New e_machine value for Tachyum's processor

Skip to first unread message

Jeff Law

Jul 29, 2021, 1:30:44 PM7/29/21
to Generic System V Application Binary Interface

Can we get an e_machine value assigned for Tachyum's upcoming processor?   I don't really care about the number as once assigned we'll just rebuild the world internally.


Cary Coutant

Aug 6, 2021, 6:16:28 PM8/6/21
to Generic System V Application Binary Interface
I've reserved the value 261 for this processor, pending more info from Jeff.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Generic System V Application Binary Interface" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
To view this discussion on the web visit

Jeff Law

Aug 20, 2021, 11:12:46 AM8/20/21
to Cary Coutant,

On 8/6/2021 4:09 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
> I'll hold the value 261 for you. Please provide the following:
> - Company name: Tachyum
> - Name of architecture/processor:
> - Preferred EM_ name:
> - Contact info (will this be you?): name, email and/or phone
> If there's any public info about the processor, please provide a URL.
> (We won't publish your email or phone number.)
> If you don't have a processor name yet, I'll just list it as "reserved by Tachyum".
Sorry, for some reason your  message got marked as spam.

I'm a fine contact point.

Jeff Law

Use "Tachyum" as the processor name.  That seems to be the consensus
here.  EM_TACHYUM should be fine as well.

No current public information.  What's out there is quite dated.


Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages