Hello Joao,
Glad you asked this question as it gives me an opportunity to explain at least the aspects that I have addressed in the chapter titled "From the River to the Sea: The Mhadei River Continuum and the Impact of Interventions".
Perhaps also those of other highly informed experts who contributed to this book. As Fredrick's post says the contributors comprise not only scientists and ecologists but also legal scholars, historians, planners, journalists, activists, and community practitioners—to explore a pressing environmental dispute. And the dispute is the damming and diversion of waters from river upstream by the Karnataka government to satiate its increasing need for water which it requires for its huge sugarcane plantations and other agriculture.
As Antonio has explained, the Mhadei river is a continuum and its basin spans three states: 4% in Maharashtra, 18% in Karnataka, and 78% in Goa where it empties into the Arabian Sea. So in order to understand the impacts of the dam we have to look at the entire river continuum. My focus was especially to refute the asinine argument of the Karnataka govt which says that Goa 'wastes' its waters by allowing them to flow in the Arabian Sea. In my paper, I demonstrate with substantial evidence, the ecological harm caused by the hydrological modifications and consequent decrease in freshwater to the estuary. One major repercussion is the intrusion of saline water that would decimate fragile populations acclimated to a certain salinity range but there are others like diminished nutrients and loss of important spawning grounds.
I wish I were able to attend the book launch but I hope some of you in Goa will grace the occasion and interact with the many experts who can tell you more.
Best wishes,
Helga