sphere.The first two are essentially flat. The last one is not—a variation of about 1.6% of the sphere radius is far too large to represent a genuine flat cutoff.
This actually tells us something important about the Geodesign model. If Kruschke's true 8v construction has seven genuine flat cutoff rings of 40 vertices each, then this STL is not an exact implementation of that construction. It is extremely close, but it appears to have undergone some optimization (or uses a different construction method) that produces near-flat rings rather than mathematically exact planes, especially towards the top and bottom.
Can your general method be fine-tuned to improve these outer layers? It is already the best method I have found online to generate Kruschke domes.
Christopher Jones

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Geodesic Help" Google Group
--
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GeodesicHelp...@googlegroups.com
--
To post to this group, send email to geodes...@googlegroups.com
--
For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/geodesichelp?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Geodesic Help Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geodesichelp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/31c908eb-15bb-4fde-aee8-7289a3dd472an%40googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/CAOkvEDk5otkL0nvQBb2rM30EagE%3D6MYLAgKVNbidqtFrr9FG2g%40mail.gmail.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/38372aca-b778-4621-bcbb-2209df81a6d2n%40googlegroups.com.