
00:16:47,037 -> 00:16:49,381
this question of changing the old world.
 
277
00:16:50,169 -> 00:16:55,330
Let us therefore examine this
Photo / response, investigate.
 
278
00:16:56,150 -> 00:16:57,776
Some evidence extracted it.
 
279
00:16:58,252 -> 00:17:00,431
Let's analyze them
and synthesize them.
 
280
00:17:00,994 -> 00:17:06,704
Let us explain the organization
of the elements of this photo.
 
281
00:17:07,530 -> 00:17:13,649
Let us explain it with one hand as if
were a core physical and photographic
 
282
00:17:14,218 -> 00:17:19,329
and secondly, as it were
a cell-photographic society.
 
283
00:17:20,219 -> 00:17:25,657
Then try to relate research
scientific and research more directly political
 
284
00:17:26,267 -> 00:17:28,468
("Where do ideas come correct:
 
285
00:17:28,940 -> 00:17:34,258
the struggle for production, the class struggle
and scientific experimentation "Mao).
 
286
00:17:34,869 -> 00:17:37,960
Conduct this research,
interrogate this photo,
 
287
00:17:38,562 -> 00:17:43,798
what is it but to know how to treat
was given the answer that the photo gives
 
288
00:17:44,436 -> 00:17:46,860
(Under the conditions of the struggle in Vietnam).
 
289
00:17:47,518 -> 00:17:51,125
We will see if this response is
entirely satisfactory for everyone
 
290
00:17:51,381 -> 00:17:52,595
(For whom? Against who?)
 
291
00:17:53,261 -> 00:17:57,123
and perhaps does not begin
other questions arise,
 
292
00:17:57,158 -> 00:18:02,039
the same as that in order better
or worse, Tout va Bien proposes.
 
293
00:18:02,980 -> 00:18:07,345
For example, we see that in
Regarding an important part of the picture
 
294
00:18:07,784 -> 00:18:12,716
(Expression of actress
the relation mouth / eyes)
 
295
00:18:13,093 -> 00:18:17,390
in Western Europe, in our
understand, can not satisfy us
 
296
00:18:17,790 -> 00:18:23,667
the same way that their authors,
who took or decided to take this photo
 
297
00:18:24,092 -> 00:18:25,612
(The collective North Vietnamese / Viet Cong,
 
298
00:18:26,548 -> 00:18:30,594
which is absolutely normal at first
view, when the conditions are different;
 
299
00:18:31,146 -> 00:18:35,965
but you still need to consider
attentive and so obstinately as they,
 
300
00:18:36,540 -> 00:18:38,750
which determines that the "normal").
 
301
00:18:39,294 -> 00:18:41,077
Saying this does not equate
to act simply as
 
302
00:18:41,600 -> 00:18:44,859
most communist parties
the West and its support
 
303
00:18:45,328 -> 00:18:47,224
(Pope, the UN, the Red Cross)
 
304
00:18:47,692 -> 00:18:50,767
saying simply: we help
Vietnam to achieve peace.
 
305
00:18:51,458 -> 00:18:55,899
Unlike, say we have
said is something much more precise
 
306
00:18:56,440 -> 00:19:00,653
eg: we help the alliance
North Vietnam and South Vietnam
 
307
00:19:01,060 -> 00:19:02,980
achieve his peace.
 
308
00:19:03,375 -> 00:19:05,005
And more precisely:
 
309
00:19:05,203 -> 00:19:10,416
since to change their old world,
Vietnam helps us to change our,
 
310
00:19:10,866 -> 00:19:13,407
how can we in reciprocity
help you, really?
 
311
00:19:13,764 -> 00:19:16,412
And since the collective
North Vietnam / Vietcong
 
312
00:19:16,899 -> 00:19:20,267
fight, criticizes and transforms
Southeast Asia,
 
313
00:19:20,800 -> 00:19:24,942
how can we fight our place
to change Europe and America?
 
314
00:19:25,514 -> 00:19:29,591
Of course, it is something broader
to say: "Peace in Vietnam"
 
315
00:19:30,020 -> 00:19:35,471
and to conduct more thorough
to create two or three Vietnams,
 
316
00:19:35,968 -> 00:19:40,538
and hence that Marx (in the preface
the first edition of Capital)
 
317
00:19:40,948 -> 00:19:44,844
readers complain without fear
and "minutiae" to overthrow
 
318
00:19:45,464 -> 00:19:49,382
"The king of hell and
release the devils. "
 
319
00:19:50,429 -> 00:19:54,456
A few months before this
your photo, Jane, and Vietnamese,
 
320
00:19:55,042 -> 00:20:00,004
and today before ourselves, each can
do if you want, your own research.
 
321
00:20:00,310 -> 00:20:02,503
Soon, we will compare
freely the results.
 
322
00:20:03,052 -> 00:20:08,983
We may take the floor without
for it, get it from listening.
 
323
00:20:09,520 -> 00:20:11,539
In short, perhaps
for a brief moment,
 
324
00:20:12,101 -> 00:20:15,655
possible to say the least
stupidity on us and the revolution.
 
325
00:20:15,924 -> 00:20:17,295
Still more.
 
326
00:20:17,671 -> 00:20:19,877
So you do not
feel personally attacked
 
327
00:20:20,411 -> 00:20:22,008
but not really able to avoid it
 
328
00:20:22,494 -> 00:20:25,133
(Think the question is
misrepresented in this way, and,
 
329
00:20:25,649 -> 00:20:29,103
the end of this letter also
we have progressed in this regard,
 
330
00:20:29,538 -> 00:20:33,431
and for this we would need very
you would respond directly,
 
331
00:20:33,842 -> 00:20:36,989
since it not only write
as directors of Tout va Bien,
 
332
00:20:37,439 -> 00:20:40,249
but as readers of this photo.
 
333
00:20:41,006 -> 00:20:44,119
And should recognize that it is first
Since people who saw your picture
 
334
00:20:44,595 -> 00:20:47,898
he writes thus concerning
that he saw his picture in a newspaper).
 
335
00:20:48,534 -> 00:20:52,224
To not feel
direct target, we would say,
 
336
00:20:52,642 -> 00:20:57,534
who feels that the target is not Jane,
but rather a function of Jane Fonda,
 
337
00:20:57,990 -> 00:21:01,814
talk to interrogate this photo
you in the third person.
 
338
00:21:02,280 -> 00:21:04,641
Jane did not tell you this or that,
 
339
00:21:05,058 -> 00:21:10,528
we say the actress or militant, incidentally,
as does the text accompanying the photo.
 
340
00:21:10,851 -> 00:21:12,915
Here, then, which
are, in our opinion,
 
341
00:21:13,453 -> 00:21:16,709
the main elements
(And the elements of the elements)
 
342
00:21:17,414 -> 00:21:19,882
that play a role
important in this photograph
 
343
00:21:20,537 -> 00:21:25,237
published in the French newspaper L'Express
the beginning of August 1972.
 
344
00:21:25,807 -> 00:21:27,381
BASIC ELEMENTS
 
345
00:21:28,305 -> 00:21:31,906
This photo was taken at the request
government of North Vietnam,
 
346
00:21:32,434 -> 00:21:33,999
as a representative at the time
 
347
00:21:34,429 -> 00:21:39,415
the revolutionary alliance between the peoples
South Vietnam and North Vietnam.
 
348
00:21:40,209 -> 00:21:46,371
This photo was taken by Joseph Kraft,
set at the foot of the picture for a text
 
349
00:21:46,888 -> 00:21:50,254
that was not written by anyone
participated in action taking the picture,
 
350
00:21:50,816 -> 00:21:52,744
but for those who disclose;
 
351
00:21:53,200 -> 00:21:56,847
ie, by a text written by
one or more editors of L'Express,
 
352
00:21:57,408 -> 00:22:02,449
without consultation with the North Vietnamese delegation
in France (checked it).
 
353
00:22:03,107 -> 00:22:05,132
This text says that it is
 
354
00:22:05,167 -> 00:22:08,232
one of the most known and
moderate American journalists.
 
355
00:22:08,524 -> 00:22:09,873
The text says, also
 
356
00:22:10,245 -> 00:22:13,163
that the actress is a militant
passionate for peace in Vietnam.
 
357
00:22:14,153 -> 00:22:17,761
But the text does not speak of
Vietnamese who appear in the photograph.
 
358
00:22:18,333 -> 00:22:20,494
For example, the text says:
 
359
00:22:20,905 -> 00:22:23,528
Vietnamese is not seen in the background
 
360
00:22:23,902 -> 00:22:27,844
Vietnam is one of the least
known and less moderate.
 
361
00:22:28,451 -> 00:22:32,091
This photo, like all
photo, is physically changes.
 
362
00:22:32,638 -> 00:22:35,533
And the mouth speaks foot photo.
 
363
00:22:36,536 -> 00:22:39,895
This photo does not walk
stresses, makes telling
 
364
00:22:40,212 -> 00:22:43,539
(Because the speech and picture
says things in his own way)
 
365
00:22:43,977 -> 00:22:49,371
the militant ranks first
TVs and Vietnam last.
 
366
00:22:50,019 -> 00:22:54,108
Foot says: "Jane Fonda asks
some inhabitants of Hanoi ".
 
367
00:22:54,867 -> 00:22:57,607
But the newspaper does not publish
the questions asked,
 
368
00:22:57,946 -> 00:23:02,410
nor the answers given by representatives
Vietnamese people in this photo.
 
369
00:23:03,183 -> 00:23:06,480
It can be seen that
that foot, it does not describe
 
370
00:23:06,912 -> 00:23:10,834
Jane Fonda asks,
and yes, Jane Fonda hear.
 
371
00:23:11,816 -> 00:23:17,781
And you might not have heard
more than 1/250 sec,
 
372
00:23:18,479 -> 00:23:24,869
but this is 1/250 that
registered and published.
 
373
00:23:25,364 -> 00:23:29,019
Undoubtedly, in speaking thus,
foot simply means
 
374
00:23:29,586 -> 00:23:32,738
which is a snapshot taken
during the course of a discussion
 
375
00:23:33,212 -> 00:23:36,941
in which the actress / activist questioned,
actually, some inhabitants of Hanoi
 
376
00:23:37,583 -> 00:23:42,736
and therefore should not be given
importance to this detail mouth shut.
 
377
00:23:43,470 -> 00:23:45,384
But we shall see later,
 
378
00:23:45,719 -> 00:23:49,870
it is not a coincidence, or
rather, it is a random,
 
379
00:23:50,534 -> 00:23:54,665
this act is immediately exploited in
within the capitalist need,
 
380
00:23:55,393 -> 00:23:58,324
the need for capital
to unmask the real
 
381
00:23:58,820 -> 00:24:01,927
at the same time and that
unmasks, or
 
382
00:24:02,230 -> 00:24:05,556
the nessecidade to "trick" the consumer
on the merchandise.
 
383
00:24:07,092 -> 00:24:11,378
BASIC ELEMENTS LESS
 
384
00:24:12,046 -> 00:24:14,938
The position of the camera
is of the type called 'counter-bitten. "
 
385
00:24:15,418 -> 00:24:21,475
At present and in history
cinema is not a position innocent
 
386
00:24:22,070 -> 00:24:26,243
She had been very
defined technical and socially
 
387
00:24:26,855 -> 00:24:28,952
by Orson Welles in
his early films.
 
388
00:24:29,871 -> 00:24:33,389
The choice of framework
Nor is innocent or neutral:
 
389
00:24:33,990 -> 00:24:40,747
fits the actress looking
and not what the actress looks.
 
390
00:24:41,683 -> 00:24:44,975
Fits the actress therefore
as if the star.
 
391
00:24:45,807 -> 00:24:49,954
And this because, really, the actress is
one starlet internationally known.
 
392
00:24:50,574 -> 00:24:54,457
On the one hand, falls within the
militating starlet, and secondly,
 
393
00:24:55,291 -> 00:24:58,766
in the same movement fits
also militant as showgirl.
 
394
00:24:59,484 -> 00:25:01,173
What is not the same thing.
 
395
00:25:01,960 -> 00:25:05,019
Or better, which may be
the same thing in Vietnam
 
396
00:25:05,636 -> 00:25:07,973
but not in Europe
or the United States.
 
397
00:25:08,925 -> 00:25:13,611
On the next page does not appear
the militant looked in this photo,
 
398
00:25:14,256 -> 00:25:16,396
but what he saw in
other times.
 
399
00:25:17,035 -> 00:25:20,373
In our opinion, it is the
same chain of images
 
400
00:25:20,850 -> 00:25:27,041
of the same type as those transmitted by
television stations and newspapers in the "free" world.
 
401
00:25:27,886 -> 00:25:30,598
Images like those seen
hundreds of thousands of times
 
402
00:25:31,086 -> 00:25:32,840
(Often as pumps)
 
403
00:25:33,517 -> 00:25:35,139
and change nothing,
 
404
00:25:35,571 -> 00:25:39,025
except among those who struggle to organize
this chain of images in a certain way,
 
405
00:25:39,421 -> 00:25:40,444
your way.
 
406
00:25:41,217 -> 00:25:43,108
(7 points of g.r.t.)
 
407
00:25:43,602 -> 00:25:47,891
In fact, if this story
Dupont was signed or Smith,
 
408
00:25:48,478 -> 00:25:52,321
the newspapers themselves would reject,
for being too banal.
 
409
00:25:52,781 -> 00:25:54,694
Actually, we
admit
 
410
00:25:55,232 -> 00:25:57,739
it should be a trivial thing,
 
411
00:25:58,257 -> 00:26:01,557
for boys of a community
farm on the outskirts of Hanoi,
 
412
00:26:02,087 -> 00:26:04,420
rebuild their school,
say for the twentieth time,
 
413
00:26:05,020 -> 00:26:08,067
after being destroyed by
Phantom Doctor Kissinger.
 
414
00:26:08,513 -> 00:26:12,977
But, of course, no one will speak
this extraordinary banality,
 
415
00:26:13,374 -> 00:26:17,333
nor militant starlet,
nor L'Express.
 
416
00:26:18,042 -> 00:26:23,101
Nor will talk about what may have been
said the American actress and her sisters Vietnamese
 
417
00:26:23,522 -> 00:26:27,675
it can be seen that
so, on the next page.
 
418
00:26:28,263 -> 00:26:31,208
The American actress asked
as it plays in Vietnam
 
419
00:26:31,630 -> 00:26:34,863
or as someone who plays in Hollywood
can pose when in Hanoi
 
420
00:26:35,204 -> 00:26:37,156
where back to Hollywood.
 
421
00:26:37,651 -> 00:26:41,049
If L'Express does not speak for all,
this is, in our opinion,
 
422
00:26:41,719 -> 00:26:44,489
that neither the American actress
says anything about it.
 
423
00:26:44,894 -> 00:26:49,147
It is true that militant
spoke of pumps and dikes.
 
424
00:26:49,777 -> 00:26:53,299
But one should not forget that
militant is also an actress,
 
425
00:26:53,765 -> 00:26:59,136
that is, for example, neither
Russell Tribunal nor Ramsey Clarke.
 
426
00:26:59,980 -> 00:27:03,060
And, in our opinion, one should take
into account that, by being an actress,
 
427
00:27:03,552 -> 00:27:06,423
and White House officials
will have no difficulty,
 
428
00:27:06,800 -> 00:27:08,211
if anyone tries to stop them,
 
429
00:27:08,810 -> 00:27:13,709
to say that the actress was unconsciously
manipulated by enemy hands.
 
430
00:27:14,239 -> 00:27:18,978
and recites a text memory.
 
431
00:27:19,575 -> 00:27:21,992
Such criticism might
ruin easily
 
432
00:27:22,588 -> 00:27:25,671
all the efforts of actress and activist.
 
433
00:27:25,825 -> 00:27:32,931
And one should understand, why she continues
vulnerable to this kind of fact,
 

434
00:27:33,510 -> 00:27:37,227
We believe that in this case, due to which
the actress did not speak militant dykes
 
435
00:27:37,771 -> 00:27:44,630
starting from an example, such an actress
Vietnamese that the first notice,
 
436
00:27:43,557 -> 00:27:46,216
and then
 
437
00:27:46,937 -> 00:27:51,618
gives a play in a village
threatened by levees broke.
 
438
00:27:53,280 -> 00:27:58,961
In this regard we believe that
the militant leave the actress
 
439
00:28:00,214 -> 00:28:03,909
(And it's what they do at their level,
the Vietnamese who use it)
 
440
00:28:04,450 -> 00:28:06,786
could begin to represent
its role historically
 
441
00:28:07,232 -> 00:28:10,068
differently to Hollywood.
 
442
00:28:10,485 -> 00:28:13,495
Maybe the Vietnamese have not
directly require it yet.
 
443
00:28:14,105 -> 00:28:15,890
but probably, yes Americans,
 
444
00:28:16,478 -> 00:28:18,927
and therefore, indirectly,
the Vietnamese
 
445
00:28:20,112 -> 00:28:23,019
(Here we find the
need back.
 
446
00:28:23,454 -> 00:28:26,714
The Vietnamese are forced
to stroll by the U.S.).
 
447
00:28:27,287 -> 00:28:30,608
In this photo, this reflection of reality
 
448
00:28:31,078 -> 00:28:35,431
two people are photographed
front, the other back.
 
449
00:28:35,988 -> 00:28:39,663
Of two people, one is
clear, the other out of focus,
 
450
00:28:40,212 -> 00:28:46,426
in the photo, the famous American is sharp
and the Vietnamese anonymous smoky.
 
451
00:28:47,083 -> 00:28:51,780
Actually, the left
American is hazy,
 
452
00:28:52,351 -> 00:28:55,623
left Vietnamese
extraordinarily clear.
 
453
00:28:56,382 -> 00:29:01,457
But also in reality, the American right
remains remarkably sharp,
 
454
00:29:01,975 -> 00:29:07,048
while the right Vietnamese, the
"Vietnamization", is increasingly erased.
 
455
00:29:07,515 -> 00:29:10,542
What to think, now, the
"Measure" of Joseph Kraft,
 
456
00:29:11,138 -> 00:29:13,180
which evaluated all contradictions
 
457
00:29:13,608 -> 00:29:17,878
regulated and, therefore,
the diaphragm and the distance?
 
458
00:29:18,626 -> 00:29:23,445
Everything was measured, as was seen
the purpose of the framework,
 
459
00:29:23,808 -> 00:29:27,743
with a certain purpose
emphasize the star militating
 
460
00:29:28,194 -> 00:29:33,001
and thus obtain a certain product,
a certain idea / commodity
 
461
00:29:33,463 -> 00:29:36,544
and this, again for some purpose.
 
462
00:29:36,866 -> 00:29:40,005
Recall, the production of this product
 
463
00:29:40,684 -> 00:29:42,775
is directly controlled
by the government of North Vietnam.
 
464
00:29:43,272 -> 00:29:46,519
But its diffusion out
Vietnam is not.
 
465
00:29:46,978 -> 00:29:50,375
When yes, very indirectly
 
466
00:29:50,796 -> 00:29:52,271
(Not to mention the feedback).
 
467
00:29:52,913 -> 00:29:56,172
This diffusion is controlled
by chain TVs
 
468
00:29:56,894 -> 00:29:58,465
newspapers and the "free" world.
 
469
00:29:59,129 -> 00:30:03,377
There is therefore a part of the movement
we need a means of communication,
 
470
00:30:04,080 -> 00:30:06,514
can not be made by
who planned the movement.
 
471
00:30:06,981 -> 00:30:12,042
What moves? And that departure
that game, is it?
 
472
00:30:12,531 -> 00:30:14,818
And played by whom?
For who? Against who?
 
473
00:30:15,546 -> 00:30:19,280
Say simply, now
(Back to this later)
 
474
00:30:19,843 -> 00:30:23,962
that examined the
clear relationship / off
 
475
00:30:24,499 -> 00:30:30,097
expressed by the two faces,
realized something extraordinary:
 
476
00:30:30,558 -> 00:30:36,650
smoky face is the clearest
and the face is the most crisp smoky.
 
477
00:30:37,433 -> 00:30:39,371
The Vietnamese can
afford to be smoky,
 
478
00:30:40,329 -> 00:30:44,392
because there is much that
in fact, it is clear.
 
479
00:30:45,093 -> 00:30:47,817
The U.S. is bound to be sharp
 
480
00:30:48,415 -> 00:30:53,922
(And is the smoky Vietnamese forces who
this, in a very clear).
 
481
00:30:54,652 -> 00:30:59,233
The U.S. is bound to emphasize
clearly its real esfumação.
 
482
00:30:59,754 -> 00:31:02,504
But none of that was mentioned in the text.
 
483
00:31:03,087 -> 00:31:08,649
This photo repeats another picture of actress
 
484
00:31:09,103 -> 00:31:11,374
which appeared on the cover of
same number of L'Express.
 
485
00:31:12,112 -> 00:31:15,152
The composition of this cover
is very eloquent,
 
486
00:31:15,625 -> 00:31:20,767
if we work in a view
Photo may cover as much as discover.
 
487
00:31:21,195 -> 00:31:24,472
A photograph imposes silence
while speaking.
 
488
00:31:25,028 -> 00:31:26,160
In our view,
 
489
00:31:26,783 -> 00:31:31,118
is one of the technical bases
double aspect of Jekyll and Hyde,
 
490
00:31:31,396 -> 00:31:32,435
principles and interests,
 
491
00:31:32,470 -> 00:31:38,132
it takes the information / deformation when
is transmitted through images / sounds
 
492
00:31:39,085 -> 00:31:45,486
in our time, the decline of
imperialism and the general trend towards revolution.
 
493
00:31:45,869 -> 00:31:47,770
The American Left
says often
 
494
00:31:48,300 -> 00:31:51,151
that tragedy is not
in Vietnam, but in the U.S..
 
495
00:31:52,096 -> 00:31:57,732
The expression on the face of this militant
picture is really an expression of tragedy.
 
496
00:31:58,498 -> 00:32:02,884
However, a social tragedy and technically
formed by their origins, namely
 
497
00:32:03,324 -> 00:32:07,417
formed / deformed by the school
Hollywood show-biz stanislawskiano.
 
498
00:32:07,923 -> 00:32:12,282
The expression of the militant was
same in Tout va Bien, reel 3,
 
499
00:32:12,794 -> 00:32:18,122
when, actress, heard one extra
sing a text of Lotta Continua.
 
500
00:32:18,810 -> 00:32:21,574
This type of expression also
when the actress was in Kiute,
 
501
00:32:22,057 -> 00:32:24,606
when looked at with air
compassionate and tragic his friend,
 
502
00:32:25,227 -> 00:32:28,873
a policeman interpreted
Donald Sutherland,
 
503
00:32:29,001 -> 00:32:31,142
and decided to spend the night with him.
 
504
00:32:31,770 -> 00:32:36,001
On the other hand, it was already
kind of expression that Henry Fonda
 
505
00:32:36,735 -> 00:32:39,665
used in the 40 to
interpret the workers exploited
 
506
00:32:40,484 -> 00:32:43,252
The Grapes of Wrath, the
Future Fascist Steinbeck.
 
507
00:32:43,793 -> 00:32:48,822
And further in the paternal history of
actress within the history of cinema,
 
508
00:32:49,155 -> 00:32:51,925
so too is the expression that
Henry Fonda had used
 
509
00:32:52,509 -> 00:32:56,483
to throw deep and tragic looks
blacks in Young Mr. Lincoln,
 
510
00:32:56,518 -> 00:33:01,173
the future admiral
honor of the Navy, John Ford.
 
511
00:33:01,748 -> 00:33:04,727
Still further, we found
this expression in the opposite camp,
 
512
00:33:05,300 -> 00:33:08,764
when John Wayne pities
the ravages of the Vietnam War
 
513
00:33:09,522 -> 00:33:11,555
in the Green Berets.
 
514
00:33:12,023 -> 00:33:13,051
In our opinion,
 
515
00:33:13,215 -> 00:33:16,693
this term has been borrowed
(Principle and interest)
 
516
00:33:17,217 -> 00:33:20,178
the mask exchanger
Roosevelt's New Deal.
 
517
00:33:20,643 -> 00:33:22,918
In fact it is a
expression of speech,
 
518
00:33:23,680 -> 00:33:26,077
and appeared for a
coincidence required
 
519
00:33:26,560 -> 00:33:30,030
at birth
economic talkies.
 
520
00:33:30,728 -> 00:33:34,771
It is an expression that speaks, but
speaks only to say how much we know
 
521
00:33:35,167 -> 00:33:36,860
(About the Wall Street Crash,
eg)
 
522
00:33:37,567 -> 00:33:40,122
but you will not say anything more.
 
523
00:33:40,839 -> 00:33:46,455
We believe that this is why the
expression Rooseveltian
 
524
00:33:46,455 -> 00:33:50,008
the expressions differ technically
that preceded it in the history of cinema,
 
525
00:33:50,772 -> 00:33:52,888
expressions of the great
silent film stars,
 
526
00:33:53,413 -> 00:33:56,584
Lilian Gish, Rudolph Valentino,
Falconetti etc.
 
527
00:33:57,235 -> 00:33:58,652
Just make the experience
 
528
00:33:58,652 -> 00:34:02,796
and make all these faces look
a photo of atrocities in Vietnam:
 
529
00:34:03,367 -> 00:34:05,651
will have no
same expression.
 
530
00:34:06,367 -> 00:34:09,445
Although all of them have the
look the same expression
 
531
00:34:34,486 -> 00:34:38,976
?
 
532
00:34:39,650 -> 00:34:45,419
Because before the talkies, film
change had a technical basis materialistic.
 
533
00:34:46,821 -> 00:34:49,330
The actor said: I'm shot
 
534
00:34:50,763 -> 00:34:52,401
therefore I think
 
535
00:34:52,989 -> 00:34:55,907
(At least I think I'm shot)
 
536
00:34:57,091 -> 00:34:59,181
I think because I am.
 
537
00:34:59,932 -> 00:35:03,338
After the spoken
there was a New Deal
 
538
00:35:03,876 -> 00:35:07,374
filmed between matter (the actor)
and thought.
 
539
00:35:08,643 -> 00:35:09,912
The actor began to say:
 
540
00:35:10,705 -> 00:35:13,923
I think (I'm an actor)
 
541
00:35:14,364 -> 00:35:17,535
therefore I am (filmed).
 
542
00:35:18,014 -> 00:35:19,769
Because I am.
 
543
00:35:20,240 -> 00:35:22,413
I think, therefore I am.
 
544
00:35:22,887 -> 00:35:27,163
As we have seen in this experiment
that deepens the Kulechov,
 
545
00:35:27,865 -> 00:35:29,862
before the expression of the New Deal,
 
546
00:35:30,529 -> 00:35:35,117
each actor of the silent era
had its own expression
 
547
00:35:35,724 -> 00:35:39,740
and silent films had
true grassroots.
 
548
00:35:40,348 -> 00:35:44,976
In contrast, when the film
speaking as the New Deal,
 
549
00:35:45,398 -> 00:35:48,317
each actor has put the
say the same thing.
 
550
00:35:49,023 -> 00:35:50,611
Can do it again
the same experiment
 
551
00:35:51,027 -> 00:35:54,732
any movie starlet,
sport or politics
 
552
00:35:56,663 -> 00:36:08,182
I think, therefore I am
 
553
00:36:08,945 -> 00:36:11,876
This expression which says a lot,
 
554
00:36:12,504 -> 00:36:16,156
This expression of
who knows very
 
555
00:36:16,744 -> 00:36:20,772
but that does not say neither more nor less
it is therefore not an expression ...
 
556
00:36:21,997 -> 00:36:27,519
an expression that does not help the reader to see
clearer in their obscure personal problems
 
557
00:36:27,891 -> 00:36:30,897
(See how Vietnam can
enlighten them, for example).
 
558
00:36:31,649 -> 00:36:33,876
Why so
settle up and say:
 

559
00:36:34,546 -> 00:36:36,806
is already something, there is always something that sticks
 
560
00:36:37,658 -> 00:36:40,330
(All of the union speech
Tout va Bien, on reel 3).
 
561
00:36:43,815 -> 00:36:47,825
And why, if an actress is not yet able
represent differently
 
562
00:36:48,633 -> 00:36:56,041
(And we still are not able to help her
correctly represent differently)
 
563
00:36:56,041 -> 00:36:58,531
why should the North Vietnamese
satisfied in this field?
 
564
00:36:58,443 -> 00:37:01,755
Our opinion is that we risk
they do more harm than good,
 
565
00:37:02,253 -> 00:37:05,173
by fabricating a good
awareness so cheap
 
566
00:37:05,634 -> 00:37:08,663
(Said in scientific terms:
 
567
00:37:09,080 -> 00:37:11,494
movement from the "negative entropy"
to information not costly).
 
568
00:37:11,876 -> 00:37:15,721
After all, this expression
also speaks to us,
 
569
00:37:16,453 -> 00:37:19,533
we make the effort to
look at it the second time.
 
570
00:37:20,112 -> 00:37:23,880
That look and that mouth
do not tell us walk,
 
571
00:37:24,287 -> 00:37:27,901
are emptied of meaning,
 
572
00:37:28,518 -> 00:37:32,235
like the boys before the Czechs
all-powerful Russian tanks
 
573
00:37:32,713 -> 00:37:35,926
or large ventrezinhos of
Biafra and Bangladesh
 
574
00:37:36,450 -> 00:37:40,811
or feet of the Palestinians in the mud
carefully maintained by U.N.W.R.A.
 
575
00:37:40,607 -> 00:37:48,741
Empty of meaning, careful capital
knows that wrap the slopes
 
576
00:37:49,397 -> 00:37:52,862
who can make the filling with the sense
empty the actual look of their future enemies
 
577
00:37:53,295 -> 00:37:56,948
already present and therefore must "absent"
Do not look anywhere.
 
578
00:37:59,510 -> 00:38:02,074
How to fight against this state of affairs?
 
579
00:38:02,763 -> 00:38:05,863
Do not stop with the publication
these and the photo in question
 
580
00:38:06,200 -> 00:38:09,013
(Immediately, they should be suppressed to
all the television and radio,
 
581
00:38:09,521 -> 00:38:15,196
in almost all countries of the world,
as well as all kinds of newspapers,
 
582
00:38:15,703 -> 00:38:17,402
what is a utopia).
 
583
00:38:17,972 -> 00:38:21,227
No.
But can be published otherwise.
 
584
00:38:21,986 -> 00:38:24,334
And this is "another way" that starlets,
 
585
00:38:24,761 -> 00:38:29,800
due to its weight and cultural facilities,
have a role to play.
 
586
00:38:30,212 -> 00:38:32,039
An overwhelming role, as they say.
 
587
00:38:32,759 -> 00:38:36,760
And the real tragedy is that they do not know
how to interpret this amazing role.
 
588
00:38:37,595 -> 00:38:39,624
How do we learn to represent you?
 
589
00:38:40,339 -> 00:38:43,466
Still have many questions
in Europe and the United States
 
590
00:38:44,144 -> 00:38:46,512
before I could answer with clarity.
 
591
00:38:46,651 -> 00:38:48,634
We propose some
them in Tout va Bien
 
592
00:38:49,072 -> 00:38:52,230
(As Marx, in his time,
starting from the German Ideology
 
593
00:38:52,669 -> 00:38:56,807
came to pose the question of
Poverty of Philosophy against Proudhon,
 
594
00:38:57,364 -> 00:39:00,422
he knew only philosophize
on poverty).
 
595
00:39:01,317 -> 00:39:04,239
If we look closely at the North Vietnamese
located behind the American actress
 
596
00:39:04,584 -> 00:39:09,429
realize then that his
face expressed something very different
 
597
00:39:09,857 -> 00:39:12,298
of the militant American.
 
598
00:39:12,519 -> 00:39:14,980
By not more than
see what looks
 
599
00:39:15,626 -> 00:39:20,274
realize that face indicates
what we face every day:
 
600
00:39:20,732 -> 00:39:26,066
pumps, disembowelled women and dykes,
 
601
00:39:26,519 -> 00:39:32,305
the house had to be rebuilt by
umpteenth time, or the hospital, the lesson to learn
 
602
00:39:32,806 -> 00:39:39,200
(Lenin said first lesson: learning, second
Lesson: learn, third lesson: learn).
 
603
00:39:40,031 -> 00:39:45,278
And that face immediate reference to the fight
everyday is possible by a simple fact:
 
604
00:39:45,744 -> 00:39:49,976
there is only one face of revolutionary
but the face of a Vietnamese revolutionary.
 
605
00:39:50,890 -> 00:39:53,001
A great past struggles
is crudely inscribed,
 
606
00:39:53,424 -> 00:39:57,246
long, this face, by imperialism
French, Japanese and American.
 
607
00:39:57,879 -> 00:40:00,990
Actually, that face is recognized,
long,
 
608
00:40:01,421 -> 00:40:06,253
as the face of revolution around the world,
even by his enemies.
 
609
00:40:07,160 -> 00:40:08,855
Do not be afraid of the words:
 
610
00:40:09,214 -> 00:40:15,122
is a face that has gained independence
his communication code.
 
611
00:40:15,769 -> 00:40:18,254
Any revolutionary face today,
 
612
00:40:18,670 -> 00:40:21,265
could not transmit so immediately
as his, the daily struggle.
 
613
00:40:21,794 -> 00:40:24,290
Simply because no
revolution, except the Chinese,
 
614
00:40:24,855 -> 00:40:28,975
already made the long march
Vietnamese revolution.
 
615
00:40:29,822 -> 00:40:30,927
Let the experience.
 
616
00:40:31,724 -> 00:40:33,504
This black ...
 
617
00:40:34,016 -> 00:40:38,165
we can not tell immediately
Why Fight, where and how:
 
618
00:40:38,577 -> 00:40:41,728
in Detroit, Chrysler factories
 
619
00:40:42,130 -> 00:40:45,546
for a better salary and
work less brutalizing?
 
620
00:40:45,889 -> 00:40:48,763
In Johannesburg, the right to
Entry into a cinema
 
621
00:40:49,209 -> 00:40:52,142
where whites exhibit
white movies?
 
622
00:40:52,899 -> 00:40:53,859
And this worker?
 
623
00:40:54,302 -> 00:40:56,043
And this European?
 
624
00:40:56,710 -> 00:40:57,855
And this Arabic?
 
625
00:40:58,864 -> 00:41:00,405
And this young radical?
 
626
00:41:00,458 -> 00:41:02,368
Tout va Bien also
answer this question,
 
627
00:41:02,940 -> 00:41:07,043
We must have the courage to say that
we have nothing to say on the faces,
 
628
00:41:07,574 -> 00:41:12,140
unless there is a legend that in the photo
talk nonsense, you repeat yourself,
 
629
00:41:12,837 -> 00:41:16,347
and we should have the courage to say that
courage is only a confession of weakness:
 
630
00:41:16,774 -> 00:41:18,684
are lost,
we have nothing to say.
 
631
00:41:19,114 -> 00:41:23,961
Unlike before that face Vietnamese
not need caption:
 
632
00:41:24,777 -> 00:41:28,312
around the world will say, is a Vietnamese
 
633
00:41:28,783 -> 00:41:32,390
and the Vietnamese struggle to
expel the Americans from Asia.
 
634
00:41:32,743 -> 00:41:38,967
Rather, isolemos face
the American actress.
 
635
00:41:39,772 -> 00:41:42,526
We see then that
conveys nothing,
 
636
00:41:43,032 -> 00:41:45,373
or rather not transmit
nothing more than himself,
 
637
00:41:46,222 -> 00:41:47,975
one that does not itself
is nowhere,
 
638
00:41:48,401 -> 00:41:53,434
lost in the infinite immensity of tenderness
eternal a Pietà by Michelangelo.
 
639
00:41:54,186 -> 00:41:57,114
Face of woman who does not
transmits any woman
 
640
00:41:57,854 -> 00:42:00,331
('s Face was a Vietnamese
function that transmits real
 
641
00:42:01,187 -> 00:42:02,744
while the face of American
 
642
00:42:03,263 -> 00:42:05,469
is a function that does not transmit
more than one function).
 
643
00:42:06,014 -> 00:42:09,145
Face that could be a
hippie needed drug,
 
644
00:42:09,794 -> 00:42:11,937
that of a student, Eugene,
Oregon
 
645
00:42:12,613 -> 00:42:17,588
when your favorite Préfontaine, just
losing the Olympic 5000 meters,
 
646
00:42:18,138 -> 00:42:21,750
and a passionate
abandoned by her love,
 
647
00:42:22,356 -> 00:42:24,151
and also an activist in Vietnam.
 
648
00:42:24,501 -> 00:42:25,667
Is it too.
 
649
00:42:26,062 -> 00:42:29,190
There is too much information in a
time / space too small.
 
650
00:42:30,050 -> 00:42:33,551
At the same time, we are certain that
is a militant thinking in Vietnam
 
651
00:42:34,077 -> 00:42:35,232
and uncertain of the whole,
 
652
00:42:35,570 -> 00:42:39,706
because it could be considering any
thing, as we have proof.
 
653
00:42:40,440 -> 00:42:42,894
So we end
asking ourselves:
 
654
00:42:43,344 -> 00:42:45,578
as a picture of a militant (or actress)
 
655
00:42:46,191 -> 00:42:48,588
not thinking necessarily
in Vietnam,
 
656
00:42:49,012 -> 00:42:53,038
is published in the very place
of an actress (or militant)
 
657
00:42:53,466 -> 00:42:55,784
thinking necessarily
in Vietnam?
 
658
00:42:56,832 -> 00:43:01,068
Because the reality of this
Photo is here:
 
659
00:43:01,616 -> 00:43:05,429
a makeup star discovery
by their own lack of makeup.
 
660
00:43:06,115 -> 00:43:08,279
L'Express but does not say so
 
661
00:43:08,919 -> 00:43:12,647
because it would be a start of
revolution in journalism.
 
662
00:43:13,401 -> 00:43:17,601
It would mean a beginning of revolution,
in Europe or the United States, which
 
663
00:43:17,926 -> 00:43:21,641
currently, it is not possible to draw
a photo of someone thinking something
 
664
00:43:22,682 -> 00:43:28,361
(Vietnam, Ford factory, the beach, etc.).
 
665
00:43:29,597 -> 00:43:33,647
They will say that we were wrong to
isolate a part of the photo
 
666
00:43:34,137 -> 00:43:36,786
when he is not
is published alone.
 
667
00:43:37,672 -> 00:43:39,633
It's a bad argument
 
668
00:43:40,429 -> 00:43:42,180
To isolate the exact
show that, indeed,
 
669
00:43:42,633 -> 00:43:47,698
I was alone and that
tragedy lies in that solitude.
 
670
00:43:48,534 -> 00:43:51,718
Because if we
isolate this face
 
671
00:43:52,341 -> 00:43:55,472
so he gets to do it,
 
672
00:43:56,353 -> 00:44:01,563
unlike face Vietnamese
which remains attached to its environment
 
673
00:44:02,079 -> 00:44:03,985
even try
observe it as yourself.
 
674
00:44:04,743 -> 00:44:07,161
It is definitely a
counter-plan.
 
675
00:44:07,679 -> 00:44:11,934
Conversely, in this picture, there
possibility of a counter plan.
 
676
00:44:12,176 -> 00:44:13,882
No counter-plan.
 
677
00:44:14,604 -> 00:44:19,948
This expression used by actress
France is known for a long time.
 
678
00:44:20,436 -> 00:44:23,402
It is the model operation
Cartesian thought:
 
679
00:44:23,932 -> 00:44:25,607
I think, therefore I am,
 
680
00:44:26,400 -> 00:44:30,131
 the same that inspired Rodin
and his statue "The Thinker".
 
681
00:44:30,774 -> 00:44:34,545
More would wander where the famous statue
Whenever there is a catastrophe
 
682
00:44:35,245 -> 00:44:37,604
in order to soften the pasta.
 
683
00:44:38,119 -> 00:44:40,779
Fraud art capitalist
humanism capitalist
 
684
00:44:41,231 -> 00:44:42,402
then burst.
 
685
00:44:42,988 -> 00:44:45,999
We understand that a
starlet can not think,
 
686
00:44:46,422 -> 00:44:51,471
because it is a social function:
is thought, and makes you think
 
687
00:44:52,034 -> 00:44:56,655
(Witness the performances of large
 thinkers like Marlon Brando
 
688
00:44:57,249 -> 00:44:59,319
or other
sons of bitches,
 
689
00:44:59,354 -> 00:45:02,190
to understand why the capital needs
support this kind of an art,
 
690
00:45:02,822 -> 00:45:06,722
to enhance the philosophy
idealistic in its fight
 
691
00:45:09,234 -> 00:45:14,648
against the materialist philosophy of Marx, Engels, Lenin
and Mao representing their people in the field).
 
692
00:45:14,842 -> 00:45:20,228
We just say isolemos, the
Otherwise, the face of American actress.
 
693
00:45:20,995 -> 00:45:24,498
Isolemos now, the words
"Unlike" in this sentence
 
694
00:45:25,020 -> 00:45:35,356
(Isolate, divide: Division revolutionary, Lenin said,
fighting against the capitalist division of labor).
 
695
00:45:36,001 -> 00:45:37,598
We see then that the figure
the militant American
 
696
00:45:38,201 -> 00:45:40,354
and the North Vietnamese
are contrary.
 
697
00:45:41,270 -> 00:45:44,664
And what really happens in
imaginary reality that image
 
698
00:45:45,279 -> 00:45:47,548
is, in our opinion, the fight
these contraries.
 
699
00:45:48,274 -> 00:45:52,909
The American eye settles in
read the word horror in Vietnam.
 
700
00:45:53,535 -> 00:45:57,584
The Vietnamese eye sees reality
American in all its horror.
 
701
00:45:58,075 -> 00:46:02,534
In this scene, the Vietnamese appears
in the background, as an extra,
 
702
00:46:02,960 -> 00:46:06,902
and behind it, we can feel
the overwhelming power of
 
703
00:46:06,937 -> 00:46:11,018
machine assembled by the collective
North Vietnam / Vietcong.
 
704
00:46:12,146 -> 00:46:17,310
Behind figuring this starlet is also
the vile and terrible capitalist machine,
 
705
00:46:17,966 -> 00:46:21,223
full of an expression cynically
humble and confusion into clarity
 
706
00:46:22,440 -> 00:46:26,363
(As Lelouch says in
L'aventure, c'est l'aventure)
 
707
00:46:27,031 -> 00:46:32,002
In short, the struggle between what
still is and what is already
 
708
00:46:32,362 -> 00:46:34,066
between the old and the new.
 
709
00:46:35,447 -> 00:46:38,697
The struggle is not limited to
act of taking this photograph,
 
710
00:46:39,648 -> 00:46:42,927
that is perpetuated by the way
as the photo was published,
 
711
00:46:43,432 -> 00:46:47,035
and because of how people who are in
cinema are looking at this photo
 
712
00:46:47,459 -> 00:46:48,835
right now.
 
713
00:46:49,459 -> 00:46:54,332
Fight between process
production and the diffusion process,
 
714
00:46:54,973 -> 00:46:59,232
according to who runs over and over,
capital or the revolution.
 
715
00:47:00,119 -> 00:47:02,144
OTHER ELEMENTS OF ELEMENTS
 
716
00:47:03,686 -> 00:47:07,179
At the risk of making disclose this photo,
the North Vietnamese are right.
 
717
00:47:07,749 -> 00:47:10,580
Or rather, have their reasons.
 
718
00:47:11,110 -> 00:47:13,347
This photo represents the role
small screw
 
719
00:47:13,735 -> 00:47:18,697
in the engine development
its current military-diplomatic offensive.
 
720
00:47:21,208 -> 00:47:25,151
This photo is one of thousands given by
Vietnamese people with their blood,
 
721
00:47:25,595 -> 00:47:27,484
to replicate the crimes
American war.
 
722
00:47:28,722 -> 00:47:33,450
Note in passing, Jane, that
collective Vietcong / North Vietnamese
 
723
00:47:33,893 -> 00:47:36,585
rarely publishes atrocities
in their documents,
 
724
00:47:37,015 -> 00:47:38,710
publish though, yes,
often fighting.
 
725
00:47:39,233 -> 00:47:43,610
To give this replica here
 
726
00:47:43,900 -> 00:47:48,930
represented here by the Committee of
friendship with the American people,
 
727
00:47:49,409 -> 00:47:51,868
invited the actress Jane Fonda.
 
728
00:47:52,265 -> 00:47:54,633
It is therefore
to play a role.
 
729
00:47:55,514 -> 00:47:57,820
Unlike many
other Americans,
 
730
00:47:58,453 -> 00:48:01,930
American actress accepted this
paper and therefore has moved.
 
731
00:48:02,572 -> 00:48:05,672
Hanoi was to put the
service of the Vietnamese revolution.
 
732
00:48:06,286 -> 00:48:11,068
Now, we can ask ourselves:
arises as a service?
 
733
00:48:11,475 -> 00:48:13,867
Or more accurately:
how to interpret this role?
 
734
00:48:14,670 -> 00:48:16,670
The American actress in action in this photo
 
735
00:48:17,093 -> 00:48:20,048
serves the Vietnamese people in
their struggle for independence,
 
736
00:48:20,745 -> 00:48:22,869
but not used
Only in Vietnam
 
737
00:48:23,228 -> 00:48:25,858
but in particular in the U.S.
and also in Europe,
 
738
00:48:26,412 -> 00:48:29,345
since the photo
came to us.
 
739
00:48:30,576 -> 00:48:33,562
That is, we, we look
this photo here
 
740
00:48:34,310 -> 00:48:37,458
we are obliged freely
to ask, this photo serves us?
 
741
00:48:38,016 -> 00:48:40,239
And in the first place: it serves us
to serve in Vietnam?
 
742
00:48:40,894 -> 00:48:43,803
(And is Vietnam that requires us
to formulate this question).
 
743
00:48:44,615 -> 00:48:48,625
ELEMENTS synthesized
 
744
00:48:49,238 -> 00:48:53,964
Neither L'Express, nor the militant
American made the difference between
 
745
00:48:54,360 -> 00:48:58,335
Jane Fonda talks, questions,
and Jane Fonda, listening.
 
746
00:48:59,094 -> 00:49:02,886
To the Vietnamese, this time
history of their struggle
 
747
00:49:03,370 -> 00:49:08,177
the most important fact about the photo
is that Jane Fonda is in her
 
748
00:49:14,356 -> 00:49:16,397
also because silence is eloquent,
but this is not said).
 
749
00:49:17,066 -> 00:49:19,299
The important thing is that it is there.
 
750
00:49:20,499 -> 00:49:25,442
But here, in 1972, the principal
is not necessarily the same.
 
751
00:49:25,976 -> 00:49:29,336
We have to know that force acts
behind this "necessarily".
 
752
00:49:30,043 -> 00:49:33,127
We meet the obligation
to insist that the foot photo lied
 
753
00:49:34,237 -> 00:49:37,665
to say that the actress spoke
the inhabitants of Hanoi
 
754
00:49:38,391 -> 00:49:41,931
when the picture showed
the militant was listening.
 
755
00:49:42,712 -> 00:49:48,338
We need the truth contradictory
This photo and not his eternal truth.
 
756
00:49:48,792 -> 00:49:53,987
And it is important for us to insist that
L'Express mind at all levels,
 
757
00:49:54,607 -> 00:49:58,022
but it is important to add
that the newspaper can lie,
 
758
00:49:58,427 -> 00:50:00,676
this is because
the picture allows.
 
759
00:50:01,161 -> 00:50:04,224
Really, L'Express
takes advantage (profit and loss)
 
760
00:50:04,726 -> 00:50:09,480
the implicit authorization for this photo
disguise the fact that the militant hear.
 
761
00:50:10,543 -> 00:50:13,633
Because saying that speaks,
and speaking peace in Vietnam
 
762
00:50:14,220 -> 00:50:17,287
L'Express can silence about
that if peace comes,
 
763
00:50:17,605 -> 00:50:22,629
leaving that step into the picture, as
he was implicit that the photo needs,
 
764
00:50:23,256 -> 00:50:26,051
By itself, that kind of peace
it comes when we saw that it is not so.
 
765
00:50:26,889 -> 00:50:29,649
But if L'Express can
thus act
 
766
00:50:30,092 -> 00:50:36,836
is probably because the American actress
militates not only saying peace in Vietnam
 
767
00:50:37,388 -> 00:50:43,446
no question that peace exactly,
or in particular that peace in America.
 
768
00:50:44,064 -> 00:50:47,474
And if you do not ask,
or can not,
 
769
00:50:48,083 -> 00:50:53,516
not because it also acts as an actress and not
as a militant, but, on the contrary,
 
770
00:50:53,864 -> 00:50:56,727
because while militant is not intended
still no question
 
771
00:50:57,171 -> 00:51:00,465
on new approaches or styles
can be applied to functions
 

772
00:51:00,926 -> 00:51:03,671
as an actress, both technically
and socially.
 
773
00:51:04,309 -> 00:51:08,172
In other words, it does not consider
their militant activity as an actress,
 
774
00:51:08,631 -> 00:51:13,621
emboras the North Vietnamese to invited
precisely as such, as an actress militant.
 
775
00:51:14,586 -> 00:51:20,346
Summarizing, speaks a different place
where you are in America
 
776
00:51:20,807 -> 00:51:23,489
which is what matters primarily
the Vietnamese.
 
777
00:51:24,049 -> 00:51:30,029
Hence the fact that it also conceals the
most important in this picture is their listening,
 
778
00:51:30,694 -> 00:51:32,705
Listen Vietnam, before talking about it.
 
779
00:51:33,473 -> 00:51:38,428
However, simultaneously, Nixon,
Kissinger and the infamous Porter hear nothing,
 
780
00:51:38,815 -> 00:51:43,018
and do not want to hear absolutely
Meetings nothing in Paris.
 
781
00:51:43,560 -> 00:51:46,960
Hence their disguises, anyway,
must unmask.
 
782
00:51:47,909 -> 00:51:52,588
And expose Nixon is not saying:
Peace in Vietnam.
 
783
00:51:53,332 -> 00:51:55,985
Because he also says that
(And Brezhnev also).
 
784
00:51:56,528 -> 00:51:58,986
You need to tell him otherwise.
 
785
00:51:59,556 -> 00:52:05,233
You must say: I hear that the Vietnamese
I will say that they want peace in their country.
 
786
00:52:05,890 -> 00:52:06,654
It must be said:
 
787
00:52:07,062 -> 00:52:09,199
as an American, shut up,
 
788
00:52:09,619 -> 00:52:12,122
because I recognize that I have
nothing to say about it,
 
789
00:52:12,715 -> 00:52:14,919
it is up to the Vietnamese
say what they want,
 
790
00:52:15,380 -> 00:52:18,318
me listen to them and then
do what they want,
 
791
00:52:18,718 -> 00:52:20,791
because I have nothing to
view with Southeast Asia.
 
792
00:52:21,291 -> 00:52:23,423
The rest is just masquerade.
 
 
 

Francis van den Heuvel

unread,
Nov 1, 2013, 7:25:36 AM11/1/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com
Thanks....
 
Francis

Sergio Basbaum

unread,
Nov 1, 2013, 7:39:26 AM11/1/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com
Hahaha, thank you very much

s



For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

shihlu...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 1, 2013, 8:35:56 PM11/1/13
to godar...@googlegroups.com

  yodasling, thanks so much for this, much appreciated.


Shih-lun

yodasling於 2013年11月1日星期五UTC+8下午7時06分42秒寫道:
...
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages