Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

empty

3 views
Skip to first unread message

hunter389

unread,
Dec 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/20/98
to
is anyone even in this NG?


Sarah Seastone

unread,
Dec 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/20/98
to
At 3:12 PM -0500 12/20/98, hunter389 wrote:
>is anyone even in this NG?

The geometry-forum newsgroup was the main group for the Geometry Forum, the
Math Forum's previous incarnation. During its heyday, discussions centered
around .....

" .... introductory messages and important announcements about the
Geometry Forum, discussions of its progress, and eventually discussions
about the Forum software. Topics found here will include items available on
the Forum and its FTP site, suggestions from users as to how to improve the
Forum as a whole, questions about finding items or helping others to read
the Forum, and discussions of our software."

This group still sees some activity, but the Math Forum keeps it primarily
for historical interest.

Geometry newsgroups currently active include:

geometry-college
geometry-pre-college
geometry-puzzles
geometry-research
geometry-software-dynamic

You can read about them starting on the Forum's discussion page at
http://forum.swarthmore.edu/discussions/ (for information click on the red
"i" next to each one), search or browse the archives, post from the Web, or
subscribe to each as a mailing list.

- Sarah

Sarah Seastone
Editor, Archivist, Web Page Designer
The Math Forum
http://forum.swarthmore.edu/
sa...@forum.swarthmore.edu

William & Brenda Gripentrog

unread,
Dec 20, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/20/98
to
yes
William Gripentrog
Watertown, SD
gr...@basec.net
wgrip...@wtn.k12.sd.us
It is a terrible thing to look over your shoulder when you are
trying to lead -- and find no one there.
Franklin D. Roosevelt

Guy F. Brandenburg

unread,
Dec 21, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/21/98
to

hunter389 wrote:

> is anyone even in this NG?

Yah, there is one, at least. And with me, that makes at least two. But
the volume and type of correspondence has been disappointing recently.


0 new messages