Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

More shocking true information on faggots

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Johann Bäcker

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 9:44:22 AM2/20/04
to
Crispy wrote:
> "Queen of Michiana" <Queen_of...@lycos.com> wrote in message
> news:<wWfZb.15077$w45....@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>...
>> Tom Shelly, White God wrote:
>>> On 19 Feb 2004 07:39:11 -0800, er...@io.com (Clay Colwell) wrote:
>>>
>>>> What's the point of the exercise, if not to make the implication of
>>>> gay=wrong?
>>>
>>>
>>> I can not take the time to put you through High School again. If
>>> you're unable to comprehend discussions, it's best that you stay out
>>> of them.
>>
>> He comprehends discussions very well.
>
> Comprehends; perhaps. Able to carry one out? Not really. Considering
> that he just did what he accused his opponent of doing; only replying
> to the parts he can foll himself into believeing; and ignoring the
> rest.

In your opinion, did the original author state FACTS in a CLEAR, CONCISE ant
TIME EFFICENT MANNER?


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.592 / Virus Database: 375 - Release Date: 02/19/2004


Crispy

unread,
Feb 20, 2004, 10:23:24 PM2/20/04
to
> > Comprehends; perhaps. Able to carry one out? Not really. Considering
> > that he just did what he accused his opponent of doing; only replying
> > to the parts he can foll himself into believeing; and ignoring the
> > rest.
>
> In your opinion, did the original author state FACTS in a CLEAR, CONCISE ant
> TIME EFFICENT MANNER?

While my statment is truye; I beleive I may have aimed it at the wrong
person in my post. I've taken the time, now regretably lost forever,
to actually read some of TS's posts; and found very little sign of
truth within them. I was directing my comment towards TS's ability to
participate in a conversation; not Craig Chilton's.

Queen of Michiana

unread,
Feb 23, 2004, 12:16:46 AM2/23/04
to
kw wrote:
> In article <e68h301f602lo1gn1...@4ax.com>,
> jno...@yourpantsbigpond.net.au says...
>> I bet you really get turned on by the part where the daughters of
>> Lott are humping daddy.
>
> What the story shows is that even incest is not as bad
> as faggotry.

"It is better to plant the seed in the belly of a sow, than to cast it upon
the ground."

1. Don't beat your meat.
2. Don't ejaculate in anyones mouth.
3. Don't ejaculate in anyones ass.

You'll be having a LOT of . . . wet dreams - IF you adhere as to what you
PRECEIVE to be the
L I T U R G I C A L Law.

However YOUR liturgical law has no bearing on me.

We have requested equal rights and protection under law. Should you and
your comrades continue denying us those rights: there will be a . . . Civil
War. Perhaps a foreign country will have to liberate us. We will then
become an OCCUPIED COUNTRY and the USA, as it has been known, will cease to
exist: due to your continued denial.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release Date: 02/21/2004


kw

unread,
Feb 23, 2004, 1:14:17 AM2/23/04
to
In article <21g_b.17202$lW7.8649
@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com>,
Queen_of...@lycos.com says...

> kw wrote:
> > In article <e68h301f602lo1gn1...@4ax.com>,
> > jno...@yourpantsbigpond.net.au says...
> >> I bet you really get turned on by the part where the daughters of
> >> Lott are humping daddy.
> >
> > What the story shows is that even incest is not as bad
> > as faggotry.
>
> "It is better to plant the seed in the belly of a sow, than to cast it upon
> the ground."
>
> 1. Don't beat your meat.
> 2. Don't ejaculate in anyones mouth.
> 3. Don't ejaculate in anyones ass.
>
> You'll be having a LOT of . . . wet dreams - IF you adhere as to what you
> PRECEIVE to be the
> L I T U R G I C A L Law.

There is much more to life than sex. Hedonism is devoted
to such self-consuming pleasures.

0 new messages