7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD

290 views
Skip to first unread message

Gerald Wheeler

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 2:55:31 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
I just got off the phone with Troy at Howell.   I was about to order the ESC, knock sensor and VSS from Howell so I could install the CCD on my 403.    Troy said the 403 and 455 didn't need the ESC and knock sensor and even if I had it hooked up, he doubted it would make any difference, especially with the 7747.   He said the 8747 would use the ESC and knock sensor.   Does the EBL convert the 7747 to act like an 8747??   Do I really need the ESC and the knock sensor to run with the EBL??   Do I lose functionality with the EBL if I don't have the ESC and knock sensor??    I'm confused about what I need for a nice running 403 with CCD.   Any opinions or advice??
 
JR Wheeler NC/OR
 
 

Bruce Hislop, Perth Communications

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 3:09:09 PM1/14/11
to Gmcmh-efi google group
The EBL basically replaces the "smarts" board in the 7747 and only uses the main circuit board for the Input buffering and conditioning and the output drivers as well as the actual connectors to the wiring harness.
When you add the EBL to the 7747 it is a completely changed controller.

Add EFI is nice but upgrading to spark control (ESC) makes your engine come to life! For ESC to operate properly you need a Knock sensor.

VSS allow you take advantage of other EBL goodies like Lean Cruise and Decelerate fuel cutoff.

Again a 7747 with an EBL is no longer a simple 7747.

Its like swapping a new motherboard into an old computer case. Its not the same beast.

Bruce Hislop
Perth Communications
br...@perthcomm.com
Sent from my Blackberry Curve


From: "Gerald Wheeler" <jrwhe...@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:55:31 -0500
Subject: [GMCMH-EFI] 7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD

Ken Henderson

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 3:16:26 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
JR,

Troy's attitude toward electronic ignition makes me wonder whether
he's ever tried it on the Olds engine. Ever since we've had this
group running (before I implemented electronic ignition on my Howell)
everyone with EI has consistently praised it and often gone so far as
to proclaim that to be more important than the fuel control. I'm not
that adamant, but I do consider it a BIG improvement, and have largely
lost faith in Howell because of their opposition to it.

Ken H.


On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bruce Hislop, Perth Communications


> The EBL basically replaces the "smarts" board in the 7747 and only uses the
> main circuit board for the Input buffering and conditioning and the output
> drivers as well as the actual connectors to the wiring harness.
> When you add the EBL to the 7747 it is a completely changed controller.

>...
> ________________________________
> From: "Gerald Wheeler"


> Sender: gmcm...@googlegroups.com
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:55:31 -0500
> To: <gmcm...@googlegroups.com>
> ReplyTo: gmcm...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [GMCMH-EFI] 7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD
> I just got off the phone with Troy at Howell.   I was about to order the
> ESC, knock sensor and VSS from Howell so I could install the CCD on my
> 403.    Troy said the 403 and 455 didn't need the ESC and knock sensor and
> even if I had it hooked up, he doubted it would make any difference,

> especially with the 7747...

Emery Stora

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 3:42:34 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com

On Jan 14, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Gerald Wheeler wrote:

> I just got off the phone with Troy at Howell. I was about to order the ESC, knock sensor and VSS from Howell so I could install the CCD on my 403. Troy said the 403 and 455 didn't need the ESC and knock sensor and even if I had it hooked up, he doubted it would make any difference, especially with the 7747. He said the 8747 would use the ESC and knock sensor. Does the EBL convert the 7747 to act like an 8747?? Do I really need the ESC and the knock sensor to run with the EBL?? Do I lose functionality with the EBL if I don't have the ESC and knock sensor?? I'm confused about what I need for a nice running 403 with CCD. Any opinions or advice??
>
> JR Wheeler NC/OR
>
>


I added the spark controlled distributor to the Howell system two or three years before I added the EBL. I have a 7747 and the ESC and knock sensor worked very well with my ECM.
After I added the EBL I installed a VSS in order to be able to use the lean burn function.

I have never agreed with Troy on this subject. I have also been disturbed about Troy and Howell not knowing that the fuel injectors that they substituted for their system were no longer 80 or 85 pound per hour at 13 psi, but rather 55 pph.. Holley were the ones that told me that I would have to increase the fuel pressure to 18 or 19 psi get 85 ppg capacity from the injectors.

I know Troy and he has even ridden in my GMC a few years back while taking measurements in order to try to get it performing properly. This was before I put on the ESC and knock sensor and spark controlled distributor.

Troy feels that the burst mode for spark retard is all that is needed but those of us that have put on the spark controlled distributor have found it gave much better performance. I have a 455 but think that the 403 would be about the same. Ask Randy for his opinion as he runs the 403.

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Santa Fe, NM


Dick Paterson

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 5:47:13 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Gerry   I'm more confused than the blind queer at the weiner roast---I have done lots of stand alone  dists for FI  and the current  ccd ones  but I dont know anything about the add ons  ELB  --7747----8747   etc. the  sharp guys on FI will have the answers --regards  dick
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:55 PM
Subject: [GMCMH-EFI] 7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD

George Beckman

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 6:38:55 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Yes you need ESC and a knock sensor.  Yes you loose functionality.  The knock table (a separate Spark screen in the WUD) and the knock counter in the Main screen won't work.  And, when it knocks, the spark won't be retarded, which is the important part.

I too am confused by Howell's continued resistance.   Zillions of GM vehicles used 7747s with ESC units and knock sensors.   I would not drive CCD without one.  The more sensors the better... informs the computer what is going on.  


On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Gerald Wheeler wrote:

Do I really need the ESC and the knock sensor to run with the EBL??   Do I lose functionality with the EBL if I don't have the ESC and knock sensor??    I'm confused about what I need for a nice running 403 with CCD. 

----

Best Wishes,


George

http://www.pggp.com


Randy Van Winkle

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 7:29:53 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
JR,

The 7747 supports the knock sensor and ESC. I'm not sure of Troy's
understanding of the CCD functionality of the 7747. It is true that it
supports the burst mode for spark retard but it also has full
functionality for receiving the KS and ESC input then acting on it
accordingly. I don't believe there is much difference between the 8747
and 7747. The 8747 was not used in many vehicles. The difference, I
believe, was in the fuel tables - not as big VE tables with everything
else being basically the same.

It is not a requirement to have the ESC and KS to run with the EBL but
you will, in my opinion, be giving up some performance. If you have the
Howell system then in order to add CCD, you need the distributor, an ESC
and a Knock Sensor. A VSS will help because it will allow for
Deceleration Fuel Cut Off (DFCO) both for the original 7747 and for the
EBL - the EBL also gives you lean cruise if you have the VSS - well
worth it in my opinion. The EBL enhances the tables for Spark Control
which helps in getting a better tune and getting the table set up for
max power while avoiding areas where knocks might occur. With the
system tuned properly, then the KS and ESC is really there to provide a
safety margin. A well tuned spark table will not ping, however, changes
in fuel, heat, etc. can cause pinging that you are not expecting - the
KS and ESC will auto retard perhaps saving your engine.

I have the 403 and initially installed the Howell system for fuel
management - my first response on the initial test drive was Wow!
Later, I added CCD with KS and ESC and, again, on my first test drive -
Wow! I ran this way for several thousand miles and never had a
problem. Added the EBL, and now I had all the tools I needed to do more
tuning. Now, I'm getting better mileage and performance is great.
BTW... when I say better mileage - it is not 15 mpg but for my rig is
doing great! My 403 ran great on the 7747. Many have installed the EBL
on their 455s and found it solved some nagging problems that were
experienced with the Howell system.

Bottom line, I think anyone going the Howell route should upgrade to a
CCD with KS and ESC and also to the EBL. From that point on, you won't
have to touch the system unless you like to "play" with this type of stuff.

Randy (likes the performance, startup, shutdown, altitude compensation,
spark control, responsiveness, etc., etc. with the EBL)
'77 Eleganza II "403"

Gerald Wheeler

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 7:41:27 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com

Randy, George, Emery, Bruce and Ken,

Thanks for your input. I trust your opinions and the fact that you are
running the Howell system with the EBL, VSS, CCD, ESC and knock sensor. I
will be ordering the various components early next week. George, I will
probably be in your area somewhere near the 3rd week of February; I'll have
a better handle on times when I finally get to the west coast; looking
forward to getting this setup installed and working. Then onto AZ for
some visiting before heading east to FL and eventually back home to NC.

JR Wheeler NC/OR


Gordon

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 8:59:11 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Dick, no longer is that politically correct.  For almost 20 years it is not even politically correct to be called Dick !  :-)      But it is still far better than having your head gosh knows where and denying a CCD hooked to an ECM has any value.  That doesn't even qualify as an intelligent statement.  We are so fortunate to have enough guys with the foresight to have bought an EBL and tried it out.  Thanks Bruce for the first that I know of.  Thanks Ken for putting this Group together.  And Randy and George who will just never quit tuning.

Dick Paterson

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 10:06:17 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Gordon  -I thought Gerry directed that message to me that  -I guess it was directed at the FI group members and I didnt catch it
---sorry I dont  mean to offend anyone  -and I certainly dont deny the value of FI  and all the work you all have done.
regards   --dick (Richard)  who should not be tinkering with posting-and making wise cracks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gordon

Ken Henderson

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 10:14:51 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Dick (err...),

I'm so politically incorrect that your colloquialism didn't even ring a bell with me until Gordon mentioned it.  He's better trained than I am.  'Course now, I've darned near bitten the end of my tongue off a few times trying to stop things from slipping off of it. :-)

What I'm trying to figure out is the forthcoming signage will be for military latrines and showers -- who goes where?

Ken H.

Gerald Wheeler

unread,
Jan 14, 2011, 11:23:41 PM1/14/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Dick,
 
Your postings are always welcome and we appreciate your being available to all of us with your knowledge and products.  
 
JR Wheeler NC/OR
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 1/14/2011 10:07:08 PM
Subject: Re: [GMCMH-EFI] 7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD

Gordon  -I thought Gerry directed that message to me that  -I guess it was directed at the FI group members and I didnt catch it
---sorry I dont  mean to offend anyone  -and I certainly dont deny the value of FI  and all the work you all have done.
regards   --dick (Richard)  who should not be tinkering with posting-and making wise cracks.
----- Original Message -----

Gordon

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 12:45:58 AM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Ken;
To be very clear, my reference of a guy with his head in the sand is directly to Troy, NOT DICK.  Troy should know better and quit leading people astray with crap that does not work 100% of the time.  An EBL is a quantum improvement to any ECM.  The more sensors you add the more info the ECM has and the better informed decisions it makes.  Confusing statements that sensors are not needed, with the fact that sensors improve the system, are very anal.  I feel very sorry for people who have spend days troubleshooting, drive to Howell and spend $$$ and more days, fooling with fuel pressure, harness and timing, when the answer is now so clear to all who will listen. 
Perhaps it is time to put a header on every gmcmh-efi message;  "Use a 2" throttle body with 80pph injectors, 7747 with an EBL, an ESC with knock sensor TO START!"  Isn't that what a new EFI convert is told after the first 5 or so message?
After the 100's of posts, that is what I think I remember.

As far as the military latrines and showers go, the Chinese figured it out a long time ago and continue the practice of "who cares"?  As long as Mr. Who get to collect the deposit for the garden, all is well.

Ken Henderson

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 7:39:25 AM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Gordon,

I understood your points & agree.

A member got a note from BobR: "...EBL for 7730 to be released Monday..."  That'll make a lot of port injection fans happy.

Ken H.

On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Gordon <wiz...@telus.net> wrote:
Ken;
To be very clear, my reference of a guy with his head in the sand is directly to Troy, NOT DICK...
 
... As long as Mr. Who get to collect the deposit for the garden, all is well.

Mr.erf ERFisher

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 8:01:27 AM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
I think it is time to get real here.

I like the EBL, (own it, but, will not use it ) but I am a tech-ie and know what is involved, and I love the technology.

there are a lot of us out here that are doing just fine with out the cost and effort of  EBL, ESC, dist. harness mods, computer driving, etc.

Howell , or anyone , cannot sell a system that has about 40 tweaks,  if you know how.   better to stay with the quadra jet.

My 2 systems are old Howell, and I raised the pressure (one little allen wrench adjustment ) at the very beginning, and all is ok for now. 

Troy is in business, and Emery's complaints are valid about them not wanting to go there.  They want to sell something that can use standard parts and be bolt-on.

there are 6 or 7 ways to go here, (even plug in a CAD 500 with a carburetor).   but to say this is the only way, is just not right.

There are only 4 guys here who know how to install and tweek the EBL system, and I would go to their garage if I wanted to install mine ;>)

so, I suggest someone should offer a bolt-on kit with the TBI, EBL, ESC, harnass, basic bin, etc, so AVERAGE JOE, could bolt this on to his GMC.  this way, users would know the cost and could just bolt it on.

this is an alternative to flaming a current vendor.

JWID
gene


 
--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and -------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html

George Beckman

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 12:12:04 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Randy can correct me but Burst Mode is the idea that when you hit the gas, "tip in" as BobR says, it could cause pinging.  And that is a perfectly valid assumption.  However, once you have the throttle down the "Burst" is over.  There is a setting, Burst Retard Time for how long the burst retard will be in effect, but this is in milliseconds and won't do much good for a long hill.

Once climbing or pulling, the ECM and EBL use wildly complicated calculations to analyze engine temperature, MAP, Throttle, RPMs, Power Enrichment, etc. to retard spark.  This "should" be sufficient and the engine should _never_ ping.  But we all know, never say never.  

This is where knock sensors and ESC (translates what the knocks mean) come into play.  On a long hill (usually), once the throttle is down where the driver wants it, the Knock Sensor is the tool to analyze how the calculations are doing under current conditions.

 
On Jan 14, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Randy Van Winkle wrote:

The 7747 supports the knock sensor and ESC.  It is true that it supports the burst mode for spark retard but it also has full functionality for receiving the KS and ESC input then acting on it accordingly.

Gordon

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 1:07:14 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
I understood Jim Bounds decision to not install EFI on a GMC because he could not support it in the field.  I think he is watching what has evolved through this Group, very carefully.  Although it was setup to support all EFI, it has evolved, through many successful installation, to the point where everyone who has had OFF IDLE STUMBLE problems recognizes both the cause and the very simple solution of an EBL.  GMC's account for less than 1% of the installed EBL base.  I monitor 2 other EFI sites and am amazed at the universal adoption of the EBL to control the EFI and spark function on 100's of very different engines.  It was developed as a solution to many problems that were "unsolvable" at the time. 

What I have suggested is a very basic "plug and play" set of components for a GMC EFI conversion.  One that does not require any tweaks or tuning whatsoever.  It also has the ability to learn as it goes and can benefit from any additional sensor input you want to feed it.  It is simple enough to use, yet has the ability to benefit from tiny improvements.
The system I am building is quite different and once again demonstrates the incredible power of the EBL.  I am using a FORD V8 coil pack (4 separate dual coils) , with a 36 toothed motorcycle sprocket on the vibration damper.  NO DISTRIBUTOR at all.  I am not recommending this to anyone, just doing it for the heck of it. 
To characterize the EBL as something only a few can benefit from because only a few totally understand how it works, is nonsense.  To think that only 3 or 4 people can install one is equally puzzling?  It requires no more knowledge to use than one needs to know about the computer they are sending emails with.  PLUG IT IN, TURN IT ON AND GO. 
To further suggest that a stock 7747 is every bit as functional as one equipped with an EBL, is to not have a basic understanding of how it works.  Ask anyone who has been burning chips, trying to make a stock GM EFI run well for the last 5 years, what they think of an EBL.

I see nothing sacred in continuing to mislead people to spend their money on antique systems of lesser design.  I got my first education on GMC EFI at Santa Rosa and luckily decided to sit back and wait until a totally reliable system showed up.  I saw the people who had given up on the other system and gone back to a carb and one who was so upset he sold his coach.  I have been burning chips for other applications since 1996, and even entertained the thought of trying to make the perfect GMC solution.  With all the variables, there is only one way to do this.  No "one chip fits all", is possible, but by having a system that learns in it's specific environment, an EBL does FIT ALL.  It will do this with just the basic inputs, but the more inputs it has the better decisions it can make and the better your engine will run. 
Gordon


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3380 - Release Date: 01/14/11

Gordon

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 1:27:29 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
George;
I have one tiny concern with all of the wonderfully detailed, specific information you and others are posting.  I love it, but wonder if this scares some people away from EFI?  They might think it is absolutely essential to have this deep understanding, in order to have a fully functional EFI.  I know this is not your intention and all of your detailed posts are very valuable to all.  When you were using hard burned chips, this understanding was absolutely necessary to obtain even acceptable performance from some difficult to setup engines.  Now, as you note, the ECM and the EBL (with ESC and knock sensor) take care of science project part that EFI tuning used to be. 
It is true "Plug and Play" not the MicroSoft Plug and play around for the rest of your life trying to get a useful output.  I am glad you continue to play and those of us who have the time and inclination, can make tiny improvements from the knowledge you share.
Thanks;
Gordon

Emery Stora

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 3:03:17 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Yes, I was a little taken back by someone posting that only 4 people were capable of tuning a system using the EBL.  I first put a TBI system on my GMC in 1993 --- yes, 18 years ago!

I have made modifications and have had several chips burned by others but when I got the EBL I was able to easily set it up and made changes that caused my TBI system to run better than ever before.  To save some time I got a starting bin file from George Beckman but I can say that one can start with the basic bin that comes with the EBL and before long, with a few "learns" by the system, you will have a good running engine.  One does not have to be a rocket scientist to use it or get it set up.

Emery Stora

George Beckman

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 5:22:07 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
I suppose you are right.  

On Jan 15, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Gordon wrote:

I have one tiny concern with all of the wonderfully detailed, specific information you and others are posting.  I love it, but wonder if this scares some people away from EFI?  They might think it is absolutely essential to have this deep understanding, in order to have a fully functional EFI.  I know this is not your intention and all of your detailed posts are very valuable to all.  When you were using hard burned chips, this understanding was absolutely necessary to obtain even acceptable performance from some difficult to setup engines.  Now, as you note, the ECM and the EBL (with ESC and knock sensor) take care of science project part that EFI tuning used to be

Jay Rabe

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 6:33:37 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com

I've been lurking on this list for about a year since getting my PB w/ Howell and asked the GMCnet about a stumble problem. 
To begin with it was indeed intimidating. Interesting though, that these last few threads have started to make some sense. For the last year I've been collecting posts that seemed to have bits and pieces of relevant info regarding configurations and connections, and after a year, rereading them, they are starting to come together in my mind. Problem is that the many discussions about the details of tables and curves don't do much for me when I have such a poor understanding of the overall picture. 
Some time ago I researched the EBL and have it on my list todo, and now it looks like I should add the ESC and CCD and VSS and knock sensor.
So to this thread: details aren't inherently scary. What's scary is not having a global picture of what's going on, what's connected to what, to put the details into context.
What I need is an idiot's guide. Recent one-liner (apologies don't remember from who, but THANK YOU whoever you are for the succinct clarity!): "Use a 2" throttle body with 80pph injectors, 7747 with an EBL, an ESC with knock sensor TO START!"
For one thing though, it seems as if there are at least a few options on how to put things together "to start" ie initial configuration if you're going to do this piecemeal. First option would be just the ECM out of the box, no bells & whistles or sensors. Consensus seems to be that will work and have benefits over a carb, but is really not taking advantage of all the possibilities. Then there's the option quoted above, then there's Randy's: start w/ ECM and add CCD, which requires ESC, which requires KS. Next step then would be add the EBL, then VSS. (Do correct me if any of this is wrong.)
So then the idiot's guide also needs to have PN and source info. I've found at least one source for everything except I have no clue about the CCD. I thought it was a Dick Paterson Springfield Ignition, but I didn't see anything on their site that was clearly a "CCD for EFI."
Here's the things I'm still confused about:
1) Source and PN for CCD as mentioned. Is it a Paterson thing and just not listed on his website?
2) Not sure what ROM/EPROM (whatever they are) I have. I found a hand-written note in some paperwork from PO that said "7747," and I understand that's the correct #, just don't know if that note meant that's what I've got or if that was the PO's note of what to get. Presume I have to take the ECM apart and look at the label on the chip to confirm.
3) Don't know what ppm my injectors are, or how to find out. But I do know from PO's service reports that they had to set up FP to 19-20psi to make it run, so suspect I do NOT have the 80's. So does this mean I am OK just compensating by running the higher FP? Or should I think about replacing with the correct 80ppm injectors?
4) Not sure about the wide/narrow band sensor thing. It's called an "air/fuel" sensor, but is that the same, ie does it replace, the "O2 sensor?" (Did I mention I'm not a mechanic? Pretty good with electronics, but very very limited mechanics experience.) I've seen the Zeitronix site and seems like consensus is the ZT-3 is sufficient for our engines.
5) I've seen 3 references for which KS to get: 2 options from Howell (MA209 & SD208), and a generic sensor for "1990 454 1-ton pickup." Don't know what's best, what's tradeoffs, etc.
6) I've seen 3 references for which VSS to get: 1 from Howell (VSS263), one from JAG (found website, didn't dig deep enough to find VSS PN), and one ref to "Ray Swartzenduber" (no clue how to contact him or PN).
7) Saw the "EBL Flash Switcher" on DynamicEFI website. Is that a need-to-have, a nice-to-have, or not-relevant/overkill?
8) Saw reference to "IAT sensor" and "Ostrich emulator" needed for EBL. I'm clueless.
How's THAT for a laundry list???
:-)
J "still majorly confused amidst glimmers of understanding" Rabe76 PBPortland, OR
________________________________> From: gbec...@pggp.com

> Subject: Re: [GMCMH-EFI] 7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD
> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:22:07 -0800
> To: gmcm...@googlegroups.com

Gordon

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 8:47:29 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jay;
For your easiest installation the consensus is to start with a 7747 that
is already equipped with an EBL. Save your Howell stumbler as a
comehome box. Dynamic has them and most people who do not want a
soldering project have purchased the complete unit, not just added the
EBL to their own 7747. If you have a source of cheap or free ECM's,
there is a huge list to choose from which work equally as well as the
7747. Getting one and sending it to RBob at Dynamic is can save you a
few dollars. You will find the list 1/2 way down this page;

http://www.dynamicefi.com/EBL_Flash.php

CAUTION; If you choose other than a 7747 you may require pin changes
which will foul you up if you have to switch back to the stock 7747 you
have kept as a spare.

I think the only reason most GMCers have a 7747 is because this is what
Howell and most other backyard guys started with? You might find it a
valuable experience to read everything on the DYNAMIC site;
http://www.dynamicefi.com/ under information, tuning, etc.

You can simply swap your current ECM for one from Dynamic and DO NOTHING
ELSE. Then if you wish, add one feature at a time and keep adding until
you are tired or totally happy.
Gordon


On 1/15/2011 3:33 PM, Jay Rabe wrote:
> I've been lurking on this list for about a year since getting my PB w/ Howell and asked the GMCnet about a stumble problem.
> To begin with it was indeed intimidating. Interesting though, that these last few threads have started to make some sense. For the last year I've been collecting posts that seemed to have bits and pieces of relevant info regarding configurations and connections, and after a year, rereading them, they are starting to come together in my mind. Problem is that the many discussions about the details of tables and curves don't do much for me when I have such a poor understanding of the overall picture.
> Some time ago I researched the EBL and have it on my list todo, and now it looks like I should add the ESC and CCD and VSS and knock sensor.
> So to this thread: details aren't inherently scary. What's scary is not having a global picture of what's going on, what's connected to what, to put the details into context.
> What I need is an idiot's guide. Recent one-liner (apologies don't remember from who, but THANK YOU whoever you are for the succinct clarity!): "Use a 2" throttle body with 80pph injectors, 7747 with an EBL, an ESC with knock sensor TO START!"

> For one thing though, it seems as if there are at least a few options on how to put things together "to start" ie initial configuration if you're going to do this piecemeal. First option would be just the ECM out of the box, no bells& whistles or sensors. Consensus seems to be that will work and have benefits over a carb, but is really not taking advantage of all the possibilities. Then there's the option quoted above, then there's Randy's: start w/ ECM and add CCD, which requires ESC, which requires KS. Next step then would be add the EBL, then VSS. (Do correct me if any of this is wrong.)


> So then the idiot's guide also needs to have PN and source info. I've found at least one source for everything except I have no clue about the CCD. I thought it was a Dick Paterson Springfield Ignition, but I didn't see anything on their site that was clearly a "CCD for EFI."
> Here's the things I'm still confused about:
> 1) Source and PN for CCD as mentioned. Is it a Paterson thing and just not listed on his website?
> 2) Not sure what ROM/EPROM (whatever they are) I have. I found a hand-written note in some paperwork from PO that said "7747," and I understand that's the correct #, just don't know if that note meant that's what I've got or if that was the PO's note of what to get. Presume I have to take the ECM apart and look at the label on the chip to confirm.
> 3) Don't know what ppm my injectors are, or how to find out. But I do know from PO's service reports that they had to set up FP to 19-20psi to make it run, so suspect I do NOT have the 80's. So does this mean I am OK just compensating by running the higher FP? Or should I think about replacing with the correct 80ppm injectors?
> 4) Not sure about the wide/narrow band sensor thing. It's called an "air/fuel" sensor, but is that the same, ie does it replace, the "O2 sensor?" (Did I mention I'm not a mechanic? Pretty good with electronics, but very very limited mechanics experience.) I've seen the Zeitronix site and seems like consensus is the ZT-3 is sufficient for our engines.

> 5) I've seen 3 references for which KS to get: 2 options from Howell (MA209& SD208), and a generic sensor for "1990 454 1-ton pickup." Don't know what's best, what's tradeoffs, etc.

Jay Rabe

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 9:00:22 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com

Hi Gordon,
Never thought about that as an option. Will study the Dynamic site some more and may get back with more questions.
Every time I learn something I find out how much more I have to learn.
:-)
Thanks,
J 76 PBPortland,  OR

----------------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:47:29 -0800
> From: wiz...@telus.net
> To: gmcm...@googlegroups.com

Randy Van Winkle

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 9:29:22 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay,

Will try to sort through some of this for you.  We use to have a place where we could post all of the generic stuff on pages and files but Google has taken that option away from us. 

See below in blue for my thoughts:

Randy (agrees that we tend to make all this sound more complicated than it is)
'77 Eleganza II "403"


On 1/15/2011 5:33 PM, Jay Rabe wrote:
I've been lurking on this list for about a year since getting my PB w/ Howell and asked the GMCnet about a stumble problem. 
To begin with it was indeed intimidating. Interesting though, that these last few threads have started to make some sense. For the last year I've been collecting posts that seemed to have bits and pieces of relevant info regarding configurations and connections, and after a year, rereading them, they are starting to come together in my mind. 
Same here.  It took me a while to get the whole picture clear in my mind.  However, after starting to work on installing and seeing how everything connects it started to clear up.

Problem is that the many discussions about the details of tables and curves don't do much for me when I have such a poor understanding of the overall picture.
Yes, the details about tables and other parameters are for more advanced understanding about how the ECM works.  Not important to know all of that stuff just to have EFI working properly on your coach.  Later, it might be interesting to jump into some of this understanding.

 
Some time ago I researched the EBL and have it on my list todo, and now it looks like I should add the ESC and CCD and VSS and knock sensor.
So to this thread: details aren't inherently scary. What's scary is not having a global picture of what's going on, what's connected to what, to put the details into context.
What I need is an idiot's guide. Recent one-liner (apologies don't remember from who, but THANK YOU whoever you are for the succinct clarity!): "Use a 2" throttle body with 80pph injectors, 7747 with an EBL, an ESC with knock sensor TO START!"
For one thing though, it seems as if there are at least a few options on how to put things together "to start" ie initial configuration if you're going to do this piecemeal. First option would be just the ECM out of the box, no bells & whistles or sensors. Consensus seems to be that will work and have benefits over a carb, but is really not taking advantage of all the possibilities.
If you already have a Howell system and it works good then as Gene has said, why do more?  He is correct, a good running Howell system will work just fine and be serviceable for many years and many run their coaches that way.  Your statement is also correct in that you would not be taking advantage of all the possibilities.

 Then there's the option quoted above, then there's Randy's: start w/ ECM and add CCD, which requires ESC, which requires KS. Next step then would be add the EBL, then VSS. (Do correct me if any of this is wrong.)
I may have said that in response to someone who didn't want to do all of it at once.  There are many options and ways to approach installing an EFI system.  One extreme  is to take incremental steps and the other extreme is to install everything all at once.  In your case, you have most of the EFI already installed if you have the Howell already up and running.  To take advantage of EFI and all the possibilities, I would say that upgrading with CCD (which requires ESC and KS), a VSS sensor and the EBL would a minimum next step.

So then the idiot's guide also needs to have PN and source info. I've found at least one source for everything except I have no clue about the CCD. I thought it was a Dick Paterson Springfield Ignition, but I didn't see anything on their site that was clearly a "CCD for EFI."
Here's the things I'm still confused about:
1) Source and PN for CCD as mentioned. Is it a Paterson thing and just not listed on his website?
There are several options for a CCD.  I got mine from a salvage yard for about $35.00.  Found it out here in CA at a pick-a-part.  Wish we had better yards around Springfield.  This thread gives a list of cars this distributor comes on <http://groups.google.com/group/gmcmh-efi/browse_thread/thread/eec6e76298c235e6/9bfd129a9f1e7efd?lnk=gst&q=cardone+distributor#9bfd129a9f1e7efd >

Cardone still sells rebuilt distributors for about $120.00 more or less (look up the vehicles in the above list).

Dick Paterson is now selling CCD distributors ready to go.  I say ready to go because the junk yard ones and the rebuilt probably will not have the correct polarity.  Pickup coil needs to be changed but that is not too difficult.

If going to the CCD, you will also need a Knock Sensor and an ESC module.

Dick just started with the CCD so may not be on his web-site yet - would need to call him.
2) Not sure what ROM/EPROM (whatever they are) I have. I found a hand-written note in some paperwork from PO that said "7747," and I understand that's the correct #, just don't know if that note meant that's what I've got or if that was the PO's note of what to get. Presume I have to take the ECM apart and look at the label on the chip to confirm.
If it is a Howell system, you have the 7747 ECM.  It is not important as to what EPROM (you have an EPROM because they are erasable) - Howell has burned the appropriate EPROM for the Olds engine.

3) Don't know what ppm my injectors are, or how to find out. But I do know from PO's service reports that they had to set up FP to 19-20psi to make it run, so suspect I do NOT have the 80's. So does this mean I am OK just compensating by running the higher FP? Or should I think about replacing with the correct 80ppm injectors?
Yes, it is OK to compensate with FP to get the 80 pph injectors.  Howell made a switch from the original GM 80 injectors to Holley injectors.  Not easy to go back.

4) Not sure about the wide/narrow band sensor thing. It's called an "air/fuel" sensor, but is that the same, ie does it replace, the "O2 sensor?" (Did I mention I'm not a mechanic? Pretty good with electronics, but very very limited mechanics experience.) I've seen the Zeitronix site and seems like consensus is the ZT-3 is sufficient for our engines.
You need a Narrow Band O2 sensor.  Again, if you have the Howell already installed then you have this on your engine already.  Usually installed as close to the manifold as possible and on the driver's side (It is possible it was installed on the passenger side) - easy to spot.  Some of us have installed a WB O2 sensor to get more information about Air Fuel Ratio (AFR) but this is not necessary.  WB02 sensors can also simulate Narrow Band sensors (which the ECM needs), however, I'm not a big fan of simulation).

5) I've seen 3 references for which KS to get: 2 options from Howell (MA209 & SD208), and a generic sensor for "1990 454 1-ton pickup." Don't know what's best, what's tradeoffs, etc.
This is an area that has been discussed a lot here without a definitive pn outcome.  You can get the KS and ESC from Howell and I believe they will be for a big block 454 which should be OK for the 455.  I got my KS and ESC from an Astro van and it seems to be working for me.  Knock Sensors (and the logic in the ESC) are designed to detect and interpret the "noises" from the engine.  Evidently, knocks resonant at different frequencies depending on the size of the cylinder bores.  There were different KS part numbers with different frequency capability.  Also, there are different ESC part numbers again depending on the size of the engine.  I think the most important aspect of all this is to get a matching set (a KS that matches or goes with an ESC).

6) I've seen 3 references for which VSS to get: 1 from Howell (VSS263), one from JAG (found website, didn't dig deep enough to find VSS PN), and one ref to "Ray Swartzenduber" (no clue how to contact him or PN).
The ECM requires a square wave signal.  The EBL can be changed to accept any number of pulses per mile.  Where this gets more interesting is if you also want to tap the VSS for cruise control.  If so, then it becomes more complicated.  If just for the ECM, then #1 on this page works (2000 ppm): <http://www.jagsthatrun.com/Pages/SpeedSensors_Speedometer.html>   Ray use to sell one that was 4000 ppm and was good if you wanted to install an Electro-Motor Cruise Control found on 89 - 90 GM Pickups.  This unit will feed the CC and the ECM.  However, Ray told me he was not going to sell them anymore although he may do another round if there was enough interest.  BobR from DynamicEFI was going to pickup Ray's source and sell them but I haven't heard if he has completed a deal yet or not.

7) Saw the "EBL Flash Switcher" on DynamicEFI website. Is that a need-to-have, a nice-to-have, or not-relevant/overkill?
This is only needed if you don't plan on hooking a laptop up to the EBL.  Allows you to select different .bins on the fly without having a laptop.  I don't think you would need to go this way. 
8) Saw reference to "IAT sensor" and "Ostrich emulator" needed for EBL. I'm clueless.
Inlet Air Temperature (IAT) gives the EBL some additional information to help fine tune the AFR.  Most of us are not sure there is much benefit for our application.  Maybe good for hotrodders with RamAir.   Was not supported by the 7747 but was added by the EBL - not required.

How's THAT for a laundry list???
:-)
J "still majorly confused amidst glimmers of understanding" 
Hopefully, the glimmers can become clearer and more permanent.

Randy Van Winkle

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 9:38:30 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay,

I forgot to add this to my rather long reply. Yes, get a complete EBL
already installed on a 7747 ECM then it is just unplug the Howell ECM
and plug in the EBL, load the default 455 bin (or get one from one of us
here on the forum) and you are ready to go. Plus, you have the Howell
ECM as a backup than can easily be plugged back in if necessary. I
would not stray from the 7747 because then you would have to make wiring
harness changes and some of the mapping differences from a 7747 and
other ECMs can be a real headache.

Randy (others will come up with other things I forgot to cover :-)
'77 Eleganza II "403"

George Beckman

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 10:20:24 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay,

We all need an idiot's guide.  Hopefully, someday, we will have one, but this has been a fun and bit painful course we have been struggling with together.  Each person here adds a little bit, which some others understand.  So, we inch forward.

I am going to past in a document I wrote up almost a year ago but never 1) finished and 2) was not sure the information was something anyone agreed upon.  So, as I look back, this is the order I would add to an original 7747 TBI system such as Howell and Affordable provice.  Howell's cable requires some surgery and we (to my knowledge) have not determined if Affordable's kit uses true CCD.

When Ken Henderson set up this GoogleList, we could post documents such as the one below, but Google has turned off that feature.  You can still read the documents we were collecting but alas, the feature is now dead.

(If you think you might like to try port injection, a new kit from the EBL folks is coming out Monday.  Of course that would mean another whole list of part.  *smile*  )

Getting the Most Out of Your Fuel Injection

 

Howell Fuel Throttle Body Injection (TBI) that many GMCers put on their coaches is a fuel control system that meters the fuel to the engine much like the Quadrajet had done for years.  Quadrajet, when set up correctly, did a very admirable job of metering fuel.  The main difference is that the TBI system checks to see how much fuel is actually burning and constantly makes adjustments.  It also is able to monitor the engine temperature and the altitude.  These variables make a big difference in the amount of fuel an engine needs.   Needed:  Basic kit from Howell, Affordable Fuel Injection or other vendors.
 

Improvement 1

 
Electronic Spark Control (ESC) allows the computer to operate a Computer Controlled Distributor (CCD).  This is a huge step in improving the system.  First, the 7747 computer that came with the Howell kits is fully able to control the spark.  Once spark is being controlled, and monitored real improvements can be seen in the system.  By monitoring ping with a knock sensor, the spark can be as advanced as possible without pinging.  The can increase fuel mileage and performance.  Needed:  CCD or an HEI distributor modified to become a CCD, an ESC module, a knock sensor and additional wiring. 
 

Improvement 2

 

The Embedded Lockers (EBL) kit is a piggy back board that mounts on the mother board of the 7747 (and others) computer that operates the fuel injection.  This accomplishes a multitude of improvements.  First, in any of the systems above, any changes in the programming of Fuel, Spark, Highway Cruise, etc. required the chip to be pulled out of the computer and re-burned with the new settings.  There have been a number of GMCers who have kindly burned new chips for many of us.  In addition, the technicians at Howell and Affordable have been very helpful in these areas.  With EBL, the GMCer can program and “Flash” the information to the computer is seconds.

EBL has a What’s Up Display (WUD) that gives you X-Ray vision into the operation of your engine.  If you have VSS, the WUD tells you how fast you are going.  It tells you how many RPMs you are running.  In addition it reports on over twenty other workings.   You know what your MAP, Throttle Position, Temperature, Spark Advance, Knock Count, Injector Duty Cycle, BLM readings, Closed Loop, Idle, DEFCO (fuel shutoff), Lean Cruise, etc.  A second screen gives instant and trip miles per gallon, fuel used, MAP reading and Lean Cruise at a glance.  (See VSS, in Improvement 3 below.)
 
EBL has a Learn Mode for the fuel tables that allows the computer to learn slight adjustments that were relegated to trial and error before.  And of course these new bits of programming can be flashed onto the chip for permanent use in seconds.  Purchase either a computer with the EBL installed or solder you own unit together.
 

Improvement 3

 

Vehicle Speed Sensors (VSS) are devices that tell the computer how fast the GMC is going.  The 7747 computer that came with the Howell kits is able to receive pulses from the VSS in a limited way.  With the addition of EBL the system moves ahead years in technology.  Once the computer knows how fast the vehicle is moving, it can add important features.  The WUD will now tell you how fast you are traveling and give instant MPG and trip MPG.   It can turn off the fuel injectors when coasting.  The computer can now switch into Lean Cruise or Highway Mode.  Because the computer knows the vehicle is at highway speeds and the engine is not pulling extra hard, the fuel ratio can be leaned out, so less fuel is used at the same speed.  Needed:  VSS unit, extra wiring.
 

Improvement 4

 

The EBL system has the ability to make use of knowing the Intake Air Temperature (IAT).  Because warm air is not as dense as cold air, this information can help the computer more accurately adjust fuel usage.  While all modern automobiles have this feature or later generations of the feature, there is not enough information with the GMC to say whether this is going to make a great deal of difference in drivability or mpg.  IAT sensor, harness and additional wiring.

 

On Jan 15, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Jay Rabe wrote:

What I need is an idiot's guide. 

Emery Stora

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 10:24:17 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
On Jan 15, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Jay Rabe wrote:

For one thing though, it seems as if there are at least a few options on how to put things together "to start" ie initial configuration if you're going to do this piecemeal. First option would be just the ECM out of the box, no bells & whistles or sensors. Consensus seems to be that will work and have benefits over a carb, but is really not taking advantage of all the possibilities. Then there's the option quoted above, then there's Randy's: start w/ ECM and add CCD, which requires ESC, which requires KS. Next step then would be add the EBL, then VSS. (Do correct me if any of this is wrong.)

You do not need the EBL to add a CCD.  However you would have to have a new chip burned to use it.  So it would be much easier to have an EBL

My CCD was installed a couple of years before I got the EBL.

So then the idiot's guide also needs to have PN and source info. I've found at least one source for everything except I have no clue about the CCD. I thought it was a Dick Paterson Springfield Ignition, but I didn't see anything on their site that was clearly a "CCD for EFI."
Here's the things I'm still confused about:
1) Source and PN for CCD as mentioned. Is it a Paterson thing and just not listed on his website?

You can get one from Dick Paterson or you can use one from any 307 Olds engine. Those engines were used in a lot of different GM cars. If you get one from a junkyard just disasseble it and clean and lubricate the shaft.  Also be sure to get the connector that mounts in the outside slot of the distributor.

2) Not sure what ROM/EPROM (whatever they are) I have. I found a hand-written note in some paperwork from PO that said "7747," and I understand that's the correct #, just don't know if that note meant that's what I've got or if that was the PO's note of what to get. Presume I have to take the ECM apart and look at the label on the chip to confirm.

No, just look at the label on the outside of the box. If it has the number 1227747 then it is a 7747 box.

3) Don't know what ppm my injectors are, or how to find out. But I do know from PO's service reports that they had to set up FP to 19-20psi to make it run, so suspect I do NOT have the 80's. So does this mean I am OK just compensating by running the higher FP? Or should I think about replacing with the correct 80ppm injectors?

Just use them at the higher fuel pressure.  But 18 might be enough.  What do they look like?  Are they a round dome on the top or do they have a plastic connector on the top with the terminals coming out the side?  You can look at Holley's web site.  The later injectors that Howell is using are Holley part number  522-43.  These are 60PPH @12psi, 85PPH @ 21PSI.

4) Not sure about the wide/narrow band sensor thing. It's called an "air/fuel" sensor, but is that the same, ie does it replace, the "O2 sensor?" (Did I mention I'm not a mechanic? Pretty good with electronics, but very very limited mechanics experience.) I've seen the Zeitronix site and seems like consensus is the ZT-3 is sufficient for our engines.

Most of us are running the narrow band sensor.  If you have the Howell already installed then you have this on your engine already.  Usually installed as close to the manifold as possible and on the driver's side.  I am running a three wire one (a heated sensor) which has a heater built in.  One wire connects to a 12 volt ignition source and another lead connects to ground.  The third lead is the sensor lead.  This allows you to install the sensor farther away from the head.  I have mine connected to the end of the headers.  Some have installed a wide band O2 sensor to get more information about Air Fuel Ratio (AFR) but this is not necessary.  WB02 sensors can also simulate Narrow Band sensors (which the ECM needs).

5) I've seen 3 references for which KS to get: 2 options from Howell (MA209 & SD208), and a generic sensor for "1990 454 1-ton pickup." Don't know what's best, what's tradeoffs, etc

I and several others are using the AC/Delco 213234 which is also sold as a KS7T or Airtex 5S2158.  It was used in many GMC vehicles including the 5. L 350 engine in a 1993 Buick Roadmaster Estate to the 1989 GMC K3500- truck with a 7.4 L engine.

.
6) I've seen 3 references for which VSS to get: 1 from Howell (VSS263), one from JAG (found website, didn't dig deep enough to find VSS PN), and one ref to "Ray Swartzenduber" (no clue how to contact him or PN).

Whatever you get it has to have a square wave output, not a sine wave.  Originally the EBL required a 2000 pulses per mile.  Now, howver, the programing allows you to adjust the system to use other pulse rates.  I am using a 4000 ppm square wave unit that i got from Ray Swartzendruber.  He can be reached at redr...@gmail.com.

7) Saw the "EBL Flash Switcher" on DynamicEFI website. Is that a need-to-have, a nice-to-have, or not-relevant/overkill?

I don't know of anyone that has one.

8) Saw reference to "IAT sensor" and "Ostrich emulator" needed for EBL. I'm clueless.

Not many of us have installed an IAT (incoming air temperature sensor).  I think that some that have it have found that it really doesn't do much for you.

I don't know what an Ostrich emulator is.  I must have missed that.  Is that where you stick your head down in the sand and ignore everything?

George Beckman

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 10:40:54 PM1/15/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay, Bruce et al,

In a posting to Bruce, earlier this evening I show a picture of the proper pickup I got from Dick Paterson. 

I used the list of cars that have distributors, to which Randy supplied a link, and got a Cardone rebuilt.  This was a couple of years ago.  In California I got it at Kragen/O'Reily's for about $120 for just the distributor... no cap or coil.  Unfortunately I used my existing coil and cap as most of us would and ended up with the polarity problem.  Dick Paterson was a big help and I finally have the correct polarity.  I don't know what Dick is charging for a CCD distributor, but it may be well worth it to have it have the correct pickup.  Dick probably uses a better module than Cardone, also.  Pickups can be between $40 and $60, I think.  It is not impossible to change, but requires driving the pin out and removing the gear.  Then there is a little keeper that was not fun.  Dick, with all his experience, said it could be a problem.  He even sent me an extra... which I ended up needing.

Perhaps Dick can weigh in on his product.


On Jan 15, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Randy Van Winkle wrote:

Dick Paterson is now selling CCD distributors ready to go.  I say ready to go because the junk yard ones and the rebuilt probably will not have the correct polarity.  Pickup coil needs to be changed but that is not too difficult. 

If going to the CCD, you will also need a Knock Sensor and an ESC module. 

Dick just started with the CCD so may not be on his web-site yet - would need to call him.

Bruce Hislop, Perth Communications

unread,
Jan 15, 2011, 10:44:44 PM1/15/11
to Gmcmh-efi google group
The Ostrich Emulator is a module that made tuning a PROM based ECM easier. The Ostrich plugs into the PROM socket and uses Flash ram to hold the program. It can be programmed in seconds over and over.
The EBL uses the same Flash technology.
Ostrich is not needed with EBL

Bruce Hislop
Perth Communications
br...@perthcomm.com
Sent from my Blackberry Curve


From: Emery Stora <emery...@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:24:17 -0700
Subject: Re: [GMCMH-EFI] 7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD


Gordon

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 12:31:11 AM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Randy;
I think you need to fine tune that statement.  Many of the GM ECM's have IDENTICAL PINOUTS.  RBob has identified all that are the same and the precise differences of those that are not.  I for one have a source of almost free ECM's from the scrap car guys.  I just have to be ready and able to respond very quickly to take them out.  When a fellow is only getting $75 per ton, he does not want to fool around taking parts off.

From RBob;
"
  • ECM to be converted to an EBL system. The ECM can be any one of the following:
1227137        '86 Safari, Astro
1226868        '85 MonteCarlo
1227429        '86-'88 S10 2.8l
1227746        Truck
1227747        Many Trucks & Vans
1228062        Blazer
1228063        '88 Camaro, Firebird
1228746        '89-'92 Camaro, Firebird, Caprice
1228747        Truck
1228838        '90 Lumina, 3.1l
16136965      '91-'94 Caprice, Roadmaster wagon
16144288      Blazer
16146299      Truck
16149405      '93 Trans Sport, Silhouette, Lumina: APV, 3.1l
16171199      '94-'95 trucks, MT
16196391      '95-'95 Lumina, Trans Sport, 3.1l
16196396      '94-'95 trucks, MT

If your vehicle uses one of these ECMs, the EBL ECM will be plug compatible. Most will be Plug'n'Play, some will need a pin or two moved on the harness connector (easy to do). In other words, unplug your stock ECM and plug in an enhanced EBL ECM with all of the features. "

Gordon

John Biwersi

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 8:46:16 AM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Ken,

Are you ready to get a Cadillac port FI manifold and throttle body from me? Eight 30 pound injectors , two 2-1/4" throttle bores, along with a EBL equipped 7730 ECM should make that 500 really snort.

 John B

Ken Henderson

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 9:18:22 AM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
John,

Thanks for the offer, but I don't have any intention of going to port injection.  There are still too many improvements to be gained from the EBL for me to take on even more challenges.  Add that to Bill Bramlett's repeated statements that he wouldn't make the TBI to port change again and it becomes an easy decision for me.  

But I'll be listening carefully to all y'all who make the leap.  Hope I don't hear any wails of anguish. :-)

Ken H.

Gary Worobec

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 10:03:10 AM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay,
I might be the newest of the newbies regarding the Howell EFI for the GMC.
While I did buy my system during the group buy a couple of years ago it
languished here in the office since then because the Q-jet was working very
well. Now with an issue with the iron manifold I decided to install it along
with a new Rockwell manifold. Here is what I did. By the way I had lots of
dumb questions which were patiently answered by George, Randy, Emery and Ken
(and a few others I should add).

ELECTRICAL

1. The cost of purchasing the EBL addition with the modified harness and the
pieces was cost prohibitive. I would have had to give up my existing Howell
ECM and harness and gotten zero credit for those items. I definitely wanted
to keep my ECM as a spare.

2. So I bought the EBL already installed into the ECM from DynamicEFI along
with the USB to serial adapter cable.

3. Bought the ESC, Knock sensor and VSS from Howell. Yes, probably could
have saved a few bucks but what the heck, Troy seems like a nice guy so lets
give him some buisness. If you do this make sure you ask Troy to include all
the WeatherPak connectors.

4. Bought the CCD distributor from Dick Paterson. I like him, he is a very
nice and pleasant guy. If you get his CCD also get his plug wire set. All
premium stuff.

5. Get a selection kit of WeatherPak connectors from Summit Racing so you
have some extras. You'll need a 4 pin for the CCD.

6. You'll need at least 7 colors of 16 gauge wire or a set of Thomas and
Betts wire ID labels.

7. You'll need special connectors for the connections to the ESC. Get these
from Mouser Electronics. The part numbers are listed on the GMCMHEFI site.
25 of each will cost you 6 bucks.

8. Get some convoluted black loom material from a local electronics store.
About 20 ft of 3/8 inch ought to do it. Probably 10 bucks.

9. There a three excellent diagrams on the GMCMHEFI site that show you what
connections need to be made into the harness. I think it is about 9 if I
recall. I used pliers to crimp the wires then a tiny dab of solder then
popped them into the right locations.

FUEL.

1. I'm keeping my existing CARTER electric pump but adding it in series with
the high pressure injection pump. I bought a matching relay connector and
two fuse holders from Howell so I could hook my existing pump into the
circuitry with the injection pump.

2. Bought two adapters to adapt the THROTTLE BODY fuel lines from push-on to
AN-6 so I can use my existing SS fuel line. Part numbers on the web site.

3. Removed the section of fuel filler pipe from the coach by cutting it at
the horizonal section and releasing it from the top hose clamp on the 1 3/8"
pipe. I welded in a fitting so I could screw in a AN-6 adapter for the
return. The method Howell says to do by punching a hole and threading is
mickey mouse.

4. Buy a new piece of 1 3/8" fuel filler hose from McMaster and replace
yours unless it is new. 9 bucks a foot

MISC

1. Emery has a nice set of directions on removing the existing "chip" in the
Howell loom that I have a hard copy of but cannot find his email. Hopefully
he will post it.

2. I'm going to use a BIN from the web site when ready to go.

3. My hope on this is to be able to allow one of the experts to tap into my
laptop via GO TO MEETING which we have an account for to be able to look at
my set up and make adjustments on the initial start up. Hopefully one of the
guys has a fast internet connection and we can do it.

Thanks

Gary and Joanne Worobec
1973 GMC Glacier
Anza, CA


=

Mr.erf ERFisher

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 10:30:44 AM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
this is a nice list of what has to be done

It would be good to include the cost of each item so folks will know  where and how to get them

thanks
gene

Randy Van Winkle

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 10:43:03 AM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Gordon,

Yes you are correct, I didn't investigate all of the ECM in the list.
Many are the same. But if you are going to use the 7747 as a backup, be
real careful as to which have minor changes in the pinouts (one wire
different can cause problems). The plugs are the same but several use
different wires for different sensor types. Even limp home mode may not
get you home because some are set for V6s, etc.

Randy (maybe more cautious than I should be)
'77 Eleganza II "403"

Gordon

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 11:40:50 AM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Gary;
That is a great list. I would just like to add that the harness from a
GM full size van is a good, long, one as the 7747 ECM is under the
passenger seat. As it usually goes to the crusher from the men's mall,
$25 will often be enough and even less if you find a pullapart/pickapart.
Gordon

> -----


> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3383 - Release Date: 01/15/11

Jay Rabe

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 3:41:08 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Gary & George & Randy & Gordon & Emory & Bruce & anyone else I missed. Absolutely great, great info. Just what I needed. Lots more studying for me to do.

One thing, somebody asked about my Howell system, and the deal is that it is NOT running well. I mentioned the stumble, which however I have not experienced since the two times home on maiden voyage a year ago. There has also been an idle hunting problem that may have been fixed since I installed a heated O2 sensor, just haven't driven it since then to test it. Waiting for my budget to allow replacing my 8 yr-old tires before any major trips. Probably too paranoid, but that's another issue. 

But biggest thing is that I seem to only be getting about 6 mpg. So all in all, plus me being into electronics/instrumentation/control, the cool factor of the WUD, and well of course the functionality, have the EBL high on my wanna-do list. Had just been overwhelmed and confused, but all this info from you guys is finally starting to clarify a roadmap. Can't thank you all enough.

On subject of the idiot's guide: George your "Getting the Most..." document is Great. If there was a way to update it a bit like with stuff from Gordon & Emory and others, it could be an incredible resource for everyone in the future. I understand google groups doesn't allow file document sharing anymore, but they do have Google Docs, which does the same thing, so I'm just asking/suggesting why don't you/we as a group decide to share such compiled knowledge there? And maybe even better, functionality-wise (due to ability to embed links), would be to set up a wikipedia page that would make it even easier to access and update for everyone. I'll be glad to help drive it in any way I can. Thoughts?

J
76 PB
Portland, OR








 
 
















 






 



 
 
 



























 




 




























































































   
 
       
 
 

Kading, Hal

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 4:15:35 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay,

Since this is Ken's list I feel he should be the one to decide how we proceed. He asked for suggestions a while back.

Hal Kading

Ken Henderson

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 4:14:49 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jay Rabe wrote:
...
On subject of the idiot's guide: George your "Getting the Most..." document is Great. If there was a way to update it a bit like with stuff from Gordon & Emory and others, it could be an incredible resource for everyone in the future. I understand google groups doesn't allow file document sharing anymore, but they do have Google Docs, which does the same thing, so I'm just asking/suggesting why don't you/we as a group decide to share such compiled knowledge there? And maybe even better, functionality-wise (due to ability to embed links), would be to set up a wikipedia page that would make it even easier to access and update for everyone. I'll be glad to help drive it in any way I can. Thoughts?

Go for it!!!  It's not long before we'll lose even the archives we've got now on Google Groups. We've had several stabs at a viable alternative,, and I've created a similar Yahoo! Group, but not had time to really investigate its possibilities.  We really do need to do something, even if it's not an improvement over what Google's taken away.

Ken "Willing to Relinquish Any or All Control" H.

Emery Stora

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 4:51:45 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com

Jay

The only time that I ever dropped to anywhere near 6 mpg was when I had a bad plug wire and a bad plug. I was only firing on 6 cylinders. 

How old are your wires!


Emery Stora

pump...@aol.com

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 6:18:21 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay:
Let me say that you are not the only one. About a year ago I was getting 4.8 to 5.9 GPH and the guys on the net here found the problem and I went up to 7.3 as an average. These guys are great and can figure out most anything.
I ran it (Howell) like that for about 8 thousand more miles then stuck a carb on and got 7.8 to 8.3. I have put about 12 thousand miles on the carb and still get 7.8 to 8.3.
I have my injection and I am waiting till a whole kit comes available that is plug and play and I dont have to tinker with it. I also dont want a computer on my lap while I am driving. I really do not want injection as a hobby, I want to camp with my motorhome as a hobby. I keep listening and watching and waiting.
In the meantime my neighbor took his injection off and has a carb now. He also had a Howell stock unit and got terrible milage and the stumble was just not acceptable.
Until I see that the plug and play unit gets a good 9 MPG the whole thing is just not worth the work to me.

Paul
73 Sequoia
Key West, Florida


=

Jay Rabe

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 11:20:07 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Cool. Thanks Ken. I've started the learning curve for creating a wiki article. I'll keep you posted on my progress.

Meanwhile, took some pictures of my injectors:

Number on the injector is (I think) 5284. Does that identify it and its ppm spec?

Emory asked about my plug wires. Haven't changed them myself, and no record of PO's having done them, so I guess they're on my list too.
:-)

J
76 PB
Portland, OR




From: hend...@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:14:49 -0500

Subject: Re: [GMCMH-EFI] 7747, ESC, Knock sensor, CCD
To: gmcm...@googlegroups.com

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jay Rabe wrote:
...
On subject of the idiot's guide: George your "Getting the Most..." document is Great. If there was a way to update it a bit like with stuff from Gordon & Emory and others, it could be an incredible resource for everyone in the future. I understand google groups doesn't allow file document sharing anymore, but they do have Google Docs, which does the same thing, so I'm just asking/suggesting why don't you/we as a group decide to share such compiled knowledge there? And maybe even better, functionality-wise (due to ability to embed links), would be to set up a wikipedia page that would make it even easier to access and update for everyone. I'll be glad to help drive it in any way I can. Thoughts?

Go for it!!!  It's not long before we'll lose even the archives we've got now on Google Groups. We've had several stabs at a viable alternative,, and I've created a similar Yahoo! Group, but not had time to really investigate its possibilities.  We really do need to do something, even if it's not an improvement over what Google's taken away.

Ken "Willing to Relinquish Any or All Control" H.

Ken Henderson

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 11:50:43 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Jay,

The 5284 doesn't tally with the numbers on my Howell-provided Holley 52-43 injectors which are labelled 6026A and 5720.  But I'm sure those are the ones you have.  They're rated 60 pph @ 12 psi or 85 pph @ 21 psi.  The spare I bought from O'Reilly's was identical.

These are photos of my injectors:

Ken H.

George Beckman

unread,
Jan 16, 2011, 11:58:43 PM1/16/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Those are the "smaller" injector that Howell has been running.  I have them in my 455 and run my pressure about 16+ lbs.  It would depend on how your chip is set up, but these injectors are very workable.  We have multiple bits of information about them and their rating.  

The next part may be way more than you wanted to hear, but it is the best I can do because these injectors are a bit of a mystery.

I am using the figure 61 #ph at 13 psi.  I run a pressure of about 16.5, which EBL spread sheet translates to 70 #ph for the injectors.   I don't know if it is correct or not, but it makes my rig run well and the computer run needing very little BLM correction.   So that is how the bin BPC  (Base Pulse Constant) is set.

That being said, the MPG constant has to be set at 80 #ph to get my trip MPG on the WUD to be more or less correct when I drive and fill at the service stations.  I am sure the the real answer is somewhere in the middle.


On Jan 16, 2011, at 8:20 PM, Jay Rabe wrote:

Number on the injector is (I think) 5284. Does that identify it and its ppm spec?


George Beckman

unread,
Jan 17, 2011, 12:04:16 AM1/17/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Oops.  I knew I should have looked up the 5284 number.  I need Emery's eidetic memory.  Instead I am plagued by a faulty memory and general slothfulness.  5720-5284...  I was only 436 off.

On Jan 16, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Ken Henderson wrote:

The 5284 doesn't tally with the numbers on my Howell-provided Holley 52-43 injectors which are labelled 6026A and 5720.

burtco99

unread,
Jan 19, 2011, 12:29:38 PM1/19/11
to GMCMH EFI
This list at first look is very interesting. I then decided to do some
web searching to see if I could expand on potential donor vehicles and
found this website:

http://www.exatorq.com/ludis_obd1/c3xref.html#1226868

They have a very detailed listing of ECMs and what they were installed
in and the data does not completely match with the list from RBob.

I thought that the above link might help in locating more donor
vehicles in the men's mall.

Thanks,
Les Burt
75 ELII

Just a lurker here for now.




On Jan 16, 12:31 am, Gordon <wizw...@telus.net> wrote:
> Randy;
> I think you need to fine tune that statement.  Many of the GM ECM's have
> IDENTICAL PINOUTS.  RBob has identified all that are the same and the
> precise differences of those that are not.  I for one have a source of
> almost free ECM's from the scrap car guys.  I just have to be ready and
> able to respond very quickly to take them out.  When a fellow is only
> getting $75 per ton, he does not want to fool around taking parts off.
>
>  From RBob;
> "
>
>     * ECM to be converted to an EBL system. The ECM can be any one of

1976 PalmBeachGMC

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 3:52:17 PM7/31/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Gary,

I've tried to get in touch with Dick a few times via email and never get a
response. I would like to purchase one of his CCD distributors to replace
the one I bought from AutoZone. Did you have to give him your distributor
in exchange? I would like to keep my AutoZone CCD distributor to use as
spare.

What is the best way to contact Dick? Can you tell me how much to expect to
pay?


Richard
1976 Palm Beach w/RollerCam455/Howell EFI+EBL
SE Michigan
Website: www.PalmBeachGMC.com

Emery Stora

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 4:27:25 PM7/31/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com, 1976 PalmBeachGMC
Richard

Dick is usually very prompt about answering his emails unless he is traveling.

Do you have the right address?

It is di...@paterson-gmc.com

Or you can telephone him

705-325-4554

Emery Stora

Kading, Hal

unread,
Jul 31, 2011, 5:44:18 PM7/31/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Richard,

When I bought my dist from Dick several years ago the core charge was very nominal. Well worth keeping as a spare.

Hal Kading

George Beckman

unread,
Aug 1, 2011, 10:26:49 AM8/1/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Climbing Siskiyou Pass I felt a little surge.  I checked my fuel pressure and it was about 8.  I was in PE and the Wide Band showed about 8-10, jumping around.

On level ground all seems normal and being as we will be home in 200 more or less level ground, I am going to go and fix there.  Even on level ground I notice some lows in FP and am thinking pump.  It could be some of that good (cheap) Oregon gas in the filter, but in my mind a filter is not going to cause an uneven flow.  However, I suppose it could cause "sipping" in the pickup and then would separate and gather in the line to the pump... causing cavitation at some times.  I probably will change the filter first.  

Randy, I have with me the pump you took off ... making me feel better about the whole thing.

George Beckman

unread,
Aug 3, 2011, 10:08:00 PM8/3/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Drove back to our "other" house (we are in the process of trying to move) and when we got to the stop sign at the end of the off-ramp I felt the steering go hard.  Being quick off the mark, I figured the engine had died.  I mentioned this to Ruth who loves the GMC but every time there is even a bump in the road she figures this is it and we will spend the rest of our days beside the road.  She probably was wishing she hadn't finished her book because she escape reads during these times.

I cranked it and it made a sputter in the initial portion of the crank, but then went into what I call "its not going to start" type cranking.  Because I have a fuel pressure gauge, I was able to see that indeed pressure was 18 during cranking.  Because it burped a couple of times, sort of windmilling, I tried a couple more times.  I let it sit and watched the fuel pump do its key on cycle.  I also tried holding the throttle down in case it was flooded.  It settled into more "its not going to start" type cranking.

I had the emergency blinkers on by now and pulled the hatch and did technical-mechanic things like checked the 12 volt and tac plugs on the distributor.  I pulled the jeep air horn and noted gas on the throttle plates.  It was a hot day, and the deck was warm.  We had the air on so it was fairly cool inside but I began to wonder about the 7747 EBL computer.  We have a 74 and it is under Ruth's seat in a cut down version of the pedestal.  The opening is to the back, close to the dinette seat back.  Ruth felt it and said it was hot.

I intended to watch the injectors while I cranked it but it started as normal on the first spin.  With the hot air on a hot day I decided running was good enough and I put the air horn on, closed the hatch and drove home.  It ran fine.  I even remembered to turn off the flashers after about 1/4 of a mile.

I am thinking that if the module got too hot, it would not have recovered in the five minutes the episode took.  It could have been a loose plug in the distributor, but nothing moved in my hand.  It could have been a hot computer, but with the air off, I am not thinking it cooled off much.  Couldn't be the dreaded vapor lock because the fuel pressure matched its setting.  Maybe it just died and didn't want to start.

Ideas?  (I carry a module and coil)

Randy Van Winkle

unread,
Aug 3, 2011, 10:26:39 PM8/3/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Sounds like it was not getting any spark.  The problem with this type of problem is that it won't happen again until you are in a tight spot.  Because you have fuel pressure (not withstanding your previous note, which I didn't see until just now, about FP), I would vote for the module.  Sounds like it went on a short hiatus. 

Randy (who does not like intermittent problems)
'77 Eleganza II "403"

Randy Van Winkle

unread,
Aug 3, 2011, 10:33:08 PM8/3/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
How full were your tanks when you were climbing? My first thought was
that you might be picking up air as the fuel sloshes around in the tank?

I agree that trying the filter first would be a good first step. You
might cut the old one apart and see if it accumulated anything
unwanted. Of course, the pump is fairly easy to change. During any of
this and your next problem, did you try switching tanks? It just
occurred to me that you might be having a problem with that new selector
valve we put on at my place last year.

Randy (still not liking intermittent problems)
'77 Eleganza II "403"

Ken Henderson

unread,
Aug 3, 2011, 10:35:32 PM8/3/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Module, or internal wires? I'd expect the module to continue to warm
during the short time you were stopped. Just don't trust those old
wires inside there, especially if, like mine, they're old and
"irreplaceable".

Ken H.

gene Fisher

unread,
Aug 3, 2011, 11:27:56 PM8/3/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
awwww man

you have had a bad year

gene

Paul Leavitt

unread,
Aug 4, 2011, 6:53:05 AM8/4/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
You might carry a pair of gloves and one spark plug. Or,,,,an inductive timing lite to check for spark. Always do the easyest and eliminate that first,,,,jwid,,,,PL

George Beckman

unread,
Aug 4, 2011, 9:42:54 AM8/4/11
to gmcm...@googlegroups.com
Excellent idea. In the wee hours of the morn, I thought of that and with daybreak I had forgotten. I will put my timing light in the coach.

Best Wishes,

George
Sent from my iPad

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages