1
00:00:26,090 -> 00:00:27,300
Dear Jane,
2
00:00:27,490 -> 00:00:30,543
In the advertising
brochure
accompanying Tout va Bien
3
00:00:30,704 -> 00:00:34,185
festivals in Venice,
Carthage,
New York and San Francisco
4
00:00:34,493 -> 00:00:36,954
we prefer to put
your picture in
Vietnam
5
00:00:37,205 -> 00:00:39,399
in place of film stills.
6
00:00:40,289 -> 00:00:45,051
We found this photo in a number
of
L'Express in early August 72
7
00:00:45,453 -> 00:00:48,809
and we think it will allow us
to
speak very concretely
8
00:00:49,260 -> 00:00:50,677
the problems
presented by Tout
va Bien.
9
00:00:51,338 -> 00:00:53,327
It is not absolutely
divert the
conversation
10
00:00:53,660 -> 00:00:56,090
and not talking about Tout va
Bien,
11
00:00:56,302 -> 00:00:58,822
as if we were afraid
speaking
of this film.
12
00:00:58,939 -> 00:01:00,237
Absolutely.
13
00:01:00,514 -> 00:01:02,710
This is a way of not
marking
time,
14
00:01:02,943 -> 00:01:05,334
(As troops
puppet Thieu
Quang-Tri)
15
00:01:05,577 -> 00:01:08,572
which eventually leads to
go
over the other.
16
00:01:09,241 -> 00:01:11,693
(As of 7th howitzers
fleet of
Quang-Tri).
17
00:01:12,082 -> 00:01:15,181
It is, therefore, a spin
18
00:01:15,294 -> 00:01:17,031
but it is worth a
expression,
19
00:01:17,423 -> 00:01:18,280
Direct a rodeo.
20
00:01:18,734 -> 00:01:19,694
That is,
21
00:01:20,076 -> 00:01:25,430
a revolution that will enable us
to tackle,
directly, the terrible problems that small,
22
00:01:25,357 -> 00:01:29,231
one way or another, the film we
shot
together earlier this year shows.
23
00:01:29,486 -> 00:01:31,329
And before speaking, then
and
in every way,
24
00:01:31,380 -> 00:01:33,585
and the qualities
defects in
our movie
25
00:01:33,862 -> 00:01:39,693
prefer to ask
critical
reporters, to viewers,
26
00:01:40,030 -> 00:01:43,909
that may have to do with us and
the effort
analyzing this your picture in Vietnam
27
00:01:44,233 -> 00:01:47,438
Taken a few months later
the
film we made in Paris.
28
00:01:47,882 -> 00:01:52,616
Really, this picture, and
the
short text that accompanies it,
29
00:01:52,448 -> 00:01:55,722
seem able to summarize Tout
va
Bien we would know better than to do it.
30
00:01:56,008 -> 00:01:58,120
And this for a very simple
reason.
31
00:01:58,192 -> 00:02:02,637
This photo answers the
same
question that the film features:
32
00:02:03,052 -> 00:02:06,329
what role should
play
intellectuals in the revolution?
33
00:02:06,809 -> 00:02:08,214
To this question,
34
00:02:08,653 -> 00:02:10,545
the picture gives a practical
answer
35
00:02:11,248 -> 00:02:13,537
(The answer is practice).
36
00:02:14,514 -> 00:02:16,008
This photo shows you,
37
00:02:16,248 -> 00:02:17,007
really you, Jane,
38
00:02:17,315 -> 00:02:20,308
in the service of
freedom
Vietnamese people.
39
00:02:21,004 -> 00:02:24,612
Tout va Bien also
answer this
question,
40
00:02:24,614 -> 00:02:26,067
but not the same.
41
00:02:26,236 -> 00:02:30,210
Because less certain that
the
Photo of responses to,
42
00:02:30,439 -> 00:02:32,790
the film exposes other questions
first.
43
00:02:32,747 -> 00:02:35,077
And they arrive, after all,
44
00:02:35,607 -> 00:02:38,869
not present as such, the
question
intellectuals and the revolution.
45
00:02:40,336 -> 00:02:42,431
As proposed, then this
question?
46
00:02:43,166 -> 00:02:45,726
The film still does not answer
accurately.
47
00:02:46,310 -> 00:02:49,093
But the way because even
answer
is not, in fact,
48
00:02:49,735 -> 00:02:51,846
an indirect way of
propose new
questions.
49
00:02:52,493 -> 00:02:56,201
Because there is no point to
old
answers to new questions
50
00:02:56,672 -> 00:03:00,307
presented by the current
development
of revolutionary struggles.
51
00:03:01,019 -> 00:03:03,634
You need to learn, even so,
to
formulate these new issues.
52
00:03:04,390 -> 00:03:05,647
And learn from those who,
53
00:03:05,784 -> 00:03:09,442
although they have not had time
to
write clearly these new issues,
54
00:03:10,564 -> 00:03:15,307
already conquered the land
where
can flourish and expand,
55
00:03:16,724 -> 00:03:20,586
and won with a new practice.
56
00:03:21,228 -> 00:03:24,445
We we told you that the way in
which,
57
00:03:24,953 -> 00:03:27,088
does not truly answer
as the
Vietnamese and you in this photo,
58
00:03:27,452 -> 00:03:30,892
was an indirect way of
first
present new issues.
59
00:03:31,373 -> 00:03:32,488
An indirect way.
60
00:03:32,846 -> 00:03:34,115
A awry.
61
00:03:34,284 -> 00:03:35,968
Now you can understand why
62
00:03:36,364 -> 00:03:39,207
the need for a rodeo
before
speaking of the film.
63
00:03:39,756 -> 00:03:42,406
And why a spin by Vietnam?
64
00:03:42,567 -> 00:03:43,454
First,
65
00:03:43,904 -> 00:03:48,984
because everyone agrees that
there
present new issues really.
66
00:03:49,794 -> 00:03:51,837
And then, because you were with
them
67
00:03:52,063 -> 00:03:53,865
after you have been with us.
68
00:03:54,082 -> 00:03:58,727
Hence, when looking at this photo
of a
actress in the theater of military operations,
69
00:03:59,594 -> 00:04:02,083
our desire to interrogate
her.
70
00:04:02,334 -> 00:04:04,538
Not to question
actress, and
yes, the photo.
71
00:04:05,034 -> 00:04:08,794
And for us, this equates to
submit
a number of new issues
72
00:04:09,161 -> 00:04:12,211
the classical response
the
Vietnamese and you
73
00:04:12,632 -> 00:04:17,055
gave this famous question
of
intellectuals, taking and disseminating this photo.
74
00:04:17,547 -> 00:04:21,222
Also something intervenes
More
in our decision
75
00:04:21,419 -> 00:04:25,538
to take this photo to
strolling
by Vietnam.
76
00:04:26,305 -> 00:04:32,149
That something is our desire to
make a
discussion of the film with the audience,
77
00:04:32,952 -> 00:04:34,211
whether or not journalists.
78
00:04:34,627 -> 00:04:37,123
Everyone is their
own
journalist and his own publisher
79
00:04:37,898 -> 00:04:43,148
depending on how it
develops
daily activity of each in a movie
80
00:04:43,977 -> 00:04:46,133
posing as star
this film.
81
00:04:47,068 -> 00:04:50,380
And it is precisely this type
of
system of self-leadership.
82
00:04:51,161 -> 00:04:52,437
we want to talk.
83
00:04:53,619 -> 00:04:55,231
To talk with the viewer.
84
00:04:56,171 -> 00:04:58,968
But to do so, we must give it a
whirl.
85
00:04:59,790 -> 00:05:02,167
Because, in the same way as
a
film is a kind of turning
86
00:05:02,669 -> 00:05:04,043
which brings us back to
ourselves
87
00:05:04,970 -> 00:05:06,545
anyway, back to the movie,
88
00:05:07,135 -> 00:05:10,002
must perform this
rodeo in
ourselves.
89
00:05:11,046 -> 00:05:15,948
And here in America, "ourselves" I
mean,
first still and always, Vietnam.
90
00:05:16,769 -> 00:05:18,662
Let us explain this with
a
little more spaciousness.
91
00:05:19,250 -> 00:05:21,482
We think it's important
and
urgent talk
92
00:05:21,789 -> 00:05:24,820
a little to those who gave
work
to see our movie.
93
00:05:26,018 -> 00:05:27,891
This is where they are,
94
00:05:28,280 -> 00:05:30,175
and also where we are.
95
00:05:30,824 -> 00:05:34,276
Therefore, we must act in
a
which may present issues,
96
00:05:34,465 -> 00:05:35,646
if they wish,
97
00:05:35,672 -> 00:05:38,376
or to respond to
questions
exposed by us.
98
00:05:39,105 -> 00:05:41,427
Viewers have to be able to
reflect.
99
00:05:42,191 -> 00:05:46,108
And reflect, first of all,
this
problem of questions and answers.
100
00:05:46,769 -> 00:05:50,461
It is also necessary that we can
be,
affected by questions from viewers
101
00:05:50,875 -> 00:05:51,817
(Or answers)
102
00:05:52,259 -> 00:05:54,186
and we can respond
(Or
question)
103
00:05:54,709 -> 00:05:59,996
with something different answers
(or questions)
also prefabricated (and answers?)
104
00:06:00,400 -> 00:06:04,012
But, prefabricated by
Who? For
who? Against who?
105
00:06:04,399 -> 00:06:08,911
That is, the possibility to
introduce a
real discussion of Tout va Bien,
106
00:06:09,413 -> 00:06:12,378
we situate outside Tout va
Bien.
107
00:06:12,926 -> 00:06:16,416
To speak of this machine,
we
leaving the factory that uses.
108
00:06:16,923 -> 00:06:21,484
Meet our base
discussion
outside the cinema,
109
00:06:21,573 -> 00:06:24,907
away to come back.
110
00:06:25,629 -> 00:06:27,643
And when we return, we will
leave
again with best step
111
00:06:28,191 -> 00:06:31,062
toward the real problems
true
of our material life,
112
00:06:31,097 -> 00:06:34,382
which the film will not
have
been only one element.
113
00:06:34,907 -> 00:06:37,521
We will not leave, nor
abandon
Tout va Bien.
114
00:06:38,136 -> 00:06:41,734
Instead, we from him,
starting
to go somewhere else,
115
00:06:42,547 -> 00:06:45,517
for example, Vietnam,
as you
back away.
116
00:06:45,850 -> 00:06:50,535
But, and this is important,
we
will with our own means.
117
00:06:51,202 -> 00:06:52,844
That means it comes?
118
00:06:53,313 -> 00:06:57,158
Our technical work
and the use
social which makes them
119
00:06:57,107 -> 00:07:00,683
(You in this picture, in
Vietnam,
us with the film in Paris)
120
00:07:01,241 -> 00:07:04,708
and from this use exactly
can
better judge.
121
00:07:05,143 -> 00:07:07,339
And for once, we are not
alone,
122
00:07:07,809 -> 00:07:09,427
the viewer will be there
too,
123
00:07:10,267 -> 00:07:13,652
will produce the same
time
they consume,
124
00:07:14,389 -> 00:07:17,910
and we will consume the
same
the time that will produce.
125
00:07:18,697 -> 00:07:21,314
Perhaps all this will seem
complicated.
126
00:07:21,484 -> 00:07:23,051
As Lenin said Vertov:
127
00:07:23,823 -> 00:07:28,616
is that the truth is simple,
but
is not simple to tell the truth.
128
00:07:29,046 -> 00:07:33,213
And Uncle Vertov had discovered
five
difficulties to tell the truth.
129
00:07:34,446 -> 00:07:36,515
Well Let's put it another
way.
130
00:07:37,198 -> 00:07:40,404
At present, it is often
said
that cinema must "serve the people".
131
00:07:41,100 -> 00:07:41,863
Very well.
132
00:07:42,383 -> 00:07:45,873
Instead of theorizing
about
defects and quality Tout va Bien,
133
00:07:46,092 -> 00:07:47,593
let us go to Vietnam.
134
00:07:47,716 -> 00:07:50,803
But we by and with the
means
of Tout va Bien.
135
00:07:51,232 -> 00:07:53,761
Let's look if one can say
so,
136
00:07:54,779 -> 00:07:56,850
as Tout va Bien "works" in
Vietnam.
137
00:07:57,011 -> 00:08:02,965
We may take, possibly,
some
conclusions of this practical example,
138
00:08:03,186 -> 00:08:04,782
on things to do and avoid,
139
00:08:05,596 -> 00:08:07,235
each of us where there is,
140
00:08:08,063 -> 00:08:12,331
with his wife, his boss,
his
children, your money, your desires, etc..
141
00:08:13,061 -> 00:08:19,119
Let's use this picture to
go
Vietnam to investigate this issue:
142
00:08:19,792 -> 00:08:23,888
how cinema can help
people
Vietnamese to win its independence
143
00:08:24,221 -> 00:08:26,720
And as we have said several
times,
144
00:08:27,280 -> 00:08:31,279
we are not the only ones to
use
this photo to go to Vietnam.
145
00:08:31,849 -> 00:08:33,906
Thousands of people did,
146
00:08:34,364 -> 00:08:38,438
probably almost here
everyone
has seen this photo
147
00:08:38,706 -> 00:08:43,979
and during a few seconds,
its
way it is served to go to Vietnam.
148
00:08:44,853 -> 00:08:47,960
Exactly, that's what we
think
are important to know:
149
00:08:48,239 -> 00:08:51,392
how each used this
photo to go
to Vietnam;
150
00:08:51,865 -> 00:08:54,688
truth: and as they went to
Vietnam.
151
00:08:55,288 -> 00:08:58,451
Because Dr. Kissinger
also
Vietnam goes to several times per year.
152
00:08:59,248 -> 00:09:04,347
It is just a guy like dr.
Kissinger
we ask why this photo
153
00:09:04,871 -> 00:09:07,598
and that relationship can
be
between this picture and Tout va Bien.
154
00:09:07,969 -> 00:09:12,643
And he and his friends
say
this is not serious,
155
00:09:13,203 -> 00:09:18,122
we would do better
talking
film, art, etc..
156
00:09:18,848 -> 00:09:22,020
But one should realize the
effort
see these types of reflections
157
00:09:22,522 -> 00:09:24,737
contradict themselves
when
Proposals thus
158
00:09:25,453 -> 00:09:30,678
complicate and obstruct all the
way
other simpler questions
159
00:09:31,272 -> 00:09:33,961
(As can be said for
ordinary
people).
160
00:09:34,998 -> 00:09:36,496
For example, before
say, "that
relationship"
161
00:09:37,399 -> 00:09:39,762
we must first ask:
"There is
even a relationship"?
162
00:09:40,938 -> 00:09:43,280
And then, it can be asked
what
is the relationship.
163
00:09:43,163 -> 00:09:47,717
Having discovered the
relationship,
we will find out a little further,
164
00:09:48,069 -> 00:09:50,598
that the relationship between our
film
and this picture
165
00:09:51,061 -> 00:09:53,059
in this issue of the
expression
166
00:09:53,469 -> 00:09:56,750
And eventually we can
judge
its importance,
167
00:09:57,239 -> 00:09:59,381
ie establish other
relationships
168
00:09:59,857 -> 00:10:02,733
with other important
questions
and other important responses.
169
00:10:03,278 -> 00:10:06,041
Say that this is
folly,
bla-bla-bla,
170
00:10:06,509 -> 00:10:10,161
but at the opposite end of
this
new small chain of questions,
171
00:10:10,693 -> 00:10:12,208
the question of the
importance,
172
00:10:12,915 -> 00:10:15,260
what others call the
question
practical result,
173
00:10:15,688 -> 00:10:18,427
appears as a
very important
issue.
174
00:10:19,658 -> 00:10:22,254
And that's because the North
Vietnamese / Vietcong
175
00:10:22,852 -> 00:10:26,791
already answered the question
about
the importance of this photo,
176
00:10:27,493 -> 00:10:32,665
able to do it in post
all
parts of the "free" world
177
00:10:33,063 -> 00:10:35,709
(This same world
that holds
free)
178
00:10:36,366 -> 00:10:39,009
demonstrating that
the
importance he attached to this picture,
179
00:10:39,471 -> 00:10:42,670
the importance he attached
to
question of the practical results,
180
00:10:43,404 -> 00:10:46,955
the importance he attached
to
question of what is important.
181
00:10:47,946 -> 00:10:51,768
This photo is therefore a
response
practice that the North Vietnamese,
182
00:10:52,381 -> 00:10:53,447
with your help, Jane
183
00:10:54,226 -> 00:10:56,830
decided to give the famous
question
we did at the time:
184
00:10:57,234 -> 00:11:00,890
what role should
play
revolutionary struggles in the film?
185
00:11:01,433 -> 00:11:06,152
In other words: what is the
role
intellectuals in the revolution?
186
00:11:07,065 -> 00:11:09,672
To this question, to which
the
photo gives a practical answer
187
00:11:10,323 -> 00:11:11,925
(The response of an entire
people;
188
00:11:12,596 -> 00:11:14,624
takes up the photo and
publishes
189
00:11:15,320 -> 00:11:19,603
and is thereby made to have
the
security and certainty that it will be published,
190
00:11:20,130 -> 00:11:21,364
both here and there,
191
00:11:21,956 -> 00:11:26,774
what is a fact, because
the
Otherwise, we would not have it).
192
00:11:27,164 -> 00:11:28,927
Tout va Bien answers
be a
question too.
193
00:11:29,420 -> 00:11:31,373
But, from another location
and
differently.
194
00:11:35,124 -> 00:11:37,774
One way is to say:
195
00:11:38,424 -> 00:11:41,243
where we are in France, in
1972,
196
00:11:41,779 -> 00:11:44,545
governed by friends
Americans
and Russians,
197
00:11:45,190 -> 00:11:47,999
nothing is so clear,
nothing
is so obvious
198
00:11:49,068 -> 00:11:50,774
(Remember, particularly,
of
Fidel Castro, saying that the UN,
199
00:11:51,617 -> 00:11:54,760
for revolutionaries,
never
evident truths,
200
00:11:55,394 -> 00:11:57,336
that imperialism was
whom had
invented,
201
00:11:58,028 -> 00:12:03,811
and that major expertly served
the
evident truths to oppress small).
202
00:12:04,649 -> 00:12:09,241
And since nothing is obvious,
Jane,
continue asking questions,
203
00:12:09,961 -> 00:12:12,925
but we strive to
do them
differently;
204
00:12:13,421 -> 00:12:17,927
in a nutshell: do
questions
new power to give new answers.
205
00:12:18,619 -> 00:12:25,923
For example, let's look at how
the Vietnamese
translate their combat and do questions
206
00:12:25,996 -> 00:12:28,233
since we also want
translate
our struggle.
207
00:12:28,848 -> 00:12:31,443
And, firstly,
honestly ask
ourselves
208
00:12:31,872 -> 00:12:35,715
what allows us to say
what
really fight.
209
00:12:36,727 -> 00:12:39,095
But perhaps at this
point,
you, Jane, we ask:
210
00:12:39,724 -> 00:12:42,991
why this picture of me and
not
Clarke one of Ramsey, for example?
211
00:12:43,439 -> 00:12:47,685
He was also in Vietnam,
also
witnessed the bombing of the dikes.
212
00:12:47,897 -> 00:12:50,136
Simply You, Jane,
because of
Tout va Bien
213
00:12:50,580 -> 00:12:54,383
and because no solution in the
film
was the same as in this picture.
214
00:12:55,066 -> 00:12:56,265
You're an actress.
215
00:12:56,265 -> 00:12:59,539
Naturally, we are all
actors
in theater history,
216
00:13:00,237 -> 00:13:04,312
but in addition, you
film and
makes us too.
217
00:13:05,222 -> 00:13:07,952
So say why you
not Yves
Montand in Chile?
218
00:13:07,985 -> 00:13:09,600
He was also in the movie.
It
is true.
219
00:13:10,367 -> 00:13:13,668
But it appears that
the
Chilean revolutionaries
220
00:13:14,528 -> 00:13:18,267
not consider it
appropriate
release photos of Yves,
221
00:13:19,247 -> 00:13:23,280
while the
revolutionaries
Vietnamese mutual agreement with you,
222
00:13:23,780 -> 00:13:26,515
considered
appropriate
disclose your photos
223
00:13:27,100 -> 00:13:31,471
(In fact, release photos
of
its agreement with the Vietnamese cause).
224
00:13:32,677 -> 00:13:36,127
Also there is another
problem,
inevitable.
225
00:13:36,614 -> 00:13:39,387
We are two men who ran
Tout va
Bien and you're a girl.
226
00:13:40,016 -> 00:13:43,436
In Vietnam the question does
not
presents this way, but rather here.
227
00:13:43,795 -> 00:13:47,273
And surely, as a woman,
you
feel somewhat or very hurt
228
00:13:47,912 -> 00:13:51,268
because we criticize,
a little
or a lot,
229
00:13:51,693 -> 00:13:53,800
their way to intervene in this
photo.
230
00:13:54,266 -> 00:13:57,904
Hurt, because they are always,
eternally,
arranged buzzwords to attack the girls.
231
00:13:59,021 -> 00:14:00,144
And for no other reason,
232
00:14:00,728 -> 00:14:04,749
hope you will
answer
speakerphone our letter,
233
00:14:05,334 -> 00:14:08,984
As we read in two
or three
sites in the United States.
234
00:14:08,929 -> 00:14:12,048
But it is also true that
in
United States and Europe,
235
00:14:12,746 -> 00:14:15,094
things are still,
or has
become in this way.
236
00:14:15,865 -> 00:14:18,614
And you and we are in
even
resort
237
00:14:19,267 -> 00:14:22,106
that this picture can
serve as
revealing.
238
00:14:23,183 -> 00:14:24,823
We left there.
239
00:14:24,929 -> 00:14:27,127
You in the USA. Of us in
Paris.
240
00:14:27,591 -> 00:14:30,164
You in us
Paris. You in
Vietnam.
241
00:14:30,650 -> 00:14:35,239
Us in Paris looking at
you
Vietnam. Of us, we the USA.
242
00:14:35,350 -> 00:14:40,006
And everybody in this
room
movies, listening to us and watching you.
243
00:14:40,718 -> 00:14:42,204
We left it all.
244
00:14:42,708 -> 00:14:47,458
All this is organized from
a
somehow works in a certain way.
245
00:14:48,156 -> 00:14:50,755
We want to discuss it, from
there.
246
00:14:51,507 -> 00:14:55,150
From Tout va Bien, go
to
Vietnam, back to Tout va Bien,
247
00:14:55,655 -> 00:14:59,994
ie returning from Vietnam to
this
room where juts Tout va Bien
248
00:15:00,425 -> 00:15:04,456
and immediately return
to
home, and tomorrow back to the factory.
249
00:15:05,087 -> 00:15:06,895
To speak of all this,
250
00:15:07,191 -> 00:15:09,649
slip on this photo
the eyes of
people.
251
00:15:10,241 -> 00:15:11,932
Or rather, we make it slide
252
00:15:11,967 -> 00:15:14,773
because the North
Vietnamese
and you already had slipped.
253
00:15:15,317 -> 00:15:18,675
Put another way:
Ask, and ask
ourselves:
254
00:15:19,116 -> 00:15:22,513
we looked at this photo?
What
we had seen it?
255
00:15:22,990 -> 00:15:25,593
And for every
question
discovers another.
256
00:15:26,034 -> 00:15:31,518
For example: we look at this
photo? As
worked our gaze to look at this photo?
257
00:15:32,299 -> 00:15:35,932
And what makes it work
thus
and not otherwise?
258
00:15:36,346 -> 00:15:37,658
And another question:
259
00:15:38,144 -> 00:15:42,368
what makes our voice
interpreting
this look this way and not another?
260
00:15:43,043 -> 00:15:45,075
Tout va Bien presents
all
these questions,
261
00:15:45,882 -> 00:15:49,457
that can be summed up in the
great question
262
00:15:50,185 -> 00:15:53,791
the role of intellectuals
in
revolutionary struggles.
263
00:15:54,151 -> 00:15:59,224
Or better said, we started
to
see that this great and famous
264
00:15:59,259 -> 00:16:03,961
question of intellectual
locks
itself when proposing.
265
00:16:04,305 -> 00:16:06,298
And the other blocks.
266
00:16:06,660 -> 00:16:08,291
And finally,
267
00:16:08,488 -> 00:16:11,624
is no longer a
question
belongs to the field of revolution.
268
00:16:11,523 -> 00:16:13,820
The current question of the
revolution
269
00:16:14,433 -> 00:16:19,645
(Discover the purpose of
this
Photo therefore the purpose of the film)
270
00:16:20,210 -> 00:16:23,502
would, moreover:
how to change
the old world?
271
00:16:24,181 -> 00:16:27,483
Immediately we see that
the
old world of the Vietcong
272
00:16:27,977 -> 00:16:30,990
is not the same as the
an
intellectual western
273
00:16:31,590 -> 00:16:36,630
the old world is not a
Palestinian
the same as that of a black boy in the ghetto,
274
00:16:37,143 -> 00:16:42,406
the old world of a
worker
Renault is not even his girlfriend.
275
00:16:43,639 -> 00:16:46,997
We see that this photo
gives
therefore, a practical response
276
00:16:47,037 -> 00:16:49,381
this question of changing the old
world.
277
00:16:50,169 -> 00:16:55,330
Let us therefore examine
this
Photo / response, investigate.
278
00:16:56,150 -> 00:16:57,776
Some evidence extracted it.
279
00:16:58,252 -> 00:17:00,431
Let's analyze them
and
synthesize them.
280
00:17:00,994 -> 00:17:06,704
Let us explain the
organization
of the elements of this photo.
281
00:17:07,530 -> 00:17:13,649
Let us explain it with one hand
as if
were a core physical and photographic
282
00:17:14,218 -> 00:17:19,329
and secondly, as it were
a
cell-photographic society.
283
00:17:20,219 -> 00:17:25,657
Then try to relate
research
scientific and research more directly political
284
00:17:26,267 -> 00:17:28,468
("Where do ideas come
correct:
285
00:17:28,940 -> 00:17:34,258
the struggle for production, the
class struggle
and scientific experimentation "Mao).
286
00:17:34,869 -> 00:17:37,960
Conduct this
research,
interrogate this photo,
287
00:17:38,562 -> 00:17:43,798
what is it but to know how to
treat
was given the answer that the photo gives
288
00:17:44,436 -> 00:17:46,860
(Under the conditions of the
struggle in Vietnam).
289
00:17:47,518 -> 00:17:51,125
We will see if this response
is
entirely satisfactory for everyone
290
00:17:51,381 -> 00:17:52,595
(For whom? Against who?)
291
00:17:53,261 -> 00:17:57,123
and perhaps does not
begin
other questions arise,
292
00:17:57,158 -> 00:18:02,039
the same as that in order
better
or worse, Tout va Bien proposes.
293
00:18:02,980 -> 00:18:07,345
For example, we see that
in
Regarding an important part of the picture
294
00:18:07,784 -> 00:18:12,716
(Expression of actress
the
relation mouth / eyes)
295
00:18:13,093 -> 00:18:17,390
in Western Europe, in
our
understand, can not satisfy us
296
00:18:17,790 -> 00:18:23,667
the same way that their
authors,
who took or decided to take this photo
297
00:18:24,092 -> 00:18:25,612
(The collective North Vietnamese
/ Viet Cong,
298
00:18:26,548 -> 00:18:30,594
which is absolutely normal at
first
view, when the conditions are different;
299
00:18:31,146 -> 00:18:35,965
but you still need to
consider
attentive and so obstinately as they,
300
00:18:36,540 -> 00:18:38,750
which determines that the
"normal").
301
00:18:39,294 -> 00:18:41,077
Saying this does not equate
to
act simply as
302
00:18:41,600 -> 00:18:44,859
most communist parties
the
West and its support
303
00:18:45,328 -> 00:18:47,224
(Pope, the UN, the Red
Cross)
304
00:18:47,692 -> 00:18:50,767
saying simply: we help
Vietnam
to achieve peace.
305
00:18:51,458 -> 00:18:55,899
Unlike, say we have
said is
something much more precise
306
00:18:56,440 -> 00:19:00,653
eg: we help the alliance
North
Vietnam and South Vietnam
307
00:19:01,060 -> 00:19:02,980
achieve his peace.
308
00:19:03,375 -> 00:19:05,005
And more precisely:
309
00:19:05,203 -> 00:19:10,416
since to change their old
world,
Vietnam helps us to change our,
310
00:19:10,866 -> 00:19:13,407
how can we in reciprocity
help
you, really?
311
00:19:13,764 -> 00:19:16,412
And since the collective
North
Vietnam / Vietcong
312
00:19:16,899 -> 00:19:20,267
fight, criticizes and
transforms
Southeast Asia,
313
00:19:20,800 -> 00:19:24,942
how can we fight our place
to
change Europe and America?
314
00:19:25,514 -> 00:19:29,591
Of course, it is something
broader
to say: "Peace in Vietnam"
315
00:19:30,020 -> 00:19:35,471
and to conduct more
thorough
to create two or three Vietnams,
316
00:19:35,968 -> 00:19:40,538
and hence that Marx (in the
preface
the first edition of Capital)
317
00:19:40,948 -> 00:19:44,844
readers complain without
fear
and "minutiae" to overthrow
318
00:19:45,464 -> 00:19:49,382
"The king of hell and
release
the devils. "
319
00:19:50,429 -> 00:19:54,456
A few months before this
your
photo, Jane, and Vietnamese,
320
00:19:55,042 -> 00:20:00,004
and today before ourselves, each
can
do if you want, your own research.
321
00:20:00,310 -> 00:20:02,503
Soon, we will compare
freely
the results.
322
00:20:03,052 -> 00:20:08,983
We may take the floor
without
for it, get it from listening.
323
00:20:09,520 -> 00:20:11,539
In short, perhaps
for a brief
moment,
324
00:20:12,101 -> 00:20:15,655
possible to say the
least
stupidity on us and the revolution.
325
00:20:15,924 -> 00:20:17,295
Still more.
326
00:20:17,671 -> 00:20:19,877
So you do not
feel personally
attacked
327
00:20:20,411 -> 00:20:22,008
but not really able to avoid
it
328
00:20:22,494 -> 00:20:25,133
(Think the question
is
misrepresented in this way, and,
329
00:20:25,649 -> 00:20:29,103
the end of this letter also
we
have progressed in this regard,
330
00:20:29,538 -> 00:20:33,431
and for this we would need
very
you would respond directly,
331
00:20:33,842 -> 00:20:36,989
since it not only write
as
directors of Tout va Bien,
332
00:20:37,439 -> 00:20:40,249
but as readers of this
photo.
333
00:20:41,006 -> 00:20:44,119
And should recognize that it is
first
Since people who saw your picture
334
00:20:44,595 -> 00:20:47,898
he writes thus concerning
that
he saw his picture in a newspaper).
335
00:20:48,534 -> 00:20:52,224
To not feel
direct target, we
would say,
336
00:20:52,642 -> 00:20:57,534
who feels that the target is not
Jane,
but rather a function of Jane Fonda,
337
00:20:57,990 -> 00:21:01,814
talk to interrogate this
photo
you in the third person.
338
00:21:02,280 -> 00:21:04,641
Jane did not tell you this or
that,
339
00:21:05,058 -> 00:21:10,528
we say the actress or militant,
incidentally,
as does the text accompanying the photo.
340
00:21:10,851 -> 00:21:12,915
Here, then, which
are, in our
opinion,
341
00:21:13,453 -> 00:21:16,709
the main elements
(And the
elements of the elements)
342
00:21:17,414 -> 00:21:19,882
that play a role
important in
this photograph
343
00:21:20,537 -> 00:21:25,237
published in the French newspaper
L'Express
the beginning of August 1972.
344
00:21:25,807 -> 00:21:27,381
BASIC ELEMENTS
345
00:21:28,305 -> 00:21:31,906
This photo was taken at the
request
government of North Vietnam,
346
00:21:32,434 -> 00:21:33,999
as a representative at the
time
347
00:21:34,429 -> 00:21:39,415
the revolutionary alliance
between the peoples
South Vietnam and North Vietnam.
348
00:21:40,209 -> 00:21:46,371
This photo was taken by Joseph
Kraft,
set at the foot of the picture for a text
349
00:21:46,888 -> 00:21:50,254
that was not written by
anyone
participated in action taking the picture,
350
00:21:50,816 -> 00:21:52,744
but for those who disclose;
351
00:21:53,200 -> 00:21:56,847
ie, by a text written by
one
or more editors of L'Express,
352
00:21:57,408 -> 00:22:02,449
without consultation with the
North Vietnamese delegation
in France (checked it).
353
00:22:03,107 -> 00:22:05,132
This text says that it is
354
00:22:05,167 -> 00:22:08,232
one of the most known
and
moderate American journalists.
355
00:22:08,524 -> 00:22:09,873
The text says, also
356
00:22:10,245 -> 00:22:13,163
that the actress is a
militant
passionate for peace in Vietnam.
357
00:22:14,153 -> 00:22:17,761
But the text does not speak
of
Vietnamese who appear in the photograph.
358
00:22:18,333 -> 00:22:20,494
For example, the text says:
359
00:22:20,905 -> 00:22:23,528
Vietnamese is not seen in the
background
360
00:22:23,902 -> 00:22:27,844
Vietnam is one of the
least
known and less moderate.
361
00:22:28,451 -> 00:22:32,091
This photo, like all
photo, is
physically changes.
362
00:22:32,638 -> 00:22:35,533
And the mouth speaks foot
photo.
363
00:22:36,536 -> 00:22:39,895
This photo does not
walk
stresses, makes telling
364
00:22:40,212 -> 00:22:43,539
(Because the speech and
picture
says things in his own way)
365
00:22:43,977 -> 00:22:49,371
the militant ranks first
TVs
and Vietnam last.
366
00:22:50,019 -> 00:22:54,108
Foot says: "Jane Fonda
asks
some inhabitants of Hanoi ".
367
00:22:54,867 -> 00:22:57,607
But the newspaper does not
publish
the questions asked,
368
00:22:57,946 -> 00:23:02,410
nor the answers given by
representatives
Vietnamese people in this photo.
369
00:23:03,183 -> 00:23:06,480
It can be seen that
that foot,
it does not describe
370
00:23:06,912 -> 00:23:10,834
Jane Fonda asks,
and yes, Jane
Fonda hear.
371
00:23:11,816 -> 00:23:17,781
And you might not have
heard
more than 1/250 sec,
372
00:23:18,479 -> 00:23:24,869
but this is 1/250
that
registered and published.
373
00:23:25,364 -> 00:23:29,019
Undoubtedly, in speaking
thus,
foot simply means
374
00:23:29,586 -> 00:23:32,738
which is a snapshot
taken
during the course of a discussion
375
00:23:33,212 -> 00:23:36,941
in which the actress / activist
questioned,
actually, some inhabitants of Hanoi
376
00:23:37,583 -> 00:23:42,736
and therefore should not be
given
importance to this detail mouth shut.
377
00:23:43,470 -> 00:23:45,384
But we shall see later,
378
00:23:45,719 -> 00:23:49,870
it is not a coincidence,
or
rather, it is a random,
379
00:23:50,534 -> 00:23:54,665
this act is immediately exploited
in
within the capitalist need,
380
00:23:55,393 -> 00:23:58,324
the need for capital
to unmask
the real
381
00:23:58,820 -> 00:24:01,927
at the same time and
that
unmasks, or
382
00:24:02,230 -> 00:24:05,556
the nessecidade to "trick" the
consumer
on the merchandise.
383
00:24:07,092 -> 00:24:11,378
BASIC ELEMENTS LESS
384
00:24:12,046 -> 00:24:14,938
The position of the camera
is
of the type called 'counter-bitten. "
385
00:24:15,418 -> 00:24:21,475
At present and in
history
cinema is not a position innocent
386
00:24:22,070 -> 00:24:26,243
She had been very
defined
technical and socially
387
00:24:26,855 -> 00:24:28,952
by Orson Welles in
his early
films.
388
00:24:29,871 -> 00:24:33,389
The choice of framework
Nor is
innocent or neutral:
389
00:24:33,990 -> 00:24:40,747
fits the actress looking
and
not what the actress looks.
390
00:24:41,683 -> 00:24:44,975
Fits the actress therefore
as
if the star.
391
00:24:45,807 -> 00:24:49,954
And this because, really, the
actress is
one starlet internationally known.
392
00:24:50,574 -> 00:24:54,457
On the one hand, falls within
the
militating starlet, and secondly,
393
00:24:55,291 -> 00:24:58,766
in the same movement fits
also
militant as showgirl.
394
00:24:59,484 -> 00:25:01,173
What is not the same thing.
395
00:25:01,960 -> 00:25:05,019
Or better, which may be
the
same thing in Vietnam
396
00:25:05,636 -> 00:25:07,973
but not in Europe
or the
United States.
397
00:25:08,925 -> 00:25:13,611
On the next page does not
appear
the militant looked in this photo,
398
00:25:14,256 -> 00:25:16,396
but what he saw in
other
times.
399
00:25:17,035 -> 00:25:20,373
In our opinion, it is the
same
chain of images
400
00:25:20,850 -> 00:25:27,041
of the same type as those
transmitted by
television stations and newspapers in the "free" world.
401
00:25:27,886 -> 00:25:30,598
Images like those
seen
hundreds of thousands of times
402
00:25:31,086 -> 00:25:32,840
(Often as pumps)
403
00:25:33,517 -> 00:25:35,139
and change nothing,
404
00:25:35,571 -> 00:25:39,025
except among those who struggle
to organize
this chain of images in a certain way,
405
00:25:39,421 -> 00:25:40,444
your way.
406
00:25:41,217 -> 00:25:43,108
(7 points of g.r.t.)
407
00:25:43,602 -> 00:25:47,891
In fact, if this story
Dupont
was signed or Smith,
408
00:25:48,478 -> 00:25:52,321
the newspapers themselves would
reject,
for being too banal.
409
00:25:52,781 -> 00:25:54,694
Actually, we
admit
410
00:25:55,232 -> 00:25:57,739
it should be a trivial
thing,
411
00:25:58,257 -> 00:26:01,557
for boys of a community
farm
on the outskirts of Hanoi,
412
00:26:02,087 -> 00:26:04,420
rebuild their school,
say for
the twentieth time,
413
00:26:05,020 -> 00:26:08,067
after being destroyed
by
Phantom Doctor Kissinger.
414
00:26:08,513 -> 00:26:12,977
But, of course, no one will
speak
this extraordinary banality,
415
00:26:13,374 -> 00:26:17,333
nor militant starlet,
nor
L'Express.
416
00:26:18,042 -> 00:26:23,101
Nor will talk about what may have
been
said the American actress and her sisters Vietnamese
417
00:26:23,522 -> 00:26:27,675
it can be seen that
so, on the
next page.
418
00:26:28,263 -> 00:26:31,208
The American actress asked
as
it plays in Vietnam
419
00:26:31,630 -> 00:26:34,863
or as someone who plays in
Hollywood
can pose when in Hanoi
420
00:26:35,204 -> 00:26:37,156
where back to Hollywood.
421
00:26:37,651 -> 00:26:41,049
If L'Express does not speak for
all,
this is, in our opinion,
422
00:26:41,719 -> 00:26:44,489
that neither the American
actress
says anything about it.
423
00:26:44,894 -> 00:26:49,147
It is true that militant
spoke
of pumps and dikes.
424
00:26:49,777 -> 00:26:53,299
But one should not forget
that
militant is also an actress,
425
00:26:53,765 -> 00:26:59,136
that is, for example,
neither
Russell Tribunal nor Ramsey Clarke.
426
00:26:59,980 -> 00:27:03,060
And, in our opinion, one should
take
into account that, by being an actress,
427
00:27:03,552 -> 00:27:06,423
and White House officials
will
have no difficulty,
428
00:27:06,800 -> 00:27:08,211
if anyone tries to stop
them,
429
00:27:08,810 -> 00:27:13,709
to say that the actress was
unconsciously
manipulated by enemy hands.
430
00:27:14,239 -> 00:27:18,978
and recites a text memory.
431
00:27:19,575 -> 00:27:21,992
Such criticism might
ruin
easily
432
00:27:22,588 -> 00:27:25,671
all the efforts of actress and
activist.
433
00:27:25,825 -> 00:27:32,931
And one should understand, why
she continues
vulnerable to this kind of fact,
434
00:27:33,510 -> 00:27:37,227
We believe that in this case,
due to which
the actress did not speak militant dykes
435
00:27:37,771 -> 00:27:44,630
starting from an example, such an
actress
Vietnamese that the first notice,
436
00:27:43,557 -> 00:27:46,216
and then
437
00:27:46,937 -> 00:27:51,618
gives a play in a
village
threatened by levees broke.
438
00:27:53,280 -> 00:27:58,961
In this regard we believe
that
the militant leave the actress
439
00:28:00,214 -> 00:28:03,909
(And it's what they do at their
level,
the Vietnamese who use it)
440
00:28:04,450 -> 00:28:06,786
could begin to represent
its
role historically
441
00:28:07,232 -> 00:28:10,068
differently to Hollywood.
442
00:28:10,485 -> 00:28:13,495
Maybe the Vietnamese have
not
directly require it yet.
443
00:28:14,105 -> 00:28:15,890
but probably, yes
Americans,
444
00:28:16,478 -> 00:28:18,927
and therefore, indirectly,
the
Vietnamese
445
00:28:20,112 -> 00:28:23,019
(Here we find the
need
back.
446
00:28:23,454 -> 00:28:26,714
The Vietnamese are forced
to
stroll by the U.S.).
447
00:28:27,287 -> 00:28:30,608
In this photo, this reflection of
reality
448
00:28:31,078 -> 00:28:35,431
two people are
photographed
front, the other back.
449
00:28:35,988 -> 00:28:39,663
Of two people, one is
clear,
the other out of focus,
450
00:28:40,212 -> 00:28:46,426
in the photo, the famous American
is sharp
and the Vietnamese anonymous smoky.
451
00:28:47,083 -> 00:28:51,780
Actually, the left
American is
hazy,
452
00:28:52,351 -> 00:28:55,623
left
Vietnamese
extraordinarily clear.
453
00:28:56,382 -> 00:29:01,457
But also in reality, the American
right
remains remarkably sharp,
454
00:29:01,975 -> 00:29:07,048
while the right Vietnamese,
the
"Vietnamization", is increasingly erased.
455
00:29:07,515 -> 00:29:10,542
What to think, now,
the
"Measure" of Joseph Kraft,
456
00:29:11,138 -> 00:29:13,180
which evaluated all
contradictions
457
00:29:13,608 -> 00:29:17,878
regulated and, therefore,
the
diaphragm and the distance?
458
00:29:18,626 -> 00:29:23,445
Everything was measured, as was
seen
the purpose of the framework,
459
00:29:23,808 -> 00:29:27,743
with a certain
purpose
emphasize the star militating
460
00:29:28,194 -> 00:29:33,001
and thus obtain a certain
product,
a certain idea / commodity
461
00:29:33,463 -> 00:29:36,544
and this, again for some
purpose.
462
00:29:36,866 -> 00:29:40,005
Recall, the production of this
product
463
00:29:40,684 -> 00:29:42,775
is directly controlled
by the
government of North Vietnam.
464
00:29:43,272 -> 00:29:46,519
But its diffusion out
Vietnam
is not.
465
00:29:46,978 -> 00:29:50,375
When yes, very indirectly
466
00:29:50,796 -> 00:29:52,271
(Not to mention the
feedback).
467
00:29:52,913 -> 00:29:56,172
This diffusion is
controlled
by chain TVs
468
00:29:56,894 -> 00:29:58,465
newspapers and the "free"
world.
469
00:29:59,129 -> 00:30:03,377
There is therefore a part of the
movement
we need a means of communication,
470
00:30:04,080 -> 00:30:06,514
can not be made by
who planned
the movement.
471
00:30:06,981 -> 00:30:12,042
What moves? And that
departure
that game, is it?
472
00:30:12,531 -> 00:30:14,818
And played by whom?
For who?
Against who?
473
00:30:15,546 -> 00:30:19,280
Say simply, now
(Back to this
later)
474
00:30:19,843 -> 00:30:23,962
that examined the
clear
relationship / off
475
00:30:24,499 -> 00:30:30,097
expressed by the two
faces,
realized something extraordinary:
476
00:30:30,558 -> 00:30:36,650
smoky face is the clearest
and
the face is the most crisp smoky.
477
00:30:37,433 -> 00:30:39,371
The Vietnamese can
afford to
be smoky,
478
00:30:40,329 -> 00:30:44,392
because there is much that
in
fact, it is clear.
479
00:30:45,093 -> 00:30:47,817
The U.S. is bound to be
sharp
480
00:30:48,415 -> 00:30:53,922
(And is the smoky Vietnamese
forces who
this, in a very clear).
481
00:30:54,652 -> 00:30:59,233
The U.S. is bound to
emphasize
clearly its real esfumação.
482
00:30:59,754 -> 00:31:02,504
But none of that was mentioned in
the text.
483
00:31:03,087 -> 00:31:08,649
This photo repeats another
picture of actress
484
00:31:09,103 -> 00:31:11,374
which appeared on the cover
of
same number of L'Express.
485
00:31:12,112 -> 00:31:15,152
The composition of this
cover
is very eloquent,
486
00:31:15,625 -> 00:31:20,767
if we work in a view
Photo may
cover as much as discover.
487
00:31:21,195 -> 00:31:24,472
A photograph imposes
silence
while speaking.
488
00:31:25,028 -> 00:31:26,160
In our view,
489
00:31:26,783 -> 00:31:31,118
is one of the technical
bases
double aspect of Jekyll and Hyde,
490
00:31:31,396 -> 00:31:32,435
principles and interests,
491
00:31:32,470 -> 00:31:38,132
it takes the information /
deformation when
is transmitted through images / sounds
492
00:31:39,085 -> 00:31:45,486
in our time, the decline
of
imperialism and the general trend towards revolution.
493
00:31:45,869 -> 00:31:47,770
The American Left
says
often
494
00:31:48,300 -> 00:31:51,151
that tragedy is not
in
Vietnam, but in the U.S..
495
00:31:52,096 -> 00:31:57,732
The expression on the face of
this militant
picture is really an expression of tragedy.
496
00:31:58,498 -> 00:32:02,884
However, a social tragedy and
technically
formed by their origins, namely
497
00:32:03,324 -> 00:32:07,417
formed / deformed by the
school
Hollywood show-biz stanislawskiano.
498
00:32:07,923 -> 00:32:12,282
The expression of the militant
was
same in Tout va Bien, reel 3,
499
00:32:12,794 -> 00:32:18,122
when, actress, heard one
extra
sing a text of Lotta Continua.
500
00:32:18,810 -> 00:32:21,574
This type of expression
also
when the actress was in Kiute,
501
00:32:22,057 -> 00:32:24,606
when looked at with
air
compassionate and tragic his friend,
502
00:32:25,227 -> 00:32:28,873
a policeman interpreted
Donald
Sutherland,
503
00:32:29,001 -> 00:32:31,142
and decided to spend the night
with him.
504
00:32:31,770 -> 00:32:36,001
On the other hand, it was
already
kind of expression that Henry Fonda
505
00:32:36,735 -> 00:32:39,665
used in the 40 to
interpret
the workers exploited
506
00:32:40,484 -> 00:32:43,252
The Grapes of Wrath,
the
Future Fascist Steinbeck.
507
00:32:43,793 -> 00:32:48,822
And further in the paternal
history of
actress within the history of cinema,
508
00:32:49,155 -> 00:32:51,925
so too is the expression
that
Henry Fonda had used
509
00:32:52,509 -> 00:32:56,483
to throw deep and tragic
looks
blacks in Young Mr. Lincoln,
510
00:32:56,518 -> 00:33:01,173
the future admiral
honor of
the Navy, John Ford.
511
00:33:01,748 -> 00:33:04,727
Still further, we found
this
expression in the opposite camp,
512
00:33:05,300 -> 00:33:08,764
when John Wayne pities
the
ravages of the Vietnam War
513
00:33:09,522 -> 00:33:11,555
in the Green Berets.
514
00:33:12,023 -> 00:33:13,051
In our opinion,
515
00:33:13,215 -> 00:33:16,693
this term has been
borrowed
(Principle and interest)
516
00:33:17,217 -> 00:33:20,178
the mask exchanger
Roosevelt's
New Deal.
517
00:33:20,643 -> 00:33:22,918
In fact it is a
expression of
speech,
518
00:33:23,680 -> 00:33:26,077
and appeared for a
coincidence
required
519
00:33:26,560 -> 00:33:30,030
at birth
economic
talkies.
520
00:33:30,728 -> 00:33:34,771
It is an expression that speaks,
but
speaks only to say how much we know
521
00:33:35,167 -> 00:33:36,860
(About the Wall Street
Crash,
eg)
522
00:33:37,567 -> 00:33:40,122
but you will not say anything
more.
523
00:33:40,839 -> 00:33:46,455
We believe that this is why
the
expression Rooseveltian
524
00:33:46,455 -> 00:33:50,008
the expressions differ
technically
that preceded it in the history of cinema,
525
00:33:50,772 -> 00:33:52,888
expressions of the
great
silent film stars,
526
00:33:53,413 -> 00:33:56,584
Lilian Gish, Rudolph
Valentino,
Falconetti etc.
527
00:33:57,235 -> 00:33:58,652
Just make the experience
528
00:33:58,652 -> 00:34:02,796
and make all these faces
look
a photo of atrocities in Vietnam:
529
00:34:03,367 -> 00:34:05,651
will have no
same
expression.
530
00:34:06,367 -> 00:34:09,445
Although all of them have
the
look the same expression
531
00:34:34,486 -> 00:34:38,976
?
532
00:34:39,650 -> 00:34:45,419
Because before the talkies,
film
change had a technical basis materialistic.
533
00:34:46,821 -> 00:34:49,330
The actor said: I'm shot
534
00:34:50,763 -> 00:34:52,401
therefore I think
535
00:34:52,989 -> 00:34:55,907
(At least I think I'm shot)
536
00:34:57,091 -> 00:34:59,181
I think because I am.
537
00:34:59,932 -> 00:35:03,338
After the spoken
there was a
New Deal
538
00:35:03,876 -> 00:35:07,374
filmed between matter (the
actor)
and thought.
539
00:35:08,643 -> 00:35:09,912
The actor began to say:
540
00:35:10,705 -> 00:35:13,923
I think (I'm an actor)
541
00:35:14,364 -> 00:35:17,535
therefore I am (filmed).
542
00:35:18,014 -> 00:35:19,769
Because I am.
543
00:35:20,240 -> 00:35:22,413
I think, therefore I am.
544
00:35:22,887 -> 00:35:27,163
As we have seen in this
experiment
that deepens the Kulechov,
545
00:35:27,865 -> 00:35:29,862
before the expression of the New
Deal,
546
00:35:30,529 -> 00:35:35,117
each actor of the silent
era
had its own expression
547
00:35:35,724 -> 00:35:39,740
and silent films had
true
grassroots.
548
00:35:40,348 -> 00:35:44,976
In contrast, when the
film
speaking as the New Deal,
549
00:35:45,398 -> 00:35:48,317
each actor has put the
say the
same thing.
550
00:35:49,023 -> 00:35:50,611
Can do it again
the same
experiment
551
00:35:51,027 -> 00:35:54,732
any movie starlet,
sport or
politics
552
00:35:56,663 -> 00:36:08,182
I think, therefore I am
553
00:36:08,945 -> 00:36:11,876
This expression which says a
lot,
554
00:36:12,504 -> 00:36:16,156
This expression of
who knows
very
555
00:36:16,744 -> 00:36:20,772
but that does not say neither
more nor less
it is therefore not an expression ...
556
00:36:21,997 -> 00:36:27,519
an expression that does not help
the reader to see
clearer in their obscure personal problems
557
00:36:27,891 -> 00:36:30,897
(See how Vietnam can
enlighten
them, for example).
558
00:36:31,649 -> 00:36:33,876
Why so
settle up and
say:
559
00:36:34,546 -> 00:36:36,806
is already something, there
is always something that sticks
560
00:36:37,658 -> 00:36:40,330
(All of the union speech
Tout
va Bien, on reel 3).
561
00:36:43,815 -> 00:36:47,825
And why, if an actress is not yet
able
represent differently
562
00:36:48,633 -> 00:36:56,041
(And we still are not able to
help her
correctly represent differently)
563
00:36:56,041 -> 00:36:58,531
why should the North
Vietnamese
satisfied in this field?
564
00:36:58,443 -> 00:37:01,755
Our opinion is that we
risk
they do more harm than good,
565
00:37:02,253 -> 00:37:05,173
by fabricating a
good
awareness so cheap
566
00:37:05,634 -> 00:37:08,663
(Said in scientific terms:
567
00:37:09,080 -> 00:37:11,494
movement from the "negative
entropy"
to information not costly).
568
00:37:11,876 -> 00:37:15,721
After all, this
expression
also speaks to us,
569
00:37:16,453 -> 00:37:19,533
we make the effort to
look at
it the second time.
570
00:37:20,112 -> 00:37:23,880
That look and that mouth
do
not tell us walk,
571
00:37:24,287 -> 00:37:27,901
are emptied of meaning,
572
00:37:28,518 -> 00:37:32,235
like the boys before the
Czechs
all-powerful Russian tanks
573
00:37:32,713 -> 00:37:35,926
or large ventrezinhos
of
Biafra and Bangladesh
574
00:37:36,450 -> 00:37:40,811
or feet of the Palestinians in
the mud
carefully maintained by U.N.W.R.A.
575
00:37:40,607 -> 00:37:48,741
Empty of meaning, careful
capital
knows that wrap the slopes
576
00:37:49,397 -> 00:37:52,862
who can make the filling with the
sense
empty the actual look of their future enemies
577
00:37:53,295 -> 00:37:56,948
already present and therefore
must "absent"
Do not look anywhere.
578
00:37:59,510 -> 00:38:02,074
How to fight against this state
of affairs?
579
00:38:02,763 -> 00:38:05,863
Do not stop with the
publication
these and the photo in question
580
00:38:06,200 -> 00:38:09,013
(Immediately, they should be
suppressed to
all the television and radio,
581
00:38:09,521 -> 00:38:15,196
in almost all countries of the
world,
as well as all kinds of newspapers,
582
00:38:15,703 -> 00:38:17,402
what is a utopia).
583
00:38:17,972 -> 00:38:21,227
No.
But can be published
otherwise.
584
00:38:21,986 -> 00:38:24,334
And this is "another way" that
starlets,
585
00:38:24,761 -> 00:38:29,800
due to its weight and cultural
facilities,
have a role to play.
586
00:38:30,212 -> 00:38:32,039
An overwhelming role, as they
say.
587
00:38:32,759 -> 00:38:36,760
And the real tragedy is that they
do not know
how to interpret this amazing role.
588
00:38:37,595 -> 00:38:39,624
How do we learn to represent
you?
589
00:38:40,339 -> 00:38:43,466
Still have many questions
in
Europe and the United States
590
00:38:44,144 -> 00:38:46,512
before I could answer with
clarity.
591
00:38:46,651 -> 00:38:48,634
We propose some
them in Tout
va Bien
592
00:38:49,072 -> 00:38:52,230
(As Marx, in his
time,
starting from the German Ideology
593
00:38:52,669 -> 00:38:56,807
came to pose the question
of
Poverty of Philosophy against Proudhon,
594
00:38:57,364 -> 00:39:00,422
he knew only philosophize
on
poverty).
595
00:39:01,317 -> 00:39:04,239
If we look closely at the North
Vietnamese
located behind the American actress
596
00:39:04,584 -> 00:39:09,429
realize then that his
face
expressed something very different
597
00:39:09,857 -> 00:39:12,298
of the militant American.
598
00:39:12,519 -> 00:39:14,980
By not more than
see what
looks
599
00:39:15,626 -> 00:39:20,274
realize that face
indicates
what we face every day:
600
00:39:20,732 -> 00:39:26,066
pumps, disembowelled women and
dykes,
601
00:39:26,519 -> 00:39:32,305
the house had to be rebuilt
by
umpteenth time, or the hospital, the lesson to learn
602
00:39:32,806 -> 00:39:39,200
(Lenin said first lesson:
learning, second
Lesson: learn, third lesson: learn).
603
00:39:40,031 -> 00:39:45,278
And that face immediate reference
to the fight
everyday is possible by a simple fact:
604
00:39:45,744 -> 00:39:49,976
there is only one face of
revolutionary
but the face of a Vietnamese revolutionary.
605
00:39:50,890 -> 00:39:53,001
A great past struggles
is
crudely inscribed,
606
00:39:53,424 -> 00:39:57,246
long, this face, by
imperialism
French, Japanese and American.
607
00:39:57,879 -> 00:40:00,990
Actually, that face is
recognized,
long,
608
00:40:01,421 -> 00:40:06,253
as the face of revolution around
the world,
even by his enemies.
609
00:40:07,160 -> 00:40:08,855
Do not be afraid of the
words:
610
00:40:09,214 -> 00:40:15,122
is a face that has gained
independence
his communication code.
611
00:40:15,769 -> 00:40:18,254
Any revolutionary face
today,
612
00:40:18,670 -> 00:40:21,265
could not transmit so
immediately
as his, the daily struggle.
613
00:40:21,794 -> 00:40:24,290
Simply because no
revolution,
except the Chinese,
614
00:40:24,855 -> 00:40:28,975
already made the long
march
Vietnamese revolution.
615
00:40:29,822 -> 00:40:30,927
Let the experience.
616
00:40:31,724 -> 00:40:33,504
This black ...
617
00:40:34,016 -> 00:40:38,165
we can not tell
immediately
Why Fight, where and how:
618
00:40:38,577 -> 00:40:41,728
in Detroit, Chrysler
factories
619
00:40:42,130 -> 00:40:45,546
for a better salary and
work
less brutalizing?
620
00:40:45,889 -> 00:40:48,763
In Johannesburg, the right
to
Entry into a cinema
621
00:40:49,209 -> 00:40:52,142
where whites exhibit
white
movies?
622
00:40:52,899 -> 00:40:53,859
And this worker?
623
00:40:54,302 -> 00:40:56,043
And this European?
624
00:40:56,710 -> 00:40:57,855
And this Arabic?
625
00:40:58,864 -> 00:41:00,405
And this young radical?
626
00:41:00,458 -> 00:41:02,368
Tout va Bien also
answer this
question,
627
00:41:02,940 -> 00:41:07,043
We must have the courage to say
that
we have nothing to say on the faces,
628
00:41:07,574 -> 00:41:12,140
unless there is a legend that in
the photo
talk nonsense, you repeat yourself,
629
00:41:12,837 -> 00:41:16,347
and we should have the courage to
say that
courage is only a confession of weakness:
630
00:41:16,774 -> 00:41:18,684
are lost,
we have nothing to
say.
631
00:41:19,114 -> 00:41:23,961
Unlike before that face
Vietnamese
not need caption:
632
00:41:24,777 -> 00:41:28,312
around the world will say, is a
Vietnamese
633
00:41:28,783 -> 00:41:32,390
and the Vietnamese struggle
to
expel the Americans from Asia.
634
00:41:32,743 -> 00:41:38,967
Rather, isolemos face
the
American actress.
635
00:41:39,772 -> 00:41:42,526
We see then that
conveys
nothing,
636
00:41:43,032 -> 00:41:45,373
or rather not transmit
nothing
more than himself,
637
00:41:46,222 -> 00:41:47,975
one that does not itself
is
nowhere,
638
00:41:48,401 -> 00:41:53,434
lost in the infinite immensity of
tenderness
eternal a Pietà by Michelangelo.
639
00:41:54,186 -> 00:41:57,114
Face of woman who does
not
transmits any woman
640
00:41:57,854 -> 00:42:00,331
('s Face was a
Vietnamese
function that transmits real
641
00:42:01,187 -> 00:42:02,744
while the face of American
642
00:42:03,263 -> 00:42:05,469
is a function that does not
transmit
more than one function).
643
00:42:06,014 -> 00:42:09,145
Face that could be a
hippie
needed drug,
644
00:42:09,794 -> 00:42:11,937
that of a student,
Eugene,
Oregon
645
00:42:12,613 -> 00:42:17,588
when your favorite Préfontaine,
just
losing the Olympic 5000 meters,
646
00:42:18,138 -> 00:42:21,750
and a passionate
abandoned by
her love,
647
00:42:22,356 -> 00:42:24,151
and also an activist in
Vietnam.
648
00:42:24,501 -> 00:42:25,667
Is it too.
649
00:42:26,062 -> 00:42:29,190
There is too much information in
a
time / space too small.
650
00:42:30,050 -> 00:42:33,551
At the same time, we are certain
that
is a militant thinking in Vietnam
651
00:42:34,077 -> 00:42:35,232
and uncertain of the whole,
652
00:42:35,570 -> 00:42:39,706
because it could be considering
any
thing, as we have proof.
653
00:42:40,440 -> 00:42:42,894
So we end
asking
ourselves:
654
00:42:43,344 -> 00:42:45,578
as a picture of a militant (or
actress)
655
00:42:46,191 -> 00:42:48,588
not thinking necessarily
in
Vietnam,
656
00:42:49,012 -> 00:42:53,038
is published in the very
place
of an actress (or militant)
657
00:42:53,466 -> 00:42:55,784
thinking necessarily
in
Vietnam?
658
00:42:56,832 -> 00:43:01,068
Because the reality of
this
Photo is here:
659
00:43:01,616 -> 00:43:05,429
a makeup star discovery
by
their own lack of makeup.
660
00:43:06,115 -> 00:43:08,279
L'Express but does not say
so
661
00:43:08,919 -> 00:43:12,647
because it would be a start
of
revolution in journalism.
662
00:43:13,401 -> 00:43:17,601
It would mean a beginning of
revolution,
in Europe or the United States, which
663
00:43:17,926 -> 00:43:21,641
currently, it is not possible to
draw
a photo of someone thinking something
664
00:43:22,682 -> 00:43:28,361
(Vietnam, Ford factory, the
beach, etc.).
665
00:43:29,597 -> 00:43:33,647
They will say that we were wrong
to
isolate a part of the photo
666
00:43:34,137 -> 00:43:36,786
when he is not
is published
alone.
667
00:43:37,672 -> 00:43:39,633
It's a bad argument
668
00:43:40,429 -> 00:43:42,180
To isolate the exact
show
that, indeed,
669
00:43:42,633 -> 00:43:47,698
I was alone and that
tragedy
lies in that solitude.
670
00:43:48,534 -> 00:43:51,718
Because if we
isolate this
face
671
00:43:52,341 -> 00:43:55,472
so he gets to do it,
672
00:43:56,353 -> 00:44:01,563
unlike face Vietnamese
which
remains attached to its environment
673
00:44:02,079 -> 00:44:03,985
even try
observe it as
yourself.
674
00:44:04,743 -> 00:44:07,161
It is definitely
a
counter-plan.
675
00:44:07,679 -> 00:44:11,934
Conversely, in this picture,
there
possibility of a counter plan.
676
00:44:12,176 -> 00:44:13,882
No counter-plan.
677
00:44:14,604 -> 00:44:19,948
This expression used by
actress
France is known for a long time.
678
00:44:20,436 -> 00:44:23,402
It is the model
operation
Cartesian thought:
679
00:44:23,932 -> 00:44:25,607
I think, therefore I am,
680
00:44:26,400 -> 00:44:30,131
the same that inspired
Rodin
and his statue "The Thinker".
681
00:44:30,774 -> 00:44:34,545
More would wander where the
famous statue
Whenever there is a catastrophe
682
00:44:35,245 -> 00:44:37,604
in order to soften the
pasta.
683
00:44:38,119 -> 00:44:40,779
Fraud art capitalist
humanism
capitalist
684
00:44:41,231 -> 00:44:42,402
then burst.
685
00:44:42,988 -> 00:44:45,999
We understand that a
starlet
can not think,
686
00:44:46,422 -> 00:44:51,471
because it is a social
function:
is thought, and makes you think
687
00:44:52,034 -> 00:44:56,655
(Witness the performances of
large
thinkers like Marlon Brando
688
00:44:57,249 -> 00:44:59,319
or other
sons of
bitches,
689
00:44:59,354 -> 00:45:02,190
to understand why the capital
needs
support this kind of an art,
690
00:45:02,822 -> 00:45:06,722
to enhance the
philosophy
idealistic in its fight
691
00:45:09,234 -> 00:45:14,648
against the materialist
philosophy of Marx, Engels, Lenin
and Mao representing their people in the
field).
692
00:45:14,842 -> 00:45:20,228
We just say isolemos,
the
Otherwise, the face of American actress.
693
00:45:20,995 -> 00:45:24,498
Isolemos now, the
words
"Unlike" in this sentence
694
00:45:25,020 -> 00:45:35,356
(Isolate, divide: Division
revolutionary, Lenin said,
fighting against the capitalist division of
labor).
695
00:45:36,001 -> 00:45:37,598
We see then that the
figure
the militant American
696
00:45:38,201 -> 00:45:40,354
and the North Vietnamese
are
contrary.
697
00:45:41,270 -> 00:45:44,664
And what really happens
in
imaginary reality that image
698
00:45:45,279 -> 00:45:47,548
is, in our opinion, the
fight
these contraries.
699
00:45:48,274 -> 00:45:52,909
The American eye settles
in
read the word horror in Vietnam.
700
00:45:53,535 -> 00:45:57,584
The Vietnamese eye sees
reality
American in all its horror.
701
00:45:58,075 -> 00:46:02,534
In this scene, the Vietnamese
appears
in the background, as an extra,
702
00:46:02,960 -> 00:46:06,902
and behind it, we can feel
the
overwhelming power of
703
00:46:06,937 -> 00:46:11,018
machine assembled by the
collective
North Vietnam / Vietcong.
704
00:46:12,146 -> 00:46:17,310
Behind figuring this starlet is
also
the vile and terrible capitalist machine,
705
00:46:17,966 -> 00:46:21,223
full of an expression
cynically
humble and confusion into clarity
706
00:46:22,440 -> 00:46:26,363
(As Lelouch says
in
L'aventure, c'est l'aventure)
707
00:46:27,031 -> 00:46:32,002
In short, the struggle between
what
still is and what is already
708
00:46:32,362 -> 00:46:34,066
between the old and the
new.
709
00:46:35,447 -> 00:46:38,697
The struggle is not limited
to
act of taking this photograph,
710
00:46:39,648 -> 00:46:42,927
that is perpetuated by the
way
as the photo was published,
711
00:46:43,432 -> 00:46:47,035
and because of how people who are
in
cinema are looking at this photo
712
00:46:47,459 -> 00:46:48,835
right now.
713
00:46:49,459 -> 00:46:54,332
Fight between
process
production and the diffusion process,
714
00:46:54,973 -> 00:46:59,232
according to who runs over and
over,
capital or the revolution.
715
00:47:00,119 -> 00:47:02,144
OTHER ELEMENTS OF ELEMENTS
716
00:47:03,686 -> 00:47:07,179
At the risk of making disclose
this photo,
the North Vietnamese are right.
717
00:47:07,749 -> 00:47:10,580
Or rather, have their
reasons.
718
00:47:11,110 -> 00:47:13,347
This photo represents the
role
small screw
719
00:47:13,735 -> 00:47:18,697
in the engine development
its
current military-diplomatic offensive.
720
00:47:21,208 -> 00:47:25,151
This photo is one of thousands
given by
Vietnamese people with their blood,
721
00:47:25,595 -> 00:47:27,484
to replicate the
crimes
American war.
722
00:47:28,722 -> 00:47:33,450
Note in passing, Jane,
that
collective Vietcong / North Vietnamese
723
00:47:33,893 -> 00:47:36,585
rarely publishes atrocities
in
their documents,
724
00:47:37,015 -> 00:47:38,710
publish though, yes,
often
fighting.
725
00:47:39,233 -> 00:47:43,610
To give this replica here
726
00:47:43,900 -> 00:47:48,930
represented here by the Committee
of
friendship with the American people,
727
00:47:49,409 -> 00:47:51,868
invited the actress Jane
Fonda.
728
00:47:52,265 -> 00:47:54,633
It is therefore
to play a
role.
729
00:47:55,514 -> 00:47:57,820
Unlike many
other
Americans,
730
00:47:58,453 -> 00:48:01,930
American actress accepted
this
paper and therefore has moved.
731
00:48:02,572 -> 00:48:05,672
Hanoi was to put the
service
of the Vietnamese revolution.
732
00:48:06,286 -> 00:48:11,068
Now, we can ask
ourselves:
arises as a service?
733
00:48:11,475 -> 00:48:13,867
Or more accurately:
how to
interpret this role?
734
00:48:14,670 -> 00:48:16,670
The American actress in action in
this photo
735
00:48:17,093 -> 00:48:20,048
serves the Vietnamese people
in
their struggle for independence,
736
00:48:20,745 -> 00:48:22,869
but not used
Only in
Vietnam
737
00:48:23,228 -> 00:48:25,858
but in particular in the
U.S.
and also in Europe,
738
00:48:26,412 -> 00:48:29,345
since the photo
came to
us.
739
00:48:30,576 -> 00:48:33,562
That is, we, we look
this
photo here
740
00:48:34,310 -> 00:48:37,458
we are obliged freely
to ask,
this photo serves us?
741
00:48:38,016 -> 00:48:40,239
And in the first place: it serves
us
to serve in Vietnam?
742
00:48:40,894 -> 00:48:43,803
(And is Vietnam that requires
us
to formulate this question).
743
00:48:44,615 -> 00:48:48,625
ELEMENTS synthesized
744
00:48:49,238 -> 00:48:53,964
Neither L'Express, nor the
militant
American made the difference between
745
00:48:54,360 -> 00:48:58,335
Jane Fonda talks,
questions,
and Jane Fonda, listening.
746
00:48:59,094 -> 00:49:02,886
To the Vietnamese, this
time
history of their struggle
747
00:49:03,370 -> 00:49:08,177
the most important fact about the
photo
is that Jane Fonda is in her
748
00:49:14,356 -> 00:49:16,397
also because silence is
eloquent,
but this is not said).
749
00:49:17,066 -> 00:49:19,299
The important thing is that it is
there.
750
00:49:20,499 -> 00:49:25,442
But here, in 1972, the
principal
is not necessarily the same.
751
00:49:25,976 -> 00:49:29,336
We have to know that force
acts
behind this "necessarily".
752
00:49:30,043 -> 00:49:33,127
We meet the obligation
to
insist that the foot photo lied
753
00:49:34,237 -> 00:49:37,665
to say that the actress
spoke
the inhabitants of Hanoi
754
00:49:38,391 -> 00:49:41,931
when the picture showed
the
militant was listening.
755
00:49:42,712 -> 00:49:48,338
We need the truth
contradictory
This photo and not his eternal truth.
756
00:49:48,792 -> 00:49:53,987
And it is important for us to
insist that
L'Express mind at all levels,
757
00:49:54,607 -> 00:49:58,022
but it is important to
add
that the newspaper can lie,
758
00:49:58,427 -> 00:50:00,676
this is because
the picture
allows.
759
00:50:01,161 -> 00:50:04,224
Really, L'Express
takes
advantage (profit and loss)
760
00:50:04,726 -> 00:50:09,480
the implicit authorization for
this photo
disguise the fact that the militant hear.
761
00:50:10,543 -> 00:50:13,633
Because saying that
speaks,
and speaking peace in Vietnam
762
00:50:14,220 -> 00:50:17,287
L'Express can silence
about
that if peace comes,
763
00:50:17,605 -> 00:50:22,629
leaving that step into the
picture, as
he was implicit that the photo needs,
764
00:50:23,256 -> 00:50:26,051
By itself, that kind of
peace
it comes when we saw that it is not so.
765
00:50:26,889 -> 00:50:29,649
But if L'Express can
thus
act
766
00:50:30,092 -> 00:50:36,836
is probably because the American
actress
militates not only saying peace in Vietnam
767
00:50:37,388 -> 00:50:43,446
no question that peace
exactly,
or in particular that peace in America.
768
00:50:44,064 -> 00:50:47,474
And if you do not ask,
or can
not,
769
00:50:48,083 -> 00:50:53,516
not because it also acts as an
actress and not
as a militant, but, on the contrary,
770
00:50:53,864 -> 00:50:56,727
because while militant is not
intended
still no question
771
00:50:57,171 -> 00:51:00,465
on new approaches or
styles
can be applied to functions
772
00:51:00,926 -> 00:51:03,671
as an actress, both
technically
and socially.
773
00:51:04,309 -> 00:51:08,172
In other words, it does not
consider
their militant activity as an actress,
774
00:51:08,631 -> 00:51:13,621
emboras the North Vietnamese to
invited
precisely as such, as an actress militant.
775
00:51:14,586 -> 00:51:20,346
Summarizing, speaks a different
place
where you are in America
776
00:51:20,807 -> 00:51:23,489
which is what matters
primarily
the Vietnamese.
777
00:51:24,049 -> 00:51:30,029
Hence the fact that it also
conceals the
most important in this picture is their listening,
778
00:51:30,694 -> 00:51:32,705
Listen Vietnam, before talking
about it.
779
00:51:33,473 -> 00:51:38,428
However, simultaneously,
Nixon,
Kissinger and the infamous Porter hear nothing,
780
00:51:38,815 -> 00:51:43,018
and do not want to hear
absolutely
Meetings nothing in Paris.
781
00:51:43,560 -> 00:51:46,960
Hence their disguises,
anyway,
must unmask.
782
00:51:47,909 -> 00:51:52,588
And expose Nixon is not
saying:
Peace in Vietnam.
783
00:51:53,332 -> 00:51:55,985
Because he also says that
(And
Brezhnev also).
784
00:51:56,528 -> 00:51:58,986
You need to tell him
otherwise.
785
00:51:59,556 -> 00:52:05,233
You must say: I hear that the
Vietnamese
I will say that they want peace in their country.
786
00:52:05,890 -> 00:52:06,654
It must be said:
787
00:52:07,062 -> 00:52:09,199
as an American, shut up,
788
00:52:09,619 -> 00:52:12,122
because I recognize that I
have
nothing to say about it,
789
00:52:12,715 -> 00:52:14,919
it is up to the Vietnamese
say
what they want,
790
00:52:15,380 -> 00:52:18,318
me listen to them and then
do
what they want,
791
00:52:18,718 -> 00:52:20,791
because I have nothing to
view
with Southeast Asia.
792
00:52:21,291 -> 00:52:23,423
The rest is just
masquerade.