Here's a published article demanding "humanity must: (1) Abruptly halt tropospheric particulate geoengineering"

[Alan Robock]

Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International

http://journaljgeesi.com/index.php/JGEESI/article/view/30157

Geophysical Consequences of Tropospheric Particulate Heating: Further Evidence that Anthropogenic Global Warming is Principally Caused by Particulate Pollution

J. Marvin Herndon
Transdyne Corporation, 11044 Red Rock Drive, San Diego, CA 92131, USA.

Mark Whiteside
Florida Department of Health in Monroe County, 1100 Simonton Street, Key West, FL 33040, USA.

Abstract
The climate science community and the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have misinformed world governments by failing to acknowledge tropospheric particulate geoengineering that has been ongoing with ever-increasing duration and intensity for decades, and by treating global warming solely as a radiation-balance issue, which has resulted in a seriously incomplete understanding of the fundamental factors that affect Earth’s surface temperature. Here we review the consequences of tropospheric particulate heating by absorption of short- and long-wave solar radiation and long-wave radiation from Earth’s surface. Generally, black carbon absorbs light over the entire solar spectrum; brown carbon absorbs near-UV wavelengths and, to a lesser extent, visible light; iron oxides are good absorbers, the most efficient being magnetite. Pyrogenic coal fly ash, both from coal burning and from tropospheric jet-spraying geoengineering (for military purposes and/or climate engineering), contains carbon and iron oxides, hematite and magnetite. The recently published climate-science paradigm shift discloses that the main cause of global warming is not carbon dioxide heat retention, but particulate pollution that absorbs radiation, heats the troposphere, and reduces the efficiency of atmospheric-convective heat removal from Earth’s surface. In addition to the World War II data, three other independent lines of supporting evidence are reviewed: (1) Passage overhead of the Mt. St. Helens volcanic plume; (2) Radiosonde and aethalometer investigations of Talukdar et al.; and, (3) convection suppression over the tropical North Atlantic caused by the Saharan-blown dust. The risks associated with the placement of aerosol particulates into the stratosphere, whether lofted naturally, inadvertently, or deliberately as proposed for solar radiation management, poses grave risks, including the destruction of atmospheric ozone. To solve global warming humanity must: (1) Abruptly halt tropospheric particulate geoengineering; (2) Trap particulate emissions from coal-fired industrial furnaces (especially in India and China) and from vehicle exhaust; and, (3) Reduce particulate-forming fuel additives.

-- 
Alan

Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor
  Associate Editor, Reviews of Geophysics
Department of Environmental Sciences             Phone: +1-848-932-5751
Rutgers University                    E-mail: rob...@envsci.rutgers.edu
14 College Farm Road            http://people.envsci.rutgers.edu/robock
New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551  USA      ☮ http://twitter.com/AlanRobock

[Ronal Larson]

Alan,  cc “Geo”

I can see why you referred this - but hope you won’t do another like it (and there are plenty - I found out)..

Ron

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineerin...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/3c425571-66d0-504d-c81f-61d9a255d2ab%40envsci.rutgers.edu.

[Alan Robock]

If there are plenty of such "refereed" journal articles out there, I think it would be good to know about them.

Alan

[Ronal Larson]

Alan:

The ones I was referring to are in your “refereed” (as opposed to refereed) category - so I’m going to pass on referring.   

Ron

[Francis Micheal Ludlow]

I find it useful to keep track of such papers, including for teaching purposes in highlighting potentially misleading / biased / agenda-driven research.

Francis

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/3F97F9C6-EFEC-48AA-8C79-8D5E90EC0052%40comcast.net.

--

Assistant Professor of Medieval Environmental History
School of Histories & Humanities, Trinity College Dublin
Email: lud...@tcd.ie
Tel: (00353) 87 648 8078

[Ronal Larson]

Francis:

I can agree, but I don’t have a good reason to do so myself.  There are plenty of papers that misrepresent biochar - which is unbothered by “refereed” papers on contrails.  My reason to jump in was to be supportive of Alan.

Ron