Making The Match Vk

[Gordon Neal]

Ihave a client who makes its matching contribution quarterly. They haven't had a good 4th quarter and want to not make a 4th quarter match. The match is discretionary, but they feel obligated to notify participants that no match will be made. Is there any sample language out there?

Our company is struggling financially and we are unable to continue to make a matching contribution as we need to use the funds to pay our creditors. By the way, I need to see all those hired in the last year in my office as soon as possible.

We have designed our 401(k) plan to provide extra compensation for those employees who are able to save. This is America after all. The more you have, the more you get. We understand that some of our employees may have serious financial obligations, such as caring for children aged parents, and that they may be working just as hard and contributing just as much to the success of the Company as anyone else, but too bad if they can't save part of their pay in order to get the match.

Some people might say that the Company is offering the match to encourage savings. America has a bad savings rate and many peoplea re headed for retirement income crisis. But this Company obviously is not trying to encourage or reward those who may choose to stretch for some savings because the savings incentive offered by the Company is an illusion, as shown by the Company's decision not to match this quarter. So how much are you going to stretch your budget to work in some savings now that you know you have no assurance of the apparent reward of the match? We hope that your retirement savings rate is unaffected by the match. Please don't think that the Company is either so paranoid, insensitive or ill advised as to create an apparent incentive that the Company is not committed to live up to. Next year, we are going to give you regular pay on the same basis. We sort of think we will pay you a specified amount, but if we have a rough time we may have to cut back a bit. We are sure you will understand.

Although the Plan was established with the intention and expectation that contributions would be made indefinitely, nevertheless, the Board of Directors has determined that the Employer Match will be suspended as of October 1, 2003. It is our hope that this suspension is temporary, however, (Client Name) reserves the right to make the suspension permanent.

Enjoyed the levity (?) but it raised a question that I'm sure has been researched. Here 'tis: Assume company has made a 50% matching contribution for several years, but totally eliminates the match. In an ideal world, the participants would increase their deferral rates so they still achieve their retirement goals. However, I suspect the opposite actually occurs - participants figure "if I'm not getting that immediate gratification/employer contribution, the hell with it" and deferrals decline. Can anyone identify online surveys that have studied actual situations?

I would like users to be able to view a list of other registered users who meet certain criteria, for example, age distance, and to be able to send those users messages.

.

Can bubble handle this? Thank you.

Karolina

Not hard at all. You can create a data type called USER, for example, and add the fields you need (age, distance, etc). Then, create a Repeating Group that searches for USERS with the criteria you want (you can do that with constraints).

Definitely possible. One of our courses teaches how to build a Swiping Dating App like Tinder, including building a matching system, messaging system, mobile UI and deploying to Android through PhoneGap

Zeroqode Lab Build Code-Free Startups and Products Zeroqode Lab Build Code-Free Startups and ProductsLearn how to build complex and beautiful apps without code. Marketplaces, on demand apps, dating apps, booking applications & more. Our tutorials take you from a total beginner level all the way to a code-free expert.

For the sake of brevity, we will assume that the car values are set in advance and that the contacts' property is dynamic, but from this example, I believe you could extend it to a bidirectional concept pretty easily.

Using a webhook that is subscribed to the change of the client budget property, your app would grab the contactID as well as the value of the custom property. From this, you will query the search endpoint to search your cars object for any that has the car value property equal to the the client budget property. Lastly, you would then associate the matches to the contact using the Association API.

@dennisedson Definitely on the right track I like the inclusion of the HubSpot app webhook subscription -- a very handy feature. @PJuers I think this is a good case for a custom object (high-value inventory items), and Dennis' approach seems logical to me. Let us know if you don't think we've understood your case, or if you have any follow up questions.

Hm, I'm not sure if I exactly understand what you want to do. Do you want to set the shapes exactly side by side or do you want to set the cone on the oval like a hat..? The first thing should work with the Snap-function if you set it to "Snap to Object" (or so - my desktop computer is off at the moment, so I can't look for the right name). You could also do it with the Transform panel, by entering exact values for the positions, width and height of the shapes. Or you could use guidelines and/or a grid. You can also let the shapes snap to grids and guidelines.

The second solution should work by placing the shapes manually first and then, to align them exactly to the horizontal middle of each other, with the Align-function (six small buttons to align to the horizontal left, middle or right and the vertical left, middle or right). You should find it somewhere in the tool bar of the Move Tool. But both shapes have to be selected to align them.

Do you have a way to look at the file? If so, what I want to do will be clear - I need to move the cone up (no problem with that!), and change it's upper curve to match the curvature of the oval precisely. In other words, I need to shape the bottom of the oval and the top of the cone to exactly match.

Ah okay, I think I understand. In that case I would place both shapes as you need them, duplicate the oval, place its layer on top of the cone layer and Subtract it from the cone. Subtract is the second button of the Geometry options (on the right side of the context bar of the Move and Node tool.

It seems the bottom (cone) curve was a little messed up at the left and right points. I corrected those. Then moved the nodes for the top elliptical curve to better match the bottom cone. I then moved the elliptical curve below the cone in the layer stack. Done the same with the hidden curve gradient fill. It helps hide some things that hard to get perfect.

1) Among the other answers (which are fine and important to know), you can try this and possibly avoid a lot of work.

The old (actually not that old) "drag and hold to match edges exactly" trick. Just gotta make sure you have the same number of nodes.

2) Ellipses are circles in perspective. There's no need (and imho it's actually unwanted) to manipulate the oval to simulate perspective... unless you're going for some kind of Dali persistence of time oval ?. It's all about where the side walls hit the ellipse boundary. Technically they'll never hit the ellipses' exact full width side nodes.... that would mean zero perspective.

...2) Ellipses are circles in perspective. There's no need (and imho it's actually unwanted) to manipulate the oval to simulate perspective... unless you're going for some kind of Dali persistence of time oval ?. It's all about where the side walls hit the ellipse boundary. Technically they'll never hit the ellipses' exact full width side nodes.... that would mean zero perspective.

One annotation: It is true that the shape of a circle changes into a constant oval if you make a perspective transformation. But it is a bit more complicated if the circle contains a texture, as you can see on my attached image. While the outer shape is an oval, e.g. the initial horizontal middle axis moves nearer to the vanishing point - behind the (new) middle axis of the oval.

3a8082e126