Fwd: G7 PDP2 PFD

2 views
Skip to first unread message

General Grievous

unread,
Oct 11, 2012, 4:19:16 AM10/11/12
to fydp-grou...@googlegroups.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: yati....@gmail.com <yati....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: G7 PDP2 PFD
To: jmuc...@gmail.com



Ok. U don't show 2 HE on one stream in a PFD. U show them on a p&id. Try check / google the rules of thumb for heat xchanger design. If the HE is too big, it is a matter of  practical. 

Nway. I cannot open d attachment as my laptop cannot detect wifi. Anything i shd know abt the attachment?

Don't focus too long on that. Pls finalise ur control. Once i'm back we'll do the hazop
Sent from Samsung Mobile


-------- Original message -------- Subject: G7 PDP2 PFD From: General Grievous To: yati....@gmail.com CC: fydp-grou...@googlegroups.com

Dear madam,
I hope you are doing great as so are we.
I am writing to inform you on a matter concerning our PFD.
Some us yesterday met with Dr
Khashayar regarding our HEN design,
focusing for the reactor 1 outlet stream and utility integration.
From the talk, he said there is no problem if our heat exchanger area is huge.
The heat exchanger in the PFD is just to show that we have a utility for a certain purpose.
In addition, he also mentioned  that there is nothing wrong with us having 2 heat exchangers.
2 heat exchangers on the same stream as you suggested.However,
having more than one heat exchanger on one stream might cause the examiners to ask us what is the reason for having more than one?
With that I conclude this email.
wish you nice day.


--
Felisberto Muchapa
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
Chemical Engineering Department
H/P No:+60149048782
Proudly MY_MOZ.




--
Felisberto Muchapa
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS
Chemical Engineering Department
H/P No:+60149048782
Proudly MY_MOZ.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages