In a message dated 6/27/07 5:47:56 AM !!!First Boot!!!,
List...@CLNews.org writes:
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:59 PM
Subject: Insurance companies arrogant; Sicko and the Politics of
Health Care
|

|
 |
Posted on Tue, Jun. 26, 2007 |
 |
 |
|
A column by Edith
Kenna
Insurance companies arrogant
I have saved an article from
a Fort Wayne newspaper of 2006 that reported Jason Govrevic,
president of Wellpoint/Anthem’s New York market, had been
spearheading an effort to encourage personal responsibility in its
consumers (of health care). Mr. Govrevic is quoted as stating,
“It’s all really designed to make you a more engaged consumer. We
know that if you’re more involved in your health care — if you’re
acting more as a conscientious consumer — it’ll be better for your
health.”
I saved this article as I knew the time would come when I
would have the opportunity to talk “responsibility” with my health
insurance company. Well, that time arrived last month when I
attempted to be a “conscientious consumer” by contacting Anthem
after receiving what appeared to be a response to my physician’s
request for prior authorization for a recommended procedure. The
exact quote from the response that I received from
Wellpoint/Anthem is as follows: “This is not an approval for claim
payment. This approval is a confirmation of medical necessity
only. We have not yet reviewed your health care plan. Depending on
the limitations of the health care plan, we may pay all, part, or
none of the claims.”
Wanting to be “engaged” in my health care decisions, wanting
to be responsible (vs. irresponsible), and certainly not wanting
to join the ranks of the 77,000 Hoosiers who in 2005 declared
bankruptcy due to medical expenses, I decided to phone customer
service of Wellpoint/Anthem to find out just when they were
planning to “review my health care plan.” I requested an estimate
of my out-of-pocket costs if I were to undergo this procedure. To
be a “more engaged and conscientious consumer,” perhaps I would
have to compare costs at various facilities, or even save money to
have the procedure done. Don’t we “responsible consumers” usually
get an estimate to have the car repaired, the house painted or the
leaky toilet fixed? I just wanted to take this cost under
consideration and make a financial plan in keeping with my budget.
I am simply a middle-class worker with modest salary and savings
trying to do the “responsible” thing.
Wellpoint/Anthem, a multimillion-dollar industry with many
technological and financial resources available, wants me to be
responsible, but they say they cannot, or will not, provide me
with any such “estimate.” Wellpoint/Anthem states that I must
first undergo the procedure, which they state is a medical
necessity, before they will review my health care plan or let me
know my out-of-pocket costs.
Somehow, this is not what Mr. Govrevic of Wellpoint/Anthem
was implying in the copy of the Fort Wayne newspaper that I saved
for just this occasion. I mean, after all, Anthem has a contract
with my physician, the facilities at which the procedure could be
provided and a contract with both me and my employer. Somehow, I
don’t think I’m the only person who has ever had this particular
procedure done in Fort Wayne. My out-of-pocket costs should not be
a secret from me. Surely someone at Anthem has a calculator, and,
at this particular point, it is only they with whom I have a
contract. Being a “well-informed consumer,” I have not hired the
facility nor the physician to complete this procedure because I
don’t know what it costs.
I am insulted again by private health insurance talking about
what consumers need to do but not providing simple customer
service in good faith. Once again I am dealing with the arrogance
of a health insurance company that, in my opinion, is acting in
bad faith by insisting that only I act responsibly. It is
ridiculous that I must first incur the debt to know the final cost
that will be borne by me.
Private insurance companies have become too arrogant and too
powerful. It is no longer clear what role private insurers serve
in the delivery of health care, other than to skim money from the
consumer while defining ever more narrowly who is deserving of
what care – or any care whatsoever. We have become a society of
insiders and outsiders.
We currently have a non-system of illness management. It is
clearly time for all Americans to have access to a simple plan
that it accessible, affordable, portable and of quality. It is
time for a single-payer system in which we all are on the inside
and not pushed toward or treated as an outsider.
The health care coverage we all need and deserve is currently
outlined in a bill, HR 676, which has been reintroduced by Rep.
John Conyers into the House Ways and Means Committee. This bill,
if enacted into law, would extend Medicare to all at reasonable
costs, simply, affordably and with responsibility shared between
the individual, the government and the medical system. It is
definitely time for all Americans to encourage a hearing on HR
676. Compromise plans being proposed by cautious reformers will
all provide more muddle and run into the same political problems
and strong pharmaceutical and insurance company lobbies.
Edith Kenna is on the board of directors of
Hoosiers for a Commonsense Health Plan |
|
© 2007 News-Sentinel and wire service sources. All
Rights Reserved.
http://www.fortwayne.com
June
26, 2007
Good Movie, Now Where's the Movement?
Sicko and the Politics
of Health Care
By RALPH NADER
He sat there dejected and indignant-twenty years ago-in our office. His
position as editor of the monthly muckraking magazine, Mother Jones, had
broken up. He was looking for a job that would allow him to bring his
conscience to work.
We gave him a place and support to start
Moore's Weekly-a media critique.
Michael Moore has gone a long way since that
short-lived publication. He went on to do documentary films, starting with
Roger and Me-meaning of course, Michael Moore.
Rich, famous and Hollywood chic, Moore will
open his latest film-'Sicko' in theatres around the country on June 29, 2007.
To many of those who have already seen this indictment and conviction of the
corporations that sell health care under an array of tricky conditions, it is
his best move yet.
He was in Washington, D.C. last week, for a
preview at the large Uptown Theatre and for testimony before a House
Committee. The media followed him with a frenzy hitherto reserved for Paris
Hilton.
But Michael Moore is no Paris Hilton from any
dimension you wish to choose. He is a heavyweight reformer, pitching his film
toward full Medicare for everyone. This also means displacing the health
insurance industry the way Medicare partially did in the mid-Sixties for the
elderly.
"I think one movie can make a difference;.I
believe it will be a catalyst for the type of real change people want," Moore
told the New York Times.
Great movies and documentaries raise people's
latent indignation levels-for a short time. Norma Rae, The China Syndrome and
The Grapes of Wrath had this effect. But films do not usually move either
people or legislators to action. Their effect does not reach enough people.
Their urgent 2 hour impact tends to diminish quickly, as compared with the
omnipresent and powerful corporate or commercial interests determined to
preserve the status quo.
Will 'Sicko' be any different? Certainly the
giant HMOs, hospital chains and drug companies are firmly entrenched with all
the sinews of power that have left this country, alone among western nations,
without health care for all. They have endured easily many mainstream print
and television exposés (see the New York Times, AP, 60 Minutes and the nightly
evening news, for example) year after year.
Authoritative reports documenting over $200
billion a year in computerized billing fraud and abuse or the loss of 18,000
American lives yearly due to the unaffordability of health care (The Institute
of Medicine) bounce off this two trillion dollar industry like
marshmallows.
Having been a taught community organizer in
Michigan, (see the new book, Citizen Moore by Roger Rapaport) Moore has
prepared with all this in mind. He allied himself with the great California
Nurses Association and their nationwide colleagues to demonstrate in favor of
the film, contact legislators and other large unions.
The anticipatory media for the movie have been
generous; citing the U.S. government's move against Moore for what it claims
was an unauthorized trip to Cuba. Right wing think tanks, funded by this
hyper-profitable, subsidized industry, pour out inane rebuttals and offer
quotes against Moore for reporters.
Unlike for other social justice movies, there
is even a bill in Congress, H.R. 676 with 74 cosponsoring legislators, led by
Cong. John Conyers (Dem. Mich.), to establish full Medicare for
all.
That is a number of lawmakers considerably
less that those who signed on to a similar bill in 1993.
There are 17 million more Americans uninsured
today than in that year, totaling nearly 48 million without coverage in 2006.
So you see where that trend is heading.
If Moore is serious about getting "real
change," as he phrases his goal, he will have to make at least two more
contributions. First, he will need to make a comprehensive effort to get many
of the 6 million or more people, who will see the film, to sign up as they
enter or leave the theatres so that they can be given a chance to connect with
each other for a cohesive change constituency.
Secondly, some of the millions he will make
from this movie should be put into a full time lobbying organization in
Washington and back in the Congressional districts to press for enactment of
H.R. 676.
With all his super-rich Hollywood contacts and
admirers, Moore should be able to multiply this proposed group's budget
several fold. Michael can even call it 'Moore's Miracle!'
Be a better Globetrotter. Get
better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it
out.