to the IMO Supporting Maritime Transport that Cools the Atmosphere While Preserving Air Quality Benefits . Baiman et al. 2024. *Oxford Open Climate Change* -- Healthy Planet Action

https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/p/the-solar-geoengineering-updates-f59 Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more The Solar

*Subscribe to the Solar Geoengineering Updates Newsletter here:* https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/ *Read Solar Geoengineering updates

Letter to IMO on Bunker Fuel Regulation has been Transmitted to the IMO (HPAC)World Climate Research Programme launches a Lighthouse Activity on Climate Intervention Research (

to the IMO Supporting Maritime Transport that Cools the Atmosphere While Preserving Air Quality Benefits": https://drive.google.com/file/d/1R9Kg3d1DozwuxPIjyLWljb9Lld_pJCVm

the inadvertent IMO experiment to reduce sulphur emissions has led to a 0.25C increase in SST's and subsequent increase in extreme meteorology now and in future.   This email wasn

letter on bunker fuel regulations is attached and accessible here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vGEDuEn6uikvGZpR9oZplPPhN8mxB1__/edit?usp=sharing&ouid

NGO's with IMO observer status for possible submission to the upcoming IMO Maritime Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) meeting in March 2024, but we'd like to offer

to the IMO Supporting the Utilization of Ship Fuels that Cool the Atmosphere While Preserving Air Quality Benefits" is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WNsRI8GbyZgdso39ptKuKFI2HA6ZuBni

of the bunker fuel regulations, Ron, you might want to reference it: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3490826/v1. Chris. From: noac-meetings@googlegroups.com

to the IMO and other organizations. >> >> The HPAC SC+ (cc'd above) will be reviewing it and making a decision on >> adding to the HPAC site for signatures, and

that the IMO would prefer other more benign aerosols to be emitted from ships flues, than reinstating bunker fuels. But it's still a good idea to raise the issue with them. I don'

fully implemented IMO maritime bunker fuel sulfur emissions regulation for “high seas” maritime transport in ways that as much as possible, increase the human and natural global

that an IMO meeting on this very topic *is being conducted now*: Meeting Summaries and Schedule https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/MeetingSummaries/Pages/Default.aspx Is

-- IMO desulphurization is not geoengineering sensu stricto, but the way in which it brings about a quasi global change in radiative forcing as a result of considered international

Andrew‹A couple of comments: 1. It may well be that it is limits in representing the forcings in the Arctic that are contributing to the actual

carry > fuel food and water to go from A to B rather ansd so cannot be on station in > mid ocean all the time. The best places for spraying tend to be far from > existing shipping routes