Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hetero Upstart! (A Zeke Krahlin Fantasy)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

chiefthracian

unread,
May 2, 2004, 2:19:46 AM5/2/04
to
HETERO UPSTART!
(a parable for the 21st century)

(c) 2004 by Ezekiel J. Krahlin
(Jehovah's Queer Witness)


Some hetero student from SF State fancies himself a courageous
activist, including for gay people. I had fun with this one. Only
sharing here, my latest post:

--begin latest post:

Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 22:47:43 -0700
To: Joshua's Wolf <insa...@global.net>
Subject: Re: [freestateofsf] Daily Digest Volume 1 #3 (2 messages)
FURTHERMORE
From: Ezekiel Krahlin <ezek...@qwickconnect.net>
Organization: Blue Rose Militia

On Sat, 1 May 2004 11:30:20 -0700, Joshua's Wolf
<insa...@global.net> wrote:

<<
I can really donate much energy into. Being a straight male, I
strongly support nearly all the issues of the LGBT community that are
on the table today and have been on the table in the past.
>>

"Nearly all" ??? I admit: I am MOST curious as to precisely WHICH
issues of my LGBT community give you a headache?

<<
But in limiting your scope
>>

Was MLK "limiting his scope" by fighting JUST for Afrikan-Amerikans?
Susan B. Anthony? Dear, if you don't focus on a specific issue, you
will NEVER excel in your life. Furthermore, the sexual-minority issue
is QUITE EXTENSIVE, covering ALL the realms of science, politics, the
arts, and even religion. Besides which, queers are born into EVERY
TYPE of culture and race...thus we are quite EXTENSIVE in scope in
every
single way but one: heterosexuality.

Your OWN bias towards your heterosexuality positively REEKS of hubris!

<<
Admittedly, if you want to create a gay army and take over San
Francisco by force -- you might have something -- but that's certainly
not
something that I could ever support.
>>

Thanks for alerting me that you wouldn't even make good cannon fodder.
You do realize, don't you, that a LOT of other people are reading our
communique? You have no idea who I am, do you? I'm one of the most
respected and beloved leaders of our Queer Community. It is I who runs
San Francisco, not Newsome...nor any mayor. And it has been so, for
quite a few years now, at least two decades. I'm behind ALL important
issues in our fair city...issues which I may not like to see come to
bear fruit...but they are what our Creator so chooses us to
EXPERIENCE,
that we may become better souls for that. But the time of our Great
Crucifixion has come to an end...for we have served well God's chosen
sorrows for Our Queer Family. Now, we are to have our own city, our
own land...yes, even our own nation.

Dare I even suggest PLANET ?!!!

<<
But unless you manage to get SF to be over 50% LBGT -- then you
probably wont pass a measure to declare San Francisco a LGBT state.
>>

Oh, so now you threaten. As if numbers always matter in every
battle...not quality, eh? Ooops! You just made a big boo-boo on the
battlefield, Napoleon. These End Times shall be remembered as the
Breeders' Waterloo. I don't give a duck's ASS how small a group we
are...even if it came to only ONE--that one being MYSELF if such came
to pass; as I am UNYIELDING in my principles--our Victory is already
predicted as DECISIVE. Yeah, we may lose some battles down the line
from now...but we already know we are destined to become the Ultimate
Victors. We did not write this script, of gay and straight, faggots
and breeders, oppressed and tyrant. Sure, it may be a lovely FANTASY
for us to dream of gays conquering the world, to own it forever
more...and then THE UNIVERSE. But, as you MUST know by know (if you
are
spiritual in ideology), God or Goddess or IT...also has an INCREDIBLE
sense of humor. So, yes, this is how things are going down...it's
gonna be a queer, queer, queer, VERY queer world, VERY soon.

<<
You could definitely get through legislation that officially
acknowledges the city as a some sort of sanctuary and a supporter of
LGBT
rights --
>>

We are ALREADY acknowledged as such...and have been, for at LEAST 3
decades. That's ONE of the problems with you psuedo-gay-friendly st8s:
what little you know of gay rights, you think you know it all! Even
when chatting with a dyed-in-the-wool gay activist. Oh, that's right,
I
almost forgot: you heteros are INDEED superior to queers in EVERY way,
not just as breeders...you are also superior in all KNOWLEDGE, thus
you are the last word on GAY issues, as you are on EVERY issue.
Excuuuuse me!

<<
but doing so in todays political environment doesn't seem like a
worthwhile campaign to me --
>>

Because you would readily COVINCE me fighting for gay rights is a
useless cause. You are truly a snake in the grass. You see, as an
Advance
Healer of Souls, I can pull the truth out of anyone...if if it is a
malicious kind of truth, why I slice it out with my psychic scalpel,
and pull the slipper cancerous node out of every crack and crevice of
your shrivelly mind...and hold it to the light of day for all to
witness in disgust...before I toss it (and you) in the moleculizer
with a brief BZZZT!!

<<
everyone here and abroad already knows that SF is one of the most
inclusive cities in the world, especially regarding sex and gender.
>>

SF is RIFE with homophobia, terrorism against gays, bashing, threats,
murders. It is BARELY better than anywhere else in AmeriKKKa. We don't
have equal rights here...we have CRUMBS tossed our way now and than,
and nothing more. Nothing more until I started illuminated these dark
corner so prevalent in our once-fair city. They are cockroaches.
Heterosexual cockroaches.

<<
I do, however, feel that certain LBGT issues are paramount and central
to a free San Francisco.
>>

How chivalrous of you.

<<
First and foremost, gay marriage has always been critical to the
movement
>>

For whose benefit? Whose movement are you talking about? Who are you
speaking for? Or THINK you are speaking for? Some nonexistant MAJORITY
of mixed heteros/queers of all classes, yearning for a world free of
bigotry? EXCEPT homophobia, of course.

<<
There are other issues i see with secession that directly affect the
LGBT community as well -- but -- we can discuss these at a later
date.
>>

Secession does not directly affect the LGBT community. Very few are
even TALKING about it. And the few who are, are written off as
nutcases.
Harmless, but nutty. That's our COVER, dude. Don't you get it yet? We
already have TAKEN OVER the city...and soon, ALL hetero citizens
will wake up to this one, all-pervasive FACT. Some will exit
peacefully; other will be FORCED outside our borders.

"Many are called, but few are chosen.
Step right up for your Lederhosen"
- Big Gay Brother Zeke Krahlin

<<
A broad coalition has the strongest chance of success. A narrow
coalition may create more passionate activists for the movement within
the community, but if our goal is for a successful secession
>>

Ahhh, you shall NOT have a secession such as you describe. WE queers
shall have OUR queer nation, no ways about it.

<<
I haven't been proud to be an american for a very long time -- but I
am proud to be part of this great city of ours
>>

Well I'M not proud that you ARE, and would like you to LEAVE.

<<
and I think that we as a people of San Francisco are united in a great
many principles that could be realized with a much greater
intensity as a Free San Francisco.
>>

We can NEVER be free, if QUEERS don't run the show. The whole show,
and nothing BUT the whole show. So help me Zeus!

--end of post (thank you for reading)


0 new messages