robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-08-01-* | grep "/unapi?" | wc -l
220752
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-12-* | grep "/unapi?" | wc -l
319427
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-11-* | grep "/unapi?" | wc -l
189454
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-10-* | grep "/unapi?" | wc -l
213381
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-09-* | grep "/unapi?" | wc -l
269213
that's for relativity.livingreviews.org
we offer unapi for our own publications' metadata and for our
reference database.
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [30/Jan/2008:11:51:13 -0700] "GET
/unapi/server?id=3295012 HTTP/1.1" 300 318
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx - - [30/Jan/2008:11:51:15 -0700] "GET
/unapi/server?id=3295012&format=mods HTTP/1.1" 200 4726
So "| grep -v format" might do the trick.
Peter
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-08-01-* | grep "/unapi?" | grep -v "format=" | wc -l
9
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-12-* | grep "/unapi?" | grep -v "format=" | wc -l
14
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-11-* | grep "/unapi?" | grep -v "format=" | wc -l
32
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-10-* | grep "/unapi?" | grep -v "format=" | wc -l
22
robert@srvd:/var/webstat/logs/resolved-srvp$ gunzip -c
lrr/access-07-09-* | grep "/unapi?" | grep -v "format=" | wc -l
9
Yes, and it seems to do this in preference to using embedded metadata like COinS, too, which is a couple of possibly unnecessary requests for every page view.
alf
although we also offer coins, zotero does use the unapi data. i'd also
guess that our readers are not exactly the avantgarde of zotero users.
but i don't really know who that would be anyway. fact ist we are not
tied to a university, so effects of student training courses would not
show, for example. an additional explanation of the low numbers is
that our readers mainly come for the fulltext articles, less so for
the bibliographical records of references cited therein. so basically,
i guess we our data is not really comparable.