Tue Dec 9, 2003 7:15 am, I said:This is the Christ saying you are in the world but you are not of theworld.
Sep 11, 2006 09:56 PDT, Gnostic Tom said:
Judas held the money bag in the garden.
He had just been paid 30 pieces of silver.
His bag was secure in his pocket.
Then someone grabbed him and he had to
run away naked without his money bag.
The Romans (Hadrian) came and took back their
field (Jerusalem) and left the Jews destitute,
exiled, without a home anymore.
I think this giving up of trying to control
the physical "kingdom" and leaving it all behind
in the quest for the spiritual "kingdom" is what
is being noted here. In the ancient mind
"naked" meant "ascetic", as in having given up
on worldly pursuits.
Sun Oct 12, 2003, Steve said:
The crassly materialistic world-view is a nice place to visit, but
I wouldn't want to live there. -Steve W.
Sep 12, 2006 16:48 PDT, Gnostic Tom said:
Adam and Eve put on clothes and left Paradise.
Christians take off clothes to be baptized
into belonging to Paradise once again.
Adam was forbidden to partake of Tree of Life
for fear he would partake of the fruit of
immortality.
Jesus was staked to the Tree of Life
and distributed the fruit of immortality.
Adam and Eve had to be exiled from Eden.
Jesus leads the chosen to the new Promised Land.
Eve gave Adam fruit that was bad for him.
Mary gave Jesus an anointing that made him Christ.
Lots of parallel symbolism at play.
Sep 13, 2006 05:41 PDT, Gnostic Tom said:
The Hymn of the Pearl (in Acts of Thomas)
tells of a prince who has gone to Egypt
to recover a pearl and return to his kingdom.
In Egypt he forgets and starts dressing like
an Egyptian. Once he remembers his true
origin and purpose he takes off the Egyptian
clothes and returns to his kingdom. I think
there may be a parallel of this idea with this
verse in Thomas. By the way, the Hymn of the
Pearl and Thomas were both written in Edessa
as was the Odes of Solomon. These texts tend
to cast light on each other if read together
in a short span of time.
Sep 11, 2006 14:13 PDT, slvan- said:
a.) We have to question if the owners are actually the owners, and not some usurper. Like the gnostic OT god.
b.) Either way, being clothed with robes (a la the Hymn of the Robe of Glory) is something that could be implied that will later happen -- if/when the real owners show up.
c.) Or, again, a la the Hymn of the Robe of Glory, their being without clothes could be like the son (in the Hymn) taking off his Heavenly (living) Robe, and departing to the far country. (To, later, receive his beautiful/light-filled robe back again.)
d.) Or these are the worldly clothes (a la the clothing of the Egyptians in the above Hymn) that the children are shedding...
Sorry; looks like I said much the same thing in each of the above...
Scott V.
Sep 12, 2006 21:28 PDT, slvan- said:
How 'bout this too:
The prohibition of partaking of the Tree of Life is a paradox, in that as
soon as one is ready (after having been awaken) one CAN and MUST partake...
but it is fruitless (pun intended) to try when one is asleep... or not
mature... or without gnosis (experiential knowledge of the heart).
Scott V.
Sep 14, 2006 16:06 PDT, Richard said:
Breaking off the topic a bit. It seems to me that these gnostic writings
sound a lot like the words of "Don Juan", from the books of Castaneda.
Revealing mysterys to the unready would probably do them no good or just
sound like noise. Is Don Juan a gnostic without having any reference to
western religions?
11 Mar, 11, Clive said:
We are carnal, our 5 senses are recepters not transmitters and I see our desires as for receiving not giving. The creator and his kingdom I see as transmitting or giving and not receiving, the total oposite of our own nature.
The field I see as the nature of the Creator, a quality that doesn't belong to us.
For us to attain a spiritual nature we need to strip off our egoism, our selfish desires by replacing them with caring desires for neighbours, with the intention that we are doing it for the sake and love of the Creator.
From Matt -
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
To love the Creator and to love our neighbour. I believe that our entrance into a spiritual state of being depends entirely on us being able to acheive these two things.
12 Mar, 11, Clive said:
Hi Ken
Funny isn't it, We both read the same passage and came up with oposit thoughts about it.
Your thoughts are that the field is this world and we(or the disciples) are not of this world.
My thoughts were that the field was the kingdom of God and that we are not of that world(yet).
13 Mar, 11, I replied:
I sometimes come up with completely different thoughts just by myself. I like to use these passages as a sort of word association exercise and write whatever comes to mind, but sometimes I do try to put then in historical context and try to guess what the authors meant. Depends on my mood.
But what I really love is seeing what others come up with.
Ken