Fwd: Grizzly-Thrift benchmark results

[寺田 佳央]

Begin forwarded message:

差出人: Bongjae Chang <bongja...@gmail.com>

日時: 2011年12月5日 15:49:58JST

宛先: "d...@grizzly.java.net" <d...@grizzly.java.net>

件名: Grizzly-Thrift benchmark results

返信先: d...@grizzly.java.net

Hi,

I would like to share results.

I attached the pdf and test sources.

First, I used Grizzly's LeaderFollower IO Strategy in server side because LFIS had a bit performance improvement than Woker Thread IO Strategy and Grizzly's Same IO Strategy in only client side.

But I found that Netty had better performance than Grizzly which used WTIS. So I also changed WTIS into Same Thread IO Strategy in server side and I found that Grizzly is best.

It seemed that maybe Netty used the default IO logic like Grizzly's STIS when I reviewed the netty sources simply.

In most of cases, Grizzly-thrift server and client modules were best. But in small packets, TSocket client had better performances.

Thanks.

Regards,

Bongjae Chang

[yone098]

米林です。

最初、添付ファイルを見逃していましたが、確かに興味深いですね。

d...@grizzly.java.net は、watch してなかったのでありがたいです。

2011/12/5 寺田 佳央 <tyosh...@yahoo.co.jp>:
> これは興味深い

--
Masaaki YONEBAYASHI
@yone098