WORKINGTON POLICE
COURT
WEDNESDAY.
At the Police-court, on Wednesday, before
T. S. DOUGLAS, Esq., (in the chair), and T. H. DALZELL, Esq. -
WILLIAM BELL and CATHERINE BELL, fish hawkers, Whitehaven, were charged with
assaulting JAMES CAHILL, grocer, Portland-street, on the 19th ult. MR.
PAISLEY appeared to prosecute. He said MR. CAHILL was the collector of
tolls for the Workington Market Company. In accordance with his usual
duty, he was collecting stallage rent from the defendants, when an altercation
took place, the result of which was that some further words ensued, when the
female BELL struck him, knocking him down. The defendant then struck
CAHILL. He had only to remind the Bench that his client was carrying out a
public duty, and that it was necessary order should be observed in a public
market, and that he should be protected when he was endeavouring to discharge
his duty. MR. CAHILL said MRS. BELL struck him straight in the face.
The male defendant collared him in North Watt Street. MRS. BELL called him
a thief before the assault occurred, when he told her he would make her prove
it. - JAMES SMITH and WILLIAM FISHER, gave evidence. The latter, in reply
to the Bench said CATHERINE was too big for JIMMY. (Laughter). They were
each fined £2, including costs, with the alternative of one month's
imprisonment.
EMILY RICHARDSON, single woman, was charged
with having been a disorderly prostitute at Workington, on the 4th inst. - P.C.
WILSON proved the case, which occurred in Church Street. the woman, he
said, was drunk at the time. She was sentenced to two month's
imprisonment.
JOHN JOHNSTONE, ironworker, was charged
with refusing to contribute to his son's support in the reformatory school. -
The defendant, who it appeared had gone to sea, was represented by his
mother. She said her son was the lad's stepfather, and he refused to pay a
farthing. - The case was adjourned for a fortnight.
BERNARD MONTAGUE, labourer, was charged
with assaulting his wife, MARY MONTAGUE, at Workington, on the 27th ult. - She
said he struck her on Monday whilst she was baking some bread at her mother's
house. He was a passionate man, and frequently assaulted her. She
applied for a separation order. - The defendant alleged that his wife took his
money, got drunk, and did not cook his victuals. She had been away as much
as nine weeks at a time, spending the time and his money at her mother's.
Thecase was dismissed, the Bench advising them to go home and live in
peace.
The following cases of drunk and disorderly
conduct were disposed of:
THOMAS CASSIDY, offence committed on the
16th ult. near the railway station. The defendant said he "never changed
lips to any man breathing". Fined 12s.
JAMES MURPHY, offence committed on the 23rd
ult. in High Church Street. Fined 12s.
CHARLES HEENAN, on the 26th. near the
railway station. - SERGEANT REID said he was in the company of CASSIDY. Fined
12s. including costs.
JOHN STEWART, bricklayer, was charged with
assaulting his wife, JUDITH STEWART on the 27th ult., at Workington. - MR. CECIL
THOMPSON represented the complainant. The defendant did not appear. -
SERGEANT ARMSTRONG said there had been some difficulty in serving the
summons. He believed he had tried to evade service. The case was
adjourned for a week.
FREDERICK APPLEYARD, steelworker, was
charged with keeping a ferocious dog at Workington, on the 22nd ult. - MR. CECIL
THOMPSON appeared on behalf of the defendant, who pleaded not guilty. - G. D.
BEDLINGTON, joiner, deposed that MR. APPLEYARDS dog had bitten him on the leg
while he was going to his work, through Vulcan's Lane. - By MR. THOMPSON - He
was going by the back way to his work and walking along the middle of the
road. The dog flew out of the yard at him. MR. PEARSON did not laugh
at witness, and say that the bite amounted to nothing. The dog was of a
retriever breed. It only made one snap at him. - JAMES M'GLASSON, residing
in Washington Street, said the dog had jumped out at the back door at him.
He saw it jump at another man. The dog might not be dangerous, but it
certainly wasn't safe. (Laughter) It was a private road for anyone that
went that way (laughter). It couldn't be very private when horses
and carts went down the lane (laughter). - INSPECTOR LANCASTER deposed that
owing to the complaint of BEDLINGTON, he saw the defendant, who promised to put
the dog down. He said it was a quiet dog, but that it would not let anyone
pass the yard. The lane was public. - MR. THOMPSON submitted that the dog
was under proper control, and that it would not have been worth its meat if it
had not taken care of its master's property. The men had no business to
pass through the back lane. He called MR. PEARSON, builder, who said the
dog merely nipped BEDLINGTON on the thigh. He was more frightened than
hurt. The dog never bothered him. - By SUPERINTENDENT THORNBURROW:
There were eight or nine back doors leading into the lane. - MR. APPLEYARD said
he had kept the dog three years and had received no complaint up to now. - The
Bench said the defendant must keep the dog on the premises. It must be
kept chained up in the back yard. They would let him off on the payment of
costs.
A number of boys were summoned b y MR.
HERBERT LEES, gas manager to the Workington Local Board, on a charge of wilful
damage to a street lamp at Workington on the 16th ult. The names of the
lads were THOMAS LENNON, THOMAS PORTER, WILLIAM TINKLER, JOHN
KIRKWOOD, JOHN MITCHELL, and WILLIAM CAIN. - MR. JOHN WARWICK
(clerk to the Local Board) appeared to prosecute. - The lads pleaded guilty. -
MR. WARWICK said on the date in question, the boys were engaged at Salter Beck
in throwing stones, and they broke a lamp. It cost the Board £60 per annum
to repair the breakages of the different lamps in their district. He asked
for a penalty to be imposed. - P. C. GRAHAM gave evidence, which was
corroborated by SERGEANT CARRUTHERS, of Harrington. - The boys said it was
KIRKWOOD who had made the best shot, which broke the lamp. - They were
fined 1s. each and 10s. costs.