
This is one of the reasons for my impatience with the book: if one is scared of naming names or indicating which castes one is referring to, the writing tends to get bland and tiresome. For instance she mentions in a chapter devoted to the family tree of the Menezes Braganza, that F X Braganza (LMB's grandfather married a woman from 'a caste that was different from his' Now what are we to make of that for to marry a Bamon would be one thing and to marry a Gawda something else. So ultimately one concludes that she was a Sudra <361.gif>
From what one gathers so far LMB was an intelligent but somewhat ineffectual character. He was able to see what was happening to the Goan economy of the time and the mess the Church and State were creating and railed at it through the press. But ultimately he was squashed like a cockroach - his printing press was destroyed - and he ended up taking potshots at the Portuguese from afar. And ultimately he ended his days in Portugal.Augusto
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Ben Antao <ben....@rogers.com> wrote:
AP: "A reflection on Portuguese rule in Goa shows that the Church did little to alleviate the poverty of the people. In fact, the Jesuits owned large agricultural tracts and coconut plantations in Salcete, some of it left behind by locals fleeing Goa on account of religious persecution. The actual state of affairs clearly proved that the Church was not neutral in the political struggle that was going on in Goa. In fact ti was vitally concerned with the defence of the political power with which its status was closely interwoven, both historically and statutorily."Who is saying the above? Sushila Mendes or Menezes Braganza? The same question for the second quotation below.Best regardsBenFrom: augusto pintoSent: Friday, February 06, 2015 12:07 PMSubject: [Bulk] [GOABOOKCLUB] Luis de Menezes Braganza: Natiionalism, Secularism, and Free-Thought in Portuguese Goa by Goa
I bought the Menezes Braganza book by Sushila Mendes Almeida Coutinho on 9 January 2015 and I've been trying to find a cue to enter into a discussion of this book which was supposed to be released at Institute Menezes Braganza but was anticipated to an earlier date for reasons which only Sushila can tell us (and I bet she won't <360.gif>
Dear TRS
My obsession with caste was shared by LMB.
Your mail indicates that we can agree that a lot of further research can be done in this area.
I won't respond further. Feel free to have the last word
August
Sushila,
Greetings.
Putting across some views / questions arising from your book:-
LMB was writing in Portuguese. So, all those Goans (of his times) who were uneducated knew nothing about his fiery views, except maybe through servant quarter gossip that he holds fiery views.
Secondly, merely knowing to read and write Portuguese would hardly have been a qualification to understand his fiery views in all their breadth and depth.
Even amongst the elite educated section (Lisbon returned?), how many actually had the time to read his fiery views ?
So, question arises: What was the circulation figure of his newspapers?
And yet, who exactly and WHY EXACTLY decided to burn down his press? What was the threat perception in this respect?
In the context of above propositions regarding LMB's exact readership in Portuguese, when and where and why exactly did Dr. T. B. CUNHA decide to write his fiery views in English language?
Did the Portuguese government allow public gatherings / public meetings in Goa, in each of the three phases (constitutional monarchy, republic, dictatorship)?
Did LMB conduct and address public meetings to disseminate his views?
Regards.
While Sushila takes her time get round to answering your questions , please bear with my views for the time being.
it seems your thrust is to determine how effective LMB was as a mass leader. And the answer appears to be not very much. He was an intellectual who was trying to persuade the Goan elite of his time as to the folly of their views.
Unfortunately for him, the elite included the Church, and forget about then, even now it does not deign fit to answer questions raised about its conduct. (the Gawda protests against the aggressive Church meddling in their practices is a case in point) And why should they: they are appointed by God is it not, and only to God are they responsible is it not?
Dear Selma
That's quite interesting. I'm not surprised by the treatment doled out to Armando M. How dare he challenge the diktats of the C which is mandated by God.
Tell me why Armando's autobiography was unpublished. I feel it was because prudence was deemed better than valor by the Menezes family
Regarding which I hope I am proved wrong
Augusto.
Augusto,This may come as a surprise but books don't materialise just like that.
I have been urging people to archive whatever diaries, letters, journals they have in a public institution but seeing the way Pai Augustino's brilliant original scripts have been left to rot at the Konkani academy perhaps they are safer in private vaults. By the way Augusto, it was you who accused me of being alarmist when I brought up the issue of Pai Augustino's manuscripts but where are they now? Still food for white ants at the academy?
Dear all: On the issue of 'censorship', please (i) stay on topic (ii) discuss books (and related ideas) rather than individuals. Your messages will definitely go through.I'd personally like to avoid converting the Goa Book Club into a forum for targeting one another. FN
--
If I knew Central Library has it, I would have checked it out. I wish the Goa-based publishers reprints both volumes, though copyright could be problem. I wish either Leonard or Fred could explore the possibility. If interested, they would have to trace a family member to check talk about copyright.