WEST WARD UNION.........Part V
The meeting continues.................
MR. CAMPLIN said that they had a vagrant ward to build at Shap, and
they might therefore as well build both. He was in favour of maintaining
their own poor, and not take them out of the Union, and they were, with a
rateable value of £17,000 or £18,000, quite able to do so, and it would be
easier to the paupers themselves to take them to Shap than out of the
Union.
MR. HUTCHINSON said his reasons for signing the memorial for the
Shap site were that a workhouse had, it appeared, to be built, a site had been
found, everything was in order, and there only wanted a few signatures.
There had been a great many misadventures, and it was quite time it should be
terminated. In fact, it would have been better if MR. ATKINSON’s speech
had been made before, and it would then have allowed other gentlemen to bring
forward sites. There was, however, only one site, and now they had the
opportunity of soldering up the difficulty. He did not think that there
were any objections on the score of humanity, or that Shap was such a place as
had been represented. He would certainly have preferred the workhouse in a
low-lying district, but it was now high time it was settled. It had been
an expensive affair, and the longer it went on, the more expense they would
incur. They were not bound to provide luxuries for paupers. Poverty,
no doubt, was a great misfortune, and they ought to provide every necessary
comfort, which he thought could be done at Shap.
THE CHAIRMAN said it did not follow that if sanction was not given
to the Shap site, they could not get a more suitable one in a low-lying
district.
MR. T. BIRD said that building would be attended with enormous
expense to maintain a small number of paupers not likely to exceed 22 or
23. If they had to build a workhouse and maintain a staff of officers, it
would cost the Union something like £400 a year, which would be a perpetual
charge on the ratepayers. If, however, they could manage to bring about an
arrangement with the East Ward for a joint workhouse, it would be a great saving
and mutually advantageous to both Unions.
THE HON. H. BROUGHAM said he quite agreed with MR. HUTCHINSON, but
the way in which he would like to see the thing settled was not by building a
new workhouse, but by amalgamating with the other Ward. The longer they
could delay the matter, the stronger would the feeling in favour of that
proposal become, and he thought it quite possible they might even yet have one
workhouse for the two Wards.
THE REV. T. HOLME said if that could be accomplished, it would
certainly be the best plan.
The memorial, which had already received 15 signatures, was lying
on the table, and several gentlemen, including REV. W. R. MARKHAM, CAPT.
MARKHAM, HON. H. BROUGHAM, and REV. C. W. BURTON, appended
their names, ,bringing up the number to twenty-two, which, we believe, forms the
requisite majority, and the memorial will therefore be at once sent up to the
Local Government Board. In the course of the conversation which ensued, we
understood that the four gentlemen just named attached their signatures under a
protest which they wrote out to accompany the memorial, in which protest they
state their objection to building a new workhouse, and express themselves
strongly in favour of amalgamation.
THE CHAIRMAN said that if a sufficient number of signatures were
attached, there was an end to the whole matter.
The subject then dropped.
=====================================================================
The meeting continues in Part VI with discussions regarding
sanitary matters and nuisances, etc..............................
=====================================================================
barb, ontario,
canada.