Wifi Hid Injector

[Auriville Cha]

Ialso tried different cables but this did not solve the problem.

I would like to make sure that it is possible to use POE to power the SXR80 and the SXS80?

And if so, do you have any idea where the problem might come from?

Could the problem be that the satellite is not powered enough?

Thank you,

Theo.

Not sure what POE injector you're using but if its supplying "just enough" when connected with just a short cable, the longer run and patch panels might be causing enough lose that it won't power it.

First problem is that the voltage is just 12 V in this use case. The resistance of a single pair, two pairs of passive "PoE", or even four pairs of AWG 24 wires is simply to high, the voltage drop is much to high to operate reliably, read there is not enough voltage left at the end of the wires.

There are reasons why industry standard compliant PoE systems operate on higher voltages, requiring two pairs (for 802.11af and at), resp. four pairs on 802.11bt. This is to ensure the cables are not overheating (burning energy due to high cable losses), the specs are tight to keep true industry standard PoE workable so the powered devices can be operated reliably within the specs (especially the voltage) on the longer supported cable runs.

I bought a Ubiquiti 802.3at injector ( -accessories-poe-injectors/products/u-poe-at) but it only puts out 48V... so the AP is running in reduced power mode. Netgear support says the Ubiquiti injector isn't actually AT compliant because the AT standard is 50V+ (they seem to be correct!).

I am having trouble connecting my EAP225 to my network via a network switch. When I connect via the router and supplied PoE injector, all works fine (SSID shows, can connect to the network ('Connected, secured'), and can access tplinkeap.net).

But when I use a PoE enabled network switch (which I bought for the purpose), I cannot access the EAP225 on the network (SSID shows, can connect but 'No internet, secured', cannot access tplinkeap.net). On the network switch, the PoE light for the connected port lights up, but not the networking light.

Please confirm that you are using the originally provided power adapter (Output: 48VDC / 1.25A) to power up the SG1005P switch. And try plugging the power adapter of the SG1005P switch to another power outlet for checking.

I've have recently been given an EAP245 V3 AP, which I will add to my network of EAP225 V3's. I was given this without an Injector and in my simplistic approach thought it would be easy as I had a couple of spare Injectors that power the 225's.

No problem, buy a 48V one, but there are 2 models TL-POE4824G and TL-POE4818G, the difference being the Max Watt output. Both would seem to be capable of powering the 245, but I would like to be sure.

LOL, I"m not totall sure, but I'm 99% confident that it will be the cheaper one :) Regardless, you should get the cheaper one as it will do, though in my region, I found the Ubiquiti active POE injectors significantly cheaper.

P/S: This is really depend the requirements and the prefer way to achieve the setup. Some may prefer single device with embedded cellular modules like SDX/MBX some may like to separate the features into multiple devices. Hope this will help.

How do I install both domes without a SIM Injector. Please consider PoE supply details. Can the splitter be used to connect both HD1s? Is a single Ethernet cable possible?

Or

How do I install both domes with a SIM Injector. Please show SIM Injector PoE supply details. Can the splitter be used to connect both HD1s? Is a single Ethernet cable possible?

Why not run the 2 domes of your SIM injector? That way you power both and you have them running on a single LAN, and you are able to place SIM & spares as you wish. All you need to configure (and match) the SIMs to each dome.

For your core switch I would use a balance router that enables you to handle multiple WANs. Configure vlans from the Domes to distinguish between the routes.

The core switch would enable you to manage the traffic as required including policies and also would enable failover/bonding/speed fusion etc if you like.

You would also be able to prioritise for guest/owner etc onboard ensuring traffic is not used by crew or non essential devices.

All can then be managed by single interface IC2, incl. your APs

There are other more sophisticated routers/firewall gateways if you need more granular control, but from what I understand above, this should work for you.

Using HD2 MBX (CAT 18). This will meet all your requirements which support 2 x CAT 18 cellular modules, Wifi WAN, and RemoteSIM support. This option dropped since the purpose here is using 2 x HD1 Domes.

This is what Sit Loong proposed to you. You have pointed out the right thing here - HD1 Domes will loss the POE source. So, you may change the Balance router to SDX or remain using Balance router (e.g. Balance 305) + 2 x PoE Injectors for the HD1 Domes. Balance router + 2 x PoE Injectors will be cost-effectiveness.

An alternative is to have very short cable runs and place the router near the antennas. This requires custom enclosures in most cases, and they are hard to reach, difficult to maintain, and have very high temperatures. It can be done, but it usually scares people away when you start talking about custom enclosures or fiberglass work.

The Dome is a perfect product for a boat - all of the radios and antennas are self contained, it has an amazing mounting solution, and it only needs a single ethernet cable which really cannot be that affected by distance or interference if done correctly.

In other setups where a device is multiple modem (like the Transit Duo) I create VLANs for each modem back to the router. On most vessels we have the GFI Kerio installed as it is a traditional favourite. The Kerio can handle multiple WAN connection on a single port via VLANs. I still have to trial this setup with a Balance router.

You are quite right about the Dome being ideal because of the cable, more expressively because it reduces cable loss (on the RF domain). And there is nothing like running a single ethernet CAT6a versus 4 x LM400 think stiff RF cable where every meter counts, connectors create losses and adaptors, pigtails etc have to be used as well.

There are a lot of manufacturers now coming out on the market with their version of the Dome antenna and it will be a very hotly debated product in the coming years.

The antenna (gain) performance is still not as good as the traditional whip setup, but I am looking forward to great improvement on this front.

So in my mind you have your central router (your WAN/firewall router) with a single cable to the SIM injector and then the SIM injector with a single to the first Dome and using the supplied passthrough to the 2nd Dome, or two separate cables from the SIM injector to the Domes if they are located in different masts or otherwise separate locations where running two runs is more convenient.

The Dome has an M35 screw mount, if you use the Ethernet splitter (supplied with the Dome) directly attached, the screw fitting is covered and the mount is thus no longer pole mount. (You can see this in the pictures on the product page -hd1-dome/)

I agree. I ended up mounting mine using the included bracket because I wanted to use the passthrough both for weatherproofing and for a second future dome. When you do this, you are almost required to use the mounting bracket or come up with some custom setup. Having a marine mount threaded bracket would have been slightly better, but with the weight of the entire setup, I can understand why the included bracket is preferred.

Yes, I suggest 2 cables from SIM Injector to WAN2 and WAN3 of the Balance router. Balance router supports same subnet for different WAN interfaces. So, LAN of both HD1 Domes, WAN2 and WAN3 of Balance router are in the same subnet. WAN2 of Balance router will point HD1#1 as a gateway and WAN3 of Balance router will point HD1#2 as a gateway.

Based on my suggestion from option 3, you may tag WAN2 as VLAN10 and WAN3 as VLAN 20 (we support 1 tagged VLAN per WAN port). Then configure VLAN10 and VLAN20 respectively in both HD1 Dome. This helps to avoid using same broadcast domain within HD1 Domes and Balance router.

PRO FACTORY KIT is the racing kit composed by RX1 PRO ECU and 2nd injector, developed by GET R&D Department to optimize the flow of fuel at mid and top, guaranteeing better performance. The kit is designed for 250cc 4-stroke engines starting from 2018 onwards and takes the most out of the engine without compromising the reliability.

RX1 PRO in the kit is ready with two maps:

- Map 1: for a standard engine with OEM single injector

- Map 2: for a standard engine with GET second injector.

These maps are totally reprogrammable through both WiGET App, by using the included WiFiCOM device, and/ or MAYA software (sold separately).

The mounting instructions included in the kit allows a quick and intuitive installation, without any further engine modifications needed.

3a8082e126