Indy 10

[sande...@gmail.com]

Are you planning to use Indy 10 for the server?

I have Indy 10 installed and would like to use it instead of indy9.

Regards

Sandeep

[Michael Genereux]

G is very loosely bound to the TCP/IP connection library and/or
Webserver. Would you look into converting the one file
(gWebServer.pas) that uses Indy 9 and getting it to use Indy 10? I
would think G would be improved by adding support for both Indies.

mg

[bee]

> G is very loosely bound to the TCP/IP connection library and/or
> Webserver.

Can G Framework produce the application as an Apache module? So, users
still can use their existing Apache server (and its existing
configurations) instead of running another web server instance.

> I would think G would be improved by adding support for both Indies.

I suggest you should focus on Indy 10 since Indy 9 is going to be
obsolete in near future. Better save your energy for other more useful
stuffs. ;)

-bee-

[Michael Genereux]

G is based on and uses source from a successful predecessor (a
closed-source framework nicknamed AOM) but updated with the dream
features that the users of AOM wanted for rapid application
development. AOM was based on Indy 9 and other than one patch we
needed for Email, worked fine.

The binding to the webserver is in a single file and hopefully in a
single class. G comes with an example webserver (not unlike Ruby's
Mongrel) but there's nothing stopping us from binding that webserver
to another TCP/IP stack or from binding G to any webserver. The only
limitation is developer time. I know we'd also like an Apache binding
in house but it's not a priority for the application currently being
built as we have to make money sometime. ;-) We do however have time
to answer questions of those who want to take on this task.

thanks,
mg