I'm a Queer Conscientious Objector
Chief Thracian
REFUSE TO SERVE A HOMOPHOBIC NATION.
---
A true Amerikan is a hetero-Amerikan.
Seig Heil!
http;//surf.to/gaybible
Robert Templeton
news:iafgqtg9bql8bjsv0...@4ax.com...
> Gays! GLBT's! Queers!
>
> REFUSE TO SERVE A HOMOPHOBIC NATION.
Well, suffice it to say, there is no need for refusal. The current policy
stands: no openly gay men or women can be admitted into the military forces
of the United States. There is the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, but, for
lack of a better phrase, don't go there.
I see it this way: if they want me to be unable to defend my nation in
hostile aggression towards another nation and instead only send
heterosexuals to do so, who am I to complain? If any person condemns me for
this, then all they must do is read the law enacted by heterosexuals that
restricts me from doing this. Blameless am I. And to say that gay men and
women have not successfully entered into the military forces in the past (or
present) while remaining quiet about their sexual orientation would be
ridiculous. A close gay friend of mine served in the U.S.A.F., was
stationed in Japan for some time, and was dishonorably discharged due to the
fact of his sexual orientation.
Robert Templeton
David L. Moffitt
"Robert Templeton" <tem...@nospamvplayground.com> wrote in message
news:LK0q7.380298$NK1.36...@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
%%%% He should have kept his dick in his pants and out of those of another
man if he wanted to stay in. Simple rule. Just as simple as don't play with
matches within 50 ft. of fuel tanks in the military.
Robert Templeton
news:5Jaq7.41760$jQ3.193...@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
Maybe you should keep your fucked attitude to yourself. He wasn't
discharged for buggery, sodomy, or playing "hide the wiggie". He was
discharged because he admitted that he was homosexual. This was long before
the "d.a.d.t." rule, so it doesn't apply. Get a fucking life. Leave
everybody alone, you homophobic waste. Your type are the ones that allow
the atrocities, as witnessed on the 11th, to continue to occur (check under
Taliban in Afghanistan for a beautiful rendition of how to blow out the
brains of homosexuals and dissident child-bearing women with no husbands).
Robert Templeton
Clay Colwell
> %%%% He should have kept his dick in his pants and out of those of another
> man if he wanted to stay in. Simple rule.
Except that a gay man can be kicked out of the military without
having engaged in any gay activity, retard.
Jim Doemer
"Clay Colwell" <er...@bermuda.io.com> wrote in message
news:9Jnq7.580632$ai2.44...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
Not at the moment. I hear that all discharges have been suspended,
including those under DADT until the crisis if over.
L. Michael Roberts
That strikes me as being monumentally hypocritical. Gays can
serve their country in times of need but not at other times... it
puts the lie to the military's assertion that gays disrupt 'unit
cohesion' but apparently only in peace time.
+==================== L. Michael Roberts =======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Hamilton, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+=================================================================+
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Let me rephrase my response: He knew that if he admitted he was a homo
he would be discharged. It has always been that way. I do not care to blow
any more heads off. That was in 1968-70 Nam not now.
> Robert Templeton
>
>
David L. Moffitt
"Clay Colwell" <er...@bermuda.io.com> wrote in message
news:9Jnq7.580632$ai2.44...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
%%%% If you don't tell them then <how> will they know? Every soldier has
always known that if you say you are queer (except Max Klinger) you will get
a DD-214 and a General D/C under the UCMJ.
David L. Moffitt
"L. Michael Roberts" <no...@IcantAffordOne.com> wrote in message
news:3BAA719B...@IcantAffordOne.com...
> Jim Doemer wrote:
> >
> > "Clay Colwell" <er...@bermuda.io.com> wrote in message
> > news:9Jnq7.580632$ai2.44...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> > > In alt.politics.homosexuality David L. Moffitt <moff...@prodigy.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > %%%% He should have kept his dick in his pants and out of those of
> > another
> > > > man if he wanted to stay in. Simple rule.
> > >
> > > Except that a gay man can be kicked out of the military without
> > > having engaged in any gay activity, retard.
> >
> > Not at the moment. I hear that all discharges have been suspended,
> > including those under DADT until the crisis if over.
>
> That strikes me as being monumentally hypocritical. Gays can
> serve their country in times of need but not at other times... it
> puts the lie to the military's assertion that gays disrupt 'unit
> cohesion' but apparently only in peace time.
%%%% You missed the other side of the coin (which doesn't meet the agenda)
Soldiers claim to be homo so they won't risk death and be discharged. I saw
it many times during the Vietnam era.
Jim Doemer
"L. Michael Roberts" <no...@IcantAffordOne.com> wrote in message
news:3BAA719B...@IcantAffordOne.com...
> >
> > "Clay Colwell" <er...@bermuda.io.com> wrote in message
> > news:9Jnq7.580632$ai2.44...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> > > In alt.politics.homosexuality David L. Moffitt <moff...@prodigy.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > %%%% He should have kept his dick in his pants and out of those of
> > another
> > > > man if he wanted to stay in. Simple rule.
> > >
> > > Except that a gay man can be kicked out of the military without
> > > having engaged in any gay activity, retard.
> >
> > Not at the moment. I hear that all discharges have been suspended,
> > including those under DADT until the crisis if over.
>
> That strikes me as being monumentally hypocritical.
You're being kind.
Gays can
> serve their country in times of need but not at other times... it
> puts the lie to the military's assertion that gays disrupt 'unit
> cohesion' but apparently only in peace time.
It's a horrible injustice. I believe the same thing happened during
the Korean and Vietnamese wars. I intend on bringing the subject
up with my state representative next Saturday, he is supposed to
attend a dinner fundraiser for the NY Survivors that I helped sponsor.
Jim Doemer
"David L. Moffitt" <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:1Wuq7.8223$Hh2.92...@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "L. Michael Roberts" <no...@IcantAffordOne.com> wrote in message
> news:3BAA719B...@IcantAffordOne.com...
> > Jim Doemer wrote:
> > >
> > > "Clay Colwell" <er...@bermuda.io.com> wrote in message
> > > news:9Jnq7.580632$ai2.44...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
> > > > In alt.politics.homosexuality David L. Moffitt
<moff...@prodigy.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > %%%% He should have kept his dick in his pants and out of those of
> > > another
> > > > > man if he wanted to stay in. Simple rule.
> > > >
> > > > Except that a gay man can be kicked out of the military without
> > > > having engaged in any gay activity, retard.
> > >
> > > Not at the moment. I hear that all discharges have been suspended,
> > > including those under DADT until the crisis if over.
> >
> > That strikes me as being monumentally hypocritical. Gays can
> > serve their country in times of need but not at other times... it
> > puts the lie to the military's assertion that gays disrupt 'unit
> > cohesion' but apparently only in peace time.
>
> %%%% You missed the other side of the coin (which doesn't meet the agenda)
> Soldiers claim to be homo so they won't risk death and be discharged. I
saw
> it many times during the Vietnam era.
>
So? You mean that DADT is only a policy when it suits the military?
Robert Templeton
I don't remember the details, but it was sort of something to do with
suspicion of his sexuality that brought it to light. Let's face it. If you
were in an establishment full of women and could not ever show your
attraction to them, how well would you fare?
Robert Templeton
David L. Moffitt
"Jim Doemer" <big...@provide.net> wrote in message
news:3baa967f$1...@news.provide.net...
%%% Zippppp-----Zingggggg-----Went right over you pointy little head didn't
it?
David L. Moffitt
%%%% The first post was: Gays! GLBT's! Queers!
REFUSE TO SERVE A HOMOPHOBIC NATION.
There is no mention of being kicked out for being gay.
Jim Doemer
So, you're an asshole, what's new moffit?
L. Michael Roberts
But if the DADT policy as abandoned completely and gay soldiers
could serve openly as they do in the vast majority of NATO forces,
there would be no need to close this "loophole". Besides, what have
you got against people who don't want to serve in combat? Surely
there are plenty of other roles they could fulfil within the
military.
Jim Doemer wrote:
> So? You mean that DADT is only a policy when it suits the military?
Exactly! Rank hypocrisy of the highest order!!
Robert Templeton
> >
> > I don't remember the details, but it was sort of something to do with
> > suspicion of his sexuality that brought it to light. Let's face it. If
> you
> > were in an establishment full of women and could not ever show your
> > attraction to them, how well would you fare?
> >
> > Robert Templeton
>
> %%%% The first post was: Gays! GLBT's! Queers!
>
> REFUSE TO SERVE A HOMOPHOBIC NATION.
>
> There is no mention of being kicked out for being gay.
Well, until the new information posted just few messages ago, it was
standard practice. What's worse is that we cannot serve during peace time
or when there are intermittent requirements for troops. But when there's
the need, Lucy, I'm hooomo! They don't give a flying fart then. Ever heard
of a double-standard, application of a double-edged sword, man speaketh with
forked tongue? "Here, indigenous people of North America, we offer a treaty
whereby we give you some baubles, make no wars, and you don't kill our few
settlers. Oh, by the way, don't mind those forts and troops and guns and
shit." Same story: oppress the weak, kill the unwary, hoodwink the
minority, etc., etc., etc. You fuckers are all.. the.. same.
And, by the way, because of this open invitation, I REFUSE to serve in the
military forces of this country. They make the laws, they can live by them.
When they treat us, atheists/gays/etc, like citizens, then maybe we'll be
inclined to protect like citizens.
Robert Templeton
Steve
wrote:
Good for you. I hear they haven't "technically" revoked DADT yet:
CONTRARY TO PRESS REPORTS, PENTAGON HAS NOT REPEALED OR SUSPENDED
'DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL, DON'T PURSUE, DON'T HARASS'
Washington, DC - Contrary to recent headlines, neither President Bush
nor Pentagon leaders have repealed or suspended 'Don't Ask, Don't
Tell, Don't Pursue, Don't Harass.'
What has happened is this: President Bush issued Executive Order 13223
on September 14, 2001 authorizing, but not ordering, the Secretary of
Defense to consider issuing a stop-loss order in each Service. The
Service Secretaries will make that decision in the next two to four
weeks. A stop-loss order may or may not include suspension of gay
discharges.
C. Dixon Osburn, Executive Director of Service Members Legal Defense
Network (SLDN), stated that "service members should continue to
operate with the understanding that 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' remains in
effect. The gay ban has not been lifted.
Jim Doemer
"Steve" <dono...@email.com> wrote in message
news:0jtlqtgdkgl9br110...@4ax.com...
They probably won't "officially" suspend it. That way when the crisis is
over they can continue the practice.
David L. Moffitt
"L. Michael Roberts" <no...@IcantAffordOne.com> wrote in message
%%%% Why did they join? Being a soldier entails the risk of combat and
death. If they feared defending their country they should not have joined.
Claiming to be a faggot (when you are not one) is a cowardly way of getting
out of your obligation.
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Since we have an all voluntary force you have that choice.
They make the laws, they can live by them.
> When they treat us, atheists/gays/etc, like citizens, then maybe we'll be
> inclined to protect like citizens.
%%%% I didn't know there were sanctions on athiest? Cite from UCMJ please!
> Robert Templeton
Clay Colwell
> %%%% Let me rephrase my response: He knew that if he admitted he was a homo
> he would be discharged.
Not even *that* is required; a simple anonymous tip-off, whether it
be valid or not, can start off a witchhunt.
Clay Colwell
So all people are equal in the eye of a rifle bullet headed toward
one's head. Yeah, that's clear enough. And once the crisis is
considered to be over, gay military personnel will hear, "Thank
you for serving us as a human shield during these trying times.
However, you're icky, so, now that we don't need human shields anymore,
fuck off."
Clay Colwell
> "David L. Moffitt" <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:1Wuq7.8223$Hh2.92...@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
>>
>> "L. Michael Roberts" <no...@IcantAffordOne.com> wrote in message
>> news:3BAA719B...@IcantAffordOne.com...
>> >
>> > That strikes me as being monumentally hypocritical. Gays can
>> > serve their country in times of need but not at other times... it
>> > puts the lie to the military's assertion that gays disrupt 'unit
>> > cohesion' but apparently only in peace time.
>>
>> %%%% You missed the other side of the coin (which doesn't meet the agenda)
>> Soldiers claim to be homo so they won't risk death and be discharged. I
> saw
>> it many times during the Vietnam era.
I'd love to have had a camera in on the review boards. What do they
do -- bring in a naked guy and tell the soldier "You say you're gay?
Prove it -- blow that guy."?
> So? You mean that DADT is only a policy when it suits the military?
Give that man the kewpie doll!
Clay Colwell
> "Clay Colwell" <er...@bermuda.io.com> wrote in message
> news:9Jnq7.580632$ai2.44...@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com...
>> In alt.politics.homosexuality David L. Moffitt <moff...@prodigy.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> > %%%% He should have kept his dick in his pants and out of those of
> another
>> > man if he wanted to stay in. Simple rule.
>>
>> Except that a gay man can be kicked out of the military without
>> having engaged in any gay activity, retard.
> %%%% If you don't tell them then <how> will they know?
Saying "I'm gay" is homosexual activity?
Reading a book by a gay author is homosexual activity?
Going to a gay bar, if even just for the music (deity knows
a lot of my straight friends do that), is homosexual activity?
An anonymous tip that merely makes the claim that so-and-so
is gay is homosexual activity?
Fritz
All it takes is for someone else to tell.
Probably someone like you.
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Taking back, my freedom of consciences!
Fritz
> > > > > That strikes me as being monumentally hypocritical. Gays can
> > > > > serve their country in times of need but not at other times... it
> > > > > puts the lie to the military's assertion that gays disrupt 'unit
> > > > > cohesion' but apparently only in peace time.
> > > >
> > > > %%%% You missed the other side of the coin (which doesn't meet the
> agenda)
> > > > Soldiers claim to be homo so they won't risk death and be discharged.
> I
> > > saw
> > > > it many times during the Vietnam era.
> >
> > But if the DADT policy as abandoned completely and gay soldiers
> > could serve openly as they do in the vast majority of NATO forces,
> > there would be no need to close this "loophole". Besides, what have
> > you got against people who don't want to serve in combat? Surely
> > there are plenty of other roles they could fulfil within the
> > military.
>
> %%%% Why did they join? Being a soldier entails the risk of combat and
> death. If they feared defending their country they should not have joined.
> Claiming to be a faggot (when you are not one) is a cowardly way of getting
> out of your obligation.
You should know a lot about cowards, that's the reason you like to
harass gays in a gay new group.
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Heheheeee-----I wonder if it ever happened?
> > So? You mean that DADT is only a policy when it suits the military?
>
> Give that man the kewpie doll!
%%%% The military has a lot of policies that are used only when it suits
them, even a Catch 22.(can't remember the Article number tho)
David L. Moffitt
"Fritz" <fsm...@bcpl.net> wrote in message news:3BAB6B49...@bcpl.net...
%%%% Are you a coward? Have you served? Couldn't keep your mouth/ass closed?
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Never did that since there were better and quicker ways like putting
them as point man on the patrol, friendly fire, or "fragging" in Nam.
Robert Templeton
Worse than that: they get dishonorably discharged. This equals "no pension,
no priviledges, no veteran benefits". Neato nifty way of abusing a group of
people for free, huh?
Robert Templeton
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Homosexuals <know> what the penalty is before-during-after joining the
military service but, act suprised when they find themselves discharged. Why
is it such a suprise? I knew about the military discharging homos for over
40 years why is it such a suprise now? You must be one of those people Will
Rogers referred to when he said some people must piss on the electric fence
themselves!
Fritz
Ain't none of your business, I don't go to other news groups and call people
names and berate or belittle them, or generally try to make them feel bad
about them selves. In short, I'm not a coward like you.
Fritz
You're a real soldier.
Fritz
> > > So all people are equal in the eye of a rifle bullet headed toward
> > > one's head. Yeah, that's clear enough. And once the crisis is
> > > considered to be over, gay military personnel will hear, "Thank
> > > you for serving us as a human shield during these trying times.
> > > However, you're icky, so, now that we don't need human shields anymore,
> > > fuck off."
> >
> > Worse than that: they get dishonorably discharged. This equals "no
> pension,
> > no priviledges, no veteran benefits". Neato nifty way of abusing a group
> of
> > people for free, huh?
> >
> > Robert Templeton
>
> %%%% Homosexuals <know> what the penalty is before-during-after joining the
> military service but, act suprised when they find themselves discharged. Why
> is it such a suprise? I knew about the military discharging homos for over
> 40 years why is it such a suprise now? You must be one of those people Will
> Rogers referred to when he said some people must piss on the electric fence
> themselves!
I don't think most people was born knowing everything, like you.
Steve
wrote:
<snip for brevity>
>They probably won't "officially" suspend it. That way when the crisis is
>over they can continue the practice.
Yep, it's an awful injustice and terribly hypocritical. How many times
have we hear the argument that it freaks straight guys out to live in
close quarters with gays and it could affect combat performance? Did
they mean that only applies during peacetime?
<humor> I can't think of anyone more combat-ready than a pissed-off
queen with a gun! <humor> Perhaps the military already knows this?
Steve
Jim Doemer
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 07:16:36 -0400, "Jim Doemer" <big...@provide.net>
> wrote:
> <snip for brevity>
>
> >They probably won't "officially" suspend it. That way when the crisis
is
> >over they can continue the practice.
>
> Yep, it's an awful injustice and terribly hypocritical. How many times
> have we hear the argument that it freaks straight guys out to live in
> close quarters with gays and it could affect combat performance? Did
> they mean that only applies during peacetime?
>
It's pretty much at the convenience of the military it seems.
> <humor> I can't think of anyone more combat-ready than a pissed-off
> queen with a gun! <humor> Perhaps the military already knows this?
>
> Steve
Quite true..
David L. Moffitt
%%%% BRAHAHAHAHAHAAAA-------ROTFLMAO------So you ARE a coward huh? I came
to this group due to your kind cross posting into "my" group. If you feel
bad about being a sick, vile, repugnant, abomination you can alway quit
sucking dicks in truck stops and mall restrooms.
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Are you rally going to sit there behind that computer and say (type)
that <you> didn't know that the military considered faggots "icky"? I guess
you are one of the fellows that must piss on the electric fence!
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Maybe they want to reserve them for point man on patrol and suicide
missions. They may be considered expendable because they would have been
discharged in peace time!
> Steve
>
>
>
David L. Moffitt
"Jim Doemer" <big...@provide.net> wrote in message
news:3babf...@news.provide.net...
%%%% Wrong. Nothing compares to a woman with PMS---nothing!
Jim Doemer
"David L. Moffitt" <moff...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:NjTq7.9211$Dn2.109...@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
Perhaps it's not the woman, but the asshole she is with. Think about
it...
David L. Moffitt
%%%%% Hummmmm-----Do you know my wife?
Jim Doemer
Not even on a bet....
David L. Moffitt
%%%% You wouldn't want to either, especially during a PMS attack!
Steve
<eyeroll> You've already used that one in another post. Try something
original next time. Don't strain yourself.
Steve
Jim Doemer
Well, I can only repeat what I said before... Perhaps it's not the woman,
David L. Moffitt
%%%% It may be more factual than you are willing to admit or know.
> Steve
Fritz
> > > > You should know a lot about cowards, that's the reason you like to
> > > > harass gays in a gay new group.
> > >
> > > %%%% Are you a coward? Have you served? Couldn't keep your mouth/ass
> closed?
> >
> > Ain't none of your business, I don't go to other news groups and call
> people
> > names and berate or belittle them, or generally try to make them feel bad
> > about them selves. In short, I'm not a coward like you.
>
> %%%% BRAHAHAHAHAHAAAA-------ROTFLMAO------So you ARE a coward huh? I came
> to this group due to your kind cross posting into "my" group. If you feel
> bad about being a sick, vile, repugnant, abomination you can alway quit
> sucking dicks in truck stops and mall restrooms.
Never! the competition will be good for you.
Fritz
You're talking to a person with absolutely no class, is Moffie.
Fritz
> > I don't think most people was born knowing everything, like you.
>
> %%%% Are you rally going to sit there behind that computer and say (type)
> that <you> didn't know that the military considered faggots "icky"? I guess
> you are one of the fellows that must piss on the electric fence!
The military is composed of human beings, and most of the men may
think gays are "icky" most of the time. But I don't think that most of them
would think the same "icky" thoughts as you. I know you can't comprehend
this, but many "men" are not threatened by gays like yourself.
Steve
I disagree. He's got plenty of class. Unfortunately, it's all LOW.
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Threatened? Perish the thought. I haven't seen or been associated with
one that I thought I should fear beyond standard precautions of good
handwashing rubber gloves, face mask, and gown. Hand washing and gloves is
all the precaution usually needed.
David L. Moffitt
%%%% Heheheeee----Zing! that was a good one.
L. Michael Roberts
Fritz wrote:
>
> "David L. Moffitt" wrote:
>
> > > > > You should know a lot about cowards, that's the reason you like to
> > > > > harass gays in a gay new group.
> > > >
> > > > %%%% Are you a coward? Have you served? Couldn't keep your mouth/ass
> > closed?
> > >
> > > Ain't none of your business, I don't go to other news groups and call
> > people
> > > names and berate or belittle them, or generally try to make them feel bad
> > > about them selves. In short, I'm not a coward like you.
> >
> > %%%% BRAHAHAHAHAHAAAA-------ROTFLMAO------So you ARE a coward huh? I came
> > to this group due to your kind cross posting into "my" group.
Hmmm... I am just wondering which of the 4 gay newsgroups listed in
the headers is the one Moffie habitually frequents.
<snip>
+==================== L. Michael Roberts =======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Hamilton, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+=================================================================+
Fritz
> <piggybacking as I have Md. Moffit kill-filed>
>
> Fritz wrote:
> >
> > "David L. Moffitt" wrote:
> >
> > > > > > You should know a lot about cowards, that's the reason you like to
> > > > > > harass gays in a gay new group.
> > > > >
> > > > > %%%% Are you a coward? Have you served? Couldn't keep your mouth/ass
> > > closed?
> > > >
> > > > Ain't none of your business, I don't go to other news groups and call
> > > people
> > > > names and berate or belittle them, or generally try to make them feel bad
> > > > about them selves. In short, I'm not a coward like you.
> > >
> > > %%%% BRAHAHAHAHAHAAAA-------ROTFLMAO------So you ARE a coward huh? I came
> > > to this group due to your kind cross posting into "my" group.
>
> Hmmm... I am just wondering which of the 4 gay newsgroups listed in
> the headers is the one Moffie habitually frequents.
When he said he was just answering a cross post, he wasn't exactly
telling the truth, ........ but then again, when did he ever?
Never mind.
Fritz
Are you pretending to be a nurse, or a doctor, this time? Or maybe
a dentist?
David L. Moffitt
David L. Moffitt
%%%% i di not know this group existed until there was cross posting into
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh. I followed a thread into this group and have hung out
expressing my opinion on some (not all) subjects. (note I do not post on the
Homosexual shame month thread) (BTW I think maf1029 is a repressed closet
winterphile. ;-)
Fritz
Ah yes, instant credibility for Moffie.
Fritz
You must be related to nurse Rachett.
David L. Moffitt
<big...@silcom.com> wrote in message
news:mda3rtcfv4vt08jbc...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:00:10 GMT, "David L. Moffitt"
> >
> >%%%% BRAHAHAHAHAHAAAA-------ROTFLMAO------So you ARE a coward huh? I
came
> >to this group due to your kind cross posting into "my" group. If you feel
> >bad about being a sick, vile, repugnant, abomination you can alway quit
> >sucking dicks in truck stops and mall restrooms.
>
>
%%%% Your handwriting looking for dates on the walls.