CCA record support?

Skip to first unread message

Jim Popovitch

Mar 27, 2015, 1:44:27 PM3/27/15
Any chance of getting CCA[1] rr support?

It's as simple as:

CAA 0 issue ""


-Jim P.

Brandon Black

Mar 27, 2015, 9:39:36 PM3/27/15
to gdnsd on behalf of Jim Popovitch
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:44 PM gdnsd on behalf of Jim Popovitch <> wrote:
Any chance of getting CCA[1] rr support?

Seems like a reasonable RR-type to add, given that it serves a functional purpose in the world and using RFC3597 for this, while possible, would be a PITA.  I haven't had much time to work on gdnsd the past couple of months, sadly, but I'll put it on the list of relatively-trivial things to try to squeeze into the next feature release.

Alternatively, if someone else wants to work it out and file a pull request against master, that would be awesome too!  The only potentially-complicated bits I foresee here aside from copying and modifying the related code for some existing RR type are: (1) the numeric id for this is >256 and (2) not breaking anyone who's currently using RFC3597 to specify this RR-type (the code assumes no overlap between explicitly-supported RR-types and RFC3597, but clearly that was a bad idea for future-proofing).

-- Brandon 
Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages