The issue has less to do with the number of samples than with your Copy Number data itself.
Here are the number of segments that you have in each sample.
| tumor |
number of segments |
| X11A |
72915 |
| X12A |
81039 |
| X19A |
102086 |
| X21A |
9517 |
| X22A |
105243 |
| X25A |
20154 |
| X26A |
38608 |
| X27A |
7407 |
| X31A |
29481 |
| X38A |
46123 |
| X39A |
130194 |
| X40A |
271113 |
| X44A |
13988 |
| X45A |
96492 |
| X50A |
142648 |
| X52A |
153809 |
| X54A |
161270 |
| X56A |
164723 |
Almost all of your tumors have 10s to 100s of thousands of copy number segments.
This means your data is extremely noisy and something went wrong either with your sequencing or the algorithm you used to generate your copy number data.
The total number of CN segments for tumors should be in the 100s and no more than a few 1000. GISTIC cannot handle data with this much noise and so it is errroring out.
Because of this, GISTIC's default setting is set to ignore tumors with more than 2500 segments.
I am sorry, but I cannot help you with troubleshooting your sequencing or the pipeline that you used to generate your CN.
Regards,
Andrew