Dear GenomicSEM development team, hello: I have run multiple times on the same machine and version of R/GenomicSEM/lava The results obtained from the second-order two factor model of usermodel (DWLS) are significantly inconsistent, including the coef

[Goodluck li]

Dear GenomicSEM development team, hello:
I have run multiple times on the same machine and version of R/GenomicSEM/lava
The results obtained from the second-order two factor model of usermodel (DWLS) are significantly inconsistent, including the coefficients
Unstand_S shows NaN/0, STD_Genotype_S shows 0/NaN, and there are slight differences in fitting metrics.
The data and script remain unchanged.
The data of chisq df p-uchisq AIC CFI SRMR are fixed, and STD_All is also fixed. However, there are significant differences in p-value and STD_Genotype_S between different versions. Perhaps 2.59e-20 has changed to 2.59e-02. Moreover, in some versions, p-value and STD_Genotype_SE can be calculated. And others display NA or<e300. or even blank.
Thank you.

[Elliot Tucker-Drob]

I suspect that you may have specified an unstable or unidentified model and/or input an ill-conditioned LDSC S matrix. I wouldn’t be able to give any more insight without further information. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Genomic SEM Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to genomic-sem-us...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/genomic-sem-users/13e0afe6-1d80-46a9-a0d8-f532bf828599n%40googlegroups.com.

[Goodluck li]

Thank you