FW: THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED EXISTS ONLY IN A MILITARY COURTROOM!!!

[Luis Ewing]

From Luis Ewing at [rcwcodebuster (at) gmail.com] or [rcwcodebuster
(at) live.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) comcast.net] or [rcwcodebuster
(at) hotmail.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) yahoo.com] or [rcwcodebuster
(at) aol.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) mail.com] or telephone: (253)
226-3741 or (360) 353-4846 or call me on SKYPE at [luisewing]

Web Sites under construction: [www.luisewing.com] or
[www.ultimateusers.com]



GODS LAW as written in the 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at [http://
www.americanvision (D0T) com] says:

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast
refused knowledge, I will also refuse thee that thou shall be no
Priest to me: and seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I
will also forget thy children.” Hosea 4:6

“And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people,
that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her
plagues: . . .” Revelations 18:4

“Then Peter and the Apostles answered, and said, We ought rather to
obey God than men.” Acts, 5:29

“Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands,
ye sinners, and purge your hearts, ye double minded.” James 5:8

“And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day
whom ye will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served (that
were beyond the flood) or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye
dwell: but I and mine house will serve the Lord.” Joshua 24:15

“No servant can serve two masters: for either he shall hate the one,
and love the other: or else he shall lean to the one, and despise the
other, Ye cannot serve God and riches.” Luke 16:13

“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers: for there is no
power but of God: and the powers that be, are ordained of God.”
Romans 13:1

“Whoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of
God: and they that resist, shall receive to themselves condemnation.”
Romans 13:2

“Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the ordinances of the world,
why, as though ye lived in the world, are ye burdened with
traditions?” Colossians 2:20

“As, Touch not, Taste not, Handle not.” Colossians 2:21

“Which all perish with the using, and are after the commandments and
doctrines of men.” Colossians 2:22

“And putting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us,
which was contrary to us, he even took it out of the way, and fastened
it upon the cross, . . .” Colossians 2: 14.

“That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about
with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with
crafttiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive.” Ephesians, 4:14

“And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully.”
Timothy, 1:8

“Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am
not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them.” Mathews 5:17.




SUBJECT: ALL COURTS ARE CONDUCTING A . . . GENERAL COURTS
MARTIAL . . . OR . . . A SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL . . . OR . . . AN
INVESTIGATION . . . AGAINST CIVILIANS WHO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE NOT IN
THE MILITIA!!!!


VIP!!!!

PRESS RELEASE!!!


“RCW 1.16.090 Legislative declaration for civil liberties day of
remembrance.
The legislature recognizes that on February 19, 1942, THE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES ISSUED EXECUTIVE ORDER 9066 WHICH AUTHORIZED
MILITARY RULE OVER CIVILIAN LAW AND LIVES . . .”


See: SHIMOLA v. LOCAL BOARD NO. 42 FOR CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al., 40
Fed. Sup. 808 (1941). This case states . . . “CIVIL RIGHTS HAVE
ALWAYS BEEN SUBJECT TO MILITARY EXIGENCY.” . . . For additional
information on this fact, see West's Key 10, CJS War, sections 10, 11
and 12, as well as the Civil Rights Acts codified under USCA 42, §
1981 and 1982 and the origination of the 14th Amendment.



“THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED” . . . EXISTS ONLY IN . . . “A MILITARY
COURT ROOM!!!!”


PLEASE FORWARD LUIS EWING’S THREE (3) NEW FREE FLYERS FAR AND WIDE,
MAKE COPIES AND HAND THESE OUT IN FRONT OF EVERY COURT HOUSE AND START
OBJECTING TO ALL THE JUDGES TO THE MILITARY NATURE OF THE COURT
PROCEEDINGS!!!!


Your Honor, I have the Right to know . . . “THE NATURE AND THE
CAUSE.”

Now watch, the judge will start reading off . . . “THE STATUTORY
CHARGES” . . . that are already on the traffic citation that the 80
IQ or less ANDROID COP gave you!

Your Honor, I object to your wasting tax payers money and time reading
me the charge again, I DID GRADUATE FROM HIGH SKOOL AND I AM CAPABLE
OF READING ENGLISH YOUR HONOR, I already know THE CAUSE your honor,
why are you reading me THE CAUSE over again, that’s NOT want I want to
know your honor, I WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THESE
PROCEEDINGS, IS THIS A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL OR IS THIS AN
INVESTIGATION UNDER A COURTS MARTIAL PROCEEDING, IS THIS A MILITARY
COURT ROOM????


Ha, ha, now we can really start to have some fun with . . . THE
THIEVES IN BLACK ROBES OF TREASON!!!!


* * *


Did you know that . . . “THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED” . . . exists
only in a . . . MILITARY COURT ROOM????

Did you know that according to . . . “ALL STATE CONSTITUTIONS” . . .
show that . . . “ALL MALES” . . . between the ages of 18 and 45 is
presumed to be in either . . . “THE REGULATED MILITA” . . . or . . .
“THE UNREGULATED MILITIA.”

All those in the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force and the National Guard
are in . . . “THE REGULATED MILITA.”

All males between the ages of 18 and 45 are according to all State
Constitutions presumed to be in . . . “THE UNREGULATED MILITIA.”

Did you know that the Voter Registrar is also the Military Enrollment
Officer for your “district”????

Did you know that they amended an amendment of an amendment to an
amendment to a statute which is only “prima facie” evidence of the
law, but in fact is not the law to make the statutes non-gender
specific so that they could unlawfully bring . . . “WOMEN” . . . in
to . . . “THE UNREGULATED MILITIA” . . . illegally and in violation of
all current State Constitutions.


Go look at Rule 2 in the Civil Rules, specifically go see CR 2 and you
will see that they have combined law and equity into one form of
action called civil.


“RULE 2
ONE FORM OF ACTION
There shall be one form of action to be known as “civil action.”“


Then search your State statutes and you will see that they have
abolished all forms of criminal pleadings just like they have done in
Washington State in this statute right here:.


“RCW 10.01.030 Pleadings--Forms abolished.
All the forms of pleading in criminal actions heretofore existing, are
abolished; and hereafter, the forms of pleading, and the rules by
which the sufficiency of pleadings is to be determined, are those
prescribed herein. [Code 1881 § 1002; 1873 p 224 § 185; 1869 p 240 §
180; RRS § 2022.].”


They have brought in the Admiralty Maritime Jurisdiction and combined
it together with Rule 2 and the martial law jurisdiction.


The Judiciary Act of 1792 makes it clear that Congress said that . . .
“the forms and modes of proceeding in causes of equity and of
admiralty and maritime jurisdiction shall be according to the course
of civil law” . . . and reads:


“SEC. 9. And be it further enacted, That the district courts shall
have, exclusively of the courts of the several States, cognizance of
all crimes and offences that shall be cognizable under the authority
of the United States, committed within their respective districts, or
upon the high seas; where no other punishment than whipping, not
exceeding thirty stripes, a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars, or
a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, is to be inflicted;
and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes
of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under
laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the
seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by
vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts
as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all cases, the
right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to
give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all
seizures on land, or other waters than as aforesaid, made, and of all
suits for penalties and forfeitures incurred, under the laws of the
United States. And shall also have cognizance, concurrent with the
courts of the several States, or the circuit courts, as the case may
be, of all causes where an alien sues for a tort only in violation of
the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. And shall also
have cognizance, concurrent as last mentioned, of all suits at common
law where the United States sue, and the matter in dispute amounts,
exclusive of costs, to the sum or value of one hundred dollars. And
shall also have jurisdiction exclusively of the courts of the several
States, of all suits against consuls or vice-consuls, except for
offences above the description aforesaid. And the trial of issues in
fact, in the district courts, in all causes except civil causes of
admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, shall be by jury.”


27 CRF 72.11 defines all crimes as being "commercial crimes and reads:

Sec. 72.11 Meaning of terms.
As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires, terms
shall have the meanings ascribed in this section. Words in the plural
form shall include the singular, and vice versa, and words importing
the masculine gender shall include the feminine. The terms "includes"
and "including" do not exclude things not enumerated which are in the
same general class.
...

Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or
State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting;
forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession
of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring,
pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like
offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and
attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the
foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana
will be treated as if such were commercial crime.”



* * *


RCW 10.37.015 Charge by information or indictment — Exceptions.


*** CHANGE IN 2011 *** (SEE 5195-S.SL) ***

No person shall be held to answer in any court for an alleged crime or
offense, unless upon an information filed by the prosecuting attorney,
or upon an indictment by a grand jury, except in cases of misdemeanor
or gross misdemeanor before a district or municipal judge, OR BEFORE A
COURT MARTIAL.

[1987 c 202 § 167; 1927 c 103 § 1; Code 1881 § 764; RRS § 2023.
Formerly RCW 10.37.010, part.]

Notes:
Intent -- 1987 c 202: See note following RCW 2.04.190.


* * *







The Sixth Amendment only gives . . . “THE RIGHT TO THE ASSISTANCE OF
COUNSEL.”

The Sixth Amendment does NOT use the word . . . “REPRESENT” . . .
or . . . “REPRESENTED.”

Go look at your State Constitution, it will probably say that you
have . . . “THE RIGHT TO DEFEND IN PERSON” . . . and/or . . .
have . . . “THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.”

But do notice, you will see with your own eyes, your State
Constitution does NOT use the word . . . “REPRESENT” . . . or . . .
“REPRESENTED” . . . anywhere in your State Constitution.

Now, go to . . . “GOOGLE” . . . and type in . . . REVISED CODE OF
WASHINGTON . . . and go look for . . . TITLE 38 . . . in the Revised
Code of Washington.

RCW 38 is entitled . . . “RCW 38 MILITIA & MILITARY AFFAIRS.”

Now go look for . . . “RCW 38.38.376 (1)(2) and you will see with your
own eyes:


THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED . . . EXISTS ONLY IN A MILITARY COURT!!!!

RCW 38.38.376 [Art. 38] Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel.

(1) The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall
prosecute in the name of the state, and shall, under the direction of
the court, prepare the record of the proceedings.

(2) THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his or her defense
before a general or special court-martial or at an investigation under
RCW 38.38.316 as provided in this subsection.


IT IS NOW UNDISPUTED THAT THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED EXISTS ONLY IN A
GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL OR AT AN INVESTIGATION IN A MILITARY
COURT ROOM!!!!


Now, go back to . . . “GOOGLE” . . . and type in . . . “UNITED STATES
CODE.”


Then when you get to the United States Code, type in 10 in the Title
box and then type in 838 in the section box and you will see the
following:



“TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART II > CHAPTER 47 > SUBCHAPTER VII > §
838

§ 838. Art. 38. Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel

(a)The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall
prosecute in the name of the United States, and shall, under the
direction of the court, prepare the record of the proceedings.
(b)
(1)THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his defense before a
general or special court-martial or at an investigation under section
832 of this title (article 32) as provided in this subsection.”


IT IS NOW UNDISPUTED THAT THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED EXISTS ONLY IN A
GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL OR AT AN INVESTIGATION IN A MILITARY
COURT ROOM!!!


Wanna set up the . . . JUDGES????

Everyone needs to start asking all the judges the following
questions:


YOUR HONOR, DO I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED?

All the judges will say . . . “YES YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE
REPRESENTED BY ANY ATTORNEY YOU CHOOSE.”

I OBJECT YOUR HONOR, WHICH STATUTE SAYS THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE
REPRESENTED????

YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE SIXTH AMENDMENT SAYS NOTHING ABOUT ANY SO
CALLED RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED!

YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE SIXTH AMENDMENT ONLY SAYS THAT I HAVE . . .
“THE RIGHT TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.”

YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE STATE CONSTITUTION ONLY SAYS THAT I HAVE THE
RIGHT TO DEFEND MYSELF IN PERSON OR BY ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.

YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, THE SO CALLED . . . “RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED
HAS NO FOUNDATION IN LAW FOR CIVILIANS.”

In anticipation that the judge will tell you that you are in a State
court and NOT a federal court and will tell you that 10 U.S.C. 838
only applies to federal courts and has no bearing in this so called
State Court, ask him the following question:


YOUR HONOR, DOES . . . “THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED COME FROM RCW
38.38.376????


If the judge tells you he doesn’t know because he does not have the
stature right in front of him, then read him the following:


YOUR HONOR, RCW 38.38.376 says:


RCW 38.38.376 [Art. 38] Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel.

(1) The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall
prosecute in the name of the state, and shall, under the direction of
the court, prepare the record of the proceedings.

(2) THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his or her defense
before a general or special court-martial or at an investigation under
RCW 38.38.316 as provided in this subsection.


YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT TO THIS MILITARY NATURE OF THIS PROCEEDING!


YOUR HONOR, IS THIS A MILITARY COURT ROOM????


YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT, BOTH THE SIXTH AMENDMENT AND THE STATE
CONSTITUTION SAYS THAT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW . . . “THE NATURE AND
CAUSE OF THIS PROCEEDING” . . . SO I AM ASKING YOU WHAT IS THE NATURE
OF THIS PROCEEDING, IS THIS A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL????


I DON’T UNDERSTAND YOUR HONOR, YOU PREVIOUSLY STATED ON THE COURT
RECORD THAT THIS IS NOT A MILITARY COURT ROOM DIDN’T YOU????


I DON’T UNDERSTAND YOUR HONOR, YOU PREVIOUSLY STATED ON THE COURT
RECORD THAT . . . “I HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED, CAN YOU PLEASE
TELL ME WHICH SECTION OF THE STATE CODES OR STATUTES SAYS THAT . . . I
HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED”????


* * *


ARE YOU IN THE MILITIA????



* * *


OREGON LAW:

“396.105 Militia comprised of organized and unorganized militia. (1)
The militia of the state shall be divided into the organized militia
and the unorganized militia.
(2) The organized militia shall be composed of the Oregon Army
National Guard and the Oregon Air National Guard, which forces
together with an inactive National Guard shall comprise the Oregon
National Guard; the Oregon State Defense Force whenever such a state
force shall be duly organized; and such additional forces as may be
created by the Governor.
(3) THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA SHALL CONSIST OF ALL ABLE-BODIED RESIDENTS
OF THE STATE BETWEEN THE AGES OF 18 AND 45 WHO ARE NOT SERVING IN ANY
FORCE OF THE ORGANIZED MILITIA or who are not on the state retired
list and who are or who have declared their intention to become
citizens of the United States; subject, however, to such exemptions
from military duty as are created by the laws of the United States.
[1961 c.454 §5(1),(2),(3); 1989 c.361 §2; 2005 c.512 §3]
396.110 [Repealed by 1961 c.454 §213]”


398.206 Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel. (1) The trial
counsel of a general or special court-martial shall prosecute in the
name of the state and shall, under the direction of the court, prepare
the record of the proceedings.
(2) THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in the accused’s
defense before a general or special court-martial by civilian counsel
if provided by the accused, or by military counsel of the accused’s
own selection if reasonably available, or by the defense counsel
detailed under ORS 398.136. Should the accused have counsel of the
accused’s own selection, the defense counsel and assistant defense
counsel, if any, who were detailed, shall, if the accused so desires,
act as associate counsel; otherwise they shall be excused by the
military judge or by the president of a court-martial without a
military judge.


* * *

CALIFORNIA MILITARY AND VETERANS CODE SECTION 120 TO 130:


“120. The militia of the State shall consist of the National Guard,
State Military Reserve and the Naval Militia--which constitute the
active militia--and the unorganized militia.

121. THE UNORGANIZED MILITIA CONSISTS OF ALL PERSONS LIABLE TO
SERVICE IN THE MILITIA, but not members of the National Guard, the
State Military Reserve, or the Naval Militia.


122. THE MILITIA OF THE STATE CONSISTS OF ALL ABLE-BODIED MALE
CITIZENS AND ALL OTHER ABLE-BODIED MALES WHO HAVE DECLARED THEIR
INTENTION TO BECOME CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES, WHO ARE BETWEEN THE
AGES OF EIGHTEEN AND FORTY-FIVE, and who are residents of the State,
and of such other persons as may upon their own application be
enlisted or commissioned therein pursuant to the provisions of this
division, subject, however, to such exemptions as now exist or may be
hereafter created by the laws of the United States or of this State.”



* * *


TEXAS LAW:


GOVERNMENT CODE
TITLE 4. EXECUTIVE BRANCH
SUBTITLE C. STATE MILITARY FORCES AND VETERANS
CHAPTER 432. TEXAS CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

SUBCHAPTER F. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE

Sec. 432.053. INVESTIGATION. (a) A charge or specification may not
be referred to A GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL for trial until a thorough and
impartial investigation of all the matters set forth has been made.
This investigation must include inquiry as to the truth of the matter
set forth in the charges, consideration of the form of charges, and a
recommendation as to the disposition that should be made of the case
in the interest of justice and discipline.
(b) THE ACCUSED IS ENTITLED TO BE ADVISED OF THE CHARGES AGAINST HIM
AND OF HIS RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED AT THAT INVESTIGATION BY COUNSEL.
ON THE ACCUSED'S OWN REQUEST, HE IS ENTITLED TO BE REPRESENTED BY
CIVILIAN COUNSEL IF PROVIDED BY HIM, or by military counsel of his own
selection if that counsel is reasonably available, OR BY COUNSEL
DETAILED BY THE OFFICER EXERCISING GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL JURISDICTION
OVER THE COMMAND.

* * *
KANSAS LAW

48-2505: (KCMJ Art. 27) Detail of trial counsel and defense counsel.
(a) (1) Trial counsel and defense counsel shall be detailed for each
general and special court-martial. Assistant trial counsel and
assistant and associate defense counsel may be detailed for each
general and special court-martial. The governor shall prescribe
regulations providing for the manner in which counsel are detailed for
such courts-martial and for the persons who are authorized to detail
counsel for such courts-martial.

(2) No person who has acted as investigating officer, military
judge or court member in any case may act later as trial counsel,
assistant trial counsel or, unless expressly requested by the accused,
as defense counsel or assistant or associate defense counsel in the
same case. No person who has acted for the prosecution may act later
in the same case for the defense, nor may any person who has acted for
the defense act later in the same case for the prosecution.

(b) Trial counsel or defense counsel detailed for a general
court-martial:

(1) Must be a judge advocate who is a graduate of an
accredited law school or is a member of the bar of the highest court
of a state; and

(2) must be certified as competent to perform such duties by
the judge advocate general of the state military forces.

(c) In the case of a special court-martial:

(1) THE ACCUSED SHALL BE AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE
REPRESENTED AT THE TRIAL BY COUNSEL HAVING THE QUALIFICATIONS
PRESCRIBED UNDER SUBSECTION (b) unless counsel having such
qualifications cannot be obtained on account of physical conditions or
military exigencies. If counsel having such qualifications cannot be
obtained, the court may be convened and the trial held, but the
convening authority shall make a detailed written statement, to be
appended to the record, stating why counsel with such qualifications
could not be obtained;

(2) if the trial counsel is qualified to act as counsel before
a general court-martial, the defense counsel detailed by the convening
authority must be a person similarly qualified; and

(3) if the trial counsel is a judge advocate or a member of
the bar of the highest court of the state, the defense counsel
detailed by the convening authority must be one of the foregoing.

History: L. 1972, ch. 203, § 48-2505; L. 1988, ch. 191, § 20;
July 1.

* * *

NOTE: I HAVE THREE (3) NEW FLYERS THAT HELP YOU MAKE THESE ARGUMENTS
IN COURT!!!! – Please send me an e-mail to the addresses listed above
and below and request that I send you the three (3) new flyers that
help teach you to argue that you have a right to “manage and plead
your own cause personally” or have “the assistance of counsel” and NOT
waive your rights to counsel when you refuse to take or accept one of
their piece of shit traitor bar attorneys!

* * *

WHEN YOU FIND THE SIMILAR . . . “MILITIA & MILITARYAFFAIRS
STATUTES” . . . regarding the alleged . . . “RIGHT TO
REPRESENTATION” . . . in your STATE, please send it to me so that I
can add it to my list above and then I will send it back to all those
who are in your STATE who are on my FIFTY STATES E-MAIL LIST!!!!

* * *

MY NEW JUDICIARY ACT FLYER CLEARLY SHOWS THAT YOU CAN APPEAR IN COURT
BY ONE (1) OF THREE (3) DIFFERENT WAYS which does NOT include any
alleged . . . “RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED.”

Also please notice in my . . . NEW JUDICIARY ACT FLYER . . . that you
will NOT find any wording that says . . . THAT YOU HAVE TO WAIVE YOUR
RIGHTS TO COUNSEL IN ORDER TO DEFEND YOURSELF!!!!

* * *
Please also see my . . . NEW RIGHT TO COUNSEL FLYER . . . which also
clearly shows you that the alleged . . . “RIGHT TO BE
REPRESENTED” . . . has . . . “NO FOUNDATION IN LAW” . . . it’s NOT in
the Sixth Amendment or in your State Constitution!!!!

Please notice that my . . . NEW RIGHT TO COUNSEL FLYER . . . also
shows you that neither the Sixth Amendment or your State Constitution
includes any wording that says . . . THAT YOU HAVE TO WAIVE YOUR
RIGHTS TO COUNSEL IN ORDER TO DEFEND YOURSELF!!!!


* * *

NO YOUR HONOR, I REFUSE TO BE . . . “REPRESENTED.”

NO YOUR HONOR, I AM NOT GOING TO HIRE ANY TRAITOR OR TREASONOUS
BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT ME AND I DO NOT WAIVE MY RIGHTS
TO COUNSEL EITHER!!!!

NO YOUR HONOR, I AM NOT GOING TO ACCEPT ANY TRAITOR OR TREASONOUS
PUBLIC DEFENDER TO REPRESENT ME AND I DO NOT WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO
COUNSEL EITHER!!!!

NO YOUR HONOR, I AM NEVER GOING TO WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL, LET THE
RECORD SO REFLECT!!!!

* * *

Everyone needs to study the attached FREE FLYERS and read over the
above arguments over and over again and start making these type of
oral arguments in court and object, object, object!


I am putting together a complete motions to dismiss package based upon
the fact that these courts have no legal authority to force counsel on
you over your objection and I am putting together the complete
documentation package that will set the court record to show that you
NEVER WAIVED YOUR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL, THEREFORE THEY CANNOT SEND YOU TO
PRISON EVEN WHEN FOUND GUILTY OF ANY CRIME.


FORMER U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGE BORK SAID:

“EVERYONE VOLUNTEERS TO GO TO PRISON.”


I HAVE FIGURED OUT THE FLAWS IN THE SIXTH AMENDMENT, THE FARETTA CASE
AND ARGERSENGER v. HAMLIN.

1.) Farettta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
2.) Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 27, 31, 37, 38, 40 (June 12,
1972).

“We hold that no person may be deprived of his liberty who has been
denied the assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth
Amendment. This holding is applicable to all criminal prosecutions,
including prosecutions for violations of municipal ordinances. The
denial of assistance of counsel will preclude the imposition of a jail
sentence.
. . . Under the rule we announce today, every judge will know when
the trial of a misdemeanor starts that no imprisonment may be imposed,
even though local law permits it, unless the accused is represented by
counsel. He will have a measure of the seriousness and gravity of the
offense and therefore know when to name a lawyer to represent the
accused before the trial starts.” ARGERSINGER v. HAMLIN, 407 U.S. 25,
27, 31, 37, 38, 40 (June 12, 1972). And;

I CAN KEEP YOU OUT OF PRISON EVEN IF YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY AT TRIAL!

1.) ABOUT 5 TO 6 YEARS AGO, I TOOK TWO IRS TAX DEFENDANTS . . .
“PATRICK GRANT DAVIS & MARTIN LOUIS BAUCOM” . . . ALL THE WAY TO
TRIAL . . . “IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN DOCKET NO. 5:02-
cr-26" . . . FOR A MAJOR INCOME TAX CASE, AND I LET THEM BE FOUND
GUILTY ON PURPOSE, THEY WERE FOUND GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS OF WILLFUL
FAILURE TO FILE INCOME TAX RETURNS, INCOME TAX EVASION AND A KLEIN
CONSPIRACY BECAUSE THEY WERE BUSINESS PARTNERS AT TRIAL, BUT THEY DID
NOT GO TO PRISON BECAUSE MY PAPERWORK SET THE RECORD TO SHOW THAT THEY
NEVER WAIVED THEIR RIGHTS TO COUNSEL, WHERE HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF
ANY BAR CARD CARRYING ATTORNEY LETTING YOU BE FOUND GUILTY ON PURPOSE
AND STILL KEEPING YOU OUT OF JAIL AT THE SAME TIME????

2.) JUST 2 YEARS AGO, I TOOK . . . “ONE CALIFORNIA DRUG DEALER
RUSSELL GUILLEMOT” . . . ALL THE WAY TO TRIAL . . . “IN THE SUPERIOR
COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO COURT CAUSE NO.
SCN221106" . . . AND I LET HIM BE FOUND GUILTY ON PURPOSE, BUT HE
DID NOT GO TO PRISON IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT HE WAS FOUND GUILTY AT
TRIAL AFTER TURNING DOWN THE PLEA BARGAIN!!!! – WHERE HAVE YOU EVER
HEARD OF ANY ATTORNEY LETTING YOU BE FOUND GUILTY OF MULTIPLE FELONY
COUNTS OF MANUFACTURING MORE THAN 30 PLUS MARIJUANA PLANTS WITH INTENT
TO DISTRIBUTE AND STILL BE ABLE TO KEEP YOU OUT OF JAIL IN SPITE OF
THE FACT THAT YOU WERE FOUND GUILTY AT TRIAL AFTER TURNING DOWN THE
PLEA BARGAIN????


3.) IN TWO OF MY OWN RECENT CASES HERE IN WASHINGTON STATE . . . “IN
THE PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CAUSE NO. XYC004075” . . . WHERE I
WAS CHARGED WITH 1 COUNT OF HARASSMENT AND 1 VIOLATION OF A NO CONTACT
ORDER AND I WAS LOOKING AT DOING TWO YEARS JAIL TIME AND EVEN THOUGH I
HAD TO SIT IN JAIL WAITING FOR TRIAL BECAUSE I COULD NOT AFFORD THE
EXPENSIVE BAIL EXTORTION FEES, I GOT BOTH CHARGES DISMISSED AND THE
CASE NEVER WENT TO TRIAL AND WAS DISMISSED BECAUSE I NEVER ACCEPTED
THE PUBLIC DEFENDER AND I SET THE COURT RECORD TO SHOW THAT I DID NOT
WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL AND THEY HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO KICK ME OUT
ON THE STREETS EVEN THOUGH I WAS IN FACT GUILTY OF THE FACTS AND THE
LAW, HOWEVER, IT WAS ALL BASED UPON THE PERJURED TESTIMONY OF MY EX-
GIRLFRIEND WHOM I AM NOW PREPARING TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES
AGAINST!!!!

FOUR (4) POSITIVE RESULTS IN THREE (3) DIFFERENT CASES:

THREE (3) DIFFERENT CASES IN THREE (3) DIFFERENT STATES WHERE FOUR (4)
DIFFERENT PEOPLE INCLUDING MYSELF DID NOT GO TO JAIL IN SPITE OF THE
FACT THAT ALL THREE (3) OTHER THAN ME WERE FOUND GUILTY AT TRIAL, OH,
AND I ALMOST FORGOT TO MENTION, MY CASE NEVER WENT TO TRIAL, I WAS
NEVER FOUND GUILTY, THEY JUST HELD ME UNTIL MY SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS
WERE VIOLATED AND THEN THEY HAD TO KICK ME OUT OF THEIR JAIL ONTO THE
STREETS A FREE MAN AGAIN BECAUSE THEY COULD NO LONGER TAKE ME TO TRIAL
BECAUSE MY SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS HAD ALREADY EXPIRED AND I NEVER WAIVED
MY RIGHTS TO COUNSEL AND NOW I HAVE GROUNDS FOR ONE HELL OF A LAWSUIT
AGAINST PIERCE COUNTY FOR NEGLIGENT INVESTIGATION, FALSE ARREST AND
FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND MY EX GIRLFRIEND FOR BARRATRY, MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION, PERJURY, LIBEL AND SLANDER, etc.

I am working on a complete . . . “KEEP YOU OUT OF JAIL MOTIONS
PACKAGE” . . . that will keep you out of jail even though you are
found guilty at trial package which I will release at some Seminars
later this year probably starting in September or maybe in 2012
sometime, I have NOT decided yet?

I hope everyone finds this information useful!


Sincerely

Luis Ewing



PS - Please send . . . “CASH ONLY DONATIONS” . . . to:

Luis Ewing
c/o General Delivery,
(City of) Copalis Crossing,
The State of Washington [98536


AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . . “WITHOUT ADMISSION” . . . by the
WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 38.38.256, 5
U.S.C. 500 (b), RCW 26.25.010, RCW 26.21.005 (19)(a), RCW 26.21A.
005 (21)(a), RCW 26.26.011 (19), RCW 26.27.021 (16), RCW
26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. § 1154, 18 U.S.C. § 1161, 18 U.S.C. § 2265,
25 U.S.C. § 1301, 25 U.S.C. § 1903 (4), 25 U.S.C. § 1903 (8), 25
U.S.C. § 1911 (a)(b)(c), 25 U.S.C. § 1901 -1963 (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C.
§ 3631, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 44 Fed. Reg. 67584 to 67595 (1979), 26 CFR
§ 305.7871-1 (a), 26 U.S.C. § 7701 (a)(40)(A), 31 CFR Subtitle A, §
10.3, 8 CFR Ch. 1, § 292.1, 8 U.S.C. § 1401 (b), 25 U.S.C. § 465,
RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), GR 24 (b)(8),
Sections 3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881, 28 U.S.C. §
1333, 28 U.S.C. § 1652, FRCP Rule 64, RCW 4.04.010, RCW 1.12.030, RCW
9.81.120, RCW 10.14.020 (1), RCW 10.14.020 (2), RCW 9A.50.060, The
Judiciary Act of 1789, September 24, 1789, 1 Stat. 73, CHAP. XX Sec.
35, 28 U.S.C. 1654, the Sixth Amendment and First Amendment of the
U.S. Constitution and article 1, section’s 1, 2, 22, 29 and 30 of the
Washington State Constitution, CrR 1.1, CrRLJ 1.1, CrR 1.3 (a) and
ARLJ No. 7. See also CR 82.5 (a) & RCW 13.34.240.


1 HAVE SEVEN (7) E-MAIL ADDRESS at [rcwcodebuster (at) the following ]
internet provider addresses to wit:

a.) gmail.com>
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) hotmail.com>
d.) aol.com>
e.) live.com>
f.) mail.com>
g.) comcast.net>


PLEASE DON’T FORGET TO COPY & PASTE ALL 7 OF MY E-MAIL ADDRESSES INTO
YOUR CONTACTS FOLDER IF YOU DON’T WANT MY E-MAILS TO GET ROUTED
STRAIGHT TO YOUR SPAM FOLDER BY YOUR INTERNET PROVIDER:

rcwcodebuster (at) gmail (dot) com, rcwcodebuster (at) yahoo (dot)
com, rcwcodebuster (at) mail (dot) com, rcwcodebuster (at) hotmail
(dot) com, rcwcodebuster (at) live (dot) com, rcwcodebuster (at) aol
(dot) com, rcwcodebuster (at) comcast (dot) net


WANT TO REACH lloyd smith? – You can contact lloyd smith at (360)
289-3429 or (360) 353-4846 or E-Mail to <godsp...@gmail.com> or
[godspastor (at) gmail (dot) com]


WANT TO REACH KURT RIGGIN? – You can contact Kurt Riggin at : (303)
463-4437 or E-Mail to: <kurtr...@q.com> or [kurtriggin (at) q (dot)
com]



CAVEAT WITH OPT OUT AND REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This E-Mail is
covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510
to 18 U.S.C. 2521; RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b); RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.
52.120; RCW 9A.52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 and is legally privileged and
you do NOT have my “consent” for forward this e-mail to anyone. The
information contained in this E-Mail is intended only for use of the
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or agent
responsible to deliver it to the Sendee, please destroy the E-Mail
after advising by reply that you erroneously received this E-Mail. The
receipt by anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive
the lawyer or “of-counsel client privilege,” nor will it constitute a
waiver of the “work-product doctrine.” Any information obtained in
violation of RCW 9.73.030; RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.
52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW
9.73.050 and further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else
without my express prior “written consent” is liable for civil
monetary damages under Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and
criminal penalties under RCW 9.73.080. The information contained in
this transmission is privileged and confidential and may be hazardous
to your preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed free “only” to those
specific recipients listed above who have previously expressed an
interest in receiving the information for research and educational
purposes and have made a prior request for said information. If the
reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is
hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication
of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b)
(C); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This message is
being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation
for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill
s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL
INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be considered SPAM as long as it
includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to be removed from
future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has reached you in
error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the mailing
list, PLEASE SEND ME AN E-MAIL REQUESTING THAT I REMOVE YOU FROM MY E-
MAIL LIST AND I WILL REMOVE YOU WITHIN 72 HOURS FROM MY RECEIPT OF
YOUR E-MAIL although it may take me 4 to 5 days to catch up to your e-
mail because I get so many e-mail request’s for my FREE FLYERS from
all over the U.S. or please return to the below listed address asking
me to remove you to Luis Ewing, c/o General Delivery, (City of)
Copalis Crossing, The State of Washington [98536] or call and leave
a message with your E-Mail address and request to be removed at (253)
226-3741. Thank you!