Gta 5 Realistic Car Speed Mod

[Carri Seargent]

Nicethread, it also took me some fiddling to get realistic values.

What do you guys do about jumps? In the default UE4 tpp example the dude jumps unrealistically high and then feels like it slowly floats down.

Any values for stuff like gravity scale, jump z accel and stuff like that to make things feel more realistic?

When I am riding my indoor trainer, connected to my Edge 1040, te speed is at least 25 to 30% to high. Is there a way or setting i have to change. Calibration was done. Hope someone can help me with this issue.

Trainer speed is calculated by counting wheel revs (cassette revs on direct drive trainers) and multiplying it by a tire circumference, with the assumption that the speed sensor/trainer reports each rev (one "tick" per rev). Input the actual tire circumference for wheel-on trainers, or the tire circumference of your usual tire for direct drive trainers. Some trainers report fractional revs (I forget which) so the input tire circumference needs to be multiplied by that fraction. e.g. the trainer reports 1/4 revs (4 ticks per rev). Tire circumference is 200cm. Set tire circumference to 200 x 1/4 = 50cm.

It's good to remember that your accurate actual speed and distance is zero. Trainer speed and distance are just made up for the rider's amusement and only roughly approximate what you might achieve if actually riding. What is relevant on a trainer is effort and time. Any workouts and their results are quantified by power, durations, HR, and cadence, and having nothing to do with speed or distance.

Thank you very much for you answer. I have a Tacx neo 2t. My Tire curcumference is 2015mm. But i suppose i need to put in my cassette rev into the 1040? How do i know what is the cassette rev of the cassette mounted on my tacx. I am sorry for the maybe stupid questions, but it is all new to me. When i run my tacx connected to the desktop app then speed and distance are more accurate and realistic. I have only the problem when the tacx is connected to my edge 1040. But since i am not able to import my trainingpeaks workouts in the tacx desktop app, and i can import them into my edge 1040, i am forced to use me edge 1040 on my tacx indoor trainer. I know that speed and distance on a indoor trainer are referential, but as you mentioned, it is nice to know, or to have an idea about the speed and distance you are travelling, pure amusement, but nice to know. Thank you if you could help me further.

The bike goes the speed of a bike irl and the fuel tank size makes sense.

UPDATE: I have found a way to edit the capped speed

Note: You will never get anything past tier 3 up to top speed its impossible without crashing so whats the point

One thing that has to be realized is that transfer of data between two VPN connected sites is the data transfers are subject to both download and upload speeds at both sites. If you copy a file from site A to site B, the upload speed at site A will likely be slower than and set the pace for the download speed at site B. The opposite is also true for data traversing the opposite direction. What should your upload speeds be at each site? Does your transfer rate match that? Have you done a speed test on just the internet to see what your download and upload speeds are for each site apart from the VPN connection? If so to the previous questions, what are the results?

I have two sites each with 500Mb fiber, 6ms latency between each other, and an encapsulated MTU around 1400. We are running DFS-R between sites, and have tried a few different routers with disappointing results. While I know it is unrealistic to get 500Mb in a hardware offloaded IPSec VPN out of a $500 router, what is realistic for under $2500 per endpoint?

How many user do you have ? Some hardware are not optimized for many concurrent users, they can maintain great performance hen a few users are connected but performance degrades when there are more users (VPN vs switching vs routing performance from single device)

We can also run mpls pricing scenarios to compare as well. We partner with hundreds of ISP VoIP and Cloud/SD-WAN providers globally - all with better than direct pricing and post sales support/escalation channels. We are 100% agnostic to the provider, design and tech and have helped hundreds of SpiceHeads navigate these waters.

We do see symmetric speeds between sites in testing, at least within reasonable tolerances. One end does see some after-hours latency increases, which can be significant, but it does not impact our core issue.

In addition, as an alternative to DFS-R, you can build a HA fileserver between sites using StarWind to replicate data. It will allow you to avoid DFS-R issues (file locking, etc.) and build active-active fileserver for your users. Leaving following links for the reference:

While data is actually sent at 6Gb/s, it is encoded to counteract two common defects in telecommunications, DC bias and Clock Recovery. This is often accomplished using a specific coding algorithm called 8b/10b encoding. It is not the only encoding algorithm which has been devised to this end, (there is for instance also a Manchester encoding), but it has become the de facto standard for SATA data transfer.

In the (aptly named) 8b/10b coding, eight bits of signal are replaced by 10 bits of (signal+code). This means that, out of the 6Gb the channel sends in a second, only 8/10 =4/5 are signal. 4/5's of 6Gb are 4.8Gb, which in turn equal 600MB. This is what degrades the 6Gb/s channel into a mere (??) 600MB/s channel.

The 600MB per second is still a raw transfer number, but is the usable rate due to encoding on the SATA bus to achieve DC-balance and a minimum amount of signal activity. Every eight bits of data are expanded into 10 bits for transmission on the SATA cable. So the wire speed of 6.00Gbit per second is effectively reduced to 4.8Gbits per second for the actual data.

Something similar happens with networking. Due to protocol overhead/10bits physical for 8 bits of pure data, it turns out a wash of 1:10 ratio rather than 1:8 when it comes to translating G or Mbps to real G or MBps.

I am on Spectrum's 400mbps plan, and had been renting their hardware on which I was seeing 460mbps+ speeds over WiFi in all areas of my house. I purchased the C7000v2 on a whim, expecting the same speeds, but I am only seeing a maximum of 300mbps over WiFi on this hardware. I see 460mbps+ over Ethernet, but WiFi speeds are disappointing.

Most devices are only 1x1 or 2x2 antenna configurations so on 5ghz their link is going to be 433mbps or 866mbps. With throughput speeds being roughly 55-65% for 5ghz (rough) you can expect max speeds while close to the router around that 400-500mbps. Thats under optimal conditions and close to the router. At distance, if your hitting 300mbps, I'm actually a little impressed because 5ghz speeds/signal drops off fast.

Thanks for your reply. I work in television production and am regularly uploading and downloading tens or hundreds of GB of data. Regardless of my use-case, if I'm paying for 400 down, and could achieve 460 with Spectrum's hardware, I'm not going to settle for less from the Netgear hardware.

That said, I was using the D3.2 Wired modem and Wave 2 router from Spectrum. I moved the C7000v2 within feet of my PC to test if distance/walls were the issue - it still never exceeded 300mbps. These numbers are consistent across speedtest.net, fast.com, Google, etc.

I couldn't find a d3.2 modem from spectrum and "wave 2" router just means its a 2nd generatation AC. Not very specific. Maybe you mean D3.1 eMTA from spectrum? which is a docsis 3.1 device. and again, its tough to tell based off "wave 2 router. You might be comparing a quite capable router to a combo device. combo devices aren't going to have the same peak performance as having a modem seperate from the router.

As well as you weren't specific with whatt you're testing on. A wireless chipset that support 160hz wide channels is going to have twice the throughput of a 80hz devices when the C7000 only has 80hz wide channel support. Especially if the "wave 2" device supports 160hz wide channels.

In general, I think you will find that the OF is not the limiting factor. The ball screws, the couplings to the stepper motors, and the stepper motors themselves are the only components of the OF itself that are subject to the forces generated by feeds and speeds. None of those are going to fail before you either 1) snap a bit, 2) bog down the spindle/router or 3) have a hold-down failure on your wasteboard.

Are you still running those numbers, or did something different work for you? I am doing the same thing as you, cutting guitars, basswood and cherry, and looking for some good numbers. Was the Makita able to handle above the 300 IPM at 18K RPM?

Hi there,

I recently upgraded to 150 Mbps full fibre broadband. I took advantage of an offer on Amazon for 4 BT mini discs as I had some coverage gaps in our three level town house. We decided to locate the router in the garage because of where the duct for the existing copper cable was - previously the router was in the lounge in the middle floor.

I've now installed all four discs - one hardwired to the router, one in the kitchen, one in the sitting room and one in a bedroom on the top floor.

I'm using the fast.com app on an iPhone to check speeds and even located right next to a disc, I'm struggling to get close to 100 Mbps on any floor. I've switched off wi-fi on the router to see if that helped but it made little difference.

I located the discs using the BT app, and all are in excellent locations apart from the kitchen which is good even though its only feet from the garage.

I've also noticed that the connection on the phone is not switching to the strongest disc - ie if I'm in the lounge its still connected to the kitchen one. I believed that meshed wi-fi solved that roaming problem that you had with older must-ssid systems.

Looking for any advice or insights that might help me understand if getting 2/3 rds of the speed is normal, and if roaming is still problematic with mesh wi-fi.

Thanks,

3a8082e126