http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2183457
The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering
Stephen Gardiner
University of Washington, Seattle
November 1, 2012
PS: Political Science and Politics, 2012
Abstract:
Some argue that geoengineering by desperate nations would be justified, and that the developed nations ought to aid them through research on how to do it. In this paper, I explore two interpretations of such arguments and find them wanting. I also argue that, whether or not geoengineering by the desperate would be justified, focusing on justification alone obscures important aspects of the ethics of geoengineering.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: solar radiation management, ethics and geoengineering, self-defense, consent, domination
Date posted: December 2, 2012
Suggested Citation
Gardiner, Stephen, The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering (November 1, 2012). PS: Political Science and Politics, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2183457
Contact Information
Stephen Gardiner (Contact Author)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengi...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to geoengineerin...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering?hl=en.
Is it unethical to seek new, more effective solutions when "ethical" actions prove ineffective?
-Greg
Sure. Sometimes.
Benjamin Hale
Assistant Professor/Graduate Director (ENVS)
Philosophy and Environmental Studies
University of Colorado, Boulder
Tel: 303 735-3624; Fax: 303 735-1576
http://www.practicalreason.com
http://cruelmistress.wordpress.com
--
> OK, when is it unethical to seek new, more effective solutions when "ethical" actions prove ineffective? By "seek" I mean to solicit and objectively evaluate potential solutions.
Indeed. That’s the question.