On Jun 3, 2022, at 1:28 AM, 'Clint Byrum' via Gearman <
gea...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Hi folks. It's been a while since 1.1.19.1 was released and tons of little improvements have landed since then. I've been dealing with a whole host of things lately, from burnout at work, to moving to a new dev laptop, to having COVID this past weekend, so I appreciate everyones' patience while I get things in order for a 1.1.20 release.
I concur. I think we're in a good place for a new release. If you want to avoid what happened with the 1.1.19 release, feel free to send me a pre-release tarball, and I'll give it a quick once over before you release it.
This might be a good time to thoroughly document the release process. Long term, it would nice to have a GitHub Actions workflow for cutting a new release quasi-automatically, imho.
> And also to consider trying out rustygear:
>
>
https://github.com/SpamapS/rustygear
>
> I'm dying to know if it could meet your Gearman needs, as I'm quite a bit more inclined to spend my dev cycles on it than the C/C++ gearmand/libgearman.
Still no SSL support in rustygear, apparently, so no.
I'd still like to see a quantified comparison with respect to performance (jobs throughput, etc.).
Later,
Ed