ELF number for SHARC processors

Steve Kilbane

unread,

Feb 16, 2011, 9:38:39 AM2/16/11

to Generic System V Application Binary Interface

Is there a number allocated for Analog Devices' SHARC processors? I
was under the impression that 133 had been allocated as EM_SHARC some
years ago (probably when 106 was allocated as EM_BLACKFIN), but I
might have incorrect information on that front.

If there isn't one, could one be allocated, please?

EM_SHARC "ADI SHARC family of 32-bit DSPs"
stephen...@analog.com

While I'm here, who's the current contact for EM_BLACKFIN?

Thanks,

steve

Cary Coutant

unread,

Feb 16, 2011, 10:25:36 AM2/16/11

to gener...@googlegroups.com, Steve Kilbane

> Is there a number allocated for Analog Devices' SHARC processors? I
> was under the impression that 133 had been allocated as EM_SHARC some
> years ago (probably when 106 was allocated as EM_BLACKFIN), but I
> might have incorrect information on that front.
>
> If there isn't one, could one be allocated, please?
>
> EM_SHARC "ADI SHARC family of 32-bit DSPs"

The latest allocation of e_machine numbers is here:

http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch4.eheader.html

I don't see SHARC on the list.

-cary

Steve Kilbane

unread,

Mar 4, 2011, 4:53:25 AM3/4/11

to Generic System V Application Binary Interface

> The latest allocation of e_machine numbers is here:

Hmm. That *does* have 133 listed as reserved for a future Analog
Devices DSP. Good-oh.
Can we have that allocated to the SHARC, then?

steve

Joseph S. Myers

unread,

Mar 4, 2011, 9:47:11 AM3/4/11

to Generic System V Application Binary Interface

On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Steve Kilbane wrote:

> > The latest allocation of e_machine numbers is here:
>
> Hmm. That *does* have 133 listed as reserved for a future Analog
> Devices DSP. Good-oh.
> Can we have that allocated to the SHARC, then?

You'll need to discuss that with the person at Analog who reserved that
number (see the HTML comments for their details), to see whether they had
some other DSP in mind, and with regi...@sco.com to publish the
allocation.

--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Steve Kilbane

unread,

Mar 4, 2011, 12:38:34 PM3/4/11

to Generic System V Application Binary Interface

Aha. Which also answers the question of who is the current contact for
the Blackfin allocation. Sadly, neither contact is still with ADI. :-P

I'll chase sco.com. Thanks!

steve

On Mar 4, 2:47 pm, "Joseph S. Myers" <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011, Steve Kilbane wrote:
> > > The latest allocation of e_machine numbers is here:
>
> > Hmm. That *does* have 133 listed as reserved for a future Analog
> > Devices DSP. Good-oh.
> > Can we have that allocated to the SHARC, then?
>
> You'll need to discuss that with the person at Analog who reserved that
> number (see the HTML comments for their details), to see whether they had

> some other DSP in mind, and with regis...@sco.com to publish the

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward