THINK GLOBALLY, GOVERN LOCALLY:
DESIGNING A NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM
ON NEAR-TERM CLIMATE RISKS AND POSSIBLE
INTERVENTIONS
Daniel Bodansky, Arizona State University
Kelly Wanser, SilverLining
ABSTRACT
There is growing concern that the global response to climate change will be inadequate to avoid an unsafe
climate. Current climate policy focuses on decarbonizing the global economy. This approach, although
essential for climate safety, will not slow warming fast enough to address near-term climate risks. Research
is therefore urgently needed to better understand these risks as well as the feasibility, effectiveness, and
safety of possibly responses, including those that leverage earth system processes to reduce warming, such
as increasing the reflection of sunlight from the atmosphere, or solar climate intervention (SCI).
While not endorsing or promoting the use of SCI, C2ES and SilverLining support expanding the knowledge
base necessary to move toward the effective governance of SCI interventions in a manner that takes into
account the safety of both the climate system and potential climate interventions, is science-based, and
promotes cooperative international decision-making.
This paper is the third in a series exploring considerations and practical options for effective international
cooperation and decision-making. The objective of the series is to explore considerations and develop
practical possibilities for effective international cooperation and decision-making that engages the social
justice issues and impacted communities. The first1
and second2
papers examined the ability of existing
international bodies to evaluate and govern SCI and explored the nature of the research required to support
science-based decision-making.
This paper argues for the establishment of a national research program on near-term climate risks and
possible responses and outlines the elements of a model program aimed at providing information in a
timely, safe, and open manner to allow for evaluation by policymakers and the public. A well-designed
national research program could serve as a model for other national and international research programs
and help provide information necessary for effective international governance. It uses the United States
context as an example, since the United States has the sophisticated research capabilities necessary to
explore near-term climate risks and interventions.
The U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) recently published two related
reports, one on a national agenda for climate research that emphasizes risk management3
and one on
research and governance for SCI that recommends a robust U.S. research program.4
The model national
research program described in this paper complements the recommendations from both NASEM reports