modified nexorade

264 views
Skip to first unread message

RC

unread,
Jun 25, 2022, 10:44:39 PM6/25/22
to Geodesic Help Group
modified Nexorade made from single strut size.JPG

Ashok Mathur

unread,
Jun 26, 2022, 1:08:42 AM6/26/22
to geodes...@googlegroups.com
Interesting work.
How did you do it?
Are you worried about the rectangular sub parts?
Regards
Ashok


Sent from my iPhone

On 26-Jun-2022, at 8:14 AM, RC <clark.rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

modified Nexorade made from single strut size.JPG

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Geodesic Help" Google Group
--
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to GeodesicHelp...@googlegroups.com
--
To post to this group, send email to geodes...@googlegroups.com
--
For more options, visit http://groups.google.com/group/geodesichelp?hl=en

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Geodesic Help Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geodesichelp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geodesichelp/38253572-71ba-4ad9-9e3c-7253be7f210en%40googlegroups.com.

Adrian Rossiter

unread,
Jun 26, 2022, 7:29:34 AM6/26/22
to Geodesic Help Group
Hi Robert

On Sat, 25 Jun 2022, RC wrote:
> [image: modified Nexorade made from single strut size.JPG]

Nice model.

To get to it from a dodecahedron, the connection method is like this

https://groups.google.com/g/geodesichelp/c/RFBZ6uFmsjU/m/WiskWJwmBwAJ

But with the triangles (base model vertices), reversed

Although this variant isn't included in the Antiprism rotegrity program,
the raw model can be made with 'wythoff' and then processed with
'rotegrity'

wythoff dod -p [.6V.4E,.4E.6F,VEF,V3EF]0F1ev1_2,e3efv2v3f0 | rotegrity -f 0.4 -t -O r | antiview -v 0.02 -e 0.02

Example based on icosahedral geodesic 1,2 dual (including central sphere
so the units are easier to see):

wythoff geo_1_2_d -p [.6V.4E,.4E.6F,VEF,V3EF]0F1ev1_2,e3efv2v3f0 | rotegrity -f 0.4 -t -O r | antiview -v 0.01 -e 0.01 - std_geo_5 -E invisible -V invisible

I'll review if there is a method to systematically identify all strut
replacement variants (for replacement by a small number of struts). I
have attached an image of another variant I made while trying to make
your version.

Adrian.
--
Adrian Rossiter
adr...@antiprism.com
http://antiprism.com/adrian
Screenshot from 2022-06-26 13-26-44.png
Screenshot from 2022-06-26 13-13-23.png
Screenshot from 2022-06-26 13-23-12.png

Adrian Rossiter

unread,
Jun 26, 2022, 8:45:48 AM6/26/22
to Geodesic Help Group
On Sun, 26 Jun 2022, Adrian Rossiter wrote:
> https://groups.google.com/g/geodesichelp/c/RFBZ6uFmsjU/m/WiskWJwmBwAJ
>
> But with the triangles (base model vertices), reversed

... and a couple of conections swapped on a unit.

RC

unread,
Jul 16, 2022, 9:53:50 AM7/16/22
to Geodesic Help Group
Ashok,

I discovered it accidentally while doodling over another geometric shape I had created.  The process is shown visually below.  As far as the rectangles, I am not worried.  The triangles that are formed lock every member rigidly.

nexorade rectangles.jpgnexorade study 03.JPGnexorade study 02.JPGnexorade study 01.JPG

Ashok Mathur

unread,
Jul 16, 2022, 11:49:24 AM7/16/22
to geodes...@googlegroups.com

Dear Robert
Thanks for the explanation.
I have played with Antiprism for only a short 
while but soon noticed that it’s off images can 
be fully inspected outside it’s frame work.
You can manipulate the generated image 
to view it from any angle that you desire.

I would like to try out two things with what 
you have done.
Firstly inspect the image in anti prism output.
Secondly can I reduce the number of nexors 
to 3 instead of four  by adjusting the  eccentricity 
till two nexors are nearly equal.
Doodle more!
Regards
Ashok



Sent from my iPhone

On 16-Jul-2022, at 7:23 PM, RC <clark.rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

Ashok,
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages