Best Regards and happy New MMXI !
Narasimham
Hi Narasimham,
I think the problem has to do with the Apollonian Circles Theorem. Let A be the given fixed point and L the given straight line. Let B be the intersection point of L with the plane E through the point A and orthogonal to L. Then if a point P moves on E such that PA/PB=1, the locus of P is a straight line, it is the perpendicular bisector of the segment AB.
Best regards,
Avni
But B or variable point B1 which is the foot of the perpendicular
dropped from P should not be a fixed point. i.e., when P is moving
away from BA, B should also move along L, PB or PB1 should always be
perpendicular to L.
Best Regards,
Narasimham
I think that in cases other than that described previously, the locus of P is not a straight line.
Best regards,
Avni
Hi Avni,
B is not a given point ,but is on a given line L. So there cannot
exist such a locus, may be?
Regards,
Narasimham
Hi Narasimham,
Let A=[0, 1, 0] be the fixed point and let the z-axis be the fixed line. Let r be the fixed ratio of the distance of a point P from z-axis over the distance of P from A. The ratio r takes values between 0 and 1. Then the line through B=[0,r/(1+r), 0], and direction vector a=[r, 0, sqrt(1-r^2)], is the locus of points P that have the fixed ratio r of distances from z-axis and point A. Now we can write
P = B+l*a = [0,r/(1+r), 0] +l*[r, 0, sqrt(1-r^2)], or
P = [ l*r, r/(1+r), l*sqrt(1-r^2)] ...(1)
The distance of P from z-axis is
d1 = sqrt(l^2*r^2 + r^2/(1+r)^2) ...(2)
The distance of P from A is
d2 = sqrt(l^2 + 1/(1+r)^2) ...(3)
>From (2) and (3) we have
d1/d2 = r .
Best regards,
Avni
You wrote :
>> Then the line ... is the locus of points P that have the fixed
>> ratio r of distances from z-axis and point A.
???
Such a locus in R^3 is obviously a *surface*, not any line,
straight or not.
Let M(x,y,z) a point in R^3
distance from M to line L x=y=0 (z axis) is sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
distance from M to A = (0,1,0) is sqrt(x^2 + (y-1)^2 + z^2)
Let H the perpendicular projection of M on z axis.
The searched locus is MA/MH = 1/r = e
so that the locus is the *surface* with equation :
x^2 + (y-1)^2 + z^2 = e^2(x^2 + y^2)
That is z^2 = (e^2 - 1)(y^2 + x^2) + 2y - 1
Consider the intersection of this surface with a plane z = k
parallel to xOy plane.
That is (y^2 + x^2) + 2y/(e^2 - 1) = (k^2+1)/(e^2 - 1)
If e != 1 it is the equation of a circle
The center of this circle is x = 0, |y| = 1/sqrt(|e^2 - 1|)
the sign of y depending on e > 1 or e < 1, but this center doesn't
depend on z, hence this center is on a straight line parallel to Oz
When z = 0, this circle is on the xOy plane and is the well known
Appolonius circle, locus of points M in the plane with MA/MO = e
Let I the center of this Appolonius circle.
*************************************************
* If e != 1, the locus is a revolution surface, *
* the axis being the parallel to Oz in I *
*************************************************
Intersect now this surface with the yOz plane, that is in this yOz
plane the locus of points with MA/MH = e, H being the perpendicular
projection of M on axis Oz.
It is well known that this curve is a conic section with
excentricity e.
A is the focus and Oz axis the directrix.
That can also be seen at once by writing the equation as
z^2 - (e^2 - 1)y^2 - 2y = (e^2 - 1)x^2 - 1
with x = 0 (plane yOz) it is z^2 - (e^2 - 1)y^2 - 2y = - 1
if e > 1 it is an hyperbola
if e = 1 it is a parabola
if e < 1 it is an ellipse
*******************************************************
* if e = 1 the locus is a parabolic cylinder *
* if e > 1 it is a revolution one sheeted hyperboloid *
* if e < 1 a revolution ellipsoid *
*******************************************************
Now for straight lines **included** in this locus.
If e = 1 the cylinder generators are infinitely many straight lines,
parallel to Ox axis.
If e > 1 there are also two families of infinitely many straight
lines (well known property of the one sheeted hyperboloid :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperboloid "doubly ruled")
if e < 1 the ellipsoid contains no straight line.
In the case of hyperboloid, the straight lines may be obtained by
intersecting the surface with a tangent plane at vertex of the
generating hyperbola. That is a plane perpendicular to Oy and
tangent to the Apollonius circle.
These lines are then y = k, z^2 = (e^2 - 1)x^2
It can be constructed as follows :
let D, D' the intersections of the Apollonius circle in xOy with Ox
OD^2 = OD'^2 = 1/(e^2 - 1) = x^2/z^2
that is the lines are parallel to KD and KD', with K = (0,0,1)
Best Regards, and Happy New Year.
Hi Philippe,
Yes,had the same results; after the full surface doubly ruled
hyperboloid of one sheet is obtained the straight line generators/
rulings are selected.The skewed asymptote generators for case e > 1are
the solution.
I believe even the simple extension of equal distances ( e = 1) in 3D
applicable as a parabolic cylinder as a generalization is unknown to
many. For e ->1, at z = 0 sections the Apollonius circles tend to the
parabola.
Although an elementary, I regard the study as a fundamental extension
of conic sections. We can use the same concept and words directrix,
focus for the locus in R^3 here as well as in planar conic sections.
Apollonius circles, one sheet hyperboloid asymptotes, parabolic
cylinder all nicely appear here together.
What still beats me though is, why are not all asymptotes in the
rulings family not considered the answer? Afterall, they are all on
the surface of revolution (y^2 + x^2) + 2y /(e^2 - 1) = (k^2+1) /(e^2
- 1), satisfying MA/MH = e.That is the motivation of this new post.
I shall shortly upload Mathematica visualization and a sketch of the
hyperbolic paraboloid ( z/h = x y (a b) ) spanning between the
asymptotes (inside the hypar, normal to it) made much before posting
this.Their edges can be also regarded as the required locus.
Hope all enjoyed the topic. So familiar, but interesting
generalization.
Best Regards,
Narasimham
Hypar parameterization is
(x,y,z) = ( u + k v, u - k v, u*v/c )
So that u = a, u = 3a are 'bisected' by u =2a,
( Equal R3 embedded straight euclidean lengths, not arcs along
surface)
and u = a, u = 4a are 'trisected' by u =2a and u= 3a etc.?
Best Regards,
Narasimham
> Walter Whiteley
> York University
Asymptotic lines extracted from One sheet hyperboloid surface and
hyperbolic paraboloid surfaces.
The two pictures are drawn to scale ( Mathematica and Ansys structural
analysis package).
They depict a case when ratio of distances = eccentricity = 2 ( > 1
case).
They are hyperbolic parallels.
For eccentricity >1, < 1 Apollonius circles would obviously appear on
main centre section,
from ellipsoid surfaces.
http://i51.tinypic.com/2628ieo.png
http://i55.tinypic.com/nfinoo.jpg
Invariant Cross Ratio = 1 is also involved for point P. Both in the
plane as Apollonius circles
and out of this plane shown in the black/white line sketch.
With Best Regards,
Narasimham