--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gep-ed" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gep-ed+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/596983B9-0F7C-4BC5-8461-25B6811FFF9A%40berkeley.edu.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CAMZGX2e7LRTJwa7HTQXwAW6XM%2BHbeb993SMhYB58k87_QCzWVA%40mail.gmail.com.
Stuart Candy, Whose future is this? |
|
Keri Facer, All our futures? Climate change, democracy & missing public spaces Keri Facer, Learning to live with a lively planet |
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/5fb16d86.1c69fb81.5915c.f1fbSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.
Hi Kate
It’s always a challenge to get them thinking positively about viable alternative futures.
For the climate session I did last week, I presented on the international politics and negotiations and them got them to research different ‘bottom-up’ initiatives aligned with their own theories of change (community, NGO, city, corporate actions) using some of the links below and discuss their potential and limitations.
Leave it in the Ground campaign (Links to an external site.)
Centre for Alternative Technology (Links to an external site.)
350.org (Links to an external site.)
Rapid Transition Alliance (Links to an external site.)
Seeds of a Good Anthropocene (Links to an external site.)
C40 (Links to an external site.)
ICLEI (Links to an external site.)
In terms of a paper that covers some of this, I just published a paper with Andrew Simms which looks at the politics and possibilities of rapid transitions (attached) and its more public facing predecessor ‘How did we do that? The possibility of rapid transition’.
We were trying to generate some ‘evidence-based hope’!
Good luck!
Pete
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Schreurs, Miranda
Sent: 16 November 2020 07:46
To: kmon...@berkeley.edu
Cc: gep...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [gep-ed] Readings/resources for finishing out this semester
Hello Kate, all – no shortage of good suggestions and options here, another one could be to look at visions of the energy and climate future itself, which we tried to do systematically in this open access study, published in Social Studies of Science:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0306312720915283
The visions cover many different energy systems or social innovations (nuclear, EVs, divestment), are positive and negative, and are drawn from robust mixed methods research. Maybe worth exposing your class to 😊
Benjamin
From: gep...@googlegroups.com <gep...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Dana R Fisher
Sent: 15 November 2020 17:55
To: Leah Stokes <lst...@ucsb.edu>
Cc: Kate O'NEILL <kmon...@berkeley.edu>; gep...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [gep-ed] Readings/resources for finishing out this semester
Going in a really different direction, here's a recent theoretical piece by Andrew Jorgenson and me that asks broad questions about risk, decision-making, and the Environment. Pdf is available here: https://www.asanet.org/ending-stalemate-toward-theory-anthro-shift
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gep-ed/CAMXTsQ-ML%3DSaOKt3ToiUnshx5zmP1NmapVadk6nxnLkKiW7zNg%40mail.gmail.com.
From Leah Stokes:
One option is you could assign something from our podcast, A Matter of Degrees. bit.ly/degreespod - I know other faculty are using it in class. We did a nice forward looking episode on electrification and cleaning up the energy system by 2035 (episode 3).
Reed Kurtz:
Please excuse the self-promotion but I did just have a (very short) snap analysis of the 2020 election and its impact on global environmental issues/climate justice come out today: https://www.electionanalysis.ws/us/president2020/section-1-policy-and-political-context/u-s-presidential-politics-and-planetary-crisis-in-2020/ I definitely wrote it for a general audience and students, and I tried to be as 'positive' looking forward as possible. In particular I talk a bit about the shift in discourse I see regarding a "Green New Deal decade" as well as make some linkage to recent events in Chile as well as the grassroots organizing by folks like Stacy Abrams as sources of hope and inspiration for the struggles ahead. Hope this is helpful!
Dana Fisher:
Going in a really different direction, here's a recent theoretical piece by Andrew Jorgenson and me that asks broad questions about risk, decision-making, and the Environment. Pdf is available here: https://www.asanet.org/ending-stalemate-toward-theory-anthro-shift
Rasmus Karlson
Chapter in: J. C. Pereira and A. Saramago (eds.), Non-Human Nature in World Politics, Frontiers in International Relations, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_6 On Conflicting Temporalities and the Ecomodernist Vision of Rewilding
Susi Moser:
Stuart Candy, Whose future is this? |
Keri Facer, All our futures? Climate change, democracy & missing public spaces Keri Facer, Learning to live with a lively planet |
There’s also the AOC video message from the future.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9uTH0iprVQ
Libby Lundstrom:
I always close my GEC course out with these videos; both offer some degree of hope and idea of a more open future if we get our act together. I think both have won awards too I think given their not-entirely-dystopian stance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=v1iJ7X_OuQI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sacc_x-XB1Y
Simon Dalby:
Kim Stanley Robinson's new novel "The Ministry for the Future". Alas it's a little long at over 500 pages, but ...!!!? It is hilarious, and with an Irish character, one Mary Murphy, at the heart of saving the world, what's not to like?
Radoslav Dimitrov:
Gabriela Iacobuta, Navroz K. Dubash, Prabhat Upadhyaya, Mekdelawit Deribe
& Niklas Höhne (2018) National climate change mitigation legislation, strategy and targets: a global update, Climate Policy, 18:9, 1114-1132, DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1489772
Maria Ivanova:
Escobar-Pemberthy, N.; Ivanova, M. Implementation of Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Rationale and Design of the Environmental Conventions Index. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7098. At https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7098
Peter Newell:
For the climate session I did last week, I presented on the international politics and negotiations and them got them to research different ‘bottom-up’ initiatives aligned with their own theories of change (community, NGO, city, corporate actions) using some of the links below and discuss their potential and limitations.
Leave it in the Ground campaign (Links to an external site.)
Centre for Alternative Technology (Links to an external site.)
350.org (Links to an external site.)
Rapid Transition Alliance (Links to an external site.)
Seeds of a Good Anthropocene (Links to an external site.)
C40 (Links to an external site.)
ICLEI (Links to an external site.)
Fossil Free (Links to an external site.)
Reasons to be cheerful (Links to an external site.)
In terms of a paper that covers some of this, I just published a paper with Andrew Simms which looks at the politics and possibilities of rapid transitions (attached) and its more public facing predecessor ‘How did we do that? The possibility of rapid transition’.
Johannes Stripple
This
is leaning toward the more imaginative side, but we have written a tourist
guide to an imagined coastal city in a decarbonised Europe circa 2045, we call
it ’Rough Planet Notterdam’.
https://www.reinvent-project.eu/roughplanetguide
"The Rough Planet Guide declines to answer the question of “how do we make
the decarbonisation transition happen?”, in favour of the question “how might
we live in a successfully decarbonised Europe?” Thinking through the polyphony
of the latter sheds new light on the former, not least because it makes it
clear that there is more than one pathway to a post-fossil Europe.
This book is not a prophecy or promise, but it is a possibility. This book is
not optimistic, but it is hopeful. This book is a fiction… but it is built upon
the best truths we could find during the four-year interdisciplinary work
research work done by many people across Europe."
It’s free to download.
Here is a recent blogpost
https://www.rapidtransition.org/commentaries/tour-tomorrow-today-why-we-made-a-travel-guide-to-an-imaginary-future-city/
It deals with sectors like steel, plastic, meat, dairy and transport so there
are some harder political economies below the surface in the book.
Ben Sovacool:
Another one could be to look at visions of the energy and climate future itself, which we tried to do systematically in this open access study, published in Social Studies of Science:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0306312720915283
The visions cover many different energy systems or social innovations (nuclear, EVs, divestment), are positive and negative, and are drawn from robust mixed methods research. Maybe worth exposing your class to
Roopali Phadke:
I was teaching an environmental politics class last Spring when all hell broke loose. I pivoted my final project and designed a new group project oriented around the new Bezos foundation and Covid. Students enjoyed it, and some of their projects were really terrific. It got them to think critically about climate change solutions, esp by playing in the neoliberal-philanthropic space. [I’m sure you can contact her for details!]
Jeff Colgan:
You’ve already got a ton of good suggestions, but if you’re looking for something really tangible and policy-oriented, you could use our new report to the Biden Admin on how they can use executive orders on climate change to advance their overall US foreign policy agenda:
https://watson.brown.edu/files/watson/imce/news/explore/2020/Final%20CSL%20Report.pdf