Predicate to use with "compass points"?

27 views
Skip to first unread message

John Muccigrosso

unread,
Sep 16, 2018, 4:50:24 PM9/16/18
to Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data
I'm trying without success to find an ontology with a predicate along the lines of "has orientation," for use with the AAT compass points concept. TIA.

Vladimir Alexiev

unread,
Sep 18, 2018, 12:28:29 PM9/18/18
to jmuc...@gmail.com, Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 11:50 PM John Muccigrosso <jmuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm trying without success to find an ontology with a predicate along the lines of "has orientation," for use with the AAT compass points concept. TIA.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gettyvocablo...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to gettyv...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gettyvocablod/0d67b8f0-6ed4-493c-83d2-bf3b981959ed%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Vladimir Alexiev, PhD, PMP
Lead, Data and Ontology Management
Ontotext Corp, www.ontotext.com
Email: vladimir...@ontotext.com, skype:valexiev1
Mobile: +359 888 568 132, SMS: 359888...@sms.mtel.net
Calendar: https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=vladimir...@ontotext.com
Publications: http://vladimiralexiev.github.io/pubs/

John Muccigrosso

unread,
Sep 18, 2018, 1:00:08 PM9/18/18
to Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 9:28:29 AM UTC-7, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:


Thanks! I didn't know this resource.

open vocab gives this example for their compassDirection:

ov:compassDirection "N"


With the AAT values, could that be:

ov:compassDirection <http://vocab.getty.edu/page/aat/300078761>

 ?

Vladimir Alexiev

unread,
Sep 20, 2018, 9:02:50 AM9/20/18
to John Muccigrosso, Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data
Yes, I think it's fine to use the same prop for resources and literals, even if the original ontology demands only one of them. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Getty Vocabularies as Linked Open Data" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gettyvocablo...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to gettyv...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gettyvocablod/a0dea3f3-3eaf-4f92-9867-92275d7d0050%40googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages