Prof R Ramakumar, Tata Institute
of Social Sciences berbagi: *Perangkap Utang Sri Lanka?*
Dari beberapa angka yang diberikan, jelas terlihat
bahwa jebakan utang yang dialami Sri Lanka bukanlah pinjaman dari China.
Pinjaman China hanya menyumbang 10% dari total utang Sri Lanka. Pinjaman Jepang
ke Sri Lanka lebih besar dari China sebesar 11%. Mengapa tidak ada yang
menyebutnya jebakan utang?
Agenda nakal dari Amerika adalah alasannya. Mereka
berbohong dan menyebarkan disinformasi untuk mencoreng China tanpa menyebutkan
angka sebenarnya. Jika utang ke China hanya 10%, Jepang 11%, maka sebagian besar
utang, jebakan utang nyata 79% berasal dari mana?
Ini adalah IMF, kreditur terbesar Sri Lanka,
organisasi yang menyebabkan semua kesengsaraan Sri Lanka. Ini adalah contoh
sempurna lain dari orang Amerika yang berbahaya yang menuding, membuat tuduhan
liar ketika mereka adalah pelaku sebenarnya.
Jebakan utang Sri Lanka disebabkan oleh
pinjaman dari IMF. Bagaimana dengan kebohongan terkenal jebakan utang
yang disebabkan oleh Pelabuhan Hambantota?
Ya, Sri Lanka mengambil pinjaman besar dari Bank
Exim China dan tidak mampu membayar kembali pinjaman itu. Tapi Sri Lanka
mengubahnya menjadi pendapatan dengan menyewakan pelabuhan ke China dan dibayar
US$1,12 miliar untuk itu. Dimana hutangnya? Di mana jebakan utang ketika itu
menjadi nilai tambah bagi Sri Lanka? Mengapa orang Amerika yang jahat masih
menyebarkan kebohongan jebakan hutang ini karena pelabuhan? Mengapa Amerika
tidak mengakui bahwa jebakan utang datang dari IMF, sebuah organisasi yang
dikendalikan Amerika?
Menyewakan pelabuhan ke China adalah bisnis yang
menguntungkan seperti Djibouti yang menyewakan tanahnya kepada Amerika, dan
beberapa negara lain sebagai pangkalan militer. Ini adalah bisnis murni,
menghasilkan uang sewa. Apa yang salah dengan itu?
Djibouti masih negara merdeka dan bangga akan hal
itu, tidak seperti semi-koloni Kekaisaran Amerika, Jepang, Korea Selatan, dan
Eropa, yang semuanya telah kehilangan kemerdekaan dan dikendalikan oleh Amerika
dan harus menjadi tuan rumah pangkalan Amerika di negara mereka sendiri, tidak
bisa mengatakan "Tidak" kepada Amerika, dan harus membayar kehadiran militer
Amerika di tanah air mereka.
Kapan media Amerika dan barat akan menghentikan
berita palsu mereka tentang jebakan utang ini? Kapan semua media yang bermusuhan
dan yang disebut jurnalis, reporter, analis berhenti mengolesi China dengan
kebohongan jebakan utang palsu ini?
Jika ada masalah jebakan utang yang nyata, tidak
ada yang akan bergabung dengan BRI, seluruh Afrika tidak akan mengambil pinjaman
dari China. Untungnya para pemimpin negara-negara ini tidak bodoh dan tidak akan
dipimpin oleh hidung jahat Amerika dan Barat dengan kebohongan dan disinformasi
menjijikkan mereka.
Tidak ada jebakan hutang dari China, hanya
kebohongan orang kulit putih.
Bukan China, IMF
Penyebab Utama Sri Lanka Jatuh Ke Krisis Ekonomi
When will the Sri Lankans (and the
IMF) ever learn?
Probably the sad story of how
the economy got where it is now is also, alas, the story of what comes next
by R.
Ramakumar April 14, 2022

Sri
Lanka's president last week revoked a days-old state of emergency after huge
public protests such as this one demanded he resign over the country's worst
economic crisis in memory. Photo: Tasnim News
The island nation of Sri Lanka is in the midst of
one of the worst economic crises it’s ever seen. It has
just defaulted on its foreign debts for the first
time since its independence, and the country’s 22 million people are facing
crippling 12-hour power cuts, and an extreme scarcity of food, fuel and other
essential items such as medicines.
Inflation is at
an all-time high of 17.5%, with prices of food items
such as a kilogram of rice soaring to 500 Sri Lankan rupees (A$2.10) when it
would normally cost around 80 rupees
(A$0.34). Amid shortages, one 400g packet of milk powder is reported
to cost over 250 rupees (A$1.05), when it
usually costs around 60 rupees (A$0.25).
On
April 1, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa declared a state of emergency. In less
than a week, he withdrew it following massive protests by angry citizens over the
government’s handling of the crisis.
The country relies on the import of many
essential items including petrol, food items and medicines. Most countries will
keep foreign currencies on hand in order to trade for these items, but
a shortage of foreign exchange in Sri Lanka is
being blamed for the sky-high prices.
Why are some people blaming China?
Many believe Sri Lanka’s economic relations with
China are a main driver behind the crisis. The United States
has called this phenomenon “debt-trap
diplomacy.” This is where a creditor country or institution lends to a borrowing
nation to increase the lender’s political leverage. If the borrower extends
itself and cannot pay the money back, it is at the creditor’s mercy.
However, loans from China accounted for only
about 10% of Sri Lanka’s total foreign debt in
2020. The largest portion – about 30% – can be attributed to international
sovereign bonds. Japan actually accounts for a higher proportion of its foreign
debt, at 11%.
Defaults over China’s
infrastructure-related loans to Sri Lanka, especially the financing of
the Hambantota port, are being cited as factors contributing to the
crisis.

The
port at Hambantota in Sri Lanka. A Chinese company is running what was a white
elephant. Photo: AFP / Lakruwan Wanniarachchi
But these facts don’t add up. The construction of
the Hambantota port was financed by the Chinese Exim Bank. The port was running
losses, so Sri Lanka leased out the port for 99 years to the Chinese Merchant’s
Group, which paid Sri Lanka US$1.12 billion.
So the
Hambantota port fiasco did not lead to a balance of payments crisis (where more
funds or exports are going out than coming in); it actually bolstered Sri
Lanka’s foreign exchange reserves by US$1.12 billion.
So what are the real reasons for the crisis?
Post-independence from the British in 1948, Sri
Lanka’s agriculture was dominated by export-oriented
crops such as tea, coffee, rubber and spices. A large share of its gross
domestic product came from the foreign exchange earned from exporting these
crops. That money was used to import essential food items.
Over the years, the country also began exporting
garments, and earning foreign exchange from tourism and remittances (money sent
into Sri Lanka from abroad, perhaps by family members). Any decline in exports
would come as an economic shock, and put foreign exchange reserves under
strain.
For this reason, Sri Lanka frequently
encountered balance of
payments crises. From 1965 onwards, it
obtained 16 loans from the International Monetary Fund
(IMF). Each of those loans came with conditions including that once Sri Lanka
received the loan it had to reduce its budget deficit, maintain a tight monetary
policy, cut government subsidies for food for the people of Sri Lanka, and
depreciate the currency (so exports would become more viable).
The
seal of the International Monetary Fund is seen outside the headquarters
building in Washington, DC, last year. Photo: AFP / Mandel Ngan
But usually in periods of economic downturns,
good fiscal policy dictates governments should spend more to inject stimulus
into the economy. This becomes impossible with the IMF conditions. Despite this
situation, the IMF loans kept coming, and a beleaguered economy soaked up more
and more debt.
The last IMF loan to Sri Lanka was in 2016. The country
received US$1.5 billion for three years from 2016 to 2019. The conditions were
familiar, and the economy’s health nosedived over this period. Growth,
investments, savings and revenues fell, while the debt burden rose.
A bad situation turned worse with two economic
shocks in 2019. First, there was a series of bomb blasts
in churches and
luxury hotels in Colombo in April 2019. The blasts led to a steep
decline in tourist arrivals –
[url=https://www.businessinsider.com/lonely-planets-top-destination-suffers-a-blow-after-blasts-2019-5#:%7E:text=Sri%20Lanka%2C%20Lonely%20Planet's%20best,killed%20more%20than%20250%20people]with
some reports stating up to an 80% drop[/url] – and drained foreign exchange
reserves. Second, the new government under President Gotabaya Rajapaksa
irrationally cut taxes.
Sri
Lanka’s then-new President Gotabaya Rajapaksa (R) and his Prime Minister brother
Mahinda Rajapaksa, former president, pose for a group photograph after the
ministerial swearing-in ceremony in Colombo on November 22, 2019. Photo: AFP /
Ishara S. Kodikara
Value-added tax rates (akin
to some nations’ goods and services taxes) were cut from 15% to 8%. Other
indirect taxes such as the nation-building tax, the pay-as-you-earn tax and
economic service charges were abolished. Corporate tax rates were reduced from
28% to 24%. About 2% of the gross domestic product
was lost in revenues because of these tax cuts.
In March 2020, the Covid-19 pandemic struck. In
April 2021, the Rajapaksa government made another fatal mistake. To prevent the
drain of foreign exchange reserves, all fertilizer imports
were completely banned. Sri Lanka was declared a 100% organic farming nation.
This policy, which was withdrawn in November 2021, led to
a drastic fall in agricultural production and more
imports became necessary.
But foreign exchange
reserves remained under strain. A fall in
the productivity of tea and rubber due to the ban on
fertilizer also led to lower export incomes. Due to lower export incomes, there
was less money available to import food and food shortages arose.
Because there
is less food and there are fewer other items to buy, but no decrease in demand,
the prices for these goods rise. In February 2022, inflation rose to 17.5%.
What will happen now?
In all probability, Sri Lanka will now obtain
a 17th IMF loan to tide over the present crisis,
which will come with fresh conditions.
A
deflationary fiscal policy will be followed, which
will further limit the prospects of economic
revival and exacerbate the sufferings of the Sri Lankan
people.
R.
Ramakumar is a professor
of economics at the Tata Institute of Social
Sciences.
This article is republished from The
Conversation under a
Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
https://asiatimes.com/2022/04/when-w...mf-ever-learn/Debt
trap cuma hoax buatan amerika dan india. Hutang Sri Lanka Ke China sudah
selesai, sudah ditukar dengan menyewakan port ke China untuk imbalan 1, 12
milyar dollar. Jadi bukan saja Sri Lanka sudah bebas dari hutang, malah kas
bertambah dengan1 milyar dollar lebih.
Malah hutang Sri Lanka ke Jepang lebih besar.
Juga IMF yg
terus memberikan pinjaman ke Sri Lanka tapi melarang Sri Lanka untuk membangun
infrastruktur sehingga roda ekonomi tersendat sendat dan membuat Sri Lanka tak
bisa bayar hutang ke IMF. Itulah jerat debt trap
sesungguhnya.