FhirStore vs OpenEHR

157 views
Skip to first unread message

FLeen

unread,
Jul 29, 2021, 9:08:11 AM7/29/21
to GCP Healthcare Discuss
Hi, We're investigating the Google HC API and a question that keeps coming up that I'm unable to answer:-

What are the reasons that Google (and AWS and Azure) choose to create 'FHIRStores' rather than use OpenEHR, which is designed for storage, whereas FHIR is not?









Erik Willsey

unread,
Aug 30, 2021, 1:09:47 PM8/30/21
to GCP Healthcare Discuss
I struggled with this for a bit as well.  I think the answer here is that these products are not attempting to provide a data persistent layer similar to an EHR.  Instead, they are providing a datastore which serves as the primary layer for integration.  That implicitly requires that it have some sort of data structures, but also means it should use a structure focused on interoperability.  OpenEHR focuses on the software operations data structures for a relational database, whereas FHIR focuses on the ability to distribute those transactions based on data contracts.  If they were to leverage an OpenEHR ERD then it would not support the integration capabilities, because it's not based on event-driven data contracts.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages