Emulating Inconsistencies in Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

[Geoengineering News]

This item and others will be in the monthly “Solar Geoengineering Updates Substack” newsletter: https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

https://essopenarchive.org/doi/full/10.22541/essoar.170785861.15326368/v1

Authors 

Jared Farley¹,Douglas G Macmartin¹, Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz

 

13 Feb 2024

Cite as: Jared Farley¹, Douglas G Macmartin¹, Daniele Visioni, et al. Emulating Inconsistencies in Stratospheric Aerosol Injection. ESS Open Archive . February 13, 2024.

DOI: 10.22541/essoar.170785861.15326368/v1

Abstract

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) would involve the addition of sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere in order to reflect part of the incoming solar radiation, thereby cooling the climate. Studies trying to explore the impacts of SAI have often focused on idealized scenarios without explicitly introducing what we call “inconsistencies” in a deployment. A concern often discussed is what would happen to the climate system after an abrupt termination of its deployment, whether inadvertent or deliberate. However, there is a much wider range of plausible inconsistencies in deployment than termination that should be evaluated to better understand associated risks. In this work, we simulate a few representative inconsistencies in a pre-existing SAI scenario: an abrupt termination, a decade-long gradual phase-out, and 1-year and 2-year temporary interruptions of deployment. After examining their climate impacts, we use these simulations to train an emulator, and use this to project global mean temperature response for a broader set of inconsistencies in deployment. Our work highlights the capacity of a finite set of explicitly-simulated scenarios that include inconsistencies to inform an emulator that is capable of expanding the space of scenarios that one might want to explore far more quickly and efficiently.

Source: ESS