Hi all,
my first issue here.
I have been looking closely at the AAT gvp:Concept instances and noted there are some consistences concerning the (English) preferred labels.
There are 2 main property which link to label xl:prefLabel and gvp:prefLabelGVP. I was trying to see if there is more consistence in one or the other property values. But I encountered issues with both of them.
Examples:
gvp:prefLabelGVP aat_term:1000799424-en
xl:prefLabel aat_term:1000799425-fr
Should xl:prefLabel include aat_term:1000799424-en as a value?
https://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300018434
Southern Song
xl:prefLabel
aat_term:1000018434-zh, aat_term:1000421665-es, aat_term:1000473914-nl, aat_term:1000644552-zh-Hant, aat_term:1000890492-zh-Latn-pinyin-x-notone, aat_term:1000890493-zh-Latn-pinyin-x-hanyu, aat_term:1000890494-zh-Latn-wadegile
gvp:prefLabelGVP aat_term:1000018434-zh
No English language label no in either xl:prefLabel or gvp:prefLabelGVP
And aat_term:1000018434-zh states: xl:literalForm Southern Song@zh
Which is not Chinese but English
xl:prefLabel aat_term:1000669433-la, aat_term:1000669433-nl
gvp:prefLabelGVP aat_term:1000669433-nl
Why is this scientific name with Dutch "(soort)" and no English.
Shouldn't there just be 1 concept for
Quercus ilex with language labels in Latin, English, Dutch, etc?
I discovered these by inspecting the results of the following
SPARQL query:
SELECT *
WHERE
{
?concept a gvp:Concept .
OPTIONAL {?concept gvp:prefLabelGVP ?gpvlabel } .
FILTER ( !regex(STR(?gpvlabel), "-en.*$") )
}
ORDER BY ?concept
LIMIT 100
Let me know if you have any thoughts on this. If there are plans to address these labels inconsistencies.
Best
a