> DOS is like an anarchist, "Free Trade" OS kernel in that no central
> authority interferes to 'govern' resource use.
I also claim DOS is like Capitalism in that vital resources such as
RAM or CPU can be 'Privatized'. Private property is very important to
me and the model I am working on, but Privatization of natural
resources such as Water Rights for the purpose of keeping price above
cost is something I consider a problem (an inefficiency) in the
system.
> NT, Linux, Solaris, etc. are more like dictatorial and "protectionist"
> where all resource use must be approved through a central authority.
I also claim Pre-Emptive kernels are more like State-run
Socialism/Communism in that resources ownership is never actually in
the hands of the citizens/processes, but access is selectively doled
out by a 'privileged' process instead of heeding the 'Market' caused
by citizens/processes *competing* for that resource.