--- the forwarded message follows ---
Date: 25 November 2008 04:41:09 GMT
Subject: Re: voxel significance vs whole brain pattern significance
Hi Anna,
I think you are on the money, and this issue needs clarification. I'll try to improve the documentation and make clear that
(1) the Z-map from the bootstrap is for visualization purposes only,
(2) all information about covariance and pattern loadings are contained in the point estimate image. This image also, can be prospectively applied to other data sets to obtain a network score.
------------------------
You are right, the point estimate of the covariance pattern consists of ALL loadings. The bootstrap procedure is only a ill-fitting attempt to use parametric maps and come up with a inferential statistical statement on a voxel-by-voxel basis. The question to be answered is: does this voxel's loadings have a positive (or negative) value in more 95% of the bootstrap samples. This is tailored for statements about single brain regions and the desire to reduce the pattern to some few key regions, similar to an SPM{T} map. (Are those regions reliably identified with a consistent sign in their loadings??)
Overall, the bootstrap should be de-emphasized for analysis purposes. The important covariance pattern consists of ALL voxels and loadings, whether they have a low Z-value or not.
The reduction to a few areas in a sense runs totally counter to the whole idea of covariance or multidimensional analysis in general.
I'll try to make this distinction between the covariance pattern and the bootstrap map clearer- they're different things. At the moment the aspect of prospective application is missing. Also, my RA is a very smart guy, but sometimes has a stilted English that's worse than mine.
Thanks for your input and maybe you could keep reading and pointing out passages that need clarification.
Chris
PS: More tomorrow