Routing table entries do not match Request Rspec

19 views
Skip to first unread message

Divyashri Bhat

unread,
Apr 28, 2014, 8:11:09 PM4/28/14
to geni-...@googlegroups.com, protoge...@googlegroups.com
Hi,

I am using the attached RSpec to reserve resources.

The topology consists of 3 nodes with a single link between each pair of nodes. Each of these links is in a different subnet. All the IPs are in the 192.168.a.xx subnet with the subnet Mask as 255.255.255.0. 

However, when I log in to node A, my routing table entry looks like:

root@nodea:/users/dbhat# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
0.0.0.0         172.16.0.1      0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
172.16.0.0      0.0.0.0         255.240.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth0
192.168.0.0     192.168.3.12    255.255.0.0     UG    0      0        0 eth2
192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
192.168.2.8     192.168.1.11    255.255.255.252 UG    0      0        0 eth1
192.168.3.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth2


I am not sure why these entries are a part of the routing table:

192.168.0.0     192.168.3.12    255.255.0.0     UG    0      0        0 eth2
192.168.2.8     192.168.1.11    255.255.255.252 UG    0      0        0 eth1

Is there a problem with the RSpec? 

Currently, I have a slice "testlearn" reserved at the Nysernet IG rack with this RSpec.

Could you please help me with this?

Thank you,
--
Regards,
Divyashri Bhat
Graduate Student
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
ECE3743Node.xml

Leigh Stoller

unread,
Apr 29, 2014, 8:43:19 AM4/29/14
to geni-...@googlegroups.com, protoge...@googlegroups.com
> The topology consists of 3 nodes with a single link between each pair of nodes. Each of these links is in a different subnet. All the IPs are in the 192.168.a.xx subnet with the subnet Mask as 255.255.255.0.

Hi. Best not to use 192.168 subnets on your links. 192.168 is
used for the control plane network. Use the 10. or 172. spaces.

Leigh





Divyashri Bhat

unread,
Apr 29, 2014, 1:22:18 PM4/29/14
to geni-...@googlegroups.com, protoge...@googlegroups.com
Hi Leigh, 
Thank you for looking into this.

I now have addresses in the 10.10 space and I see similar entries as before in the routing table

root@nodea:/users/dbhat# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
0.0.0.0         172.16.0.1      0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0
10.0.0.0        10.10.3.12      255.0.0.0       UG    0      0        0 eth2
10.10.1.0       0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth1
10.10.2.8       10.10.1.11      255.255.255.252 UG    0      0        0 eth1
10.10.3.0       0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth2
172.16.0.0      0.0.0.0         255.240.0.0     U     0      0        0 eth0


This particular entry is not mentioned in the RSpec (attached here):
10.0.0.0        10.10.3.12      255.0.0.0       UG    0      0        0 eth2
10.10.2.8       10.10.1.11      255.255.255.252 UG    0      0        0 eth1

Is there any way to delete or avoid these entries?

Thank you,



Leigh





--
GENI Users is a community supported mailing list, so please help by responding to questions you know the answer to.

If this is your first time posting a question to this list, please review http://groups.geni.net/geni/wiki/GENIExperimenter/CommunityMailingList
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GENI Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geni-users+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ECE3743Node.xml

Nicholas Bastin

unread,
Apr 29, 2014, 1:49:10 PM4/29/14
to geni-...@googlegroups.com, protoge...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Divyashri Bhat <divyash...@gmail.com> wrote:
This particular entry is not mentioned in the RSpec (attached here):
10.0.0.0        10.10.3.12      255.0.0.0       UG    0      0        0 eth2
10.10.2.8       10.10.1.11      255.255.255.252 UG    0      0        0 eth1

Is there any way to delete or avoid these entries?

Are you sure your postboot scripts aren't causing these entries to be added?

--
Nick 

Leigh Stoller

unread,
Apr 29, 2014, 1:51:11 PM4/29/14
to geni-...@googlegroups.com, protoge...@googlegroups.com
> This particular entry is not mentioned in the RSpec (attached here):
> 10.0.0.0 10.10.3.12 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth2
> 10.10.2.8 10.10.1.11 255.255.255.252 UG 0 0 0 eth1

Hi. Is this slice currently running someplace?

Leigh





Divyashri Bhat

unread,
Apr 29, 2014, 1:55:18 PM4/29/14
to geni-...@googlegroups.com, protoge...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Nick and Leigh.

I am not changing or setting the IP address within the postboot script. 

The slice name is "testlearn" at the Nysernet IG Rack.

Thank you very much for looking into this.



Leigh





--
GENI Users is a community supported mailing list, so please help by responding to questions you know the answer to.

If this is your first time posting a question to this list, please review http://groups.geni.net/geni/wiki/GENIExperimenter/CommunityMailingList
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GENI Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geni-users+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Leigh Stoller

unread,
Apr 29, 2014, 2:13:48 PM4/29/14
to geni-...@googlegroups.com, protoge...@googlegroups.com
> I am not changing or setting the IP address within the postboot script.

So, is the routing correct or incorrect? :-)

The short answer is that the route generator that constructs the
static routes, has “optimized" them in an unusual, but correct way.

If you want finer grained control over the routes, you might have
to add that to your boot scripts (deleting the existing routes
and adding your own).

Leigh






Divyashri Bhat

unread,
Apr 29, 2014, 2:40:34 PM4/29/14
to protoge...@googlegroups.com, geni-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Leigh,

Thank you once again :)

We will definitely want to delete these routes as they are interfering with the routes that we try to set later:

10.0.0.0        10.10.3.12      255.0.0.0       UG    0      0        0 eth2
10.10.2.8       10.10.1.11      255.255.255.252 UG    0      0        0 eth1

I will add that into the postboot script.

Thanks,



Leigh






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "protogeni-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protogeni-use...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

mon...@sbsstc.ac.in

unread,
Dec 27, 2015, 1:39:21 AM12/27/15
to GENI Users, protoge...@googlegroups.com
Hllo sir,
I want to connect my nodes to router through switch in jack,In jack we can reserve our nodes but there is no facility to reserver router and switch.Could u plz help me to let me know that how should i reserve router and switch to connect to my nodes to create my topology???
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages