Winrar 64 Bit With Crack

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ronald

unread,
Aug 4, 2024, 5:07:21 PM8/4/24
to gaylumriarob
Ill try and make this as short as i can. I'm looking for a .bat file to rar up and password folders with files in them, but the problem is a little more tricky than i thought, each folder can have anything from 1 to 400 files in it, i have two .txt files, one with the desired number of.rar file names and one with the desired number of .rar passwords, so txt doc's look like this, first is filenames.txt:

What I want to do is apply the 1st list of 50 file names in the .txt document to 50 sub folders sat within a main folder, and the 1st list of 50 passwords to be used for each of those .rar's created, so my end result would be > inside 1st main folder 50 rars each passworded differently, I also want the .rar files passwords to be encrypted so you cannot see the contents of the any .rar file unless you enter the password.


I created file names & password lists to help with the process of generating the passworded rar files, but if you can do it without needing predefined password/file name lists then that would be less work to do, but i would need some sort of file name / password list creating by the .bat file so i know what .rar has what password.


Basically I'm looking for it to take a group of folders and rar them up individually in some form of alphabetical order and apply random passwords to the rar's (these passwords should be 20 characters long and contain numbers and upper/lower case letters), but i want the rar encrypting which is an option in winRAR which stops users seeing contents of the rar until a password is entered


The first part merely sets up some variables, used later in the script. (As it happens, every one of them is used in the script just once, so you could easily substitute the values for the corresponding variable expansions. I only declared those variables habitually, I often use variables like that in my batch scripts.)


the password file is read by one of the commands in the inner loop's body, namely SET /P. SET /P reads the standard input stream, which is the console by default, but the standard input in this case is redirected for the entire inner loop to be from the passwords.txt instead.


Note that you could generate the passwords in a similar way. If there's a single command that accepts the output file name as a parameter and just does the job without interruptions, you could insert that command just after the DIR.


I have a multipart .rar archive containing a single .tar.gz file inside it (don't ask why, that is just how it was made). I am missing a few of the parts, but do have the first part. I would like to extract as much of the .tar.gz as possible. How can I do that?


when it was done, I loaded the file in Deluge bittorrent client, and forced recheck, and I was only missing the percentage that I really didn't have, meaning the bittorrent client identified that I do have the true information between all the zeros I added.


I had a password protected RAR archive in 6 parts, but part4 was missing. I tried to use WinRAR's repair function but it said it couldn't find the recovery record. I tried the methods above but they didn't work and the extraction always stopped where the missing part started.


Finally, I decided to fool WinRAR into thinking parts 5 and 6 were a different archive and renamed them as "archive.part1.rar" and "archive.part2.rar". I then told WinRAR to extract the new part 1 and even though I got an error message saying it couldn't extract the file that ended at the beginning of the new part 1 (as it was missing some data from the missing part 4), it managed to extract all the other files from the original parts 5 and 6.


I had only the second part of two part rar archive, while unpacking part 2 as expected winrar popped a message saying the first part was missing; I also noticed that the full content of part two had been unpacked in the folder; so without touching winrar's popup message, I copied the unpacked files into another folder and then clicked on close in the winrar's popup message; the unpacked contents were deleted by winrar, but since I had copied them earlier into a different folder, I could use the unpacked content from that different folder.


If the offset you need to seek to isn't prime, then use a block size larger than one. dd can only seek to multiples of the output block size. dd really does make read and write system calls with that block size, so bs=1 really sucks.


I haven't visited this forum for 2 years I think, a testament to Arch's stability! I'm by no means an advanced user but I like Arch's cutting edge, rolling release system and I want to stick with Arch come what may.


With that said, following a power outage during a system upgrade, I had to install a new Arch system since my old one suddenly started behaving very strangely. I had Wine installed on that system and I don't recall any problems with getting Winrar to work.


Now, however, I am struggling to get Winrar to install, never mind run. I have installed 7zip as a test and that worked without a hitch but Winrar is proving to be very stubborn. I've tried installing all optional dependencies for Wine, I've tried uninstalling (pacman -Rsc) and reinstalling but to no avail.


Ark can create files, but you need to have rar installed. Unrar only allows opening archives (hence, the un- prefix).

Ark has really improved a lot lately, but the compression options are still a bit lacking.


To activate this dialog in WinRAR select "Settings" command inOptions menu and click on "Integration"tab. The same set of options also is available when installing WinRAR,so it is possible to change the described below options both duringinstallation and later, in WinRAR settings.


Associate WinRAR as default viewer for selected formats. It is reasonableto leave these options selected, so you can open archives in WinRAR bydouble clicking on archive name or icon in Explorer or Desktop. "Toggle all" button selects all formats at once or deselects themif all they are already selected.


Beginning from Windows 10, Windows treats these association optionsas recommendation only. Generally they are applied in case no other userapplication is associated with a file type. Otherwise they are utilizedto build "Open with" list with multiple entries. So it may be necessaryto resort to Windows own settings to change an already existing fileassociation, such as "Choose another app" with "Always use this app toopen files" option in "Open with" Explorer menu or "Choose default appsby file type" in Windows settings.


Here you can specify additional file name extensions for archiveformats supported by WinRAR. For example, if you have files with ".dat"extension, which are in RAR format, you can enter "dat" in this fieldto associate WinRAR with such files and add extraction commands tocontext menus displayed for "dat"files in Windows shell. If you need to enter several extensions, separatethem by spaces.


This option adds WinRAR icon to top level of classic style Start Menuin Windows XP. Starting from Windows Vista, programs cannot add themselvesto the top of the Start menu, so this option adds WinRAR icon to"All Programs" list. You can use "Pin to Start Menu" Windows command if you need to add an application icon to top of Start Menu in WindowsVista and newer.


I was searching for optimal compression. In that search, I decided to compare WinRAR x64 5.40 against 7-Zip x64 16.02. This post describes that comparison. (Note also a later post discussing security in 7-Zip, another post offering some WinRAR benchmarks, and a different post reviewing Windows native compression.)


Both 7-Zip and WinRAR offered multiple configuration options. I began by choosing what I thought would be optimal for each. For WinRAR, I chose RAR5, Best compression method, 1024MB dictionary, no options other than delete after compression. (Later, I would find that a 32MB setting seemed to be considered optimal for the dictionary. Newer versions of WinRAR would confusingly offer RAR (rather than RAR5) as the latest version, with RAR4 as the legacy alternative.)


I ran 7-Zip and WinRAR with those settings, one at a time, on a reasonably fast machine (Intel Core i7 4790 with 16GB RAM). The computer was not particularly busy with anything else, aside from the Firefox and Chrome browsers, in which I was reading from a few tabs I had already opened. I ran the programs on the following file sets. The first bullet point explains the various pieces of information included in each of these test result reports. These are actual times, not times reported by the programs, though the latter seemed to be off by only a few seconds, mostly due to lag in program startup. File sizes are as reported by Windows Explorer > select file > right-click > Properties.


For my purposes, however, in a variety of day-to-day uses, I decided that compression yielding just a few percentage points of extra space was not as important as notably faster performance. I reached that decision because sometimes I would be waiting on the computer to finish zipping or unzipping files, whereas I rarely if ever noticed whether a compressed archive was a few percentage points larger or smaller than it might have been.


(See a later post for an expanded list.) Note that the list of filetypes to be skipped included PDF, in my case, because I was using Adobe Acrobat to create PDFs. Some PDF-creation programs produced less efficiently packaged output, in which case compression might make a visible difference. It was also reportedly possible to achieve better compression of Acrobat PDFs, as well as of numerous other file types (e.g., JPG, ZIP, PNG) by using the command-line Precomp program before using 7-Zip or WinRAR.


At this point, I started to become more embroiled in the differences that could result if I tweaked various settings in WinRAR and 7-Zip. I did not attempt to make a thorough study of this. I engaged in the following comparisons; I found myself starting down a slippery slope that could result in days of arcane testing and retesting; and then I backed out. As a result, the following material may be informative, but it is neither structured nor thorough.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages