Renewing the Precautionary Principle for the Development of
Complex System Technologies
Lukas Nicholson
ABSTRACT
Arguments against developing or adopting new technologies often rely on the
precautionary principle (PP). Conceivable harms that could arise from new technologies
suggest a cautious approach that requires key decision-makers to demonstrate some
acceptable level of safety. If they cannot, then the PP is thought to provide reasons for
maintaining the technological status quo. Critics of the PP sometimes raise the
‘arbitrariness objection’ (AO). According to the AO, the PP arbitrarily privileges risk
aversion by neglecting opportunity costs and advocating a ‘better safe than sorry’
approach to decision-making. I argue that the AO fails when applied to the development
of what I call complex systems technologies (CSTs). Some CSTs introduce more
uncertainty, portend worse harms, and therefore pose greater risks than does merely
foregoing their development. Through an analysis of one particular class of CSTs –
namely, solar radiation management (SRM) technologies – I argue that choosing to
precautionarily forego their development is far from arbitrary. Lastly, through my
analysis of SRM technologies, I develop a modified version of the PP that surmounts
the AO and can therefore guide the development of SRM technologies and new CSTs
more broadly