Group: http://groups.google.com/group/goat-rodeo/topics
- Is the project alive? [2 Updates]
Topic: Is the project alive?Alexz <carn...@gmail.com> Sep 26 06:05PM -0700 ^
Hi,
wondering the status of support for Stambecco now and going
forward? It seems to have been quite for over a year.
Thank you and kind regards,
- alexz
David Pollak <feeder.of...@gmail.com> Sep 26 07:37PM -0700 ^
--
> Hi,
> wondering the status of support for Stambecco now and going
> forward? It seems to have been quite for over a year.
There's be no use of Stambecco, so we haven't done work on the project.
Sorry.
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Simply Lift http://simply.liftweb.net
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Blog: http://goodstuff.im
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Goat Rodeo" group.
To post to this group, send email to goat-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to goat-rodeo+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/goat-rodeo?hl=en.
David,
no worries, all good - thanks for starting it in the first place!
I'm doing something of the nature of a social network. Stambecco is a shoe-in, and I would prefer it over Akka for features, compactness and design style. I'd gladly use it provided I won't end up stuck with a custom build of an EOL library :).
I'd contribute as well if that'd help the project carry on. So far I've updated the code base for Lift 2.4-M4 with SBT 0.11. I was also going to add Record-Squeryl support, and use Redis PubSub instead of RabbitMQ.
Please let me know your stance. If you'd rather people use Akka, that'd be good to know too (your latest public opinion on this that I could track down is over a year old.)
On Sep 27, 10:36 am, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>If you provide advice and a cheer like you say, I'm going to take it
> With all that being said, I do not have a lot of time to contribute code to
> Stambecco. I'll gladly dig out the private repo and publish it. I'll also
> be happy to participate in Stambecco-related discussions. But I don't have
> the time or inclination to "own" the project. If, however, you want to
> become the lead sled dog for the project, I'll happily be a cheerleader.
>
> What do you think?
on.
Stambecco deserves to live long and prosper ;)
Please do dig out that private repo when you have an opportunity.
What are the legal concerns, if any?
Would you mind if the project was moved to Github, it now being sort
of the open source default?
On Sep 27, 2:10 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Alexz <carna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 27, 10:36 am, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> The code is Apache 2.0. I'm not going to get all lawyer-y on the code.Awesome!
> I'll just add you as a repository owner and you can do whatever you want.
> Just createdhttps://github.com/stambecco/stambecco I even added my private
> goat repository so you can see the full distributed stuff in action.I'm zvozin - thanks!
>
> Just give me your github ID and you'll be a co-owner of the project.
Any time you have time to read and/or critique the code - by all
means, I love me some advice from a more experienced man.
Ditto for any other project-related advice.
> Rock on!
Will do. :)
> David
- z
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Goat Rodeo" group.
To post to this group, send email to goat-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to goat-rodeo+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/goat-rodeo?hl=en.
While your at it, can't you name it back to Goat Rodeo? I frickin'
loved that name :D
Cheers,
Viktor
I have a fondness for Goat Rodeo as well... Alex... what do you think?
Jay Cain
> --