Hi everyone,
I wanted to share a quick field moment from Las Vegas that may interest the geodesic / lightweight-structure community.
During CES, we exhibited GeoWind blades n the Las Vegas Sphere (a landmark example of large-scale geometry in architecture). What stood out wasn’t just the location—it was the reaction from the public: people were surprised that a wind “turbine-like” kinetic sculpture can be built using very accessible, low-cost materials and simple fabrication methods, while still looking clean and architectural.
My key takeaway: geometry + lightweight framing + smart surface design can make wind-driven structures far more approachable—both as an educational build and as an urban installation.
If the group is interested, I can share:
our simplest bill-of-materials approach (budget-oriented),
lessons learned on stability/assembly in outdoor wind,
and what made the design “read” well to non-technical visitors.
Thanks, and I’d love to hear if anyone here has tried similar low-cost kinetic or wind-reactive builds.
Best,
YoungJune Jeon
GeoWind


--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Geodesic Help" Google Group
--
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GeodesicHelp...@googlegroups.com
--
To post to this group, send email to geodes...@googlegroups.com
--
For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/geodesichelp?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Geodesic Help Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geodesichelp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/3861442b-3bca-4e6d-bb61-5157d6618760n%40googlegroups.com.
Hi Dx G,
Thanks for reaching out — I appreciate your interest.
I’d be glad to share what I’ve been working on with the GeoWind rotor. I recently finished a new blade/rotor build and I’m now moving into field testing (mounting the generator, choosing a good site, and collecting more repeatable RPM/torque and output data). I attached a short video so you can see the current motion and setup.
Your wind-driven vehicle thought is interesting. My main work is stationary generation, but once I have cleaner data, I can share it and we can talk about what characteristics might translate to propulsion or assistance concepts.
And yes — a multi-angle connector like your USconn sounds relevant. My frame uses repeated compound-angle nodes, so anything that simplifies alignment and assembly is valuable. If you can share a quick overview (photos/sketch + how it clamps/locks, strut profiles, angle range), I can tell you where it would fit best in this kind of geometry.
Best regards,
YoungJune
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Geodesic Help" Google Group
--
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GeodesicHelp...@googlegroups.com
--
To post to this group, send email to geodes...@googlegroups.com
--
For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/geodesichelp?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Geodesic Help Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geodesichelp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/091c0782-2296-406a-b09c-67f222f126b8n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAMRvOPgHQ4hihpoX7%2BJtfs456Y_SLA9%3Do-tFxi%3Dg47AE3B4G8A%40mail.gmail.com.
Apologies that the video I posted wasn’t available to review—its file size may have exceeded the limit. I’ll repost it soon.
If you prefer, you can also view any of my public videos on Instagram: instagram.com/geowind.kr
Best regards,
Young June Jeon
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/b897a9df-4c74-44b7-9784-d02b7e5a0ebfn%40googlegroups.com.
Hi everyone,
I’d like to share a simple connector concept I designed while building the GeoWind turbine frame.
The connector is a pentagonal (5-sided) fitting with an outer diameter of 10 mm.
Inside the connector, there is a stop-shoulder (internal lip) so that an inserted pipe seats at a consistent depth and cannot slide further in.
The connector’s built-in geometry follows the regular icosahedron: it reproduces the characteristic 108° angles that appear between edges (specifically the angle relationship formed when you reference edges that are two steps apart in the icosahedral edge pattern).
With this connector, the frame becomes extremely straightforward to build:
If you cut 30 pipes to exactly the same length and assemble them using these angle-defined connectors, you can form a regular icosahedron easily and accurately, with minimal measurement and alignment work.
Best regards,
YoungJune (GeoWind)
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CABWq%3Di4n%3De2y0k%3DN-Mq1atYaotjJYdKSCNsMB8z9ukO3vm3Chg%40mail.gmail.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAMRvOPgHQ4hihpoX7%2BJtfs456Y_SLA9%3Do-tFxi%3Dg47AE3B4G8A%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Levente,
Thank you for the question — that is a very important point.
You are correct that the base face made by connecting the icosahedron vertices is a golden-ratio isosceles triangle (the standard icosahedral triangular face geometry).
However, that triangle by itself does not create enough drag difference between the two rotational directions when the whole rotor turns in the wind. In other words, if the sail is only a simple triangular surface, the drag asymmetry is limited.
So the extra flap was added intentionally to create directional drag asymmetry:
When the sail moves in the drag-receiving direction, the flap forms a pocket / cup-like shape, which catches more wind and increases drag.
When the sail moves in the opposite direction (against the useful torque direction), the shape behaves more like a cone, which reduces resistance compared with the pocket side.
This increases the drag difference around the rotation axis and helps generate stronger rotational torque.
Also, when the blade orientation becomes more horizontal to the wind direction, the shape can produce a lifting effect as well (in a simplified way), so the sail is intended as a very simple hybrid of drag-based + lift-assisted behavior.
In addition, the way these triangular sails are connected follows points that do not significantly deviate from the key structural/mechanical points of the regular icosahedron frame. This was important to me because I wanted the aerodynamic shaping to remain aligned with the main load path and geometric logic of the icosahedral structure.
Also, the angles of the faceted streamlined form were designed to maintain approximately 31 degrees, which I considered a useful angle for this type of streamlined/faceted aerodynamic shaping.
The geometric inspiration for this simplified faceted shaping came partly from the structure of the F-117 (faceted stealth aircraft surfaces), where planar faces are used to create directional aerodynamic effects.
So, the flap is not just an added piece — it is the key feature that gives the sail different aerodynamic behavior depending on rotational direction.
If helpful, I can make a simple sketch showing:
pocket mode (high drag),
cone mode (lower drag), and
the resulting torque direction.
Best regards,
YoungJune
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAOkvEDnM0nMeUNkj2UCD26006OUvAagK4dCic-c5Hf5dEZo9eA%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi everyone,
As a follow-up to my previous message, I would like to share an additional video showing the blade curvature design of the GeoWind sail.
In my earlier reply, I explained the idea of creating directional drag asymmetry (pocket-like behavior in one rotational direction and cone-like behavior in the opposite direction). This video is intended to help visualize how the sail curvature and faceted shaping support that concept.
The video focuses on:
the curvature concept of the sail surface,
how the added flap contributes to directional aerodynamic behavior,
and how the overall shape is intended to increase torque generation during rotation.
I hope this makes the design intention clearer.
Thank you again for your thoughtful comments and discussion.
Best regards,
YoungJune Jeon
GeoWind
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAMRvOPgjqAVJBJzL1O_LWtvLgauBKy4h9CXwAos%3DgZjE0UK%2B-g%40mail.gmail.com.
Dear Paul,
Thank you for your question.
The triangular wing-face used in the GeoWind blade is what I refer to as a golden-ratio isosceles triangle, derived from the geometric relationships of the icosahedral vertices.
Rather than giving only a short explanation in email, I think it would be better to share the attached paper, where the geometric basis and design logic are explained in more detail.
Please kindly refer to the attached paper for the full explanation.
Best regards,
Young June Jeon
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAE1FiLX1FLD7fnXMB%3DLAdU7vaRrZMPMdnn%3Dvw4owNC96GY1wWw%40mail.gmail.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Geodesic Help Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/geodesichelp/hGEFbzoQQog/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to geodesichelp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAMRvOPjPZMB4dEEpferpzEQCSJqQh7zWqjhEn6HSnppCepaXAA%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Dx G,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful message and for sharing your past experience. I really appreciate the time you took to write this.
The workflow you described — prototype fabrication, performance measurement, 3D data visualization, CFD modeling, and iterative redesign — is extremely helpful and relevant to what I am trying to build with GeoWind.
I’m working on a vertical-axis wind turbine design and currently improving the blade geometry and performance testing process. Your note is a strong reminder that I should deepen the CFD side in parallel with physical prototyping.
If you are open to it, I would also be very interested to hear:
what kinds of measurements were most useful in your project, and
what made the CFD collaboration most effective in improving the prototype.
Thank you again for your encouragement and insight.
Best regards,
Young June Jeon
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAF1iHD4mdVktJoSKssRTsRfquL_eX9_rVJRiYMu%2BJEPz2ypRwg%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Rob,
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback and the detailed questions. I really appreciate your careful observations.
You are correct — the screenshots are from SolidWorks.
Please see my answers below:
Tube material and size
I used an aluminum tube with 10 mm inner diameter and 1 mm wall thickness.
Image 2 vs. Image 3 (different connector versions)
Yes, Image 3 is an older version of the connector.
In the older version, the pipe insertion depth was not always consistent during assembly.
So in the newer version, I added an edge / stop-shoulder so the pipe stops at a fixed position. This helps achieve more precise and repeatable assembly.
Connector material
Because I am using an aluminum pipe, I made the connector in the same material (aluminum) by casting.
Retention method (anti pull-out / fixing)
For temporary installation, after connecting the pipe and connector, I fixed it using rivets.
For future permanent installation, I plan to use a combination of:
rivet fastening, and
glue bonding
Blade material and frame-blade assembly
The blade uses a PP-based plastic material.
For fixing the blade to the frame, I am planning to use:
fixing rivets, and
3M tape or silicone adhesive
This structure behaves somewhat like an aircraft wing in the sense that it continuously experiences vibration as well as expansion and contraction (temperature and load effects).
Because of that, the blade-to-frame connection needs to be:
secure enough for reliable fixation, but also
flexible enough to accommodate movement from thermal expansion/contraction and vibration.
So I am working toward a design that provides both firm attachment and controlled compliance rather than an overly rigid joint.
Thanks again for your excellent questions and observations. They are very helpful during this prototype development stage.
Best regards,
Young-June
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/42edd4d4-70c0-4fea-ae73-a05d19ac4248n%40googlegroups.com.
바람과 물리를 제외하고 구조적 문제를 논의할 의향은?
보낸사람: Young June Jeon <youn...@gmail.com>
받는사람: geodes...@googlegroups.com
날짜: 26.02.23 11:49 GMT +0900
제목: Re: GeoWind at the Las Vegas Sphere — a low-cost wind “sculpture” build approach
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAMRvOPgEBax%2BfNqB3wvagetRGGTOwOmSwT6KKRRCyZ-cq_TYdw%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/6c806488-deb2-45e6-be17-baa44f93b247n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/20260223233428.OU9IN-etR5CsWFbNPK3XCQ%40cariland.hanmail.net.
Hello,
I tested a wind turbine blade based on a geodesic sphere (V2). At this early stage of the design, I made five faces with flat panels. It only turns slightly, but it does rotate.
Thanks
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/79c866f6-edad-4422-a5c5-800ed0fda638n%40googlegroups.com.
준영님,
고맙습니다.
자세한 이야기는 만나서 나누기로 하고, 제가 영어가 서툴러 영어로 글을 거의 쓰지는 못하였습니다.
오랜 시간 이 그룹의 소통을 들여다 보면서 참으로 많은 것을 배웠습니다.
오랜 시간 지켜보면서 제가 느낀 점은 "나의 의견을 전달하면 질문하는 이에게 도움이 될 수 있을 것 같은데?"라는 것입니다.
제가 상상하는 그것을 영문으로 만들기가 어려웠던 것이지요.
후회스러눈 것이기도 하지요.
지금 영준님의 영상을 보면서 한글로 표현해 봅니다.(의견)
"지오데식 돔"의 내부(바람막이)가 꼭 면이어야만 합니까?
곡선으로 휘어지면 아니 되는 것일까요?
팔랭개비의 날개나, 배의 스크류나, 풍력계의 날개나, 모두가 직선의 면을 같고 있지 않습니다.
즉, 바람은 곡선을 좋아 한다는 사실이지요,
레오나르도 다빈치의 "새의 비행" 책을 참고해주세요.
그럼 더욱 훌륭하고 멋진 작품이 태어날 듯 합니다.
준영님을 만나면 할 이야기 많기에 오늘은 이만, 총총.
보낸사람: Young June Jeon <youn...@gmail.com>
받는사람: geodes...@googlegroups.com
날짜: 26.03.06 13:23 GMT +0900
제목: Re: Re: GeoWind at the Las Vegas Sphere — a low-cost wind “sculpture” build approach
첨부파일: IMG_3885.MOV
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAMRvOPg_ReibwxO6zS6nunoDCLaeYAYFRUUQ7TOTOjwroKjL7g%40mail.gmail.com.
대표님께서 건의해주신 방향에 대해서는 저도 오래전부터 비슷한 연구를 진행해 왔습니다.
초기에는 평면 패널도 시험해 보았지만, 이후 곡률을 넣어 설계했을 때 회전 토크가 더 증가하는 것을 확인했습니다. 바람을 받는 면이 컵 모양이면 항력이 증가하고, 고깔 모양이면 항력이 줄어들어, 결과적으로 전체 회전 성능이 더 좋아졌습니다.
또한 블레이드가 바람을 직접 받지 않고 비껴가는 위치에 있을 때에도, 에어포일 형상의 면에서 비행기 날개와 유사한 양력 효과가 발생하여 회전 토크를 높이는 데 도움이 된다는 점을 알게 되었습니다.
그래서 현재는 모든 모델에 에어포일 형상의 날개를 적용하고 있으며, 심지어 액세서리나 장식용으로 제작하는 모델에도 같은 개념을 반영하고 있습니다.
In English
I have also researched the idea you suggested for a long time.
When I designed the surface with curvature rather than as a flat panel, I found that the rotational torque increased. In addition, when the wind-facing surface had a cup-like shape, drag increased, while a cone-like shape reduced drag. Overall, these effects contributed to a higher rotational torque.
Moreover, when the blade moved into a position that partially slipped past the wind, the airfoil-shaped surface itself generated a lifting force similar to that of an airplane wing. I found that this also acted as a factor that increased rotational torque.
For this reason, I now apply airfoil-shaped blades to all of my models. I even incorporate this principle into models made for accessory or decorative purposes.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/20260309205719.YIc3kQohSOeQjXDgM2jHJg%40cariland.hanmail.net.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/d7497648-712b-49b2-a4a4-4866cfab4aefn%40googlegroups.com.