PLEASE TAKE ACTION NOW.
Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi has an op-ed in Wednesday's New York Times
addressing the administrative detention of Khader Adnan and Palestinian
nonviolent efforts to achieve freedom.
He will
surely be attacked for his efforts, probably largely on account of his
defense of Khader Adnan's right not to be held indefinitely under
administrative detention.
OVER
the past 64 years, Palestinians have tried armed struggle; we have
tried negotiations; and we have tried peace conferences. Yet all
we have seen is more Israeli settlements, more loss of lives and
resources, and the emergence of a horrifying system of segregation.
Khader Adnan, a Palestinian held in an Israeli
prison, pursued a different path. Despite his alleged affiliation with
the militant group Islamic Jihad, he waged a peaceful hunger strike to
shake loose the consciences of people in Israel and around the world.
Mr. Adnan chose to go unfed for more than nine weeks and came close to
death. He endured for 66 days before ending his hunger strike on Tuesday
in exchange for an Israeli agreement to release him as early as April
17.
Mr. Adnan has certainly achieved an
individual victory. But it was also a broader triumph — unifying
Palestinians and highlighting the power of nonviolent protest. Indeed,
all Palestinians who seek an
independent state and an end to the Israeli occupation would be wise to
avoid violence and embrace the example of peaceful resistance.
Mr.
Adnan was not alone in his plight. More than 300 Palestinians are
currently held in “administrative detention.” No charges have been
brought against them; they must contend with secret evidence; and they
do not get their day in military court.
Britain’s
practices in Northern Ireland during the 1970s and 1980s were not so
different from Israel’s today — and they elicited a similarly rebellious
spirit from the subjugated population. In 1981, Bobby Sands, an
imprisoned member of the Irish Republican Army, died 66 days after
beginning a hunger strike to protest Britain’s treatment of political
prisoners. Mr. Sands was elected to Parliament during his strike;
nine other hunger strikers died before the end of 1981; and their cases
drew worldwide attention to the plight of Roman Catholics in Northern
Ireland.
Just as Margaret Thatcher, then
the British prime minister, unsympathetically dismissed Mr. Sands as a
“convicted criminal,” Israeli officials have accused Mr. Adnan of being
an active member of Islamic Jihad. But if this is the case, Israel
should prove it in court.
Mr. Adnan’s actions over the
past nine weeks demonstrated that he was willing to give his life —
nonviolently and selflessly — to advance Palestinian freedom. Others
must now show similar courage.
What is
needed is a Palestinian version of the Arab revolutions that have swept
the region: a mass movement demanding freedom, dignity, a just
peace, real democracy and the right to self-determination. We must take
the initiative, practice self-reliance and pursue a form of nonviolent
struggle that we can sustain without depending on others to make
decisions for us or in our place.
In the
last several years, Palestinians have organized peaceful protests
against the concrete and wire “separation barrier” that pens us into
what are best described as bantustans. We have sought to mobilize
popular resistance to this wall by following in the nonviolent
traditions of Martin Luther King Jr. and Mohandas K. Gandhi — and we
remain determined to sustain peaceful protest even when violently
attacked.
Using these techniques, we have
already succeeded in pressuring the Israeli government to reroute the
wall in villages like Jayyous and Bilin and
helped hundreds of Palestinians get their land back from settlers or
the Israeli Army.
Our movement is not
intended to delegitimize Israel, as the Israeli government claims. It
is, instead, a movement to delegitimize the Israeli occupation of the
West Bank, which we believe is the last surviving apartheid system in
the world. It is a movement that could free Palestinians from nearly 45
years of occupation and Israelis from being part of the last
colonial-settler system of our time.
I
remember the days when some political leaders of the largest Palestinian
political parties, Al Fatah and Hamas, laughed at our nonviolent
struggle, which they saw as soft and ineffective. But the turning point
came in the summer of 2008, when we managed to break the Israeli naval
siege of Gaza with small boats. Suddenly, I
saw great respect in the eyes of the same leaders who had doubted the
power of nonviolence but finally recognized its potential.
The
power of nonviolence is that it gives Palestinians of all ages and
walks of life the tools to challenge those subjugating us. And thousands
of peace activists from around the world have joined our movement. In
demonstrations in East Jerusalem, Silwan and Hebron we are also being
joined by a new and younger Israeli peace movement that categorically
rejects Israeli occupation.
Unfortunately,
continuing Israeli settlement activity could soon lead us to the point
of no return. Indeed, if we do not soon achieve a genuinely independent
Palestinian state, we will be forced to press instead for a single
democratic state with equal rights and responsibilities for both
Palestinians
and Israelis.
We are not sure how long it
will take before our nonviolent struggle achieves its goal. But we are
sure of one thing: it will succeed, and Palestinians will one day be
free.
Mustafa Barghouthi, a
doctor and member of the Palestinian Parliament, is secretary general of
the Palestinian National Initiative, a political party.
The only recognizable feature of hope is action.