Git for Windows - End User License Agreement

151 views
Skip to first unread message

D JP

unread,
Jan 21, 2023, 11:09:40 AM1/21/23
to git-for...@googlegroups.com
Hi Admin,

Good day!
Where can I see or extract a copy of EULA for Git for Windows?

Thanks,
Dianna

Konstantin Khomoutov

unread,
Jan 21, 2023, 12:34:49 PM1/21/23
to git-for...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:52:57PM +0800, D JP wrote:

> Where can I see or extract a copy of EULA for Git for Windows?

Git for Windows is free software [1], so it does not have a EULA because what
matters is the project's source code, and that's what the applicable licenses
protect - as opposed to some vendor's intellectual properties - which EULAs
typically do. To learn about its licensing terms, please refer to the
"LICENSES" section of its official release notes [2].
FWIW, this is the URL linked to by the "LICENSES" button at the bottom
of the GfW project's landing page [3].

I honestly have no idea whether _the binaries_ built by the GfW maintainers
and the installer executable containing them are covered by some different
license or licenses, but I never witnessed any discussions of these matters,
so I think it's safe to assume the licenses from [2] are applicable as well.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software
[2] https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra/blob/master/ReleaseNotes.md#licenses
[3] https://gitforwindows.org/

Dirk Heinrichs

unread,
Jan 23, 2023, 1:29:34 AM1/23/23
to djap...@gmail.com, git-for...@googlegroups.com
Am Dienstag, dem 17.01.2023 um 15:52 +0800 schrieb D JP:

Where can I see or extract a copy of EULA for Git for Windows?

It's the first thing the installer shows to you. However, it's plain GNU General Public License (GPL) v2, so you can also simply ask Google for it.

HTH...

Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs
Senior Systems Engineer, Delivery Pipeline
OpenText ™ Discovery | Recommind
Recommind GmbH, Von-Liebig-Straße 1, 53359 Rheinbach
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer Gordon Davies, Madhu Ranganathan, Christian Waida, Registergericht Amtsgericht Bonn, Registernummer HRB 10646
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht gestattet.

Konstantin Khomoutov

unread,
Jan 23, 2023, 9:29:05 AM1/23/23
to git-for...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:29:28AM +0000, 'Dirk Heinrichs' via git-for-windows wrote:

>> Where can I see or extract a copy of EULA for Git for Windows?
>
> It's the first thing the installer shows to you. However, it's plain GNU
> General Public License (GPL) v2, so you can also simply ask Google for it.

I understand that the distinction is indeed subtle, but please make no
mistake: EULA is a contract for which you - the user - agree to fulfill your
part when accepting the EULA (usually through some means of the UI performing
installation of the piece of software to which that contract applies).
Contrary to this, F/OSS licences are not contracts.

You might consider this passage from the Wikipedia [1]:

| Unlike EULAs, free software licenses do not work as contractual extensions
| to existing legislation. No agreement between parties is ever held, because
| a copyright license is simply a declaration of permissions on something that
| otherwise would be disallowed by default under copyright law.

It does not mean that it's impossible to force some entity to comply with the
terms of a F/OSS license in some legislations, but still the distinction is
important to those involwed with legal issues. That's why I refrained from
using the term "EULA" in my earlier answer. F/OSS licenses are not EULAs.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-user_license_agreement

Dirk Heinrichs

unread,
Jan 23, 2023, 9:36:54 AM1/23/23
to kos...@bswap.ru, git-for...@googlegroups.com
Am Montag, dem 23.01.2023 um 18:28 +0400 schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov:

F/OSS licenses are not EULAs.

Well, when you're installing GfW on your computer, you're the End User. You're presented a License (GPL) that you need to Agree with. That's what those 4 letters are all about.

Bye...

Dirk Heinrichs

unread,
Jan 24, 2023, 1:44:10 AM1/24/23
to git-for...@googlegroups.com
Am Montag, dem 23.01.2023 um 18:28 +0400 schrieb Konstantin Khomoutov:

F/OSS licenses are not EULAs.

No license is an EULA. EULA is the process of agreeing to a license.

If you install GfW on your computer, you're an End User. You're presented a License (GPL in this case) that you need to Agree with. That's what these 4 letters are all about.

Bye...

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages