System Tweaker PRO Root 5.0.1 APK (Latest)
Hercules Montero
I had installed everything correctly, with root space 21 GB. However, I reinstalled Ubuntu to get rid of this, this time with root as 100 GB. It all worked fine for 20 days. But today I started getting the notification again. File system root low disk space- 1 GB left.
this is a hint for normal users - what can cause a root / boot fill up (especially often happening on full encrypted setups cause the standard installation only creates about 100MB root partition).In your case you could use the "Baobab" GUI Tool - to determine what is causing the fill-up (perhaps there is a defect driver spamming the logs?!?)
I'm trying to set up a new Arch system. I have running system but I have no idea any more how I set it up years ago, and I've struggling with the new system for days. Now I am at the point where at least the initramfs is loaded, but when it comes to unlocking the root partition, I never get asked for the LUKS key. The system ist stuck at "A start job is running for /dev/disk/by-uuid/....".
Other than that, the new system is fully set up and was arch-chrooted before any conf file changes. I have not forgotten to mount the EFI partition. "grub-install --efi-directory=...", "grub-mkconfig", and "mkinitcpio -P" were run in the chrooted system. It seems that the only missing thing is that the initramfs system doesn't ask for a LUKS passphrase. It doesn't matter if I put "keyboard" before or after "autodetect" in the HOOKS line of mkinitcptio.conf
The only difference I can think of is that the old system uses secure boot. I haven't tried to tackle that on the new one yet. This will become most likely a followup question because I have neither an idea of how I set up the old system nor how to find out how it is set up.
New system usually means new uuid. Recheck you uuid, the one in the grub as well in fstab.
XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX is the UUID of the (encrypted) LUKS partition ?
UUID of the efi partition was adapted as well ?
The new system has an additional "2" - vg-arch2 - is this right ?
Worng UUID was the solution. I used a partuuid instead of the uuid. At first I thought that that should trigger an error message but them realized that that is no option because initramfs must wait for devices to come online and therefore cannot tell a slow device from a misspelled UUID. I later fought a much harder battle that was caused by a single double-quote sign (") after the correct UUID (leftover from a sloppy commandline-copy-and-paste): The device is detected when it comes up, the password prompt appears, the LUKS device is unlocked, and then initramfs is stuck in a "A start job is running for /dev/...." loop.
Our corporate machine administrators distribute corporate root CA certificates via Active Directory, but Chrome does not trust system certificates by default. Is there any way to tweak Chrome to trust those certificates, instead of manually add them to Chrome CA store? I know we can do this in Firefox, so I think it may also be possible for Chrome.
I know how to add them to Chrome CA store. I want to know whether there is a way to directly ask Chrome to trust system trust store. I tagged this question with Windows because I mainly works on Windows (with Active Directory), but it would be good to know whether Chrome can trust macOS Keychain Access, or /etc/ssl/certs on Linux.
Chrome uses the Certificate Store on Windows for validating certificates. If Chrome is complaining, then the certificate is not installed on Trusted Root Certificates on your local machine or the certificate's CN (Common Name) does not match the domain name you are accessing.
I suggest you that You can Import that Certificate in Your Web-Browser but to Universally available this certificate for Everyone it may take some time that's why Web-Browser Delivers Update to users.(These Update include CA Authorities's Signature Certificates).
CertificatePrivate keyIntermediate certificate (Typically supplied in a separate file from the vendor)Once you have this information, you can install your new certificate by clicking on the Security tab of your site, then clicking on the Edit Certificate link.
I just installed a theme called Yosembiance that I found on gnome-look.org. Installation went well and the theme works, but not on the sudo level system apps like Nautilus and System monitor. Anyone have an idea on how to make the theme apply to everything system-wide? It is rather annoying having the inconsistency. Thanks!
To answer your question, yes and no.
You can log in as root and change the theme from there, or you could set the theme in the /etc/skel/.config for use when a new user account is created. I'd go with the first option if it really bothers you.
Exactly as the others said. Root is a different user and the theme setting are separate. Just a suggestion though: Although it might be annoying it is a good idea to at least have different themes between the root and your regular account because its a nice visual cue that you are using the manager with elevated privileges, in which you need to be more careful not to do sth you should not.
"nano /etc/skel/.config" will create a new file or folder, the file doesn't exist by default in the system, the skel directory is meant as a place holder for a customised user /home dir when a new user is created on the system. When a new user is created useradd will copy the contents of /etc/skel to that users home dir.
I'm using the Gnome Shell, I't been using Gnome tweak tool as well. The theme is set in that but the window setting doesn't apply to apps like Nautilus, settings etc when I run from my standard user that was created at installation. The GTK theme changes, but not the window which has the minimize, maximize and the close buttons on it. I really just want the theme to be consistent throughout the entire OS regardless of whether its being run by my account, or root.
Ok, just installed this over my Ubuntu Gnome install and it works (after 5 minutes of playing with it anyways). I think if I can increase the DPI settings in the OS, this will work well. I'll have to do a bit more research to see if switching to Linux Mint is any better than an Ubuntu based OS or if its better to just install Cinnamon overtop Ubuntu and use it that way.
Edit: turns out Mint is based on Ubuntu and there is a way of increasing the bottom panel size. It feels a little bit like a step backward from Ubuntu Gnome with Gnome 3 made to look a bit more like Gnome 2 (reminds me of my Ubuntu 9.04 days), but I can live with that.
I've used Linux for some time now, around two years. I've tried Arch, Debian, Ubuntu, suse, Fedora, Sabyon, antergos, and even Makulu, but Mint has that polish that I can't find in any other distro. I would consider myself to be pretty well of with the cli, and can't for the life of me find a more polished distro than Mint. I would say Fedora runs a close second just due to the package base. If you have any further questions regarding Mint feel free to PM me. I would also like to recommend the Mint forums as the users are very helpful.
Linux Mint is based on Ubuntu and has Cinnamon (Gnome 3 fork) and MATE (Gnome 2 fork). I personally use MATE for speed and I love it. But I'm glad to hear that you got this to work. The theme might be older and work only in GTK2 DEs.
I've run Mint for a long time, but I left Mint because of the no easy upgrade path. That's why run arch or Debian, both are far more stable in my opinion. Polish or not, I need something to just work.
Dear Profs. Yesterday I upgraded fc39->fc40. The upgrade procedure didn't cause any problem (I did the upgrade via cli)... However... After the upgrade, on the first postinstallation run, the system freezes at initramfs stage. Please tell me how to...
After doing a sudo dnf --refresh upgrade I'm unable to boot the newly installed kernel, with the following message shown: initramfs-6.8.7.fc40.x86_64.img not found Kernel panic. I can boot selecting the 6.8.5 older kernel just fine. Any...
chroot is an operation on Unix and Unix-like operating systems that changes the apparent root directory for the current running process and its children. A program that is run in such a modified environment cannot name (and therefore normally cannot access) files outside the designated directory tree. The term "chroot" may refer to the .mw-parser-output .monospacedfont-family:monospace,monospacechroot(2) system call or the chroot(8) wrapper program. The modified environment is called a chroot j...
Overcautious?.. ? --kver is only supposed for non-running kernels. To generate an initramfs for the running kernel: # dracut --hostonly --no-hostonly-cmdline /boot/initramfs-linux.img This is how I learn! ?
I tried recompiling the kernel while installing NVDIA drivers but something went wrong. My partition is no longer bootable and I am dropped to a dracut shell. How can I restore my fedora 24 system? After booting from a live DVD I can mount /boot...
Hello Friends: Before I manually open up my /boot/initramfs.img to tweak it manually, perhaps someone can help me with using dracut. I can't get boot successfully until make proper adjustments to "/boot/initramfs.img". Here is the...
A common mechanism for upgrading a NetBSD system to a newer version is by rebuilding the system from sources and installing the results. This works both for stable releases such as NetBSD 10.0 and for NetBSD-current. In particular, if you are running a stable NetBSD release in a production environment, you are encouraged to perform this procedure regularly in order to incorporate any security fixes that have been applied to the branch since its release.
b37509886e